Classic pattern for .20 cu.in
#26

My Feedback: (1)
Technically, that's probably true Ed. However, there are several forty-size genuine pattern designs from the '70s. I guess around the time of the gas crunch the prices of balsa and glow fuel began to climb. There were a number of "economical" pattern designs published during that era, the goal being to allow modelers to compete with a smaller investment. I have no idea how successful any of them were. But, if a Super Pacer competed in a contest would that make it a pattern plane? I mean, Toyota Camrys are winning NASCAR races.
David

David
#28

Technically, that's probably true Ed. However, there are several forty-size genuine pattern designs from the '70s. I guess around the time of the gas crunch the prices of balsa and glow fuel began to climb. There were a number of "economical" pattern designs published during that era, the goal being to allow modelers to compete with a smaller investment. I have no idea how successful any of them were.
FB
#29
Back in the mid 70's southern Ron Chidgey took the Tiger Tail and shrunk it to make the Bobcat. Southern R/C had a kit which said on the box it would "Purr with a 29 or Prowl with a 40" with today's engines I would suspect that if it was built lightly that it would be a great 20-32 size plane. I have a kit downstairs and it does show retracts also but I think they would be a little tight fit as a trike. Jim Kirkland's Mustang X was a .46 size which might work well with the 32 size motors of today. Also had retracts. There was a Supra Fly 25 ARF at one time maybe late eighties or early nineties and I have a partially built Aurora 25 kit from MK from about the same time frame.
I spent alot of time working in at Samsung in Korea during the early nineties and at that time 10% nitro fuel was selling for around $40.00 per gallon at local hobby shops. I went to a local pattern contest in Chang Won and all the pilots flew 20-25 size machines. They said that the only guys that flew 60's or 120's were the masters going for the team trials. Had a real ball flying a borrowed "little Arrow" with OS 25 VFDF piped and it was FAST. Had better eyes then.
Hope this helps.
Peace
Mark O

I spent alot of time working in at Samsung in Korea during the early nineties and at that time 10% nitro fuel was selling for around $40.00 per gallon at local hobby shops. I went to a local pattern contest in Chang Won and all the pilots flew 20-25 size machines. They said that the only guys that flew 60's or 120's were the masters going for the team trials. Had a real ball flying a borrowed "little Arrow" with OS 25 VFDF piped and it was FAST. Had better eyes then.
Hope this helps.
Peace
Mark O

#30
David:
If Nascar becomes any more business and any less racing you might see a Toyota Prius winning. At least Old Time Pattern is not about the money like most other sports.
Go fast and Roll left.
Peace
Mark O
If Nascar becomes any more business and any less racing you might see a Toyota Prius winning. At least Old Time Pattern is not about the money like most other sports.
Go fast and Roll left.
Peace
Mark O
#31
ORIGINAL: rainedave
Great suggestion WEDJ. I've been perplexed by that odd cloud formation above your left shoulder since I first saw that photo last year.
David
Great suggestion WEDJ. I've been perplexed by that odd cloud formation above your left shoulder since I first saw that photo last year.
David
#32
ORIGINAL: Ed Cregger
......The Peppermint Pattie was available as a kit here in the US and utilized a .15 sized engine, but it was pattern-like and not a true patternship.................
It's early. I'm still on my first cup of coffee. My comments were not intended to offend anyone.
Ed Cregger
......The Peppermint Pattie was available as a kit here in the US and utilized a .15 sized engine, but it was pattern-like and not a true patternship.................
It's early. I'm still on my first cup of coffee. My comments were not intended to offend anyone.
Ed Cregger
Of course, a .15 size has disadvantages in pattern and would not be seriously competitive, but the PP .15 flies just like its larger sibling.
#33
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
ORIGINAL: WEDJ
Not to start an argument, Ed, and I am not offfended, but the PP .15 is truly a miniature pattern ship. I designed it to be cheaper, easier and quicker to transport/fly for practice. I have a first place trophy somewhere from a fun fly / pattern event in MA back when. If you read the R/C Sportsman article, it explains all.
Of course, a .15 size has disadvantages in pattern and would not be seriously competitive, but the PP .15 flies just like its larger sibling.
ORIGINAL: Ed Cregger
......The Peppermint Pattie was available as a kit here in the US and utilized a .15 sized engine, but it was pattern-like and not a true patternship.................
It's early. I'm still on my first cup of coffee. My comments were not intended to offend anyone.
Ed Cregger
......The Peppermint Pattie was available as a kit here in the US and utilized a .15 sized engine, but it was pattern-like and not a true patternship.................
It's early. I'm still on my first cup of coffee. My comments were not intended to offend anyone.
Ed Cregger
Of course, a .15 size has disadvantages in pattern and would not be seriously competitive, but the PP .15 flies just like its larger sibling.
-
My goal with such a statement was to start dialogue about what is and what isn't a patternship. The reason that I bought the Peppermint Pattie originally was because of its resemblance to Jim Martin's Banshee. But I never once considered competing with it.
I won a pre-novice contest flying an RCM Trainer 60. Does that make that model a patternship? (wink)
The smaller models, at least in my experience, are hurting when it comes to knife-edge flight and point rolls. On the other hand, they seem to excel at snapping maneuvers, spins and Lomcevaks.
Ed Cregger
#34

