Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2012, 12:22 PM
  #1426  
WILDCRASHWILLY
Senior Member
 
WILDCRASHWILLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western KY
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Zor,

Yes, I'm running dual switches and dual bats. I'm feeding the power in at each end of the rx bus. Where I normally run about seven channels 1 through 7, I just reprogram my sticks and channels to use 2 through 8 on the Optima 9 channel rx. I use channel one and nine for power.


Dand@oz,

Man, you are a fast builder. Your build looks great. I have been very slow. I travel a lot in my job and have had quite a bit of extra activities on the days I've been at home the last year. I do have a few pics to update but not much. I'll post them this weekend.
Old 03-28-2012, 01:24 PM
  #1427  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: WILDCRASHWILLY

Zor,

Yes, I'm running dual switches and dual bats. I'm feeding the power in at each end of the rx bus. Where I normally run about seven channels 1 through 7, I just reprogram my sticks and channels to use 2 through 8 on the Optima 9 channel rx. I use channel one and nine for power.

>
>
>
WILDCRASHWILLY,

So from what I see and understand I really wonder what you are accomplishing with two batteries, two switches and their wiring.

You have this extra not negligeable weight.
The extra battery is as I understand supposedly for reliability in case a single battery fails (like a cell becomes opened (no voltage from that battey) or shorted (lower voltage) ) .

Now if one battery fail there is no way in flight to open the switch and disconnect the failed battery.
If the failed battery is opened and no voltage is present that is fine but if a cell is shorted then this failed battery becomes a severe load on the still good battery.

Batteies are much more likely to have a shorted cell than a fully open one.

Any comments (from anyone) ?

Zor



Old 03-29-2012, 12:21 AM
  #1428  
beepee
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Zor,

I have done the same and have remained concerned about a cell shorting out, but it is the simplest system. It also provides switch redundancy, which is a known mode of failure.

Bedford
Old 03-29-2012, 04:38 AM
  #1429  
Kolbboer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rømskog, NORWAY
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Hi Wildcrashwilly,

I have beenused the same system andfeeding the power in at each end of the rx bus. between the switches and rx i have added a batschare from "Smart fly" price~ 30$

Smart-Fly BatShare, you can tolerate a single failure (open-circuit, short-circuit, low voltage) in either battery pack, or switch, or battery wiring, without losing radio control.
The Smart-Fly BatShare continually monitors both battery packs and switches for the one with the higher voltage, and routes that to your Rx and servos. You may combine different size packs. In practice, with two good packs, the BatShare draws power equally from both packs, adding their individual capacities. I.e., if Battery #1 is a 6V/1350mAH pack, and Battery #2 is a 6V/2700mAH pack, you will have 4050mAH power supply onboard, with at least 1350mAH to fly on, in case of a failure.

3 yearsin my Yak 54, andno problem (im going to use the same setup in my Dynaflite Decathlon)

Jan B
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ge94515.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	85.2 KB
ID:	1744147  
Old 03-29-2012, 04:43 PM
  #1430  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: Kolbboer

Hi Wildcrashwilly,

I have beenused the same system andfeeding the power in at each end of the rx bus. between the switches and rx i have added a batschare from "Smart fly" price~ 30$

Smart-Fly BatShare, you can tolerate a single failure (open-circuit, short-circuit, low voltage) in either battery pack, or switch, or battery wiring, without losing radio control.
The Smart-Fly BatShare continually monitors both battery packs and switches for the one with the higher voltage, and routes that to your Rx and servos. You may combine different size packs. In practice, with two good packs, the BatShare draws power equally from both packs, adding their individual capacities. I.e., if Battery #1 is a 6V/1350mAH pack, and Battery #2 is a 6V/2700mAH pack, you will have 4050mAH power supply onboard, with at least 1350mAH to fly on, in case of a failure.

3 yearsin my Yak 54, andno problem (im going to use the same setup in my Dynaflite Decathlon)

Jan B
Now this makes sense.

Any idea of the insertion losses in voltage?

