RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   AMA Discussions (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/ama-discussions-74/)
-   -   AMA is a real value!! (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/ama-discussions-74/4954573-ama-real-value.html)

KidEpoxy 11-07-2006 11:49 AM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
Model.Flyer-
(if that is your real name)


CHIRP, CHIRP, CHIRP
um, did you really find it odd that a guy didnt respond to your 11:44pm post before 1:30am?
Just when do you think I sleep?
Egad! What do you want, my pager number so you can wake me up to reply to your comments?



That was your statment, not mine. If the AMA takes $18 of my dues, as you say they do, and if there are 150000 members, that is $2.700.000 taken from dues. YOU SAID THAT, not me. IF you then take the million that is raised in advertising and add it to the subscription income YOU STATED, and then take the $2,000,000 cost YOU STATED away, you are left with a profit of @1,700.000. ALL FROM THE NUMBER YOU STATED. Where do you think that $2,700,000 YOU POSTED ABOUT went?

use one of your UnSays now?
fine, we can play this game here too

MA Nov 06, page 183, gray box text:
When membership in the AMA includes subscription to MA, $18 of the dues are for the subscription


and lest see what I said:
"MA has to admit on the back page every month how it takes $18 from my ama $58. "


MA Aug 06, page 152:
REVENUE
....MA Advertizing 991k
....MA Subscriptions 62k

EXPENSES
....MA Magazine Direct Costs 2.2mil


and what did I say, $1mil in $2mil out?



so, No.
I shant be needing one of my UnSays. My post was accurate,
MA does indeed say they take $18 of my $58
AMA does indeed say $1mil in, $2mil out regarding MA

I'll give you this, it isnt the back page, it is the next to back page, I was posting from recollection.

While I said they take $18 from each member for their MA, I had no idea you wouldnt read that gray text to get the details on it prior to impuning my word. Maybe folks outside Texas dont know this, but calling folks a liar aint hospitable


oh, and next time wait more than 2hours before implying folks are hiding from you
Nice way to drag in a quote from another thread where we were thinking STL was missing... but that is probably completely unrelated.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 12:19 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy

Model.Flyer-
(if that is your real name)


CHIRP, CHIRP, CHIRP
um, did you really find it odd that a guy didnt respond to your 11:44pm post before 1:30am?
Just when do you think I sleep?
Egad! What do you want, my pager number so you can wake me up to reply to your comments?



That was your statment, not mine. If the AMA takes $18 of my dues, as you say they do, and if there are 150000 members, that is $2.700.000 taken from dues. YOU SAID THAT, not me. IF you then take the million that is raised in advertising and add it to the subscription income YOU STATED, and then take the $2,000,000 cost YOU STATED away, you are left with a profit of @1,700.000. ALL FROM THE NUMBER YOU STATED. Where do you think that $2,700,000 YOU POSTED ABOUT went?

use one of your UnSays now?
fine, we can play this game here too

MA Nov 06, page 183, gray box text:
When membership in the AMA includes subscription to MA, $18 of the dues are for the subscription


and lest see what I said:
"MA has to admit on the back page every month how it takes $18 from my ama $58. "


MA Aug 06, page 152:
REVENUE
....MA Advertizing 991k
....MA Subscriptions 62k

EXPENSES
....MA Magazine Direct Costs 2.2mil


and what did I say, $1mil in $2mil out?



so, No.
I shant be needing one of my UnSays. My post was accurate,
MA does indeed say they take $18 of my $58
AMA does indeed say $1mil in, $2mil out regarding MA

I'll give you this, it isnt the back page, it is the next to back page, I was posting from recollection.

While I said they take $18 from each member for their MA, I had no idea you wouldnt read that gray text to get the details on it prior to impuning my word. Maybe folks outside Texas dont know this, but calling folks a liar aint hospitable


oh, and next time wait more than 2hours before implying folks are hiding from you
Nice way to drag in a quote from another thread where we were thinking STL was missing... but that is probably completely unrelated.

You are a crackup. You showed as being on RCU for about an hour after I posted last nite. Ah, well, no harm done.

Then you come back with I should have gone out and looked for something you said was someplance and not where you said it was

Now, you still seem to hold the position that the 18 is taken from each members dues. OK, BUT, BUT, BUT just where is the accounting for it in the financial statement? You could have and should have looked there before making your statement. The subscription income you claim is simply not accounted for.

