Community
Search
Notices
Gas Engines Questions or comments about gas engines can be posted here

Engine v's Engine Help!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2007 | 09:41 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , FINLAND
Default Engine v's Engine Help!

Hi,

I will soon buy either a QQ 86" Yak or a EF 88" Yak, my question is what engine for either plane (for all out 3D) MVVS45 or DA50?

Assuming both will run a pitts muffler.

I am not trying to start a war here, just get some performance/operation feedback, in relation to either airframe.

Thanks in advance for your help,

C.

Old 02-19-2007 | 10:10 AM
  #2  
AirWizard's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Coffeyville, KS
Default RE: Engine v's Engine Help!

Loaded question!!!!!

I like the DA 50R BUT I'm going to put a Brillelli 366GT "60cc" on my EF 88" Yak
Old 02-19-2007 | 10:44 AM
  #3  
BaldEagel's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,673
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Kent, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Engine v's Engine Help!

cwalsh

The QQ 86" is fitted out for a cannister muffler, and the MVVS 45 needs a cannister it will not produce full power with a pitts type muffler, gained 1100rpm with the cannister.

Mike
Old 02-19-2007 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , FINLAND
Default RE: Engine v's Engine Help!

Hi BaldEagle,

Thanks for the info, I know the QQ has a tunnel (I think that the EF will also). Did not know that the MVVS needed a pipe, was under the impression that a pitts would be fine. Does the DA benefit from a cannister? (not concerned with noise)

Assuming both engines have a cannister, which one is the best choice for the aircraft in question?

Thanks!

C.
Old 02-19-2007 | 04:09 PM
  #5  
Jake Ruddy's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bear, DE
Default RE: Engine v's Engine Help!

Personally I would be holding off to see the video of the Brillelli 60 on a pipe.

If you look at the extremeflight site you will see video with the DA 50 on a pipe.. the B 60 will be even better. MOst engines gain 300-500+ rpm on a pipe.



edit: Here is the link to the build thread.. ( should be done tonight ) http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_5342415/tm.htm
Old 02-19-2007 | 04:23 PM
  #6  
Bass1's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Va.Beach, VA
Default RE: Engine v's Engine Help!

A guy in my club had a QQ yak with a DA 50 and wrap around pitts. It was an awesome flying airplane. Which reminds me, Make sure your servo arm screws are tight and secured![X(]
Old 02-20-2007 | 12:06 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,602
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Valley Springs, CA
Default RE: Engine v's Engine Help!

They're both good choices. Pick the one that works out the lightest and the least expensive when all is said and done.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.