My Feedback: (1)
I think the era of small pattern ships was primarly due to the advent of small radio systems from '68 on. Size wise, there is very little difference between .40 and .60 size models. And it was soon realized that the bigger models could be flown further out making them look smoother.
#35
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
ORIGINAL: HighPlains
I think the era of small pattern ships was primarly due to the advent of small radio systems from '68 on. Size wise, there is very little difference between .40 and .60 size models. And it was soon realized that the bigger models could be flown further out making them look smoother.
I think the era of small pattern ships was primarly due to the advent of small radio systems from '68 on. Size wise, there is very little difference between .40 and .60 size models. And it was soon realized that the bigger models could be flown further out making them look smoother.
I agree that that is what happened. However, I always flew closer in and down low, with the judges' permission, of course. That seemed to win me a few points by making the other fellows look like sissies for flying so high and "safe". <G>
This strategy didn't always work. You had to spy a bit and find out about the judges in advance, which is not always fool proof.
Yep, the heavy reed and early proportional systems were huge with huge batteries. This high weight demanded a large airplane to pull it all around.
Pattern changed from backyard mechanics/aerodynamicsts/builders (mostly blue/gray collar in my area) to being similar to modern all-out car racing, with a similar increase in cost. I enjoyed the former era immensely because I could still create/invent and accomplish things with my effort, whereas the later, more professional style of pattern flying places more emphasis on the depth of one's pockets. Both styles needed similar piloting dedication and diligence, but the ability to express oneself creatively was more closely related to the previous style of pattern that we now call classic pattern. I quit flying when it became a buy'n'fly game. Just like I quit drag racing when it was possible to buy a faster car than I could ever build in my back yard. The fun had been taken away, as far as I was concerned.
Ed Cregger
Ed Cregger
#36
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
ORIGINAL: rainedave
Technically, that's probably true Ed. However, there are several forty-size genuine pattern designs from the '70s. I guess around the time of the gas crunch the prices of balsa and glow fuel began to climb. There were a number of "economical" pattern designs published during that era, the goal being to allow modelers to compete with a smaller investment. I have no idea how successful any of them were. But, if a Super Pacer competed in a contest would that make it a pattern plane? I mean, Toyota Camrys are winning NASCAR races.
David
Technically, that's probably true Ed. However, there are several forty-size genuine pattern designs from the '70s. I guess around the time of the gas crunch the prices of balsa and glow fuel began to climb. There were a number of "economical" pattern designs published during that era, the goal being to allow modelers to compete with a smaller investment. I have no idea how successful any of them were. But, if a Super Pacer competed in a contest would that make it a pattern plane? I mean, Toyota Camrys are winning NASCAR races.

