Ignition Battery Voltage Question
#27

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: apalsson
I have a temp probe on my charger but never used them. I have a habit of touching all batteries I charge though to se if they get hot and don't recall ever noticing a change when I charge at 1A
I'm not familiar with John's charger at all though. Modern day chargers are so cheap ($25 - $50) that I tend to retire the old ones and get the ones with more features. I also notice that when I charge my batteries with 1A as a max current, the charger spends a lot of the charge time at lower rates.
I agree, if a battery gets hot while charging, it's not a good sign. The Eneloops have a rated 1,500 charge lifespan (obviously at normal rates) so even if there is a slight reduction in life span, they give you a pretty good value
I have a temp probe on my charger but never used them. I have a habit of touching all batteries I charge though to se if they get hot and don't recall ever noticing a change when I charge at 1A
I'm not familiar with John's charger at all though. Modern day chargers are so cheap ($25 - $50) that I tend to retire the old ones and get the ones with more features. I also notice that when I charge my batteries with 1A as a max current, the charger spends a lot of the charge time at lower rates.
I agree, if a battery gets hot while charging, it's not a good sign. The Eneloops have a rated 1,500 charge lifespan (obviously at normal rates) so even if there is a slight reduction in life span, they give you a pretty good value
Another danger with Eneloops and probably the main reason Sanyo recommends temp monitoring during charge is their reduced voltage depression when full charge is reached. Many older chargers can't detect this tiny voltage change and will continue to charge forever making the batteries very warm..... read that hot! Don't ask my how I know this! Temp. monitoring therefore acts like a secondary line of defense against overcharge.
By the way, the pack I overcharged has been working well for over a year now and so far shows no signs of damage. Traditional high impedance NIMH cells would have been wiped out given the same treatment.
#29

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
For those that don't want to buy a bunch of extra equipment to charge an Eneloop. Plug it into the receiver side of your wall wart radio charger. Low output, designed for charging 400 to 600 mA batteries at about 1/10C.
For those that don't want to buy a bunch of extra equipment to charge an Eneloop. Plug it into the receiver side of your wall wart radio charger. Low output, designed for charging 400 to 600 mA batteries at about 1/10C.
#30

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: Lifer
What is a ''dodgy'' pilot?
What is a ''dodgy'' pilot?
What comes around ........
#32

My Feedback: (90)
ORIGINAL: captinjohn
I have a Sirrus Smart charger. It is about 10 years old. Do you think it would be ok to use it on the ''Sanyo'' ''Eneloop'' 1900MA pack I have? It has a 3 position switch for charging. 250, 500. and 1000. Do these numbers represent the pac size to be charged or the rate of charge? Got find the directions for it! Capt,n
I have a Sirrus Smart charger. It is about 10 years old. Do you think it would be ok to use it on the ''Sanyo'' ''Eneloop'' 1900MA pack I have? It has a 3 position switch for charging. 250, 500. and 1000. Do these numbers represent the pac size to be charged or the rate of charge? Got find the directions for it! Capt,n
Please trust me. I have not had a case of battery-over-draw with the measure method. Be the packs be nicad, A123 or lipo. Such a small charger is a good insurance to protect your major RC investment.
#33
Well I read all the replies so far. I never really noticed that my Sirrus Pro charger did any better at all than the common ordinary charger you get with your TX system. in fact I use it only as a field charger for about 10 min when I do use it. So I will dolike Tom & others say...just use a standard low rate charger for the Eneloopbattery packs. I think the low rate may be best....a gut feeling. Best Regards, Capt,n
#34