Zor

Old 03-30-2012, 07:40 AM
  #1431  
[email protected]
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Yes, I've gone fast with this plane, probably faster than I should have because there are some things that I could have done better. But I'm trying to meet a model contest date of 31 March. I won't be able to fly it until later in April due to unfavorable weather, but I can do the dog an pony show Still have windows, trim scheme, and finalizing details, but it looks like a plane now.


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Mk26356.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	144.2 KB
ID:	1744619   Click image for larger version

Name:	Oj28299.jpg
Views:	173
Size:	117.6 KB
ID:	1744620  
Old 04-01-2012, 08:16 PM
  #1432  
WILDCRASHWILLY
Senior Member
 
WILDCRASHWILLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western KY
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Jan,

I've heard about the bat share over on a ******giants thread but I have never used one. Definitely worth checking out.

Zor,
I agree that this will not help for a shorted cell, but it will cover me for a bad switch or bad connector. Although, I have heard of cell shorting, I have not seen this. At some of the clubs I've flown at, I have seen a switch failure and a few battery failures due to poor solder joints. Fortunately I have never had a bat failure. I only use Nobs batteries from Hangtimes Hobbies. His quality is excellent. Also, I have been told that wrongwayrc has great quality as well. I'm mainly doing this for redundancy on the connectors, wiring, and switches. Also, I'm increasing flight time with dual 2300 a123's. I like the idea of having 4600 Mah reserve to work with. With the engine I'm running the additional weight of 6.3 oz for the extra bat. and the extra half ounce for the switch really is not an issue for me. I will admit however, I have not completely decided to go with the dual set up as I'm only running metal gear analog servos. I do run duals in the 3d plane with digitals though as they can draw pretty heavy. The A123's will give up their energy rapidly if the demand is there. The down side, is if something shorts, it will be like an arc welder in the fuse... (It will all be toast[:@] )

dand@oz,

From what I can see your workmanship is great. Looking forward to seeing the finished model.
Old 04-01-2012, 08:28 PM
  #1433  
WILDCRASHWILLY
Senior Member
 
WILDCRASHWILLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western KY
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Here are a few pics. I may have a duplicate if so, I'm sorry. had a couple out of sequence on my computer. Spent a little time documenting the LG mod today. On some previous post here somewhere, Zor spoke about floating the collars if fastened to the LG at the fuse and locking the wire to the collars if the LG was not fastened to the fuse. I originally planned to have it all float but the more I thought about it what he said made sense, so I locked the music wire to the collars. Also, I used 5/32 wire and wheel collars. I used 6-32 allen head socket screws from RTL Fasteners to lock the collars. My screws were a little too long so I cut them off with a little cutter that I have. I cut them to 7.5mm in length, (give or take .1mm either way. Hope the pics are self explanatory.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Lj23729.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	232.6 KB
ID:	1745753   Click image for larger version

Name:	Xt60264.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	232.6 KB
ID:	1745754   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fl18721.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	229.9 KB
ID:	1745755   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ys49246.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	231.6 KB
ID:	1745756   Click image for larger version

Name:	Vg55566.jpg
Views:	134
Size:	231.8 KB
ID:	1745757   Click image for larger version

Name:	Wn86686.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	230.9 KB
ID:	1745758   Click image for larger version

Name:	Jl94438.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	229.8 KB
ID:	1745759   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hf19345.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	212.5 KB
ID:	1745760  

Click image for larger version

Name:	Wv32691.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	229.2 KB
ID:	1745761  
Old 04-01-2012, 08:32 PM
  #1434  
WILDCRASHWILLY
Senior Member
 
WILDCRASHWILLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western KY
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Some more pics. Also, in the previous post, you'll see where I was making some servo trays for the choke and throttle servos. Forgot to mention that earlier.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Tr50474.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	228.3 KB
ID:	1745762   Click image for larger version

Name:	Je99281.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	230.3 KB
ID:	1745763   Click image for larger version

Name:	Pu52393.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	232.2 KB
ID:	1745764   Click image for larger version