David
Jim Kirkland's Mustang X was a serious attempt at .40 sized patternships. I don't recall him winning enough contests with it to make it a notable pattern model. But there is much that I do not know.
I'm not down on .40 sized patternships that much anyway. It is the smaller models that I do not recognize as "real" patternships. Again, I do not know everything and I do know that in some countries you had to fly in the .25 size class while working your way up to larger engine powered models. So, somewhere in the world, there most likely are true patternships in the smaller sizes.
The only Southern R/C Bobcat kit that I am familiar with had a constant chord wing. The larger model it was allegedly copied from does not. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that the Bobcat was a scaled down Tiger Tail because of the wing differences. Let's talk it over, whoever said that the Bobcat was a scaled down patternship. I'm just trying to boost dialogue, not say anyone is wrong - or even right.
Ed Cregger
#38
ORIGINAL: Ed Cregger
The only Southern R/C Bobcat kit that I am familiar with had a constant chord wing. The larger model it was allegedly copied from does not. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that the Bobcat was a scaled down Tiger Tail because of the wing differences. Let's talk it over, whoever said that the Bobcat was a scaled down patternship. I'm just trying to boost dialogue, not say anyone is wrong - or even right.
Ed Cregger
The only Southern R/C Bobcat kit that I am familiar with had a constant chord wing. The larger model it was allegedly copied from does not. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that the Bobcat was a scaled down Tiger Tail because of the wing differences. Let's talk it over, whoever said that the Bobcat was a scaled down patternship. I'm just trying to boost dialogue, not say anyone is wrong - or even right.
Ed Cregger
Ed, I believe you may be thinking of the Alley Cat.
#40
Hello Ed:
I'm sure you were thinking of the Alley Cat rather than the Bob Cat. I even looked at the box and saw the tapered wing. You must be talking to my eye doctor, He just keeps making my glasses thicker every season.
Peace
Mark O
I'm sure you were thinking of the Alley Cat rather than the Bob Cat. I even looked at the box and saw the tapered wing. You must be talking to my eye doctor, He just keeps making my glasses thicker every season.
Peace
Mark O
#41
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
ORIGINAL: roncoleman
Ed, I believe you may be thinking of the Alley Cat.
ORIGINAL: Ed Cregger
The only Southern R/C Bobcat kit that I am familiar with had a constant chord wing. The larger model it was allegedly copied from does not. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that the Bobcat was a scaled down Tiger Tail because of the wing differences. Let's talk it over, whoever said that the Bobcat was a scaled down patternship. I'm just trying to boost dialogue, not say anyone is wrong - or even right.
Ed Cregger
The only Southern R/C Bobcat kit that I am familiar with had a constant chord wing. The larger model it was allegedly copied from does not. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that the Bobcat was a scaled down Tiger Tail because of the wing differences. Let's talk it over, whoever said that the Bobcat was a scaled down patternship. I'm just trying to boost dialogue, not say anyone is wrong - or even right.
Ed Cregger
Ed, I believe you may be thinking of the Alley Cat.
-
Hmm, now that you've mentioned it, you may very well be right, Ron. Thanks.
Ed Cregger
#43
Mad Man Marko-RCU, what size prop was on that Little-Arrow with the 25VF-DF. I have several of these engines and wanted to use them for several 25 size planes, but haven't been able to get any info on the right size prop to utilize the engine correctly.
windcosmic.
There's a variety of .20-.25 sized plans available. You may need to look around RCU to find the right one for yourself. I have found many people here to be very generous with sharing a plan or two. If you can't find a .20-.25 size plan you like you can always get a larger say .60 size plan scanned and shrink it down yourself. I did this with my Deception plan. Originally a .60 size, I had the plan scanned and then used photoshop to shrink it to a .20-.25 size.
My chioces.
Mk Curare 20
MK Magic 20
Super Pacer (although not really a pattern plane, it sure looks cool and fast)
Matlas 20
Mk Aurora 25
Dirty Birdy 20
Usra Major 20
Blue Angel Jr
MK Cosmos 20
Mk Skymaster 20
windcosmic.
There's a variety of .20-.25 sized plans available. You may need to look around RCU to find the right one for yourself. I have found many people here to be very generous with sharing a plan or two. If you can't find a .20-.25 size plan you like you can always get a larger say .60 size plan scanned and shrink it down yourself. I did this with my Deception plan. Originally a .60 size, I had the plan scanned and then used photoshop to shrink it to a .20-.25 size.
My chioces.
Mk Curare 20
MK Magic 20
Super Pacer (although not really a pattern plane, it sure looks cool and fast)
Matlas 20
Mk Aurora 25
Dirty Birdy 20
Usra Major 20
Blue Angel Jr
MK Cosmos 20
Mk Skymaster 20
#44

