RCGF Engines
#1476
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: holly,
MI
nice vid jake ... couldent take it no more, so i ordered one of the 45's hopefully it wont take too long to get.. its going in a ultrarc g-202 should be pleanty of power... thanx in advance henry
tim
tim
#1478
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: CAMDEN,
TN
Got some numbers on he 50cc today. It belongs to a flying buddy. We dialed it in on a Xoar 23x8. It has only had about 1/2 gallon through it and is turning 5780 rpms. Also hooked it up to a digital scale to get an idea of how it pulled. The scaled read 26 lbs 13 ozs. It may get to 6000 rpms with some run time.
#1483
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Francisco,
CA
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
How you set your propeller in relation to the engine compression stroke is entirely up to you. For those that hand start their engines, a blade position close to a two o'clock and eight o'clock position works very well. Again, propeller positioning is completely up to the user. The only time propeller position becomes critical to starting is when a magneto is used for an ignition system. With electronic ignition systems propeller position is not important at all.
How you set your propeller in relation to the engine compression stroke is entirely up to you. For those that hand start their engines, a blade position close to a two o'clock and eight o'clock position works very well. Again, propeller positioning is completely up to the user. The only time propeller position becomes critical to starting is when a magneto is used for an ignition system. With electronic ignition systems propeller position is not important at all.
T.O.M, thanks for the prop article. It was very helpful. Although I have been convinced multi bolt is the way to go, I can also see it can easily ruin your props, too, even with a drill press. The wood grain can play games with your otherwise straight drill bits.
Piston,
- Re: 26 cc Mounting Template
The vertical distance between the mounting holes in the 26 cc templates say 49 mm. The users' manual says it's 50 mm. I measured my 26 and found it's closer to 50 mm than 49 mm. I'm not 100% convinced my measurement is correct. I used a caliper and measured several times. I don't have a good center hole locater.
The drawing mention carburetor outline, but it seems missing. Is it incomplete? The carburetor outline will be very helpful.
Best Regards.
#1484
TOM, re your prop mounting post, that's another A+ in my book . And on behalf of the rest of us who possibly never knew it all, thanks a bunch.
Karol
Karol
#1485

My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: MIDLAND, TX
Hey Testpilot6 If you want it here is what I found .The bolt pattern is correct. I marked it out on a large board and mounted the engine .Then I bolted a flat board on the prop adabtor and a pin and turned the prop with pin on it full rotation and this gives dead center for prop swing. The 49 should be divided like this. from center down bottom of engine mounting bolt is 30mm and up to top of engine mounting bolt is 19mm . Hope this helps you. Fooped
#1486
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Francisco,
CA
ORIGINAL: FOOPED
The bolt pattern is correct. I marked it out on a large board and mounted the engine .Then I bolted a flat board on the prop adabtor and a pin and turned the prop with pin on it full rotation and this gives dead center for prop swing. The 49 should be divided like this. from center down bottom of engine mounting bolt is 30mm and up to top of engine mounting bolt is 19mm . Hope this helps you. Fooped
The bolt pattern is correct. I marked it out on a large board and mounted the engine .Then I bolted a flat board on the prop adabtor and a pin and turned the prop with pin on it full rotation and this gives dead center for prop swing. The 49 should be divided like this. from center down bottom of engine mounting bolt is 30mm and up to top of engine mounting bolt is 19mm . Hope this helps you. Fooped
However, if you make a metal bracket that mates directly to the engine mount, 1 mm will be a big difference.
#1487
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Francisco,
CA
Right now my bigger problem is the cutout for the carburetor. A carb template will help.
Maybe the reason for the lack of the carb template could be the odd shape of the carb. The cutout profile can vary according to how far the cutout is relative to the engine.
However, I'm also contemplating another approach, where I don't have to worry about a cutout.
Maybe the reason for the lack of the carb template could be the odd shape of the carb. The cutout profile can vary according to how far the cutout is relative to the engine.
However, I'm also contemplating another approach, where I don't have to worry about a cutout.
