GMS .25s and kill switch
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: cypress, CA
I have a GMS .25 and it will not kill
even with the throttle closed all the way.
What is up with that? I runs slow enough
to land but with the engine running I'm
breaking props.
even with the throttle closed all the way.
What is up with that? I runs slow enough
to land but with the engine running I'm
breaking props.
#2

My Feedback: (21)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Spencerport, NY
Simple: You have an air leak somewhere.
There are many places for air to get in:
1. Around the carburetor barrel
2. Through the front bearing
3. Under the carburetor seat
4. Around the backplate
5. Through the head gasket
What nobody's been able to explain to me is why OS engines and engines with OS carburetors shut down reliably. Even OS engines use shielded (not sealed, not airtight by any stretch of the imagination) front bearings. You'd think that if the front bearings were the problem, OS engines should have major shutdown problems too.
There are many places for air to get in:
1. Around the carburetor barrel
2. Through the front bearing
3. Under the carburetor seat
4. Around the backplate
5. Through the head gasket
What nobody's been able to explain to me is why OS engines and engines with OS carburetors shut down reliably. Even OS engines use shielded (not sealed, not airtight by any stretch of the imagination) front bearings. You'd think that if the front bearings were the problem, OS engines should have major shutdown problems too.
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: cypress, CA
I don't think I have an air leak.
No bubbles in the fuel line. I resealed
everything. No change. Thanks, any more
ideas, or how to check where the leak may be?
No bubbles in the fuel line. I resealed
everything. No change. Thanks, any more
ideas, or how to check where the leak may be?
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: orange county,
CA
Sup big bad john, whith the engine running, shoot little amounts of carb cleaner around the flanges of the carb, backplate, hose fittings, ets. if the engine increases in RPMs, you have found your leak, use the little red straw that the carb cleaner comes with, and be sure to only use the smallest amount of spray, but it won't hurt anything.Good Luck, keep us in touch.
Where in Cali are you?
Where in Cali are you?
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston,
TX,
Take the carb off, apply RTV between the carb body and o-ring, also remove the carb screws and seal them up good with RTV and replace them, put the carb back on and press hard, and tighten the screws, that should take care of the air leaks.
RTV is gasket maker available at any auto parts store. You got air coming into the carb, more than likely from the 2 sources listed above, so your engine is getting just enough air and fuel that it doesn't want to shutdown.
RTV is gasket maker available at any auto parts store. You got air coming into the carb, more than likely from the 2 sources listed above, so your engine is getting just enough air and fuel that it doesn't want to shutdown.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Douglasville,
GA
Originally posted by Big_Bad_John
I don't think I have an air leak.
No bubbles in the fuel line. I resealed
everything. No change. Thanks, any more
ideas, or how to check where the leak may be?
I don't think I have an air leak.
No bubbles in the fuel line. I resealed
everything. No change. Thanks, any more
ideas, or how to check where the leak may be?

If your carb barrel is closing 100% of the way, and it still runs, you have an air leak.
I had a Magnum the same way. I had to re-seal carb, backplate, and needle valve to fix it.
You might give the RTV idea a try. If this is a drawbar type carb holder, you may never
get it to seal with O-rings alone. (Carb or intake may be slightly damaged)
Also, slip a small length of fuel tubing over where the needle valve screws in, so
it's half on the needle, and half on the housing. That will eliminate this common air leak.
#8
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NC USA
Originally posted by Big_Bad_John
I have a GMS .25 and it will not kill
even with the throttle closed all the way.
What is up with that? I runs slow enough
to land but with the engine running I'm
breaking props.
I have a GMS .25 and it will not kill
even with the throttle closed all the way.
What is up with that? I runs slow enough
to land but with the engine running I'm
breaking props.
1) Did you purchase your engine directly from MECOA?
2) Did they tell you, at the time of purchase, or put anything in the box saying, that the engine would not shut down by design??
They claim they do this to let everyone know about this "feature."
Thanks.
#9
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: cypress, CA
Originally posted by Icarus
Hey John,
1) Did you purchase your engine directly from MECOA?
2) Did they tell you, at the time of purchase, or put anything in the box saying, that the engine would not shut down by design??
They claim they do this to let everyone know about this "feature."
Thanks.
Hey John,
1) Did you purchase your engine directly from MECOA?
2) Did they tell you, at the time of purchase, or put anything in the box saying, that the engine would not shut down by design??
They claim they do this to let everyone know about this "feature."
Thanks.
Yes, they (2) came right from MECOA. We fly at Whitter Narrows, about 6-8 miles from MECOA.
No there was no verbal or written notice.
Last weekend, after several club experts helped,
we got one of them to idle and kill. I have
taken everything apart and sealed them when I reassembled it. I added a seal (fuel tube) over the high speed needle. I then turned the needle
out 3 turns and the idle screw 2 turns out. Fired
right up. I (we) adjusted the high speed needle.
It still would not kill. I OPENED the idle screw
about 3/4 of a turn (1/4 at a time) and it kills
from the transmitter. Three weekends of trial and
error, mostly error.
The engines were purchased for slo-quicky 500,
the are speced in the rules. I'm just running some
fuel in them to get them broken in a little.
#10

