Wing Section for a New Bipe.
#76
Senior Member
Brian, even with all paint, the 300 gram wing weight ( I assume about 600 squares) is within reach. I build mono panels at around 550 squares all paint and no honeycombing, and get about 330-350 grams panel weights. Equipment adds around another 60-70 grams.
About the only base color which would finish heavier is yellow. Yellow just doesn't cover as well as the other colors do, and I've tried dope, polyu enamel, epoxy enamel, water based acrylic, and the dope variant-- S T I T S. Many years ago DuPont made a great lacquer in yellow that covered well applied light. It no longer exists of course.
I have not tried any of the Chroma colors from DuPont and I know from talking with Bob Hunt (CL) that Chroma is really terrific stuff. But then again it's from DuPont with the appropriate sticker shock
About the only base color which would finish heavier is yellow. Yellow just doesn't cover as well as the other colors do, and I've tried dope, polyu enamel, epoxy enamel, water based acrylic, and the dope variant-- S T I T S. Many years ago DuPont made a great lacquer in yellow that covered well applied light. It no longer exists of course.
I have not tried any of the Chroma colors from DuPont and I know from talking with Bob Hunt (CL) that Chroma is really terrific stuff. But then again it's from DuPont with the appropriate sticker shock
#77
Thread Starter

Hi Matt,
Yes, 300g would be easily attainable if I used the 0.2oz veil on the outside.
The 0.3oz will take quite a lot extra to fill to a 'paint ready' surface. So I will pay a weight penalty for using this.
However for these particular wings , with the low % tip sections, I think it will be worth the penalty. I have had flexing wing tips on a bipe already (due to some strut issues) and it is difficult to handle, especially in turbulent conditions.
Also as the surface is so hard and stiff I don't think the honeycomb pattern will show through very much if at all !?? Maybe use smaller cut-outs with the 0.2oz.
Brian
Yes, 300g would be easily attainable if I used the 0.2oz veil on the outside.
The 0.3oz will take quite a lot extra to fill to a 'paint ready' surface. So I will pay a weight penalty for using this.
However for these particular wings , with the low % tip sections, I think it will be worth the penalty. I have had flexing wing tips on a bipe already (due to some strut issues) and it is difficult to handle, especially in turbulent conditions.
Also as the surface is so hard and stiff I don't think the honeycomb pattern will show through very much if at all !?? Maybe use smaller cut-outs with the 0.2oz.
Brian
#78
Senior Member
Let me suggest you do it a bit differently if you ever go down this path again. Use the 0.3 on the inside and esaki tissue or light silkspan on the outside. Esaki is a little stiffer than silkspan but more expensive and weight is a wash. But the covering is not very ding resistant. Lots of TLC must be used.
Either paper fills quicker than the carbon veils. Still, I don't wet sand until the very end after the base coat is applied. I use fewer nitrate coats on the paper which isn't quite water proof until after the primer. Strength is not an issue with the combo...remember I used a DLE55 on the Delta originally. This big block was not very friendly to the composite fuse but the wings/stabs were/are fine.
I will be building a set of wings/stabs for my new Congruence design at some point and I may honeycomb them both.The technique can shave up to 40% of the original foam weight so it's a worthwhile effort....
BTW-- I have a new hybrid 22x10 prop patterned after the 21x10 apc nearing completion. I think the 185 will spool up well with this load up front. Weight is less than 100 grams. It's gonna be a very interesting experiment.....
Either paper fills quicker than the carbon veils. Still, I don't wet sand until the very end after the base coat is applied. I use fewer nitrate coats on the paper which isn't quite water proof until after the primer. Strength is not an issue with the combo...remember I used a DLE55 on the Delta originally. This big block was not very friendly to the composite fuse but the wings/stabs were/are fine.
I will be building a set of wings/stabs for my new Congruence design at some point and I may honeycomb them both.The technique can shave up to 40% of the original foam weight so it's a worthwhile effort....
BTW-- I have a new hybrid 22x10 prop patterned after the 21x10 apc nearing completion. I think the 185 will spool up well with this load up front. Weight is less than 100 grams. It's gonna be a very interesting experiment.....
#79
Thread Starter

