Seagull 540 elevator servo arrangement
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Am I missing something here? The manual shows the two servos at the rear of the plane - no problem there....but the pushrod arrangement is not symmetrical.
I was always taught both servos should be mirror images of each other, meaning if the pushrod on one servo is closest to the horizontal stab, so should the other one...
Comments?
Jerry
I was always taught both servos should be mirror images of each other, meaning if the pushrod on one servo is closest to the horizontal stab, so should the other one...
Comments?
Jerry
#3
The Pacific Aero Model Gee Bee Model Y had the same suggested arrangement. It saves the builder from either electrically reversing a servo or from using an in-line servo reverser. As long as the geometry of the servo-to-horn connection is the same on both sides, it'll work just fine.
(If it were me though, just for asthetics alone, I'd reverse one servo!)
(If it were me though, just for asthetics alone, I'd reverse one servo!)
#8
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Jerry
I felt the same as you do so what I did was moved the one that was supposed to be under the stab to a location that was directly across from the other that way both throws where the same. I put some photo's of this on the seagull 540 pictures post under the arf section.
http://rcuniverse.com/showthread.php...7&pagenumber=2
Mark
I felt the same as you do so what I did was moved the one that was supposed to be under the stab to a location that was directly across from the other that way both throws where the same. I put some photo's of this on the seagull 540 pictures post under the arf section.
http://rcuniverse.com/showthread.php...7&pagenumber=2
Mark