#1488

My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: MIDLAND, TX
Sorry I thought you were talking about the bolt pattern that you bolt the standoffs and engine to the fire wall. Not the standoff themselves. I used the stand offs and cut hole in firewall to clear the carb on my pattern . made and kept temp for later use. The wide foot on the standoff goes to the firewall and the 11mm on the engine. The lenght is going to vary per mount as far as the hole drilled in them as long as they are flat which I found nothing wrong with mine they do'nt have to be perfect. If I made my own out of square hardwood and was going to box the carb in then you would want to be more accurate in drilling the mounting holes.
#1489
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Francisco,
CA
ORIGINAL: FOOPED
Sorry I thought you were talking about the bolt pattern that you bolt the standoffs and engine to the fire wall. Not the standoff themselves. I used the stand offs and cut hole in firewall to clear the carb on my pattern . made and kept temp for later use. The wide foot on the standoff goes to the firewall and the 11mm on the engine. The lenght is going to vary per mount as far as the hole drilled in them as long as they are flat which I found nothing wrong with mine they do'nt have to be perfect. If I made my own out of square hardwood and was going to box the carb in then you would want to be more accurate in drilling the mounting holes.
Sorry I thought you were talking about the bolt pattern that you bolt the standoffs and engine to the fire wall. Not the standoff themselves. I used the stand offs and cut hole in firewall to clear the carb on my pattern . made and kept temp for later use. The wide foot on the standoff goes to the firewall and the 11mm on the engine. The lenght is going to vary per mount as far as the hole drilled in them as long as they are flat which I found nothing wrong with mine they do'nt have to be perfect. If I made my own out of square hardwood and was going to box the carb in then you would want to be more accurate in drilling the mounting holes.
It's 50mm(1.96) x 68.5mm (2.70). So maybe it's a matter of tolerance.
#1490

My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: MIDLAND, TX
Yes you are correct I used vertical center of 49mm and horizonal of 68mm but to put the prop in the center had to use 19mm and 30 mm and it worked out perfectly. On the templet on the web it showed 24.5mm up and down this should be changed to 30mm and above it should be show 19mm for a total of 49mm. then the prop would be on center line.
#1492

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ossining,
NY
Finally got to fire up the 50cc Twin and was very impressed. Ran 4 tanks through it with a total run time of about 50 minutes and a little under 1/2 gallon consumed. Temp was 26*F, 60 ft ASL. Fuel was 89 octane (10% ethanol, of course) and Pennzoil Air-cooled low ash 32:1. Prop was TBM 21x8. Reliable idle after first 2 tanks was 1800 RPM, high 6580 RPM. Nice running engine with outstanding transition, RPM's probably held down a bit by my jury-rigged muffler extensions, made from some PTFE (Teflon) elbows and an old wing tube. Henry advised that the 2-into-1 header won't be available until sometime in March and I didn't want to cut the cowl for the stacks, hence the modification...
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNg1F...e=channel_page
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNg1F...e=channel_page
#1495
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orlando,
FL
Hey Goirish
LOTS of commentary on do you need one or not. ALL points of view are valid on both sides of the discussion.
Listed are options for killing your engine safely.
1. Servo on choke plate. The reason is for easy of starting, but also for stopping the engine either at the flight line or if you experience a throttle related issue in the air.
2. REMOVE the idle stop screw. This will assure that the carb throttle plate will close all the way and that this bolt will NOT vibrate its way down in time giving you a higher than needed idle. This trick is used by many modelers. In fact, I will be updating my manuals with this item.
3. Use another servo to mechanically turn off your ignition switch.
4. Use an Ignition kill switch.
and of course the FINAL SOLUTION
5. Dump the plane and hope for the best.... It is called DOWN elevator solution.
Many modelers use the KISS method. The simpler the wiring the less chance for problems. Again... extremely valid methodology and thought.
Personally... I advocate the use of ignition kill switches because of that possible one in a million chance that a situation will occur that may cause injury to people and to lesser extent property. I call it my "peace of mind" policy. And for me.. it is worth the small cost of the switch!
