Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Combat
 Receiver for combat? >

Receiver for combat?

Community
Search
Notices
RC Combat Discuss rc combat planes, techniques and strategies here.

Receiver for combat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2009 | 09:50 PM
  #1  
Bad Tooth's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Livingston, MT
Default Receiver for combat?

Can anyone suggest a good, cheap receiver to use for combat? Is there any problem with using a single channel Rx with a plane like the battle axe?
Old 07-11-2009 | 11:35 PM
  #2  
Blue Note's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Knoxville, TN
Default RE: Receiver for combat?


ORIGINAL: Bad Tooth

Can anyone suggest a good, cheap receiver to use for combat? Is there any problem with using a single channel Rx with a plane like the battle axe?

Single channel or single phase/conversion. Big problem if single channel. FM or 2.4? I always prefer 2 aileron servos for redundancy, but many use one single servo. The Hitec Electron 6 seems to continue to be a quite popular FM receiver. I now use the Spektrum AR500 for the 2.4 stuff for about $50. Full range and no problems yet, running 6.0V batteries.
Old 07-12-2009 | 09:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Loxahatchee, FL
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

Do not use single conversion for combat!!!! the vibration and speed make a combo that will ensure loss of control. The electron 6 is a good choice for FM. Make sure you install the crystal rubbers to make sure you do not have any crystal problems. I have used the AR 6100 and the 5000 for 2.4 and the both work great. if you have older AR 6100's they should have the fast connnect update. Spektrum also is prone to low voltage brown out so an appropriate battery is in order. I have also used their plug in capacitor (with the car stuff) to avoid low voltage brown out.

Some Cheap off brand stuff will work and guys are using it, but I try not to skimp on the control end, you get what you pay for. Open B planes are about 90MPH, out of control even for a short time can be devistating.
Old 07-12-2009 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
Alex Treneff's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jackson, TN
Default RE: Receiver for combat?


ORIGINAL: Bad Tooth

Can anyone suggest a good, cheap receiver to use for combat? Is there any problem with using a single channel Rx with a plane like the battle axe?
Hi Bad Tooth,

The Battle Axe will accommodate anything up to a standard 7-channel 72 mHz receiver in size. Years back (circa 2004 I believe) I used Hitec Feather single-conversion receivers in my Battle Axe's, but eventually ran into an interference issue with a certain combination of two other radios. Because single-conversion is inherently more susceptible to interference, I wouldn't recommend using it with any airframe beyond the manufacturer's recommendations.

Have fun and let us know how you do! [8D]

Best regards,
Alex Treneff

Old 07-12-2009 | 10:43 PM
  #5  
Bad Tooth's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Livingston, MT
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

Hey Alex! You found me! I just put in my order today for those 2 BattleAxes; can't wait till they get here. I did order the Hitec Neutron 6S dual conversion. It looks like the Neutron is the new Electron.

I did try a single conversion in a glow plane once and it was the only time I have ever had radio problems. So I figured that's what you guys would say about using them for a combat plane.

I have less than 2 weeks to get ready for the local combat event......... Should be fun getting ready for that.
Old 07-16-2009 | 09:43 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (180)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Shelby Township, MI
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

I've been using the Hitec 4, 5, and 6 channel SC Rx in combat for three years without a single problem. We also use the Electron 6 and 555 with excellent results.
Old 07-16-2009 | 08:23 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Mather, CA
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

I second the Electron 6 or the discontinued 555, the ONLY two I trust. Never a failure, rock solid control and getting cheaper too.
Old 07-17-2009 | 07:01 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Holiday City, OH
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

I run the 555, i tried the 05S singles in my ssc's and while the did work I have had 2 go bad, one during nats. I still have a SC 04something hitec in a hard case and never had a problem with it in my ssc's. The 05s was really a full range for electric models in a cardboard case.

555 is still my favorite for size, durability and price.

Old 07-19-2009 | 08:11 AM
  #9  
badger5964's Avatar
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

I use the Berg 4 channel micro receiver. No problems, very small, full range, cheap and it has a programmable failsafe.

[link=http://www.b-p-p.com/product.php?productid=302&cat=18&page=1]berg micro stamp RX[/link]
Old 08-08-2009 | 10:34 PM
  #10  
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,084
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Birmingham, AL
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

I maidened my ssc Lethal Weapon today and used a Corona single conversion rcvr and had no issues. Not bad for a 13 buck rcvr that is destined for combat duty[sm=lol.gif]
John
Old 08-12-2009 | 01:59 PM
  #11  
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lima, OH
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

I used hitec dual conversions, 555, electron6 for a number of years and had some problems at a site in Ft Worth. I switched to the single conversion BERG which many of the guys were flying without problems. I've been very happy with them the last 3 years. The receivers and crystals cost less and are smaller and lighter. In combat it is nice if you don't have to move your receivers from one ship to another so price is important.
Old 08-28-2009 | 06:08 PM
  #12  
Alex Treneff's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jackson, TN
Default RE: Receiver for combat?

ORIGINAL: Bad Tooth

Can anyone suggest a good, cheap receiver to use for combat? Is there any problem with using a single channel Rx with a plane like the battle axe?
We have been using the Assan X8 2.4Ghz system here for a while and are pleased to announce that TreneffRC is now an authorized USA retailer for Assan.

The X8 system is great for combat because it is small, light, extremely affordable, and of course with 2.4 Ghz there aren't any interference issues to worry about.

The X8 system, which is great for your whole fleet, allows you to turn almost any existing 72 Mhz radio with a module into a 2.4 Ghz broadcast system in 60 seconds. Simply pull the old module from the radio and snap in the new Spread Spectrum module. And of course you still have all your current programming in the radio.

I really like the system because I can go to an event anywhere or be at the field on a busy weekend and not have to worry about being "shot down" by accident as I might on 72mhz.



[link=http://treneffrc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=078999100889]Assan CF-I combo for Futaba/Hitec[/link]


[link=http://treneffrc.com/proddetail.asp?prod=078999100896]Assan CJ-I combo for JR[/link]



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.