YOU ARE WRONG.

Does that make you a liar? Not to my way of thinking. it just makes you uniformed or misinformed. accounting practices and the IRS rules involved in such accounting for unrelated businesses appear to be beyond your scope.

Now you change your post and claim 62k subscriptions. Lets see, 62k divide by 18 dollars gives us 3444 AMA members. Yeah, you know what your doing

NOT

ps

When did the AMA get so small? You really should use that UnSay before you get your foot in your mouth fruther.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 12:20 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf

Maybe someone hear would be so kind to explain this exclusion and how it relates to us as insured.

Thanks in advance. page 23 of the pdf
Read the entire policy, quit looking for catchwords.

the exclusion you dredged up is under the section entitled “Coverage C Medical Payments” (begins page 22). read what is covered and what is not. note the use of the words you and your as discussed early in the policy. medical payments for the insured are covered under a separate policy. coverage of Bodily Injury is explained in Coverage A beginning on page 18. read the whole thing and keep items in the context the policy addresses them in. If you have a problem with that, call AMA Special Services for an explanation.

KidEpoxy 11-07-2006 01:03 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
"You are a crackup. "
I try, I do get to use the Smiley, the Pbbb, & the Wink a lot ;):):D

"You showed as being on RCU for about..... "
I dont stay up to watch SuSe ISOs from Carrol D/L, I just wake up sometime in the night & turn offthe machine

"YOU ARE WRONG."
yup, it was the Next to last page, not the last page... already made that concession.l




hold the position that the 18 is taken from each members dues. OK, BUT, BUT, BUT just where is the accounting for it in the financial statement? You could have and should have looked there before making your statement. The subscription income you claim is simply not accounted for.
First off, it is not MY income claim, it is the AMA & MA putting those numbers in print.
And yes, THEY print stuff that doesnt add up.
And if you have read the Opt Out of MA thread, you would see where we have argued this to death. I'm one of the guys that was pointing out the flaws in the numbers published & asking for more accountability on the guys running MA. But others countered that with The AMA Can Do No Wrong, and I cant change their minds.


You really should use that UnSay before you get your foot in your mouth fruther.
I tire of this.
I said MA SAID XXX, and AMA SAID YYY.
They did. My post was accurate. You are the one chosing constants and using math, and finding the error in what the AMA & MA tells us. I have also said in other threads that their numbers dont add up & we should fire folks at MA. Do Not confuse me telling what faulty numbers MA has in print, with me generating those faulty numbers..... espesially since I have griped about them to no end.

and what is the important part here?
That AMA & MA print faulty numbers,
or your unprecedented need only to find errors in my posts, such as it being the next to last page rather than the last page, and drag in a quote against STL from another thread. Odd how STL's contradicting posts are Mysteriously Vanishing from threads after my quoting them, and now some new guy is on a Credibility Crusade against me.

The folks here have alread heard where I stand on things, our lines have been drawn. I stand by my citation of what claims MA & AMA make. Whether the new guy want to be my friend or not is of no importance.



------------------------------------------------------


Would like to get to the bottom of whether GuyB, the member in the parking lot, gets any insurance help with them $75k med bills.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 01:22 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy

"You are a crackup. "
I try, I do get to use the Smiley, the Pbbb, & the Wink a lot ;):):D

"You showed as being on RCU for about..... "
I dont stay up to watch SuSe ISOs from Carrol D/L, I just wake up sometime in the night & turn offthe machine

"YOU ARE WRONG."
yup, it was the Next to last page, not the last page... already made that concession.l




hold the position that the 18 is taken from each members dues. OK, BUT, BUT, BUT just where is the accounting for it in the financial statement? You could have and should have looked there before making your statement. The subscription income you claim is simply not accounted for.
First off, it is not MY income claim, it is the AMA & MA putting those numbers in print.
And yes, THEY print stuff that doesnt add up.
And if you have read the Opt Out of MA thread, you would see where we have argued this to death. I'm one of the guys that was pointing out the flaws in the numbers published & asking for more accountability on the guys running MA. But others countered that with The AMA Can Do No Wrong, and I cant change their minds.


