Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 JetJoe OWNERS thread >

JetJoe OWNERS thread

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

JetJoe OWNERS thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008 | 07:11 AM
  #1826  
Xairflyer's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,766
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Co. Donegal, IRELAND
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

How did you reduce the compressor clearance, did you just shim it forward.

See your club has the same indent as ours lmfc.
Old 11-25-2008 | 06:07 AM
  #1827  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: GrimsbyNE LINCS, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Machined the front cover till it just touched. Then used fine wet and dry where it scraped the marker pen I put on it on my olde lathe.. I used to build these things. Keep repeating untill as much of the front cover and compressor is almost touching as possible. Then give it one more go, thats the running clearance

The biggest difference between a wren mw54 and a supersport is the running clearance and its also why they dont sell it as a self assembly kit.

If it helps the supersport it will help the JJ too. There was loads of clearance on mine, and once set up a bit tighter it runs cooler and better especially at startup. But I dont know about thrust because I didnt measure that before... But if the compressor is less "leaky" then it becomes more efficient.
Old 11-25-2008 | 10:40 PM
  #1828  
Ed
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bemis, NM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

What glow plug is the JJ-1400 normally supplied with at purchase here in the U.S. ?

I'd like to keep the voltage setting the same when changing plugs, and not have to readjust it.

Thanks.

Ed
Old 11-26-2008 | 01:14 AM
  #1829  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mt. Vernon, IL
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

The JetJoe comes with a OS A3 plug.
Old 11-26-2008 | 01:25 AM
  #1830  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: ferrara, ITALY
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

the egv is red glow
Old 11-29-2008 | 08:45 AM
  #1831  
rcdriver22's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Newcastle, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

ORIGINAL: dynopower

Machined the front cover till it just touched. Then used fine wet and dry where it scraped the marker pen I put on it on my olde lathe.. I used to build these things. Keep repeating untill as much of the front cover and compressor is almost touching as possible. Then give it one more go, thats the running clearance

The biggest difference between a wren mw54 and a supersport is the running clearance and its also why they dont sell it as a self assembly kit.
I agree on the running clearances, also you might later try a 14 blade compressor ($50) and increacing the see through on the NGV. The burn in the picture looks rather red than the usual nice cool blue. Not sure what Sara will make of you using Wren parts to upgrade a JJ1400, you may not get any cakes if you visit them.
Old 11-29-2008 | 10:00 AM
  #1832  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: GrimsbyNE LINCS, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

The red is because its accelerating and its almost dark. The camera makes it look like its glowing hot though! You dont see it in normal daylight? EGT is about 650 at full power. I already have a 14 blade compressor (I think?).

I have lots of bits laying about. Including a kamps and an old Shreckling built ten years ago and jj bits etc.

Early JJ motors were sort of good home built motors that needed some fine tuning and setting up.

As for upgrading with wren bits, why not? I had them! They fit, and they help. Its all just bits of metal at the end of the day. The tailpipe was swapped because the JJ one was too tight and hard to remove after a run or two. And because it ran a bit hot with the single bit jj one and the wren one was bigger area outlet after I cut 3mm off it for yet another home built mw54. The FOD screen front end was because I watched a huge bee go in at about 1/3rd power in my garden... Motor never even coughed though.

Old 11-29-2008 | 11:22 AM
  #1833  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: RotherhamYorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread


ORIGINAL: dynopower


As for upgrading with wren bits, why not?

Because the engine looks like a Wren, but isn't. There's already been one incident with a JJ being sold as a Wren by disguising it with our FOD screen and tailcone. The new purchaser only got a couple of flights before the engine failed catastrophically, spitting turbine blades out. Everyone at that flying field thought it was a Wren ...

We've worked hard to make good engines, we have an excellent reputation and when we see an engine which looks like a Wren but is a cheap Chinese copy, we get angry. I think any other manufacturer would feel the same.

Sara Parish
Wren Turbines
Old 11-29-2008 | 11:56 AM
  #1834  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: GrimsbyNE LINCS, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

You have no need to worry as I have no intention of selling it ever and certainly not as a wren!
I make it quite clear that its a mix of bits to everyone.
As I said earlier I treat JJ motors as a good homebuilt that needs the same care, caution and setting up. I know the turbine wheel wasnt certified, neither was the one in my old Shreckling. I keep very clear!

I can understand why you would get upset though as I saw the other thread you pm me a link to.