Name:	Vp39667.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	230.3 KB
ID:	1745765   Click image for larger version

Name:	Rc40115.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	231.9 KB
ID:	1745766   Click image for larger version

Name:	Zq96605.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	227.4 KB
ID:	1745767   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ce70706.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	235.2 KB
ID:	1745768  
Old 04-02-2012, 03:45 PM
  #1435  
minkiehuoise
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: lake alfred, FL
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


      i need some help!!!!!!!! i have a dynaflite super decathalon kit i am trying to build.i have the tail feathers done ,now i am at the wings and need help. i would like to know how the four basswood spar .doublers go with the taper, up or down just on the main spar or back spar too
                                                                                                                                                         i need help waynw
Old 04-02-2012, 03:47 PM
  #1436  
minkiehuoise
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: lake alfred, FL
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


      i need some help!!!!!!!! i have a dynaflite super decathalon kit i am trying to build.i have the tail feathers done ,now i am at the wings and need help. i would like to know how the four basswood spar .doublers go with the taper, up or down just on the main spar or back spar too
                                                                                                                                                         i need help waynw
Old 04-02-2012, 05:16 PM
  #1437  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

WILDCRASHWILLY

Just to mention that something is bothering me about your landing gear.

Where it is mounted to the fuselage it is so narrow front to back.

I imagine that on a landing the planemay be coming at what would be a wheel landing and the wheels hit a bump or a crevisse in the ground. There is little front to back distance to prevent the gears from tearing backward and pulling out of the fuselage or damaging it.

Just a thought.. Any comments ?

Zor
Old 04-02-2012, 07:05 PM
  #1438  
WILDCRASHWILLY
Senior Member
 
WILDCRASHWILLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western KY
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Minkie,

Spar doublers go on the root side of the wing. Doubler with taper is on top of bottom spar and below on upper spar. The spar slots on the inner ribs are deeper to accomodate the wider section of spar. Look back on page 50 of this thread post 1247 left pic and page 51 post number 1259 at the right pic. You'll need to blow the pictures up to see better. Look next to the tube just out of the ply webs and you can see them. Sorry, I should have taken better pictures of that stage of the wing but, in all honesty, I didn't think to get a detailed picture.

Zor,

I agree, the landing gear should be a little wider but, it is built to plan at that point. No doubt, the narrow gear is why everyone is having to modify with the music wire to keep it from bending. Look at the picture in post 1334. The inner ply plate is wider than the footprint under the plane. Hopefully this will be strong enough to hold it. So far I've not heard of anyone having issues with that part of the fuse, so I guess it is working okay.

Old 04-02-2012, 08:02 PM
  #1439  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: WILDCRASHWILLY

Minkie,

Spar doublers go on the root side of the wing. Doubler with taper is on top of bottom spar and below on upper spar. The spar slots on the inner ribs are deeper to accomodate the wider section of spar. Look back on page 50 of this thread post 1247 left pic and page 51 post number 1259 at the right pic. You'll need to blow the pictures up to see better. Look next to the tube just out of the ply webs and you can see them. Sorry, I should have taken better pictures of that stage of the wing but, in all honesty, I didn't think to get a detailed picture.

Zor,

I agree, the landing gear should be a little wider but, it is built to plan at that point. No doubt, the narrow gear is why everyone is having to modify with the music wire to keep it from bending. Look at the picture in post 1334. The inner ply plate is wider than the footprint under the plane. Hopefully this will be strong enough to hold it. So far I've not heard of anyone having issues with that part of the fuse, so I guess it is working okay.

Looks like we have a misunderstnding here.

The "music wire" help to reduce the bending upward toward the top of the model.
I does nothing for what I am talking about.

I am referring to movement backward toward the tail. The wheels hitting a bump or falling in a groove in the ground resulting in a backward impact on the wheels.

There is much longer moment arm from fuselage to ground than there is in the longitudinal (prop to tail) dimension (width if you like) of that narrow landing gear.