You really should use that UnSay before you get your foot in your mouth fruther.
I tire of this.
I said MA SAID XXX, and AMA SAID YYY.
They did. My post was accurate. You are the one chosing constants and using math, and finding the error in what the AMA & MA tells us. I have also said in other threads that their numbers dont add up & we should fire folks at MA. Do Not confuse me telling what faulty numbers MA has in print, with me generating those faulty numbers..... espesially since I have griped about them to no end.

and what is the important part here?
That AMA & MA print faulty numbers,
or your unprecedented need only to find errors in my posts, such as it being the next to last page rather than the last page, and drag in a quote against STL from another thread. Odd how STL's contradicting posts are Mysteriously Vanishing from threads after my quoting them, and now some new guy is on a Credibility Crusade against me.

The folks here have alread heard where I stand on things, our lines have been drawn. I stand by my citation of what claims MA & AMA make. Whether the new guy want to be my friend or not is of no importance.



------------------------------------------------------


Would like to get to the bottom of whether GuyB, the member in the parking lot, gets any insurance help with them $75k med bills.
If you have any accounting skills they are so rudimentary as to be useless in this discussion. The numbers in the financial statement are just fine. It is your interpretation of them that is faulty. If you have doubts, the CPAs that certify the statement do not. As I pointed out to you in a previous post, the problems you have are related to the way the IRS allows for the accounting by a 501 c 3 unrelated business. If you do not understand that, you can do one of several things. Educate yourself with accounting books, spend time on the IRS site and determine what the rules are, or call the AMAs EVP. He will happily discuss the issue with you. He also is a CPA. Carping here will not resolve your confusion and misinformation.

Am I calling you a liar? No. To tell a lie requires intent. To have intent requires knowledge of the subject. To call one a liar requires that telling a lie is possible. Since I do not view you as having the necessary requirements to tell a lie, I certainly do not feel you are a liar.

I have already covered guy b. Since you have problems with financial statements you might try your hand at reading the insurance pollicies posted on the AMA site. I wish you better luck with such an endevor.

ptulmer 11-07-2006 01:47 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
model.flyer, are you saying that by adding the advertising revenue of $1mil and $2mil of membership dues, then subtracting the $2mil costs of producing equals a $1mil profit? No matter how you cut it, a magazine that should show a profit is COSTING us. At the end of it all, the actual amount it costs us is about $8, but it's not really very good. So... that's eight dollars for the rag and twelve for the insurance. Where is the other $38 of my dues going....?

model.flyer 11-07-2006 01:54 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 

ORIGINAL: ptulmer

model.flyer, are you saying that by adding the advertising revenue of $1mil and $2mil of membership dues, then subtracting the $2mil costs of producing equals a $1mil profit? No matter how you cut it, a magazine that should show a profit is COSTING us. At the end of it all, the actual amount it costs us is about $8, but it's not really very good. So... that's eight dollars for the rag and twelve for the insurance. Where is the other $38 of my dues going....?
I drew no conclusions about how much is made or lost by MA. I strictly used KidEpoy's posts as fact, just as he posted it. Obviously he had no basis in fact to post as he did, which was my point.

The actual facts are in the accounting in the audited financial statements on the AMA web page. There you can determine where all the money goes. Not sure where you got it, but I think your estimate of $8 is low since it does not contain any amount for magazine staff salaries.

I also think that the insurance cost more since the amount you used does not seem to include the $250,000 deductibe (self insured) payments per liability claim paid by the AMA.

Silent-AV8R 11-07-2006 01:56 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
Grab your October 2006 MA issue. Open it to page 165. Doug Holland published the 2005 Schedules of Operating Expenses. That tells you exactly where your money went.

You can also go to the AMA website, log into the Member’s area and download the most recent audit report.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 02:02 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: Phaedrus-MMVI

Grab your October 2006 MA issue. Open it to page 165. Doug Holland published the 2005 Schedules of Operating Expenses. That tells you exactly where your money went.

You can also go to the AMA website, log into the Member’s area and download the most recent audit report.
Welll, you used to be able to download the most recent audit, but 2005 has been pulled off for some reason. Any idea why?

ptulmer 11-07-2006 04:14 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
I don't really care if I can download an audit. How does the $38 have a positive influence on my experience? I'll even answer that for you. It has very little impact outside of Muncie. Now, this may come as a surprise, but I don't really want to fund Graceland. IF I could get my club to take another route to insurance, AMA would be off my list until changes are made. As it stands, it's forced enrollment if you want to fly at a club. There's no need to make changes when people are forced to pay up. No, AMA is definitely not a value. Fifty-eight bucks for something worth twenty is NOT a value.