People do this though with everything to do this hobby, and others. EG my car is a ford with a V8 Rover engine.
My helis are a mix of all kinds of bits.
My DF motor is OS but has piston and liner from an OPS modded to fit.
My canon camera has an adapter that lets me use Nikon lenses. (Actually it doesent I use Nikon but I was reading about this adapter a guy made two mins ago and its the same thing)

But you see the point. People will do it.
Most people think all turbines look the same. Those that know will see most likely that its not a wren because of the engine casing or in any case becase I tell them.

I understand your fears but I treat it as a home built so its safe. Even I am scared of something letting go! But you cant really stop people swapping or adapting parts for everything in this hobby as its part of the fun.
Old 11-29-2008 | 07:35 PM
  #1835  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

I agree. We swap parts all the time. OS carbs on ST-3000. TT parts in an OS engine. It is part of the hobby. At heart, most modellers are fiddler. We repair and try to improve. So, a few WREN parts in a JJ was bound to happen. AND, Sara should be happy that, in her view, higher quality parts are replacing lower quality. Wouldn't that make it safer?

DW_Crash
Old 11-29-2008 | 08:03 PM
  #1836  
Kriptonic69's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Up Yours, CA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread


ORIGINAL: dw_crash

AND, Sara should be happy that, in her view, higher quality parts are replacing lower quality. Wouldn't that make it safer?

DW_Crash
It's like putting a Corvette Bumper on a Pinto.....

Sure it looks better, but it's still going to blow up. I wouldn't know any manufacture that would be happy at that point.
Old 11-29-2008 | 08:35 PM
  #1837  
Xairflyer's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,766
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Co. Donegal, IRELAND
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Works in reverse too, a guy I know bought a S/H manual start wren 54, and upgraded it with a new JetJoe front cover and bullet starter as it was less than half the price of the wren one. Hope he dos'nt sell it as a JetJoe
Old 11-29-2008 | 09:50 PM
  #1838  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Easley, SC
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

I received my new JJ1400 turbine today. It looks good. It is going on my Falcon 120. Notice the tailcone. It also has a FOD screen installed.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Tq48707.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	85.8 KB
ID:	1081110  
Old 12-01-2008 | 11:45 PM
  #1839  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mt. Vernon, IL
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

The new JetJoe 3000 is on the JetJoe website now.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Db84364.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	17.3 KB
ID:	1082454  
Old 12-02-2008 | 06:34 PM
  #1840  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, , AUSTRALIA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

ORIGINAL: fw190pilot

The new JetJoe 3000 is on the JetJoe website now.
Yes Mark, I noticed that Jet-Joe was advertising the 3000 on his website a couple of days ago, I can find no price for it though? I haven't finished my testing, evaluation and modification of the one I have as yet either!! I hope he hasn't "jumped the gun" somewhat. So far it looks to be quite a robust engine, considering some of the early JJ engines were a little "fragile" to say the least.

The factory balance job done to the particular "pre-production" engine I have, (it doesn't sport a serial number!?) was actually very good, I did a "core check balance" on it just last week and was quite surprised to see numbers in the very low "teens" on the mg-in scale on my Schenck CAB960H machine, very encouraging indeed and much needed on the 70mm turbine wheel, I only needed to give it a small touch-up to bring it into single figures, bare in mind however that numbers below ~28mg-in will give a very nice result, we're talking 0.001 of an oz-in on the grind radius that we're using, very small numbers indeed. I consider the balance of the rotatives to be one of the most critical items on our model turbine engines.

Jet-Joe (Jeff) himself has asked me to make any modifications I deem necessary to make the engine run nicely and to be honest, I can see maybe just two or three items which need attention and I have already given Jeff my thoughts as to my findings, just some minor things which I believe will help make the engine perform a little more reliably.

One thing which I would like to see is a later model FADEC/ECU unit, the one supplied is the Nades AU-540, although it works well, is a little dated and I believe ceased production nearly 4 years ago! The supplied fuel pump is the nice FlightWorks 400-B unit and suits the engine nicely.

I've done a few test runs up to full noise so far, (115k) and I can tell everybody that this engine does indeed make the claimed 30lbs of static thrust, in fact I measured three clear runs of well over 31lbs with EGT's in the 620-630c range, not bad at all. The acceleration rate has been the sticking point and originally the engine would not run up as nicely as one would like, bare in mind though that ten years ago it would have been classed as a rocket!!.... but after some "modifications" to the combustion chamber and other little "secretive" items and some tweaking of the ECU I have been able get a very respectable 3.2 seconds from idle to max rpm, not bad at all.

