Community
Search
Notices
Electric Pattern Aircraft Discuss epowered pattern aircraft in this forum

Neu versus Plettenberg.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2011 | 06:30 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: pound ridge, NY
Default Neu versus Plettenberg.

OK so I admit to being in a slightly cantankerous mood, but none the less I'm certain that this observation is true to the facts.

1) Plettenberg has recently produced the 30-10 Advanced and claimed:

Advance – immer einen Schritt voraus.
which (having taken 7 years of German) I believe translates to . . . "Advance - Always a step ahead."


BUT . . .

2) I think the Neu ORKs were out there well before this motor. The trouble is they never marketed it to the right people.

The whole point here is a bit of nationalistic hubris . . . we can do it . . . and usually we do

Joe



Old 05-30-2011 | 06:58 PM
  #2  
DaveL322's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Medford, NJ
Default RE: Neu versus Plettenberg.

Joe,

My meager German would concur with your translation.

However, comparing the Advance to the ORK is not really appropriate, in my opinion. The useable range of operation is quite different between the motors.....the ORKs are not well suited for the relatively low RPM in pattern or aerobatic applications. Should Neu choose to make a direct drive motor for aerobatics, I am sure it would be top level, as are the motors they currently make for specific disciplines.

Regards,

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.