Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
 2.4 receiver question >

2.4 receiver question

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

2.4 receiver question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2008 | 01:27 PM
  #1  
Traxxas_Man_KY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lawrenceburg, KY
Default 2.4 receiver question

I have a world models nemesis 52 and a hangar 9 twist 150 that needs receivers (2.4) I was looking at Spektrums AR6200 and AR7000 Other than size, are there any real performance differences here? Or, as long as it's full range, what other receivers do you guys recommend for 2.4? I'm using the JR X9303 radio/transmitter.

Thanks
Old 12-26-2008 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
Ed
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bemis, NM
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question




Old 12-26-2008 | 03:32 PM
  #3  
Traxxas_Man_KY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lawrenceburg, KY
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

Well, as you see I am still new to the hobby and these forums........I will try to place the post better next time.
Old 12-26-2008 | 06:16 PM
  #4  
KI8FR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ovid, MI
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

YOu are not hurtting any thing by putting that in here. I know that you are going to put that in a arf so it is fine.
Old 12-26-2008 | 06:35 PM
  #5  
Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gloversville, NY
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

If it's full range, it should work fine. I use both and have had no problems.
Old 12-26-2008 | 06:38 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: HUNTSVILLE, AL
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

I have a Twist 150 with a 6200 in it and it does fine.........................
Old 12-26-2008 | 06:38 PM
  #7  
carrellh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Garland, TX
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

As long as it is a full range unit I would use the least expensive model that has the right number of channels.
Old 12-26-2008 | 06:42 PM
  #8  
carrellh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Garland, TX
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

ORIGINAL: Hangar_9_Guy
Well, as you see I am still new to the hobby and these forums........I will try to place the post better next time.
Do you already know how to fly RC planes? Asking only because you mentioned 'still new' the Nemesis and Twist are not exactly 'new guy' models.
Old 12-26-2008 | 09:43 PM
  #9  
planebuilder66's Avatar
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Middletown, CT
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

Wow Ed your so wicked smart, I hope you have fun blessing us with your quick and suttle reminders that we might not know things, or better yet, which fourm to put it under. A wise man was once a beginner too.
Old 12-27-2008 | 10:37 AM
  #10  
Zeeb's Avatar
My Feedback: (41)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,740
Received 73 Likes on 60 Posts
From: St George, Utah UT
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question


ORIGINAL: Hangar_9_Guy

I have a world models nemesis 52 and a hangar 9 twist 150 that needs receivers (2.4) I was looking at Spektrums AR6200 and AR7000 Other than size, are there any real performance differences here? Or, as long as it's full range, what other receivers do you guys recommend for 2.4? I'm using the JR X9303 radio/transmitter.

Thanks
Well I'll try and clear up the issue for you;

Both the 6200 and the 7000 are full range rx's, just one is a 6 channel and the other is a 7 channel.

With the exception of the new AR5000, all the full range rx's have at least one satellite rx. The new AR5000 is also full range but has a slightly different antenna arrangement than the other full range rx's and it is 5 channel. The little rx's other than the AR5000 like an AR6100 without a satellite rx, are defined as Park Flyer/small electric type rx's.

Any Spektrum/JR 2.4GHz transmitter with the exception of the DX6, can run any Spektrum/JR 2.4GHz rx. The DX-6 can only run an AR6000 rx, but your X9303 will even run that older AR6000.

Does that help clear things up for you?
Old 12-27-2008 | 03:34 PM
  #11  
Traxxas_Man_KY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lawrenceburg, KY
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

Zeeb....yes, thank you very much. I guess I was just wanting to keep my equipment safe, but not spend more $$$ than I needed to.

Thanks again
Old 12-27-2008 | 05:37 PM
  #12  
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,256
Received 443 Likes on 362 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question


ORIGINAL: Ed

Don't you think that using the RADIO FORUM would be a better idea for obtaining this kind of information ? ? ? durrr [>:]
Just my .02 but if you have time to type this type of response why don't you either answer the question, or hit the back button and move on to a thread you find more interesting?

If the thread is that far off topic, one of us will be happy to move it.
Old 12-28-2008 | 01:04 AM
  #13  
KI8FR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ovid, MI
Default RE: 2.4 receiver question

BarracudaHockey

Good words to live by on the forums... Thanks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.