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: captinjohn
Well I read all the replies so far. I never really noticed that my Sirrus Pro charger did any better at all than the common ordinary charger you get with your TX system. in fact I use it only as a field charger for about 10 min when I do use it. So I will do like Tom & others say...just use a standard low rate charger for the Eneloop battery packs. I think the low rate may be best....a gut feeling. Best Regards, Capt,n
Well I read all the replies so far. I never really noticed that my Sirrus Pro charger did any better at all than the common ordinary charger you get with your TX system. in fact I use it only as a field charger for about 10 min when I do use it. So I will do like Tom & others say...just use a standard low rate charger for the Eneloop battery packs. I think the low rate may be best....a gut feeling. Best Regards, Capt,n
#36
Senior Member
Dodgy pilot = those whose skill levels falls way short of where they think it is....
= those why fly with only 3 channels yet have ailerons. Throttle is operated by an On/Off switch.
= those who arrive, slap their airie together and fly without any preflight checks.
= those why fly with only 3 channels yet have ailerons. Throttle is operated by an On/Off switch.
= those who arrive, slap their airie together and fly without any preflight checks.
#37
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Capetown, SOUTH AFRICA
ORIGINAL: apalsson
Sorry Tim but with the utmost respect, that is nonsense. Where does this keep coming from?
1. An Rcexl ignition places very little load on the battery (200 - 400mAh) where the rated discharge current of NiMh (Eneloop) cells is in excess of 10C
2. It has been established more times than I care to remember, a 4-cell NiMh (Eneloop) battery is probably an optimum power source for these ignitions. They typically have a capacity of 2,000 - 2,300mAh which easily gives you 4 - 5 hours run time at wide open throttle
3. Running at 6V only increases the power consumption of the ignition (therefore heat dissipation) but doesn't give any better spark (these are digital devices)
4. I fail to see how it can be of an advantage to use a battery with nominal cell voltage above the safe operating voltage of the ignition and then use a semiconductor to drop the same voltage down to a save (yet marginal) level
If I had a dollar for every time I have seen this have to be explained, I'd be better off than I'm now
ORIGINAL: TimBle
I'd opt for a LiFePO4 through a diode or BEC to drop the voltage under 6V. They're not as unreliable as NiMH cells under load.
I'd opt for a LiFePO4 through a diode or BEC to drop the voltage under 6V. They're not as unreliable as NiMH cells under load.
1. An Rcexl ignition places very little load on the battery (200 - 400mAh) where the rated discharge current of NiMh (Eneloop) cells is in excess of 10C
2. It has been established more times than I care to remember, a 4-cell NiMh (Eneloop) battery is probably an optimum power source for these ignitions. They typically have a capacity of 2,000 - 2,300mAh which easily gives you 4 - 5 hours run time at wide open throttle
3. Running at 6V only increases the power consumption of the ignition (therefore heat dissipation) but doesn't give any better spark (these are digital devices)
4. I fail to see how it can be of an advantage to use a battery with nominal cell voltage above the safe operating voltage of the ignition and then use a semiconductor to drop the same voltage down to a save (yet marginal) level
If I had a dollar for every time I have seen this have to be explained, I'd be better off than I'm now
The dis-advantages to Nimh are as such...
1) Nimh is dated technology
2) Nimh requires maintenance, i.e. discharging for maximum output
3) Nimh are prone to false peaking
4) Nimh need to be slow charged
5) Nimh are used by old farts
6) Nimh heat up when charged
7) Nimh can explode when charged
8) Nimh are prone to dead cells
9) Nimh need a fancy charger
10) Nimh need different delta v settings for temperature variations
11) Nimh self discharge, although this is less prevalent with eneloop technology
The advantages to Nimh are as such...
1) Nimh have the perfect voltage for spark
2) Nimh do not require a regulator
You did ask...
#38
Senior Member
The advantages to Nimh are as such...
1) Nimh have the perfect voltage for spark
Currently, but its a design problem. Ignition manufacturers can design an ignition to be very happy on a 7.4V Lipo without a regulator.
1) Nimh have the perfect voltage for spark
Currently, but its a design problem. Ignition manufacturers can design an ignition to be very happy on a 7.4V Lipo without a regulator.
#39

My Feedback: (6)
Man, I have had a ton of problems with Nimh batteries and are disgusted with them. I've had numerous packs fail over the past few years, and they were "quality" batteries maintained by a very good charger. I'm done with them.
Buy up some good old fashioned nicads before the supply dries up. That's what I did. (They are doing away with them...)
AV8TOR
Buy up some good old fashioned nicads before the supply dries up. That's what I did. (They are doing away with them...)
AV8TOR
#40
ORIGINAL: Truckracer
When used on correct sized batteries, the Sirrus is a very good charger. Also, I would certainly use it for a quick top off charge at the field. Just keep track of the time it is on and don't walk away and forget it. Its only real fault is that there are better chargers available today. All their info, specs and manuals are available for viewing at their website.
ORIGINAL: captinjohn
Well I read all the replies so far. I never really noticed that my Sirrus Pro charger did any better at all than the common ordinary charger you get with your TX system. in fact I use it only as a field charger for about 10 min when I do use it. So I will dolike Tom & others say...just use a standard low rate charger for the Eneloopbattery packs. I think the low rate may be best....a gut feeling. Best Regards, Capt,n
Well I read all the replies so far. I never really noticed that my Sirrus Pro charger did any better at all than the common ordinary charger you get with your TX system. in fact I use it only as a field charger for about 10 min when I do use it. So I will dolike Tom & others say...just use a standard low rate charger for the Eneloopbattery packs. I think the low rate may be best....a gut feeling. Best Regards, Capt,n
#41
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: av8tor1977
Man, I have had a ton of problems with Nimh batteries and are disgusted with them. I've had numerous packs fail over the past few years, and they were "quality" batteries maintained by a very good charger. I'm done with them.
Buy up some good old fashioned nicads before the supply dries up. That's what I did. (They are doing away with them...)
AV8TOR
Man, I have had a ton of problems with Nimh batteries and are disgusted with them. I've had numerous packs fail over the past few years, and they were "quality" batteries maintained by a very good charger. I'm done with them.
Buy up some good old fashioned nicads before the supply dries up. That's what I did. (They are doing away with them...)
AV8TOR
I've disposed of tens of the rechargable types for my cameras too and other electronics. Nothing but problems with them.
#42
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
For those that don't want to buy a bunch of extra equipment to charge an Eneloop. Plug it into the receiver side of your wall wart radio charger. Low output, designed for charging 400 to 600 mA batteries at about 1/10C.
For those that don't want to buy a bunch of extra equipment to charge an Eneloop. Plug it into the receiver side of your wall wart radio charger. Low output, designed for charging 400 to 600 mA batteries at about 1/10C.
#43