I was just commenting. There would be no problem in any normal landing.
I noticed that you are using four blind nuts holding this landing gear.
I see that the piece of ply is fairly long in the front to rear dimension .
I am concerned that the blind nuts can crush into that plywood.

The main thing is that you are not concerned as I am and of course it is your plane.

If it was mine I would modify this mounting.

Cheers from Zor.

Old 04-03-2012, 05:08 AM
  #1440  
minkiehuoise
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: lake alfred, FL
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


thanks for the help because it was driving nuts. it all make sence when you think about it. just had a mental block for a while thanks agine
minkiehuoise
Old 04-03-2012, 05:25 AM
  #1441  
do335a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: Zor

WILDCRASHWILLY

Just to mention that something is bothering me about your landing gear.

Where it is mounted to the fuselage it is so narrow front to back.

I imagine that on a landing the plane may be coming at what would be a wheel landing and the wheels hit a bump or a crevisse in the ground. There is little front to back distance to prevent the gears from tearing backward and pulling out of the fuselage or damaging it.

Just a thought.. Any comments ?

Zor
FWIW, that was never a problem on my Super Dud. The issue was the cheap, weak LG itself. That would allow it to splay with the slightest load.

Even with that music wire brace, there will be a tendency for the gear to bend at the unsupported curve in the leg just above the wheels. I found that out very early on.

Old 04-03-2012, 05:31 AM
  #1442  
do335a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: minkiehuoise


i need some help!!!!!!!! i have a dynaflite super decathalon kit i am trying to build.i have the tail feathers done ,now i am at the wings and need help. i would like to know how the four basswood spar .doublers go with the taper, up or down just on the main spar or back spar too
i need help waynw
Don't trouble yourself with that.

The taper is only between two ribs and amounts to nothing. You will not compromise the plane in any way if you don't bother to taper the spar doublers. You would save maybe a fraction of an ounce of weight in what is already a very porky airframe. Won't amount to a pinch and not worth the effort.

Just cut the doublers to the appropriate lentgth and laminate them to the spars.

There are many other places where you can save much more weight than that without hurting anything and with a lot less effort than cutting a taper.
Old 04-03-2012, 07:29 AM
  #1443  
83scamp
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbia City, IN
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: do335a



Don't trouble yourself with that.

The taper is only between two ribs and amounts to nothing. You will not compromise the plane in any way if you don't bother to taper the spar doublers. You would save maybe a fraction of an ounce of weight in what is already a very porky airframe. Won't amount to a pinch and not worth the effort.

Just cut the doublers to the appropriate lentgth and laminate them to the spars.

There are many other places where you can save much more weight than that without hurting anything and with a lot less effort than cutting a taper.

I don't know that I agree with that statement. By not tapering the end of the spar doubler, you create a potential stress riser right where the doubler ends. The whole point of tapering the end of the doubler is to gradually transition the load to the thinner section of spar. The struts on this plane are for looks only, by not tapering the doubler, you significantly increase the load at that spot, and if the wing ever fails, it will fail there. I personally will follow the directions on this step. I don't want to accidentally end up with a folded wing. It works on a Corsair, not a Super Decathlon.
Old 04-03-2012, 08:37 AM
  #1444  
Pitts532M
My Feedback: (1)
 
Pitts532M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

Been watching this thread, love the planes.It seems the nose is a bit long for Decathlon, is it and if so has anyone tried to shorten the nose?
Thanks.
Old 04-03-2012, 10:05 AM
  #1445  
Zor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: 83scamp


ORIGINAL: do335a



Don't trouble yourself with that.

The taper is only between two ribs and amounts to nothing. You will not compromise the plane in any way if you don't bother to taper the spar doublers. You would save maybe a fraction of an ounce of weight in what is already a very porky airframe. Won't amount to a pinch and not worth the effort.

Just cut the doublers to the appropriate lentgth and laminate them to the spars.

There are many other places where you can save much more weight than that without hurting anything and with a lot less effort than cutting a taper.

