Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
 U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad? >

U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2005 | 09:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

I just managed to break a Low Altitude record with my Hanger 9 Twist.[:@]

I really like the Twist but I want to get something different for now.

I am leaning toward the Great Planes U-Can Do .60.

I have also been looking at a Morris Hobbies Jerry's Big Boy.

I also found someone selling Accel Hobby Katana 70’s at a reasonable price.

I have a Satio 100 that I am planning on using for my next plane.

Can't imagine that either one of them will win any beauty pageants.


My question is do any of these planes have any good or bad tendencies? If so please tell me about your experiences.
Old 09-20-2005 | 10:05 AM
  #2  
bubbagates's Avatar
My Feedback: (32)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Elizabethtown, PA
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

RCBOZO,

To be honest I do not own the UCD60 but I have flown one for several flights with a Saito 92 and it was a very nice flying plane. This gentlemen lets me test fly allot of his planes and all he mentioned that he did to it was beef the landing gear block.

It hovered very well, knife edge was fine with a slight pull to the canopy (expected since he was slightly tail heavy) inverted was a dream, flat spins were pretty flat both inverted and upright, and when I landed it it was very predictable and SSSLLLOOOWWW

It's way different from a Twist and if you could fly a Twist well then the UCD60 with be so much better. I had a Twist, loved it then went to the Funtana90 with a YS110 and what a difference. I still could do everything with the F90 that I could with the Twist but the F90 did it WAY BETTER
Old 09-20-2005 | 10:07 AM
  #3  
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 685
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Locust, NC
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

The U-Can-D0 60 has a very bad "tuck to belly" in knife edge flight. Other than that, it's a fun plane.
Z
Old 09-20-2005 | 10:10 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

I really like the UCD airplanes. I've had the 60 and the 46. I think the 46 is a better flying airplane but I like both of them, a lot.
The 60 is very nice with a Saito 100. If you use 30% fuel it's very VERY nice. It's a great plane and I love flying the UCD. I've had many "so call nicer" airplanes but I don't think I like them better. The UCD is sooooo much fun to fly.
The problems with this plane:
1. The fuel tank is a little high and the engine will tend to leak fuel when not running. It's not a performance problem, just messy.
2. Very light airframe. This is good and bad. It makes the plane fly nicely but it is a bit fragile. But I don't think any more so than most modern 3D planes.
3. The landing gear block is weak. Almost everybody that has this plane breaks it out sooner or later. But the good news is you can glue it right back in. It's an easy fix.
4. This plane is not known for it's Knife Edge capability. I can do them all day long but it is harder than on some other planes, namely, The Yak or the Showtime just to name a couple. You either have to be good on the sticks or use a lot of mixing to get it to do a good KE.
5. I'm also told (can't do them pesonally) that the wing design of the UCD doesn't allow for good rolling harriers. It will do them but again not as nice.
6. Also, the Harrier maneuver isn't as nice as some.

On the positive side:
1. One of the funnest planes you'll ever fly.
2. Will do any 3D manuever just not as nice as some.
3. Hovers easier than almost any other plane.
4. Super easy to fly and land.
5. Very light, high perfomrance airframe.
6. The best visual detection of any airplane I fly.
7. Inexpensive for what you get.
8. Very good support and availability.
9. Flexible for engine combo. Very good with Saito 100 and 16x4W prop. Excellent with YS 110 and 16x6 prop.
10. Truly a nice 3D airplane. I've had two 60 and 5 46 sizes. They inspire so much confidence that I'm willing to try anything with them. Obviously I can't do it all. But I haven't crashed them recently.

Seanychen even has one of these with floats. Very flexible airframe.

This is one plane I will always replace and never be without. It is truly the plane I have the most FUN with. And for me, that's what it's all about.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Barry
PS: theres a thread on the 3D forum about the 46. Over 3000 posts. You are welcome there and will get great information about the 60 airplane on that thread as well. Just ask any question you want. You'll get answers.
Old 09-20-2005 | 10:18 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Barry Cazier Thanks for that SUPER reply! Barry what else do you fly? I would have to make this next plane my daily flyer. Is the U-Can-Do that type of plane? I know that the Twist was it for me.
Old 09-20-2005 | 10:25 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

bubbagates I am glad you said that the U-Can could fly SSLLOOWW! I really enjoyed flying the Twist with 2 clicks of throttle about 5 feet off the ground. It looked cool too!
Old 09-20-2005 | 10:28 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

