rcmiket

That's why we need a wall......................................

Mike

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

LoL...good one. The moose will build it, and pay for it too.

Chris P. Bacon

My Feedback: (4)

That's going to require a lot of Moose.

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

It's going to be a big wall, a great wall, the bestest of walls ever. It's going to be huuuuuuuuuuge.

Chris P. Bacon

My Feedback: (4)

roflmao!

HoundDog

My Feedback: (49)

What????
Are U sure U spelled that correctly. Could U Use that in a Sentens?
Are there any other uses/meanings for "roflmao!"?

HoundDog

My Feedback: (49)

[h=2]AirVenture Master Schedule of Events See ya-all there.
This will be my 45th stright year of attendance @ OSH.[/h]Even came home from our honeymoon in 75 to make the last day. Heard about that for years.
https://www.eaa.org/en/airventure/eaa-airventure-schedule-of-events

Want to know every thing about DRONES attend these seminares at
AirVenture 2016 @ OSH July 25 thru 31.
[h=2]AirVenture Schedule of Events[/h]Submit


Clear all filters
DronesX


Drone Basics with Drone Girl
Monday, July 25 · 9:00 AM - 10:15 AM







FAA Drone Policy
Monday, July 25 · 10:00 AM - 11:15 AM







Aerial Mapping With UAV's
Monday, July 25 · 2:30 PM - 3:45 PM







Drone Flying
Monday, July 25 · 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM







Precision AG With UAS
Tuesday, July 26 · 10:00 AM - 11:15 AM







Drones In Todays World
Tuesday, July 26 · 11:30 AM - 12:45 PM







Commercial Aerial Video
Tuesday, July 26 · 2:30 PM - 3:45 PM







Search & Rescue Drone Technology
Wednesday, July 27 · 8:30 AM - 9:45 AM







Drones: Sharing the Airspace
Wednesday, July 27 · 11:30 AM - 12:45 PM







Industrial Inspections With UAS
Wednesday, July 27 · 2:30 PM - 3:45 PM







Commercial Aerial Video
Thursday, July 28 · 2:30 PM - 3:45 PM







UAV/Airspace Controller Perspective
Friday, July 29 · 8:30 AM - 9:45 AM







FAA Drone Policy
Friday, July 29 · 1:00 PM - 2:15 PM







Industrial Inspections With UAS
Saturday, July 30 · 8:30 AM - 9:45 AM







UAV/Airspace Controller Perspective
Saturday, July 30 · 10:00 AM - 11:15 AM







Commercial Aerial Video
Saturday, July 30 · 1:00 PM - 2:15 PM







Precision AG With UAS
Sunday, July 31 · 8:30 AM - 9:45 AM







FAA Drone Policy
Sunday, July 31 · 10:00 AM - 11:15 AM

rcmiket

Damm I'm about "droned" out after that........................................

Mike

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

Have fun Doggy...behave, and get all kinds of good info to share with the folks here. We'll expect a full debrief!

Sport_Pilot

Will they use moose pooh?

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

Of course...and let me tell you something else, it will be exceptional pooh. Premium quality stuff, second to none. The best. People are already talking about it by the way. Pure cornfed organic stuff. Nobody does better pooh!

HoundDog

My Feedback: (49)

Dam up the Rio Grand. Load it with Crock-A-Gators and Piranha(FISH w/ BIG TEETH) Besides they could use DRONES with HD cameras and rockets too.
There that keeps it with in the context of this thread. So There.

HoundDog

My Feedback: (49)

Do they have them great big Pooh Poop'n Moose's there in Conn.?
Do U suppose it would be cheaper to ship the Moose's to Texas than shipping all that Mooseie Pooh? Gators $ Crocks ... I vote for Gators & Crocks.
U know them Crock-A-Gators.

Now this is getting stupid. Think I'll go buy some Model Airplane parts. Maybe Drone Parts.

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

We didn't have them in the state per se, until the late 70's when the started drifting in from NY. I guess they found the accomdations acceptable, even the tax rate, cuz they are here to stay now. Most are seen in the NW corner of the state. Deer, fox, coyotes and even wolves are more plentiful. Before long, we'll probably see someone start hunting with a drone!

Chris P. Bacon

My Feedback: (4)

Nothing on traditional model aircraft?

