OS46SF Diesel
#1
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: hulshout, BELGIUM
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#4
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nice work, Jef!
What RPM range were you getting? ...on which prop? ...fuel?
I played with a few of these several years back. Brief break-in on glow fuel - to where the initial metal-dirty exhaust ran clean and starting by hand was sure and easy. Then DDD head and Davis ABC fuel. 11" to 13" diameter, 6-ish and deeper pitch props.
Very nice combo.
OS stock P&L are ABN, so medium low oil % worked fine. I don't recall the exhaust being that juicy. (You use a nice extension rig, too!)
Stock OS carb proved to have better economy than another make, even with a case-pressure operated pump.
Engines definitely showed RPM plateau at about 3/4 throttle: wider open, no RPM gain but wetter exhaust and quicker fuel consumption. I didn't fly any of the engines I worked on, but the guy I did them for had good in-air performance.
What RPM range were you getting? ...on which prop? ...fuel?
I played with a few of these several years back. Brief break-in on glow fuel - to where the initial metal-dirty exhaust ran clean and starting by hand was sure and easy. Then DDD head and Davis ABC fuel. 11" to 13" diameter, 6-ish and deeper pitch props.
Very nice combo.
OS stock P&L are ABN, so medium low oil % worked fine. I don't recall the exhaust being that juicy. (You use a nice extension rig, too!)
Stock OS carb proved to have better economy than another make, even with a case-pressure operated pump.
Engines definitely showed RPM plateau at about 3/4 throttle: wider open, no RPM gain but wetter exhaust and quicker fuel consumption. I didn't fly any of the engines I worked on, but the guy I did them for had good in-air performance.
#6
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: hulshout, BELGIUM
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nice work, Jef!
What RPM range were you getting? ...on which prop? ...fuel?
I played with a few of these several years back. Brief break-in on glow fuel - to where the initial metal-dirty exhaust ran clean and starting by hand was sure and easy. Then DDD head and Davis ABC fuel. 11" to 13" diameter, 6-ish and deeper pitch props.
Very nice combo.
OS stock P&L are ABN, so medium low oil % worked fine. I don't recall the exhaust being that juicy. (You use a nice extension rig, too!)
Stock OS carb proved to have better economy than another make, even with a case-pressure operated pump.
Engines definitely showed RPM plateau at about 3/4 throttle: wider open, no RPM gain but wetter exhaust and quicker fuel consumption. I didn't fly any of the engines I worked on, but the guy I did them for had good in-air performance.
What RPM range were you getting? ...on which prop? ...fuel?
I played with a few of these several years back. Brief break-in on glow fuel - to where the initial metal-dirty exhaust ran clean and starting by hand was sure and easy. Then DDD head and Davis ABC fuel. 11" to 13" diameter, 6-ish and deeper pitch props.
Very nice combo.
OS stock P&L are ABN, so medium low oil % worked fine. I don't recall the exhaust being that juicy. (You use a nice extension rig, too!)
Stock OS carb proved to have better economy than another make, even with a case-pressure operated pump.
Engines definitely showed RPM plateau at about 3/4 throttle: wider open, no RPM gain but wetter exhaust and quicker fuel consumption. I didn't fly any of the engines I worked on, but the guy I did them for had good in-air performance.
Last edited by jef-lemmens; 09-22-2014 at 10:07 AM.
#7
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: hulshout, BELGIUM
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#13
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: hulshout, BELGIUM
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: hulshout, BELGIUM
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#17
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do the same thing if I'm breaking engines in at home. Makes a huge difference in noise. You just don't want the hose dipping into the water. That is if you're using muffler pressure to the fuel tank.