Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232 >

Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2003 | 11:33 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Curitiba, PR, BRAZIL
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

For my third plane, I am thinking of building a 40 sized CAP 232 from a plan (150 cm or 59 in span, final weight around 2.5 kg or 5.5 pounds) and fit in it an OS 65 LA. What do you think of this engine, is it a good and reliable one or it will be better if I put an OS 46 FX?? Since the price difference between them is very small and the 65 LA is a little more powerful I am in doubt....

Many thanks in advance,
Old 08-11-2003 | 04:17 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tularosa, NM
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

Eagleone

either the 46 or 65 will fly the plane , but before you decide to go 2 stroke on that type of plane ,check out the 4 strokes,for that type of plane they are the best option.

Highlander
Old 08-11-2003 | 06:48 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: South Canaan, PA
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

I personally like Enya. They are very reliable. The enya website has there four stroke engines and specs. I forget the sites name but I will get it. I think it is mrc.com
Old 08-11-2003 | 08:36 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tacoma, WA
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

The 65LA is only marginally more powerful then the 46FX and I garantee that the FX will run better and last longer.

Or, if that little bit of power means that much to you, check out the Magnum .52
Old 08-11-2003 | 08:44 PM
  #5  
JohnW's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lincoln, NE
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

If you are choosing between the 60LA and 46FX, I'll offer another vote for the 46FX for similar reasons to what 3DF posted.
Old 08-11-2003 | 09:20 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Moorhead, MN
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

EagleOne,
what size is the front of that plane? Heighth x Width????
Old 08-12-2003 | 10:26 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Curitiba, PR, BRAZIL
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

Well actually I am begginig to get inclined to the 46FX because itīs lighter. But on the other hand the OS 65 LA seems to have more torque and swings the same props that a FS 70 swings. For me, 4 stroke engines are out of question because they are too expensive....Their price here in Brazil is the same as the price of 5 standard servos plus a 46 FX plus all the material to build the plane. Too expensive....Since I am only 14 my parents arenīt willing to pay the price of a complete airplane just for an engine....
I ordered a 46 LA for another plane I have and as soon as it comes to my hands (the LHS didnīt have it in stock just the 40LA so they ordered from the distributor) I will see how it runs....Since I want my CAP to be a little overpowered, if I use the 46FX should I reduce the airplane size by a factor of 0.85 (so it will be lighter) or keep the original dimensions and build light???

Again many thanks,
Rodrigo Maia
Old 08-12-2003 | 10:29 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Curitiba, PR, BRAZIL
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

Originally posted by brschmid
EagleOne,
what size is the front of that plane? Heighth x Width????
I donīt have the plans on the computer I am right now, but once I get home I will check these dimensions. From what I recall itīs asomething like 12cm (5in H) X 10cm (4in W).....I donīt know if itīs correct, but as sson as I get home I will check on the plan....
Old 08-12-2003 | 01:36 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Curitiba, PR, BRAZIL
Default Firewall dimensions

On the original version:
Height: 14 cm (5.5in)
Width: 11 cm (4.3in)

On the 15% scaled down version:
Height: 12cm (4.7in)
Width: 10 cm (4.0in)
Old 08-12-2003 | 03:26 PM
  #10  
BigSTIK40flier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: houston, TX
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

i would put a saito .65 in it in 2 stroke i would put a TT.46 pro with APC 11x6 prop
Old 08-13-2003 | 12:14 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tacoma, WA
Default Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

Magnum .52! $100 THat's cheaper then an FX!
Old 01-01-2004 | 10:08 PM
  #12  
motodude11's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: baltic, CT
Default RE: Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

How about a Webra 50gt with a pitts muffler
Old 01-02-2004 | 02:28 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lansing, MI
Default RE: Engine for a 40 sized CAP 232

How about an Irvine .53 in it? It won't sling a smaller prop as fast as the Webra, but it's got more power. It's a real stump puller with a 12x6 on it. And only $126 at www.hobbybarn.com - Joe

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.