Silent-AV8R 11-07-2006 04:16 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 

ORIGINAL: model.flyer



ORIGINAL: Phaedrus-MMVI

Grab your October 2006 MA issue. Open it to page 165. Doug Holland published the 2005 Schedules of Operating Expenses. That tells you exactly where your money went.

You can also go to the AMA website, log into the Member’s area and download the most recent audit report.
Welll, you used to be able to download the most recent audit, but 2005 has been pulled off for some reason. Any idea why?
I do not know if it was "pulled off" or never posted, so I cannot answer your question.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 04:40 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: ptulmer

I don't really care if I can download an audit. How does the $38 have a positive influence on my experience? I'll even answer that for you. It has very little impact outside of Muncie. Now, this may come as a surprise, but I don't really want to fund Graceland. IF I could get my club to take another route to insurance, AMA would be off my list until changes are made. As it stands, it's forced enrollment if you want to fly at a club. There's no need to make changes when people are forced to pay up. No, AMA is definitely not a value. Fifty-eight bucks for something worth twenty is NOT a value.
FYI Muncie was paid for from the reserves built from members a lot of years ago. If you are talking about the buildings or maintenance, that is going to take place somewhere, or rent paid.

If all you want from the AMA is insurance, you can get that elsewhere. usually for a heck of a lot more money. One of the big reasons the policy the AMA buys is even available with a $250000 dedctible is the AMA reserves invested in Muncie. Don't beieve it? Go try to buy an umbrella policy without homeonwership. Apparently you are getting the benefit of something you never paid into. Not a bad deal.

If you have no use for competition, flyins, giving kids schlorships, or representing the hobby to govermental bodies or the other things the AMA does, well, fine.

Club members and/or landlords make the decision about who is allowed to fly at club fields. Not the AMA. Yes, the AMA recommends that only members be allowed to fly if the club has exclusive rights to the field. The AMA also requires that all club members be AMA members. The recommendation and the requirement are two different things. If you are a club officer, you may better understand clubs make the decision to reqire all who fly there to be AMA members. It is there neck, and those of the members of the club on the line. Self-preservation bothers you, I take it. No body is twisting your arm.

rcmiket 11-07-2006 04:50 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
[quote

I certainly hope your comments here are to show a shocking corolation to a line of thinking about AMA costs and apropriations. Because if you honestly feel that way about the United States and the "Republic of Texas" you can remove that avatar of yours because that 2nd amendment belongs to the United Stated of America NOT some so said republic. And I am a member of the US military and I support the efforts and ideals that the current administration of this great nation and what it is trying to get done despite the efforts of the general public to sling bipartisan mud around the real issues of national security and Homeland Defence. To think any nation or person would enter into a conflict without intended victory is rediculous. Do yourself a favor and turn off the Communist News Network and have a little faith that the leaders of this nation want what is best for it, yesturday, today and tommorow, reguardless of their party affiliation. Or of course... you can go start your own country.
][/quote]

Well said I want to thank you for your service and sacrifice. Thank God for people like you willing to serve.

ptulmer 11-07-2006 04:50 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 

ORIGINAL: model.flyer


If you have no use for competition, flyins, giving kids schlorships, or representing the hobby to govermental bodies or the other things the AMA does, well, fine.
Which part of that cost $6,000,000.00 per year? Come on, man! Get real! Yes, I am a club officer and no, you don't have the option to not be an AMA member to fly at an AMA club. It's required by the AMA for insurance purposes. Our club is on public land and they specified AMA because of the organization backing the insurance. So stick it where the sun don't shine, because it sure feels like an arm twisting to me.[:'(]

When is the last time AMA sent a check to help you with a funfly or local competition? They CHARGE to list it in the magazine we pay for, for cryin' out loud. More suprising is that I think scholarships is not an appropriate way for dues to be spent. Nor do I think the AMA has done any "representing". The few times it was tried it turned into a fiasco.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 05:08 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: ptulmer


ORIGINAL: model.flyer


If you have no use for competition, flyins, giving kids schlorships, or representing the hobby to govermental bodies or the other things the AMA does, well, fine.
Which part of that cost $6,000,000.00 per year? Come on, man! Get real! Yes, I am a club officer and no, you don't have the option to not be an AMA member to fly at an AMA club. It's required by the AMA for insurance purposes. Our club is on public land and they specified AMA because of the organization backing the insurance. So stick it where the sun don't shine, because it sure feels like an arm twisting to me.[:'(]

When is the last time AMA sent a check to help you with a funfly or local competition? They CHARGE to list it in the magazine we pay for, for cryin' out loud. More suprising is that I think scholarships is not an appropriate way for dues to be spent. Nor do I think the AMA has done any "representing". The few times it was tried it turned into a fiasco.
Show just one place where the AMA says that you must be a member to fly at a chartered club field. Just one. Simply, it does not exist. Not even once. Look in the club charter package and try to read what it says with an open mind and you will find that there is no such requirement.