I don't know that I agree with that statement. By not tapering the end of the spar doubler, you create a potential stress riser right where the doubler ends. The whole point of tapering the end of the doubler is to gradually transition the load to the thinner section of spar. The struts on this plane are for looks only, by not tapering the doubler, you significantly increase the load at that spot, and if the wing ever fails, it will fail there. I personally will follow the directions on this step. I don't want to accidentally end up with a folded wing. It works on a Corsair, not a Super Decathlon.
FYI ___The struts can be easily made "working effective struts" by using the snap mehod.
No tools needed for removal or assembly.

Zor

Old 04-03-2012, 12:23 PM
  #1446  
do335a
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon


ORIGINAL: 83scamp


ORIGINAL: do335a



Don't trouble yourself with that.

The taper is only between two ribs and amounts to nothing. You will not compromise the plane in any way if you don't bother to taper the spar doublers. You would save maybe a fraction of an ounce of weight in what is already a very porky airframe. Won't amount to a pinch and not worth the effort.

Just cut the doublers to the appropriate lentgth and laminate them to the spars.

There are many other places where you can save much more weight than that without hurting anything and with a lot less effort than cutting a taper.

I don't know that I agree with that statement. By not tapering the end of the spar doubler, you create a potential stress riser right where the doubler ends. The whole point of tapering the end of the doubler is to gradually transition the load to the thinner section of spar. The struts on this plane are for looks only, by not tapering the doubler, you significantly increase the load at that spot, and if the wing ever fails, it will fail there. I personally will follow the directions on this step. I don't want to accidentally end up with a folded wing. It works on a Corsair, not a Super Decathlon.[img][/img]

A stress riser is the last thing that you need to concern yourself with at that point. You've got bigger problems, such as where parts don't fit because of the size supplied yet they are shown to be in contact with one another on the plan and glued together. The designer's solution was to draw the lines thicker on the plans to fill the gap. Not so great engineering there.

You will also notice that my spar doubler buts against the rib at its end. It's also attached along its length to a shear wb. It ain't goin' nowhere, my friend.

Just to be certain, I also junked those flimsy plastic strut attachments and the wood screws to hold them on. My struts became fully functional, attached to the plane with 6-32 socket head cap screws througn metal tangs into blind nuts, installed in well reinforced hard points.

Look at the sketch below and you'll see what the book shows and how I did the spars. Does it work? You bet! My plane flew through a tree and the only damage was to the tree. This plane is built like the proverbial brick XXXXhouse.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Vt57275.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	76.5 KB
ID:	1746367  
Old 04-04-2012, 01:05 AM
  #1447  
beepee
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

532M,

Don't shorten the nose, whether scale or not. It would only make the tail-heavy problem worse.

Bedford
Old 04-04-2012, 10:58 AM
  #1448  
Nothrottle
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bitter Root Barnstomers, MT
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

I see the music wire as unnecessary weight as my Decath has experienced a few hard landings. No splaying here but.... the 6" DuBro under-inflated tires do provide an ample cushion... with a 55cc DLE spinning a 22x10 composite prop. This setup provides ample additional weight and power! By moving the rudder and elevator servos under the rear hatch plus the 5-cell battery pack just behind the CG. The 16oz. fuel tank is centered on the cg, perfect balance was obtained.
Old 04-05-2012, 10:35 AM
  #1449  
minkiehuoise
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: lake alfred, FL
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

hi crashwilly:
when i built my taylorcraft and i wanted make the gear stronger i used coat hangers hope this helps minkiehuoise
Old 04-08-2012, 11:01 PM
  #1450  
Guitarman52
My Feedback: (2)
 
Guitarman52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Racine, OH
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Building a Dynaflite Super Decathlon

I finished my decathalon kit about a week ago and got to maiden it Saturday. I put an RCGF 26 gasser on it with a 16x10 prop. I was very disappointed, it was a real hand full. Very under powered. I tore the landing gear off , but other than that it was in pretty good shape. What do most of you guys use for a motor.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.