My Feedback: (17)
I have a Midwest Flea Fli +10 kit stored away for a build someday. It is a neat kit but is going to require some work to get a full ball bearing 25 in the nose. Many of these old kits have fire walls positioned so there is not much room for the engine.
#46
If my memory is correct I believe that the prop was an 8 5 or 6 but I kind of remember an MK or other japanese propeller with metric markings. The builder had shrunk the arrow plans to about 4 foot span. It flew nice but was really fast. I would say that the engine was about 16K or better. I'm trying to find some pictures of the Korean R/C flying. I was surprised about the development that those guys put into smaller pattern planes. They flew a shorter like intermediate pattern and used 6-8 oz tanks. They said that the average flyer could not afford the fuel for a 60-120 size ship. They were kind of sad to hear that I was paying about $ 12.00 for a gallon of 15% CP at the store and we got discounts for volume. Really nice guys to fly with same as most R/C guys around the world.
Peace
Mark O
Peace
Mark O
#47
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Maynardville, TN
Well, you can practice the SPA classes with about anything... I've seen Ed Hartley fly the expert routine with a Goldberg Cub, and he does it beautifully. He flys it at the KCRC field in Knoxville, and calls it the "Pattern Cub". Takes some mixing but it does the routine very precisely! Ed flys a Curare at SPA events for the judges sake.....LOL!!
#48
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kalamazoo,
MI
Wow! Nice Curare 10, but at this momento that comes all up to 173.90 EUR = 272.420 USD shipping included to the states!
><
Tomasina ChicaWolverina! [sm=wink_smile.gif]
><
Tomasina ChicaWolverina! [sm=wink_smile.gif]
ORIGINAL: martenson
I have bought a Curare 60 from Sunshine Shop in germany, they even make a smaller one look.
Take care.
We deliver the Curare in three sizes, as C60, C40 and C10.
The Curare 10 can be watched only since a short time on model airports. Owing to its small dimensions it is transportable into every boot even when it is put togehter. With a 2,5 ccm motor the model can be started after short rolling or our with hand launching. In spite of its balanced flight property the Curare 10 is no model for beginners.
Specifications
Wingspan: 1030 mm
Length: 870 mm
Weight: from 1100 g
Motor: 2,5 - 3,5 ccm
kit contents:
ready-built GRP- fuselage, GRP- cowl, sheeted wings and tailplane, canopy, wooden parts, main gear, plan and parts-list.
time of delivery: 8 days
Please look here http://shop.wega-sunshine.com/index....08af0a35dbd8c&
I have bought a Curare 60 from Sunshine Shop in germany, they even make a smaller one look.
Take care.
We deliver the Curare in three sizes, as C60, C40 and C10.
The Curare 10 can be watched only since a short time on model airports. Owing to its small dimensions it is transportable into every boot even when it is put togehter. With a 2,5 ccm motor the model can be started after short rolling or our with hand launching. In spite of its balanced flight property the Curare 10 is no model for beginners.
Specifications
Wingspan: 1030 mm
Length: 870 mm
Weight: from 1100 g
Motor: 2,5 - 3,5 ccm
kit contents:
ready-built GRP- fuselage, GRP- cowl, sheeted wings and tailplane, canopy, wooden parts, main gear, plan and parts-list.
time of delivery: 8 days
Please look here http://shop.wega-sunshine.com/index....08af0a35dbd8c&
#49
ORIGINAL: rainedave
Great suggestion WEDJ. I've been perplexed by that odd cloud formation above your left shoulder since I first saw that photo last year.
David
Great suggestion WEDJ. I've been perplexed by that odd cloud formation above your left shoulder since I first saw that photo last year.
David




