Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 SSE vs. 4*40 >

SSE vs. 4*40

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

SSE vs. 4*40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2006 | 07:06 PM
  #1  
Neddy191's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Advance, NC
Default SSE vs. 4*40

I'm going to be getting my second plane kit (not arf, I enjoy the building process) soon and I'm trying to decide which one to get. I'm thinking of either the 4* or the SSE. I"d like a plane that can grow with my skills. I've read that if you keep the throws down initially with the SSE it can be tame enough for a second plane. I really like to looks of the SSE better thand the 4*. (I know people will recommend the Tiger 2 but for some reason it doesn't strike my fancy.)
Old 07-23-2006 | 07:13 PM
  #2  
niteowl5001's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

Hey neddy,
what is an SSE?
Old 07-23-2006 | 07:14 PM
  #3  
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bealeton, VA
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

I know exactly what you mean. I destroyed a Tiger 2 (no survivors), and i'm not big on it, either. I have a SSE that I built from a kit. An easy build, and a great plane to fly. Even capable of some 3D manuvers with a good strong engine. Will slow down to a crawl for landing with the flaperon option, if you have a computer radio. Still slows down pretty good without flaps. Only thing, it comes out a little light, an least in my opinion. It can be a handful in a good wind. I haven't flown a 4*, but i've heard good things about it. I actually might get one for my next build. Happy flying!
Old 07-23-2006 | 07:51 PM
  #4  
Neddy191's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Advance, NC
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

ORIGINAL: niteowl5001

Hey neddy,
what is an SSE?
SSE is the Sig Somethin' Extra
Old 07-23-2006 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
RCKen's Avatar
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,247
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Lawton, OK
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

Neddy,
I've built 3 SSE's, they're great planes to have. If you want something to grow on the SSE will be the plane to get. It's going to have a lot more capabilities than the 4-star will down the road.

Ken
Old 07-23-2006 | 10:20 PM
  #6  
ChuckW's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Clovis, CA
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

I've owned and flown both. The 4-star was great. It's an easy build and great to fly. Landings were easy for me even when I was fresh off my trainer. The Somthin Extra is also an excellent plane that has a lot more aerobatic capabilities that the 4-star. The only down side is that it can be a little more difficult at first than the 4-star, especially with high control throws. It tends land a faster than a 4-star too. All that being said, I flew my 4-star for a couple months, then I never brought it out again after flying the SSE. Sure, I had a few rough landings with the SSE but the performance was so good that I didn't want to fly anything else. I pretty much flew my SSE ARF into the ground and now I'm working on a kit version. If you think you have the skills, go for the SSE; you'll love it. If you still aren't sure, stick with the 4-star.
Old 07-24-2006 | 03:11 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

i have a 4 star 40, great plane. i would suggest buddy box first flight just for confidence reasons. the plane lands very smooth,i mean very smooth. mine has a .46tt on and it is fast. we did 2 caculations 2 get the speed. radar gun showed up at 152mph, my calculation showed at 157 fairly close. just distance time formual to find velocity. ok but i would say it is fairly aerobatic. i mean i can hover, loops, rolls, performs a blender, avalanche, snap roll, flat spin i have not mastered it yet but i belive i will get it eventually, upside down flight, etc.... in my opinion u will not be unhappy with the 4 star. i did get it as an arf, however i have heard that it is a very easy and nice plane to build so.... i have not personally flown the sse but i have seen movies of it an it seems fairly aerobatic. i think u will be happy with either. it did seem that the SSE was more aerobatic though. u can just tell if u know wht i mean.
Old 07-24-2006 | 03:35 AM
  #8  
RVM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sacramento, CA
Default RE: SSE vs. 4*40

Could always try a Goldberg Chipmunk.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.