Hi Matt,
Thank you, and yes I had already reached the conclusion re the 0.3oz on the inside.With that on the inside and tissue or the 0.2 on the outside the composite effect would still be there allbeit with a less resilient surface from hanger rash point of view.
One piece bipe wings get a lot of handling at assembly and disassembly - not funny in a 25mph gusting wind out in the open - we do not have shelters where we fly and it is mostly windy.
All good fun.
Brian
Thank you, and yes I had already reached the conclusion re the 0.3oz on the inside.With that on the inside and tissue or the 0.2 on the outside the composite effect would still be there allbeit with a less resilient surface from hanger rash point of view.
One piece bipe wings get a lot of handling at assembly and disassembly - not funny in a 25mph gusting wind out in the open - we do not have shelters where we fly and it is mostly windy.
All good fun.
Brian
#80
Thread Starter

Hi,
Have all the small parts sanded after applying the sanding sealer, tail halves,elevators,ailerons and the rudder. Wings awaiting further assembly work.
I have glassed (0.5 to 0.75 oz) models in the past and this stuff takes more sanding - to my surprise !!
The 0.3oz seems very different to the 0.2oz in this regard. It does take a lot more dope to seal to begin with.
Anyway I am able to use sharp 400gt wet paper to flat this. Even with the 400gt I had a lot of sanding on these parts and using considerable pressure.
They are finish sanded with 600gt.
The 0.3oz carbon has a big advantage over glass for this process - you can see exactly what is happening !!
Matt, The second pic is both tail halves c/w elevators on the scales - not to bad but weight is up some !??. The third is one of yours taken from your 'covering balsa with carbon veil' thread for reference.
Brian
Have all the small parts sanded after applying the sanding sealer, tail halves,elevators,ailerons and the rudder. Wings awaiting further assembly work.
I have glassed (0.5 to 0.75 oz) models in the past and this stuff takes more sanding - to my surprise !!
The 0.3oz seems very different to the 0.2oz in this regard. It does take a lot more dope to seal to begin with.
Anyway I am able to use sharp 400gt wet paper to flat this. Even with the 400gt I had a lot of sanding on these parts and using considerable pressure.
They are finish sanded with 600gt.
The 0.3oz carbon has a big advantage over glass for this process - you can see exactly what is happening !!

Matt, The second pic is both tail halves c/w elevators on the scales - not to bad but weight is up some !??. The third is one of yours taken from your 'covering balsa with carbon veil' thread for reference.
Brian
#81
Senior Member
Hi Brian,
I agree, slightly over 4 ounces for the whole stab w/ elevators is a really good weight.
One of the main reasons i don't use 0.3 or heavier grades of carbon veil outside. Weight sounds great but the actual application takes more dope than one thinks.
Years ago when I first used carbon veil, the 0.5 variety was the first weight I used. It was not satisfactory weight-wise. Wound up snading it all off, what a PITA. But boy was it stiff. Anyway, the 0.2 was the one that produced the better results on the outside. Eventually I returned to light paper on the outside and veil on the inside. It seems to be the best of all the worlds so to speak, for those that love to finish in paint rather than wrinkle kote.
I agree, slightly over 4 ounces for the whole stab w/ elevators is a really good weight.
One of the main reasons i don't use 0.3 or heavier grades of carbon veil outside. Weight sounds great but the actual application takes more dope than one thinks.
Years ago when I first used carbon veil, the 0.5 variety was the first weight I used. It was not satisfactory weight-wise. Wound up snading it all off, what a PITA. But boy was it stiff. Anyway, the 0.2 was the one that produced the better results on the outside. Eventually I returned to light paper on the outside and veil on the inside. It seems to be the best of all the worlds so to speak, for those that love to finish in paint rather than wrinkle kote.
#82
Thread Starter

Hi Matt,
I got some zink stearate in today.
Impressive stuff and not too expensive. €25 for a kilo, which is not bad for a one off order from a lab,, supplier.
A 30cc dispensing cup filled with talc (patted down and filled flush with the top) weighed 20g.
The same cup filled with zink stearate weighed 15g. The cup weighed 2g.
Thats 18g for the talc V 13g for the same volume of zink stearate.
I can see or feel no difference in how finely ground one is versus the other.
That should make a difference to the weight that the sanding sealer coats add.
Brian
I got some zink stearate in today.
Impressive stuff and not too expensive. €25 for a kilo, which is not bad for a one off order from a lab,, supplier.
A 30cc dispensing cup filled with talc (patted down and filled flush with the top) weighed 20g.
The same cup filled with zink stearate weighed 15g. The cup weighed 2g.
Thats 18g for the talc V 13g for the same volume of zink stearate.
I can see or feel no difference in how finely ground one is versus the other.
That should make a difference to the weight that the sanding sealer coats add.
Brian
#83
Thread Starter