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: TimBle
Nicads good, NiMH bad.
I've disposed of tens of the rechargable types for my cameras too and other electronics. Nothing but problems with them.
ORIGINAL: av8tor1977
Man, I have had a ton of problems with Nimh batteries and are disgusted with them. I've had numerous packs fail over the past few years, and they were ''quality'' batteries maintained by a very good charger. I'm done with them.
Buy up some good old fashioned nicads before the supply dries up. That's what I did. (They are doing away with them...)
AV8TOR
Man, I have had a ton of problems with Nimh batteries and are disgusted with them. I've had numerous packs fail over the past few years, and they were ''quality'' batteries maintained by a very good charger. I'm done with them.
Buy up some good old fashioned nicads before the supply dries up. That's what I did. (They are doing away with them...)
AV8TOR
I've disposed of tens of the rechargable types for my cameras too and other electronics. Nothing but problems with them.
In most cases, users went out and bought high capacity, high impedence NIMH batteries, fryed them a few times on a charger then wondered why they didn't work so well. In some cases these same batteries couldn't supply the current they needed from day one because the user chose to use the wrong battery for the application. Simply stated, NiCd batteries are a bit more tolerant to abuse and for a given cell size, usually have a lower impedence. As a result, many users get along better with NiCds than they do NIMH batteries.
I was always thankful that I didn't sell batteries to the RC community and I'll leave it at that.
#44
Senior Member
The problem is not many NiMH cell manufacturers provide the cell information on the casing or in a brochure. There are plenty of NiMH packs out there, being sold to unsuspecting retailers and pilots, that are not really up to the job reliably. We only find out when something goes wrong.
Any system is only aws strong as its weakest link and as you say, why risk an investment in RC with substandard battery packs? I agree, hence I prefer to fly with LiFePO4 (Hyperion or A123) because I trust those as I have not had a single issue with any of the two cell packs.
They're safe for Ignitions and Rx but adding a diode just keeps things nicely under control.
I'd rather that than trust a 4cell NiMH pack that decides to drop a cell on you midflight...
Any system is only aws strong as its weakest link and as you say, why risk an investment in RC with substandard battery packs? I agree, hence I prefer to fly with LiFePO4 (Hyperion or A123) because I trust those as I have not had a single issue with any of the two cell packs.
They're safe for Ignitions and Rx but adding a diode just keeps things nicely under control.
I'd rather that than trust a 4cell NiMH pack that decides to drop a cell on you midflight...
#46
You guys can trash talk NiMH batteries all you want. That's fine but I still have the first Eneloop pack that I built over 5 years ago and it still kicks butt. I use ONLY GENUINE "Sanyo" Eneloops (yes there are cheap knockoffs made in that wonderful country that copies everything these days) and I have never, and I repeat, never had a single pack failure. Even though the Chinese have mastered copying the packaging they haven't quite mastered the actual cells as there are some visual clues as to the authenticity. I have a computerized battery analyzer (CBAIII) and the Genuine Eneloops will hold a 10 amp discharge rate without dropping below 1 volt per cell. As far as ignition packs go IMHO they are great. They work great on my DA50, DL50, DLE55, DA100, and DLE111 and will last longer than I am physically capable of flying in one day. On the one lungers they will empty a two gallon gas can and still be haulin the mail. Heck at some of the big meets I've borrowed gas for another flight and never even considered the need to recharge the ignition pack.
As a disclaimer, I am using the 2300 A123's as my flight pack but I can not see any reason to add more complexity to my ignition setup. KISS is my moto. Keep It Simple Stupid
As a disclaimer, I am using the 2300 A123's as my flight pack but I can not see any reason to add more complexity to my ignition setup. KISS is my moto. Keep It Simple Stupid
#47