Cheers
Henry
LOTS of commentary on do you need one or not. ALL points of view are valid on both sides of the discussion.
Listed are options for killing your engine safely.
1. Servo on choke plate. The reason is for easy of starting, but also for stopping the engine either at the flight line or if you experience a throttle related issue in the air.
2. REMOVE the idle stop screw. This will assure that the carb throttle plate will close all the way and that this bolt will NOT vibrate its way down in time giving you a higher than needed idle. This trick is used by many modelers. In fact, I will be updating my manuals with this item.
3. Use another servo to mechanically turn off your ignition switch.
4. Use an Ignition kill switch.
and of course the FINAL SOLUTION
5. Dump the plane and hope for the best.... It is called DOWN elevator solution.
Many modelers use the KISS method. The simpler the wiring the less chance for problems. Again... extremely valid methodology and thought.
Personally... I advocate the use of ignition kill switches because of that possible one in a million chance that a situation will occur that may cause injury to people and to lesser extent property. I call it my "peace of mind" policy. And for me.. it is worth the small cost of the switch!
Cheers
Henry
#1496
Thanks Henry You said that you use kill switches, any particular kind? No one at our club flys gassers so I am stuck out on a limb all alone. I think some other members are very interested in gas, in fact a couple have come to my home to look at the engine. They seemed to be impressed with what they saw, oh yea I think they like the engine too.
#1497
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fresno,
CA
Hey Jake,
I just got a chance to see your video of the Aero Works plane powered by the RCGF 45 cc engine. That was great, thanks for sharing. It sure gets me excited about installing my new RCGF 45 into my GP Giant Super Sportster but I have to be paitent until the pitts muffer that I ordered with the engine is available. The engine performance looks really great and I can't hardly wait.
Best wishes and good safe flying.
Heli-NuBee (Roger)
I just got a chance to see your video of the Aero Works plane powered by the RCGF 45 cc engine. That was great, thanks for sharing. It sure gets me excited about installing my new RCGF 45 into my GP Giant Super Sportster but I have to be paitent until the pitts muffer that I ordered with the engine is available. The engine performance looks really great and I can't hardly wait.
Best wishes and good safe flying.
Heli-NuBee (Roger)
#1499
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orlando,
FL
Hey Goirish
There are several kinds on the market today. Choices are always out there.
For years I have been using the 42 Percent Products. I was put onto them by a fellow modeler who swears by them, and sold me one of his, to get me going. I have a customer ever since. In fact go here for more information
[link=http://www.zrcgf.com/store/Details.cfm?ProdID=44&category=9]Remote Electronic Cut off Switch[/link]
Cheers
Henry
There are several kinds on the market today. Choices are always out there.
For years I have been using the 42 Percent Products. I was put onto them by a fellow modeler who swears by them, and sold me one of his, to get me going. I have a customer ever since. In fact go here for more information
[link=http://www.zrcgf.com/store/Details.cfm?ProdID=44&category=9]Remote Electronic Cut off Switch[/link]
Cheers
Henry
#1500
Senior Member
Well, fu=inally maidened the P-4y/26cc yesterday. Of course, it was a lot colder at the field and a lot of moisture in the air - so the motor that strated on two flips in Lakewood made me work a bit - had to adjust the low end (and probably should have adjusted the high end as well).
Flight went well - IMHO 18x8 is too much prop though - plane was a lot slower than I was expecting. I'm going to try a 16x8 next week, plus tune the top a bit tighter at the field. Pretty much had to fly at full throttle the whole flight - burned through 15 oz or so of fuel - but was paying attention to the plane not my watch, so I can't tell you how long (Gary might know)
Flight went well - IMHO 18x8 is too much prop though - plane was a lot slower than I was expecting. I'm going to try a 16x8 next week, plus tune the top a bit tighter at the field. Pretty much had to fly at full throttle the whole flight - burned through 15 oz or so of fuel - but was paying attention to the plane not my watch, so I can't tell you how long (Gary might know)