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

Much like calling Rob's flight illegal, you might want to do a little research on this kid and his escapades, then weigh in. That article doesn't even cover everything he's been involved with, nor his history of legal fights. This kid is all about shock value and attention. Watch the video that lead to the altercation with the lady. It took two to tango, and he could have avoided the whole thing by not flying where he wasn't supposed to be. He of course felt (and still does I'm sure) that he could fly wherever he wanted, whenever he wanted, however he wanted. As usual, the video only told part of the story. He was more than happy to call attention to himself by posting the video and trying to show how little ol innocent him was assaulted. Never said the police charged him for that altercation either, in fact the woman was charged and took a plea. How you arrive at the conclusion the college expelled him "because of the drone" is a mystery, the article certainly didn't say that, and it had absolutely nothing to do with that incident. It was yet another of his self promoting escapades that brought yet more attention to him (the gun drone, soon to be followed by the flamethrower drone). His behavior on campus was the issue, not the drone. His other charges for assualt on a police officer were well documented...on film no less. More charges, more blame on others.

LoL....easy to put porn on someones cell phone you say? That's a new one, i've had one for 20 years...never had that kind of issue. I suppose his filthy texts trying to lure a 14 year old girl (that he was too humiliated to have read back into the record at his hearing) was put there too? As always, there will be two sides of the story, and a judge or jury will ultimately weigh the evidence and he'll get his day in court. At this point, he has the attention he appears to desperately want, I just doubt it's the kind he wanted. He's got state charges pending, and probably federal ones coming down the pike as well. He is a poster child for something, but it sure isn't the betterment of drones/quads.

Sport_Pilot

Would it be better pooh if it were concrete fed?

Sport_Pilot

I didn't call Rob's flight illegal, I asked a question if perhaps it was. As to this case I think the information is too distorted. Not sure what is going on. But yeah if he overflew that is a violation, but not much of one and I don't see why the young lady was in such a dither. As to the guns on a drone, that was legal at the time.

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

Stop me if you've herd this one....yes, that was a horrible pun.

If it was to be concrete...it would be the best concrete....blah blah blah.

wahoo

My Feedback: (59)

...

rcmiket

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...-226502-1.html


"A California man has become the first to have his private pilot certificate revoked for allegedly operating a drone illegally. Ralph Rebaya is appealing the emergency revocation of his ticket, which happened June 1, more than six months after he allegedly violated about 20 conditions of his FAA exemption for drone operation. Among the requirements for commercial drone operations under those FAA exemptions is that operators hold at least a private certificate. The allegations stem from a filming contract Rebaya’s company, Heli Watch LLC, was working on at Studio City. Among the allegations are that Rebaya flew his DJI-S-900 in “close proximity” to people and that the site of the filming was within five nautical miles of Bob Hope Airport and within Class C Airspace.
In an emergency revocation, which is the most extreme enforcement action available to the FAA, the agency has to make the case that there is immediate danger that can only be mitigated by withdrawing flight privileges. In this case, there was a six-month gap between the alleged transgressions and the revocation and the FAA explains the emergency this way. “This determination is based on your lack of qualification to hold your [certificate] because of the nature and seriousness of the violations set forth in this order.” Ironically, the order states that Rebaya knows the regs inside and out and his real crime was defying an FAA inspector’s refusal to permit the filming flights. The revocation order says the inspector caught him flying the drone and told him to stop but he didn’t. “You have demonstrated that you lack the required care, judgment and responsibility to hold a pilot certificate,” the order says. If his appeal fails, Rebaya can’t apply for a new certificate for at least a year.
Rebaya is appealing the revocation on the grounds that the FAA official who issued the order isn’t authorized to issue such orders. He also claims the punishment doesn’t fit the crime because, at the time, the FAA was inconsistently enforcing rules that Rebaya described as “unfinalized, incomplete, ambiguous.” He alleges the revocation is being used to “send a message” to drone operators about the perils of crossing the FAA. The appeal will be heard by an NTSB administrative law judge."


Mike

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

He is right about a message being sent.... too bad he isn't getting it. Let's see if he think's it's all worth it after paying his legal fees.

Sport_Pilot

i think he had a good point. However, I don't think that entirely excuses his behavior.

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

Absolutely agree. He might have a point or even a legitimate gripe, but his method of resolution is proving to be poorly executed.

porcia83

My Feedback: (8)

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1a1_1468582685

This guy. Horrible footage, horrible flights, and dangerous to boot. He's the kind that needs to get arrested and pay some serious fines.