Hi,
I've been beaten to it !
Gernot Bruckmann's new model.
A revisit to the Sensation c/w new wings and all moving tail.
At AUW less than 4Kg !!!!!!!
I wonder is he using one of the new contras with a 6S to 8S heli motor ??
Brian
PS ; I've put this here to avoid opening a new thread.
I've been beaten to it !

Gernot Bruckmann's new model.
A revisit to the Sensation c/w new wings and all moving tail.
At AUW less than 4Kg !!!!!!!
I wonder is he using one of the new contras with a 6S to 8S heli motor ??
Brian
PS ; I've put this here to avoid opening a new thread.
Last edited by serious power; 05-15-2015 at 02:28 AM. Reason: addition
#85
Firstly Brian it's great to see Ireland still at the forefront of European aerobatic flying. Hopefully your home brewed bipe will add to a long list including composite construction, 4 strokes, electric power, contradrives to name a few…..
Actually the same argument applies to the wings. Ailerons are just something to warp so why not do away with them and go for all flying wings also geodetically built? This isn't as daft as it sounds with the wing panels pivoting on thin section ball raced tubes and driven by S-bus high voltage servos. …...
I know that camber is more effective than angle of attack at changing lift but years ago there were a few successful aerobatic soarers which used wing twist and they flew very well.
I hope this might give you a few ideas to play with and you know the address to send the plans to!
Malcolm
Actually the same argument applies to the wings. Ailerons are just something to warp so why not do away with them and go for all flying wings also geodetically built? This isn't as daft as it sounds with the wing panels pivoting on thin section ball raced tubes and driven by S-bus high voltage servos. …...
I know that camber is more effective than angle of attack at changing lift but years ago there were a few successful aerobatic soarers which used wing twist and they flew very well.
I hope this might give you a few ideas to play with and you know the address to send the plans to!
Malcolm
Jim O
#86
Senior Member
Hi,
I've been beaten to it !
Gernot Bruckmann's new model.
A revisit to the Sensation c/w new wings and all moving tail.
At AUW less than 4Kg !!!!!!!
I wonder is he using one of the new contras with a 6S to 8S heli motor ??
Brian
PS ; I've put this here to avoid opening a new thread.
I've been beaten to it !

Gernot Bruckmann's new model.
A revisit to the Sensation c/w new wings and all moving tail.
At AUW less than 4Kg !!!!!!!
I wonder is he using one of the new contras with a 6S to 8S heli motor ??
Brian
PS ; I've put this here to avoid opening a new thread.
Did you fly yours yet?
#87
Thread Starter

Hi Matt,
The original Sensation was indeed quite small, area wise.
This looks a little bigger, but not much.
No Matt, I had to park it for a collection of reasons. Amongst them, it had got too far into the last season and I needed some stick time.
Also I just wasn't happy with the weight build up using talc.
I got some sink stearate but it was not behaving properly - I hadn't a clue how to use it.
I have just recently got some good guidance.
Mostly though I got into real difficulty with my back - both upper and lower - a long story - old war wounds and all that.
We have had other 'life' stuff going on as well - mostly good though.
Getting back to it this week - Alex and Isaac are inspiring me some.
Brian
The original Sensation was indeed quite small, area wise.
This looks a little bigger, but not much.
No Matt, I had to park it for a collection of reasons. Amongst them, it had got too far into the last season and I needed some stick time.
Also I just wasn't happy with the weight build up using talc.
I got some sink stearate but it was not behaving properly - I hadn't a clue how to use it.
I have just recently got some good guidance.
Mostly though I got into real difficulty with my back - both upper and lower - a long story - old war wounds and all that.
We have had other 'life' stuff going on as well - mostly good though.
Getting back to it this week - Alex and Isaac are inspiring me some.
Brian