My Feedback: (90)
I only see the benefit of a cell to be longer capacity holding time. It is still a NiMH battery with pretty high internal resistance.
My question is what is the benefit of longer capacity holding time for this hobby. One can always charge in the morning and go to the field in the afternoon, right?
My question is what is the benefit of longer capacity holding time for this hobby. One can always charge in the morning and go to the field in the afternoon, right?
#48

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: Jezmo
You guys can trash talk NiMH batteries all you want. That's fine but I still have the first Eneloop pack that I built over 5 years ago and it still kicks butt. I use ONLY GENUINE ''Sanyo'' Eneloops (yes there are cheap knockoffs made in that wonderful country that copies everything these days) and I have never, and I repeat, never had a single pack failure. Even though the Chinese have mastered copying the packaging they haven't quite mastered the actual cells as there are some visual clues as to the authenticity. I have a computerized battery analyzer (CBAIII) and the Genuine Eneloops will hold a 10 amp discharge rate without dropping below 1 volt per cell. As far as ignition packs go IMHO they are great. They work great on my DA50, DL50, DLE55, DA100, and DLE111 and will last longer than I am physically capable of flying in one day. On the one lungers they will empty a two gallon gas can and still be haulin the mail. Heck at some of the big meets I've borrowed gas for another flight and never even considered the need to recharge the ignition pack.
As a disclaimer, I am using the 2300 A123's as my flight pack but I can not see any reason to add more complexity to my ignition setup. KISS is my moto. Keep It Simple Stupid
You guys can trash talk NiMH batteries all you want. That's fine but I still have the first Eneloop pack that I built over 5 years ago and it still kicks butt. I use ONLY GENUINE ''Sanyo'' Eneloops (yes there are cheap knockoffs made in that wonderful country that copies everything these days) and I have never, and I repeat, never had a single pack failure. Even though the Chinese have mastered copying the packaging they haven't quite mastered the actual cells as there are some visual clues as to the authenticity. I have a computerized battery analyzer (CBAIII) and the Genuine Eneloops will hold a 10 amp discharge rate without dropping below 1 volt per cell. As far as ignition packs go IMHO they are great. They work great on my DA50, DL50, DLE55, DA100, and DLE111 and will last longer than I am physically capable of flying in one day. On the one lungers they will empty a two gallon gas can and still be haulin the mail. Heck at some of the big meets I've borrowed gas for another flight and never even considered the need to recharge the ignition pack.
As a disclaimer, I am using the 2300 A123's as my flight pack but I can not see any reason to add more complexity to my ignition setup. KISS is my moto. Keep It Simple Stupid
#49

My Feedback: (19)
Jezmo,
Well stated!
Like you I use A123 batteries for flight packs in my newer planes but my NiCd and NIMH batteries are serving extremely well for ignition. I still have quite a fleet of smaller and seldom flown planes that use nickel based batteries and will continue to do so until they die from old age. Yes, these older batteries will probably be replaced with A123s when the time comes but I'm certainly not going to throw out perfectly good batteries just because newer technology has come along. Unless something changes, my transmitters will continue to use Eneloop batteries. In over 40 years of flying RC, I have never had an in flight battery failure.
Well stated!
Like you I use A123 batteries for flight packs in my newer planes but my NiCd and NIMH batteries are serving extremely well for ignition. I still have quite a fleet of smaller and seldom flown planes that use nickel based batteries and will continue to do so until they die from old age. Yes, these older batteries will probably be replaced with A123s when the time comes but I'm certainly not going to throw out perfectly good batteries just because newer technology has come along. Unless something changes, my transmitters will continue to use Eneloop batteries. In over 40 years of flying RC, I have never had an in flight battery failure.
#50

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: Truckracer
Jezmo,
Well stated!
Like you I use A123 batteries for flight packs in my newer planes but my NiCd and NIMH batteries are serving extremely well for ignition. I still have quite a fleet of smaller and seldom flown planes that use nickel based batteries and will continue to do so until they die from old age. Yes, these older batteries will probably be replaced with A123s when the time comes but I'm certainly not going to throw out perfectly good batteries just because newer technology has come along. Unless something changes, my transmitters will continue to use Eneloop batteries. In over 40 years of flying RC, I have never had an in flight battery failure.
Jezmo,
Well stated!
Like you I use A123 batteries for flight packs in my newer planes but my NiCd and NIMH batteries are serving extremely well for ignition. I still have quite a fleet of smaller and seldom flown planes that use nickel based batteries and will continue to do so until they die from old age. Yes, these older batteries will probably be replaced with A123s when the time comes but I'm certainly not going to throw out perfectly good batteries just because newer technology has come along. Unless something changes, my transmitters will continue to use Eneloop batteries. In over 40 years of flying RC, I have never had an in flight battery failure.
A123 on flight packs and Eneloop on ignitions for 50cc and up
Smaller planes, simply a 5-cell Eneloop on RX and a 4-cell Eneloop on ignition