The sound of this engine is quite unlike any that I have heard to date, I guess it most resembles the Jet-Central Rhino but is still "different" and has a noise all it's own, for those who love turbine engines....its a beautiful noise!! I have measured the fuel consumption at ~465ml/min and although it is just slightly higher than the quoted figure on the JJ website (16oz/min~455ml/min) I can't really fault it.

I will post further updates as I progress, but at this point, although nowhere near the Wren, Jet-Cat or Jet Central for quality... the JJ-3000 looks to be a reasonably good engine.

Cheers,
Smithy.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ig13763.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	51.0 KB
ID:	1082886   Click image for larger version

Name:	Wr55907.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	56.4 KB
ID:	1082887   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ms42670.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	29.2 KB
ID:	1082888   Click image for larger version

Name:	At55315.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	1082889   Click image for larger version

Name:	Dp84069.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	38.5 KB
ID:	1082890   Click image for larger version

Name:	Tk75929.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	54.9 KB
ID:	1082891  
Old 12-02-2008 | 07:07 PM
  #1841  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Are your tweaks being sent back to JetJoe for improving the production run?

DW_Crash
Old 12-02-2008 | 07:24 PM
  #1842  
Xairflyer's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,766
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Co. Donegal, IRELAND
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Glad to see JetJoe are moving forward, if nothing else to keep winding up the people who knock them
Old 12-02-2008 | 07:28 PM
  #1843  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, , AUSTRALIA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread


ORIGINAL: dw_crash

Are your tweaks being sent back to JetJoe for improving the production run?

DW_Crash

Yes DW,
Jeff and I converse regularly, so I really hope he's listening to us, he's very interested in getting this engine to a good reliable setup, time will tell.
So far, so good, I've given this one a pretty hard time and it is standing up to it thus far.
I had it running at 90%+(up near 100k) for over 30 mins on the weekend, (I'm sure my nearby neighbors are happy about that!) and all seems good, I was trying to see if the aluminum housing would distort or if I could make something let go, but it just didn't happen!! Used a helluva lot of fuel doing it too

Cheers,
Smithy.
Old 12-02-2008 | 07:41 PM
  #1844  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, , AUSTRALIA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread


ORIGINAL: Xairflyer

Glad to see JetJoe are moving forward, if nothing else to keep winding up the people who knock them
Hey Xair,
Don't get me wrong, I'm not for one minute suggesting this is a high quality engine, the likes of Wren, Jet-Cat, AMT and Jet-Central would put it to shame, I would however suggest it may be a cheaper alternative to one of the engines listed. There are so many good engines out now it makes the mind boggle!

Cheers,
Smithy.
Old 12-02-2008 | 10:44 PM
  #1845  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

So true Smithy. There are many good engines out there. I'd figure none are bad, just some better. And, you get what you pay for.

DW_Crash
Old 12-04-2008 | 10:49 PM
  #1846  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Easley, SC
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Smithy:

Was this after you performed your balanced?
Old 12-05-2008 | 08:02 PM
  #1847  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: LondrinaParana, BRAZIL
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Hello Guys

I dont know if its good. I think it is, but its nice.
Old 12-06-2008 | 05:10 AM
  #1848  
rcdriver22's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Newcastle, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

Bought FOUR JJ1400 to date £3000+
from Joe and I have kept none of them

After running all of them long and extensively, as a GTBA member, only buy from a known rep who understands swarf/tollerances in the lbuild i.e Andy in the UK.

It is worth the $300 £400 extra to have one at least JJ flying in the air. (that's not just one sat in a work bench or land based in a RC car)

Resale or Residual value on a JJ!?? buy for a dollar, sold for a cent. Who wants them 2nd now ?



Old 12-07-2008 | 03:31 PM
  #1849  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, , AUSTRALIA
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread


ORIGINAL: akpepp

Smithy:

Was this after you performed your balanced?
Actually both, I did some testing both before and after, no noticeable difference between each to be honest.

Cheers,
Smithy.
Old 12-07-2008 | 08:28 PM
  #1850  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Easley, SC
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread

I have not seen a used JJ for sale since I started looking for a turbine. But if anybody wants to sell one for a cent on the dollar I will be happy to take it of there hands.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.