Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Reload this Page >

Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2008, 03:30 PM
  #1  
sled
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , ON, CANADA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

Hi to all!

I am a newbie to this hobby, and as a result knowlege and advise from seasoned vetrans is always needed. On the recommendation of the senior pilots at the local flying club, it was suggested that the choice of a trainer with a semi-symmetrical airfoil, rather than a flat bottom wing design, due to the crosswind conditions at the local field was best. I will be installing the 5th servo in the wing for ailrons/flaprons. But the choice of engine has yet to be determined. I have read as much as my sore red eyes will allow on the forums, and I seem no closer to a decesion, but I am considering the following, Evolution 0.61NX, Super Tiger SUPG61, Thunder Tiger TTT61PRO. I did consider the OS OSM61FX, but at $200.00 here in the Great White North, well ..... I don't mind paying for good quality and performance. I just object to over paying for it. So there it is, what should a newbie do!

Thanks in advance!
Sled

Old 10-12-2008, 05:11 PM
  #2  
w8ye
My Feedback: (16)
 
w8ye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Shelby, OH
Posts: 37,576
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default RE: Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

I had a Hobbistar 60 for several years until radio failure. I had a MDS 68 on it and thought it was a perfect match.

The airplane had an unbelievable smoothness compared to my LT40.

I wouldn't pay any outrageous price for a new engine.
Old 10-12-2008, 05:51 PM
  #3  
carrellh
Senior Member
 
carrellh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Garland, TX
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

The only one I have personal experience with is the Thunder Tiger. It was originally on a Hobbistar.

It was a decent running engine but it never had great midrange performance or transition from low to high throttle. Maybe it was a tuning issue on our part, but it was never as good as my brother's Thunder Tiger 46.
Old 10-12-2008, 06:59 PM
  #4  
hogflyer
 
hogflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

I have a (2) Thunder Tiger .61 Pro's, and an Evolution. 61 on an Alpha 60 (and an older OS .61 SF). All are great running engines, hand start easily, and transition with no hesitation. From my experience, you can't go wrong with either the Evolution or TT Pro. Either one will work great on the Hobbistar 60.

Hogflyer
Old 10-12-2008, 07:31 PM
  #5  
calachie
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: no city, OK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

Evolution .61NX is a Great engine.


_____________________________________

Corsair - Evolution.61, AT6 Texan- Evolution .61, P51 Mustang - Evolution.46, Twist - Evolution .61, Eagle2 Evolution-.46. AMA 191557.

Old 10-12-2008, 07:37 PM
  #6  
ABELL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fayette, AL
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Engine Choice for Hobbistar 60 MKIII

For the money you can't beat the TTPro 61. I have one on a Hobbistar myself. I have a 12/7 on it and just like the everreadi rabbit it just keeps going and going and going. Easy to tune and very reliable

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.