My Feedback: (21)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Spencerport, NY
That's funny, because I believe the AMA Safety Code says you need to be able to shut down the engine by remote control. If the engine doesn't shut down by remote control, no insurance.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Douglasville,
GA
You must have a different copy of the code than I do.
Can you post the relevant portions for me? Just curious.
I'm just thinking... a lot of FF, CL, combat, and pylon racers are gonna be tweaked, if so
Can you post the relevant portions for me? Just curious.
I'm just thinking... a lot of FF, CL, combat, and pylon racers are gonna be tweaked, if so
#13

My Feedback: (21)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Spencerport, NY
Sorry, I misunderstood that thread. I thought he was referring to the AMA Safety Code.
According to the rules at http://www.rccombat.com:
Rule 3.3 of the RCCA Open Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Rule 3.5 of the RCCA Scale Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Of course, it's up to the contest director's discretion whether he wants to enforce that rule or not. If you only have a few competitors at a meet, you really can't afford to be disqualifying people for a minor infraction.
The rule really doesn't make sense, because if you don't have control of the airplane, you almost certainly won't have control to shut off the engine.
The AMA Safety Code does NOT have a requirement for engine shutoff. Of course, if it did, it would have to apply to R/C only. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
According to the rules at http://www.rccombat.com:
Rule 3.3 of the RCCA Open Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Rule 3.5 of the RCCA Scale Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Of course, it's up to the contest director's discretion whether he wants to enforce that rule or not. If you only have a few competitors at a meet, you really can't afford to be disqualifying people for a minor infraction.
The rule really doesn't make sense, because if you don't have control of the airplane, you almost certainly won't have control to shut off the engine.
The AMA Safety Code does NOT have a requirement for engine shutoff. Of course, if it did, it would have to apply to R/C only. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
#14
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NC USA
Originally posted by mkirsch
Sorry, I misunderstood that thread. I thought he was referring to the AMA Safety Code.
According to the rules at http://www.rccombat.com:
Rule 3.3 of the RCCA Open Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Rule 3.5 of the RCCA Scale Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Of course, it's up to the contest director's discretion whether he wants to enforce that rule or not. If you only have a few competitors at a meet, you really can't afford to be disqualifying people for a minor infraction.
The rule really doesn't make sense, because if you don't have control of the airplane, you almost certainly won't have control to shut off the engine.
The AMA Safety Code does NOT have a requirement for engine shutoff. Of course, if it did, it would have to apply to R/C only. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Sorry, I misunderstood that thread. I thought he was referring to the AMA Safety Code.
According to the rules at http://www.rccombat.com:
Rule 3.3 of the RCCA Open Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Rule 3.5 of the RCCA Scale Combat rules states a requirement for engine shutoff.
Of course, it's up to the contest director's discretion whether he wants to enforce that rule or not. If you only have a few competitors at a meet, you really can't afford to be disqualifying people for a minor infraction.
The rule really doesn't make sense, because if you don't have control of the airplane, you almost certainly won't have control to shut off the engine.
The AMA Safety Code does NOT have a requirement for engine shutoff. Of course, if it did, it would have to apply to R/C only. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
As the the CD's descretion, well, I'm not sure the AMA would agree, given that one of the selling points of our hobby to local communities is the AMA insurance provided, that covers, among other things, incidents at contests. If an engine could not be stopped, and a bystander was injured, then AMA's insurer would not necessarily be obliged to provide coverage. Somehow, I don't think the latitude to wave insurance coverage is really in the hands of the CD, and the insured might think twice if they gave it a thought at all.
If a rule's a rule, then all those engines that won't quite are a problem for everybody. Perhaps GMS should just fix the problem and be done with it. OS engines stop just fine. So what's the deal?
#15

My Feedback: (21)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Spencerport, NY
The engine shut off requirement only applies to R/C combat, and is only in the AMA rules because the AMA rules are, for the most part, a verbatim copy of the RCCA rules. It is not part of the core Safety Code, and as such insurance coverage does not depend on compliance with that rule.
GMS is not the only engine manufacturer who has problems with shutdown, but they are the only manufacturer that lauds such a deficiency as a "feature."
As far as forcing GMS to comply, good luck! The number of engines they sell for competition combat is negligible compared to the number they sell for general aviation (including "club combat"). They're heavier and less powerful than most alternatives, and priced about the same as the popular Magnums and Norvels.
GMS is not the only engine manufacturer who has problems with shutdown, but they are the only manufacturer that lauds such a deficiency as a "feature."
As far as forcing GMS to comply, good luck! The number of engines they sell for competition combat is negligible compared to the number they sell for general aviation (including "club combat"). They're heavier and less powerful than most alternatives, and priced about the same as the popular Magnums and Norvels.
#17
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NC USA
Well, I must admit the price is nice. But if it won't shut down, then it may not be allowed in AMA competition - depending on the CD, I guess. That's a lot of latitude, though. Would hate to show up and be disqualified because of my GMS!