There are examples all over the country where chartered clubs are on public land and anyone can fly there.

The payment on the Muncie debt on the buildings, etc. is $200000 a year from an Indiana educational bond, as evidenced in the statement. The rest of the expenses are also there. The CPAs that did the audit expressed their concurrence with the accounting. Apparently the IRS also approves. If you can’t look at a statement and determine what it says, well, there is no way I can teach you on this forum.

You want a big ad in the mag for a sanctioned event? Pay for it. If you just want the small one its free, in spite of the garbage posted in this forum.

rcmiket 11-07-2006 05:18 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
Why should we have to pay for a ad when our dues already subsidise the magazine. The magazine is a drain on our funds that could be better spent elsewhere. As far as the go to a AMA field and fly if your not AMA go and try it, past experience says you ain't flying.

model.flyer 11-07-2006 05:27 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: rcmiket

Why should we have to pay for a ad when our dues already subsidise the magazine. The magazine is a drain on our funds that could be better spent elsewhere. As far as the go to a AMA field and fly if your not AMA go and try it, past experience says you ain't flying.
you need to broaden your horizons. Go to the clubhouse and ask in the Sulpulveda Basin thread if there is an AMA club affiliated with the field. Then ask if AMA is required to fly there. I assure you, it is not. There are examples like this accross the country, many in TX. The decision is made club by club, by the landlord and/or the club. Show one place where the AMA says otherwise. Just one.

Rat1 11-07-2006 05:29 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: ptulmer

model.flyer, are you saying that by adding the advertising revenue of $1mil and $2mil of membership dues, then subtracting the $2mil costs of producing equals a $1mil profit? No matter how you cut it, a magazine that should show a profit is COSTING us. At the end of it all, the actual amount it costs us is about $8, but it's not really very good. So... that's eight dollars for the rag and twelve for the insurance. Where is the other $38 of my dues going....?

[sm=idea.gif][sm=50_50.gif]

This was asked before but no one could give a real answer other then the other 38 dollars is to offset some of the lower price that the junior members pay.

If your post is true about the costs etc then a person could actually get the needed AMA insurance for flying at clubs for less then 20 bucks a year. And people gripe at me because I think that 30 dollars a year is all someone should pay if they could get out of receiving the magazine and opting out of donating to pay for junior members.

Red Scholefield 11-07-2006 05:52 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: redfox435cat

I challenge you to produce ONE such case with verifiable facts.

that would require naming names and I'm not under any of your obligations to do that.

June of 96' After a fun fly event at VAFB. Model(Gp superspot 40) doing a low high speed inverted pass. We were trying to drag our rudder on the ground I was flying my tower uproar. A by standard, not an AMA member runs onto the runway at the far end after hoping the fence unannounced and is struck my the model, Luckly only cuased a broken arm. AMA rep concidered the flying irresposible and in violation of AMA rules and denided the claim. This was of course from the atament of the guy that got hit and his wife. The pilot was yellling out his intestions and had complete control of the model, we both were, I had just done the same with the mine a few seconds earlier. He was hung out to dry. No home owners insurance, doesn't own a house and was just a grunt mechanic so no real benifits from work. Ended up filing bankrupsy.

Feb of 98' Lompoc feild 1/4 scale pitts losses all control and hit a chevy truck in the parking lot doing sever damage to the vehical and destroying the models in the bed. Traced interferance to a local tower, this is why our local feild had blacked out channels 39-41. Luckly I was parked on the other side of the feild. The vehical was covered by the auto insurance but the 2 grand in models no one would claim resposiblitly. The AMA wouldn't think of paying the guys additinal insurance premiums. The pilot payed that out of his pocket, he was that kinda of guy.