These are my current and recent planes.
Extreme Flight Yak with YS 110 (sold)
Twist with Saito 82 (sold)
UCD46 with Saito 82 (keeper)
UCD60 with YS 110 (keeper)
Ultra Stick Lite120 with YS 110 (keeper)
Sig Mayhem with YS110 (keeper)
Showtime with YS 110 (keeper)
Funtana 90 with YS 110/Saito 150 (gave away) This is a bad airplane and a good one to stay away from
Ultra Stick 60 with Saito 100 (gave away to good friend) This is a great combo
Ultra Stick40 with OS50SX (sold)
Harrier3D90 with YS110 (still in the box, my next project)

I've also had several trainers but I'm sure you have no interest in them.

The UCD would be an excellent daily flyer. I think if you liked the Twist you would love the UCD. It's a much better airplane. Again, I have more fun with this airplane than any other I've had.

Thanks
Barry
Old 09-20-2005 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
gjeffers's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Round Mountain , NV
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Barry, are you at work again playing on the computer??????

Ditto Barrys report!!

i owned 3, 2-60size and 1 46, that i just hosed up and will be ordering another, Great planes!!!!

there ugly, who said that??

THAT 46 HAS SAITO 100
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Us52486.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	30.5 KB
ID:	326741   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ql33990.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	60.6 KB
ID:	326742   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sy63740.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	82.1 KB
ID:	326743   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sm29371.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	64.4 KB
ID:	326744  
Old 09-20-2005 | 11:51 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Gary I think you exceeded the recommended engine size for that .46! How does it fly?
What engine do you use for your .60 U-Can-Do........Satio 220?
Old 09-20-2005 | 12:09 PM
  #10  
bubbagates's Avatar
My Feedback: (32)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Elizabethtown, PA
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?


ORIGINAL: gjeffers

THAT 46 HAS SAITO 100
[X(][X(][X(][X(] That's allot of engine for that plane. Heck the 92 Saito does just fine in the 60 size but would not be near as powerful as the 100 in the 46.

Ah well, I guess I cannot say much. The same guy I mentioned that let me fly his also had a Twist that had the Saito 92 in it that is now in his UCD60. He never pinned the firewall and I was there the day he did the maiden on the Twist. We checked it out, he took off nice and easy, hovered it, torqued it and a quick inverted flat spin. He landed wen to fuel it and the engine/firewall popped right out of the plane. That night he bought the UCD and has never looked back, it's his favorite plane
Old 09-20-2005 | 01:12 PM
  #11  
gjeffers's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Round Mountain , NV
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Ya know, i just had a 100 that needed a home,(came out of my 60) and ill tell ya it really was a great combo if done right, i had over 300 flights on it when the left main wing exploded and it went down, but wasnt because of the engine, i never abused it, just used it, i plan on putting it back in when i get my next 46, and i gonna love it too!!!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ca80630.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	48.4 KB
ID:	326767   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fa86415.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	65.9 KB
ID:	326768   Click image for larger version

Name:	Lq37645.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	68.8 KB
ID:	326769   Click image for larger version

Name:	Jd87932.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	89.8 KB
ID:	326770  
Old 09-20-2005 | 03:16 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?


ORIGINAL: RCBOZO

Gary I think you exceeded the recommended engine size for that .46! How does it fly?
What engine do you use for your .60 U-Can-Do........Satio 220?
Saito 220!?!?! I like the sounds of that! Man, you'd have to back the idle down for hover. I think I'd love it.
Thanks
Barry
Old 09-20-2005 | 03:24 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Napoleon, OH
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

Gary / bubba is there any ground clearance problems with using a 16" x 4W prop on the U-Can Do .60?

Is there any cheaper place to buy the .60 than using coupons at Tower Hobbies? $ 179.99 .60 ARF ( $25 off of $200 )
Old 09-20-2005 | 04:14 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: U-Can-Do .60 Good or Bad?

RCBOZO...I used the 16" prop on mine with both the Saito and the YS engines. No problems with clearence. No cheaper or better place to get 'em than Tower. If you're a super club member that includes shipping.
You sound serious.
Thanks
Barry

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.