Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 Reciever Question >

Reciever Question

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Reciever Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:33 AM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: Reciever Question

It doesn't work at all, the guy at my LHS said that 9 out of 10 times its the crystal, we will find out when I do the range test with the new crystal.
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:47 AM
  #27  
RCKen's Avatar
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,236
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Lawton, OK
Default RE: Reciever Question


ORIGINAL: F-15 Fan

It doesn't work at all, the guy at my LHS said that 9 out of 10 times its the crystal, we will find out when I do the range test with the new crystal.
F-15,
I'm not trying to argue or discredit your LHS, but this isn't true. While it is true that a lot of times it is the crystal in a receiver that causes problems. But it is nowhere near 9 out of 10 times. There are a lot more problems that can and do occur in a receiver after a crash that happens. Cracked circuit boards, damaged electronic components, cracked solder joints, and many other problems can pop up. A range check is not a accurate test of the operation of a receiver that has been involved with a crash. As has been stated earlier in this thread, the only real way to know if your receiver is 100% operable is to send it in and have it serviced by a reputable repair facility. Many times problems with damaged receivers won't show up in a range check, but will show up when subjected to the rigors of flight.

Ken
Old 02-24-2008 | 11:47 AM
  #28  
My Feedback: (-1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,400
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Hemderson, NV
Default RE: Reciever Question

And we are seeing A lot of problems with the 2.4 systems also. They tend to lock up for 4 seconds after signal loss. The loss of signal can be A low battery or just the angle of the antenna of the TX and plane. Now A third and even fourth RX is being offered for the systems for this reason. Nothing is fool proof.
Ken said it all, just send in your crashed gear and have it checked out, it's worth the price to have it done just for the piece of mind.
Old 02-24-2008 | 12:16 PM
  #29  
Missileman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Poland, OH
Default RE: Reciever Question


ORIGINAL: Gray Beard

And we are seeing A lot of problems with the 2.4 systems also. They tend to lock up for 4 seconds after signal loss. The loss of signal can be A low battery or just the angle of the antenna of the TX and plane. Now A third and even fourth RX is being offered for the systems for this reason. Nothing is fool proof.
Ken said it all, just send in your crashed gear and have it checked out, it's worth the price to have it done just for the piece of mind.
4 second loss of control just for pointing the antenna in the wrong direction briefly? Thats a pile of balsa for sure. I think I will stick with 72Mhs for a while.
Old 02-24-2008 | 12:29 PM
  #30  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: Reciever Question

Well, I guess we will have to send it in sometime.
Old 02-24-2008 | 01:15 PM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: Reciever Question

Oh, I just found out that I am using an FM reciever!
Old 02-24-2008 | 01:31 PM
  #32  
Missileman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Poland, OH
Default RE: Reciever Question


ORIGINAL: F-15 Fan

Oh, I just found out that I am using an FM reciever!
72Mhz is an FM frequency.
Some people call PPM receivers FM but the truth is PCM receivers are also FM.
Old 02-24-2008 | 02:26 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Reciever Question

Scratchonly, how do you know it is not the crystal? Did you find a way to check them both, if so let us know how you checked the nonremovable one.
Old 02-25-2008 | 07:13 AM
  #34  
rwright142's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,143
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default RE: Reciever Question

F-15 Fan,

Sorry for your loss. Have you had any training with an instructor? If not, I can understand why you feel the hobby is no fun. It is expensive, a lot more expensive if you don't have any instruction, training, etc. because you will crash more often then if you did have training. Plus, a club and instructor will teach you more than just how to fly. They teach safety, how to tune engines, all about radios, servos, etc.
To find a local club go to the [link=http://www.modelaircraft.org/clubsearch.aspx]AMA Club Search[/link] here: http://www.modelaircraft.org/clubsearch.aspx

Good luck with your Pulse maiden next weekend.
Old 02-25-2008 | 08:29 PM
  #35  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: Reciever Question

I had an instructor, the only reason I said that was because I just couldn't believe my luck, but I am getting a new FM reciever so I don't risk destroying a second plane.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.