Last August at roague feild Lompoc airport, it's all we got now. Fun fly 40 out of control due to dumb thumbs bounces 100 degrees off a near by light pole and bounces off another pilots car. I was just showing up as it happended and almost hit my truck AMA of course denises the claim since there was no writen permission from the land owner, just a verbal agreement from the airport commisioner, all partys were AMA members. Feild set up exceed all AMA requiments but none of it matters.

Same feild, same two guys. While test taxing a hog bipe it goes out of control and slames into other pilots truck at full throttle. Denied for the same reasons. Now the guy just flies electrics.

This stuff can happen to anyone at any time your at the feild. and as usualy the AMA takes your guys veiw. Show me proof and what did you do wrong. Sorry I didn't take the Barr exam. If the loop hole existes they will use it.
As we suspected. Checking with the AMA there were no claims filed that could be traced to this time frame or local. More blowing smoke re: AMA insurance coverage. These so far have established no credibility.

rcmiket 11-07-2006 05:53 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
So I'll just jump in my flying saucer for the 10 mintue to Califonia. I fly here in EL Paso and my club and the Northeast club require AMA because of the site owner insurance. I have homeowners to cover me but no dice... no card.... no fly. Which one's in Texas can I go to and fly at a AMA club with no AMA? What your refering to is Public Land not private and there are many that make a deal with the city or country that AMA is required that's how the clubs sold the idea in the first place. All I know is were I fly and have traveled to fly. Pack your plane and go to a few fly-ins or contests and see how far you get.

SoCal GliderGuider 11-07-2006 05:57 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: model.flyer

giving kids schlorships,

The less than $40,000 that comprise the "scholarships" comes from outside sources. It's not AMA money. You would think that a non-profit that takes in over $6 mill a year could afford to do a bit more. Also there are very unrealistic qualifications for the scholarships.


ORIGINAL: model.flyer
or representing the hobby to govermental bodies...
Representing the AMA's narrow minded and self serving ideas.

Did you ever get the impression that there is something missing from this sentence?

"There is no coverage for injury to a member to his own family (Household and Relative(s) living in the
member’s household) for claims or suits." PDF 500-A

Like; "There is no coverage for injury to a[nother] member [or] to [any member's] family..."

Just have to love legal speak!

model.flyer 11-07-2006 06:01 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: rcmiket

So I'll just jump in my flying saucer for the 10 mintue to Califonia. I fly here in EL Paso and my club and the Northeast club require AMA because of the site owner insurance. I have homeowners to cover me but no dice... no card.... no fly. Which one's in Texas can I go to and fly at a AMA club with no AMA? What your refering to is Public Land not private and there are many that make a deal with the city or country that AMA is required that's how the clubs sold the idea in the first place. All I know is were I fly and have traveled to fly. Pack your plane and go to a few fly-ins or contests and see how far you get.
so, just as I said, the club and/or the landlord made the decision to protect their butts in your area. so, why is it you are whinning about the AMA?

you wanna know where in TX? you do the legwork and find out. they exist


SoCal GliderGuider 11-07-2006 06:15 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 


ORIGINAL: model.flyer

so, just as I said, the club and/or the landlord made the decision to protect their butts in your area. so, why is it you are whinning about the AMA?

you wanna know where in TX? you do the legwork and find out. they exist

Not exactly. One only has to read the propaganda and debrief the club member that has talked to AMA HQ about the strategies that are presented for use with the local municipalities. Quite a bit of scare tactics. This is all intentional and intended to gin up the flagging AMA membership.

rcmiket 11-07-2006 06:20 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
I certainly hope your comments here are to show a shocking corolation to a line of thinking about AMA costs and apropriations. Because if you honestly feel that way about the United States and the "Republic of Texas" you can remove that avatar of yours because that 2nd amendment belongs to the United Stated of America NOT some so said republic. And I am a member of the US military and I support the efforts and ideals that the current administration of this great nation and what it is trying to get done despite the efforts of the general public to sling bipartisan mud around the real issues of national security and Homeland Defence. To think any nation or person would enter into a conflict without intended victory is rediculous. Do yourself a favor and turn off the Communist News Network and have a little faith that the leaders of this nation want what is best for it, yesturday, today and tommorow, reguardless of their party affiliation. Or of course... you can go start your own country.

rcmiket 11-07-2006 06:21 PM

RE: AMA is a real value!!
 
Sorry wrong Button.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.