2 meter plans
#476
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Reykjavik, ICELAND
Thanks Jon
But it isn't original, probably seen this done many hundreds of times. It isn't easy to come up with something new, but I hope the plane will look nice when finished.
The fuselage is almost finished will have pictures of it tonight.
But it isn't original, probably seen this done many hundreds of times. It isn't easy to come up with something new, but I hope the plane will look nice when finished.
The fuselage is almost finished will have pictures of it tonight.
#477
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodstock, GA
Dreadnaught: The Tempest root is 20", the tip is 7.5" to 8", depending on how you trim it. Mine is 7.5".
I just got done making the drawings for all the Tempest mods, and am just cleaning up some notes and am about to mail them out to a few people. If you wish, I'll be glad to send you a set.
And Sig, that plane looks awesome. I can't wait to see what you do with a Tempest [8D]
-Mike
I just got done making the drawings for all the Tempest mods, and am just cleaning up some notes and am about to mail them out to a few people. If you wish, I'll be glad to send you a set.
And Sig, that plane looks awesome. I can't wait to see what you do with a Tempest [8D]
-Mike
#478

My Feedback: (5)
Mike, I would love to see the specs for the Tempest. The plane I am designing is coming along real well, and I plan to post a build thread tomorrow a.m. when I get the pictures sorted out. I have all of the structural stuff down, but I'm a little shaky on the aerodynamics. A template would be nice, thanks.
Are you talking about snail mail? If you want, I can CAD them up for you.
Are you talking about snail mail? If you want, I can CAD them up for you.
#481

My Feedback: (82)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bay Village,
OH
I figure that if the plans call for them then they are not going to put me much closer to the 11lb limit than fixed gear, mounting screws, pants, wheels, and axles would.
With the retracts I would have some 2-56 pushrods and connectors, a servo in the fuselage, wheels, struts, axles, and mounting screws. I guess that weighs just a couple ounces more than fixed gear. most guys are getting between 10 and 10-1/2 lbs for their typhoons...a couple extra ounces are worth it to me.
I suppose there is a reliability issue with fixed vs. retractable gear. Mechanical retracts are not as risky as pneumatics, I think.
With fixed gear a really bad landing can break the fuse; with retractable, it rips the wings to pieces.
So i guess it comes down to which system has the lightest weight, best reliability, is the most durable, and the most aerodynamic. I dont know for certain about which is the best weight, reliability or durability...but retracted wheels are most aerodynamic.
chris
With the retracts I would have some 2-56 pushrods and connectors, a servo in the fuselage, wheels, struts, axles, and mounting screws. I guess that weighs just a couple ounces more than fixed gear. most guys are getting between 10 and 10-1/2 lbs for their typhoons...a couple extra ounces are worth it to me.
I suppose there is a reliability issue with fixed vs. retractable gear. Mechanical retracts are not as risky as pneumatics, I think.
With fixed gear a really bad landing can break the fuse; with retractable, it rips the wings to pieces.
So i guess it comes down to which system has the lightest weight, best reliability, is the most durable, and the most aerodynamic. I dont know for certain about which is the best weight, reliability or durability...but retracted wheels are most aerodynamic.
chris
#482
ORIGINAL: sigk
Well I use two boards, then I can have all the mess on one board and keep the other one tidy.
I'm actually using the glow version of the MVVS 1.50 but with the Walbro carb.
This engine is about 800gr and the pipe is rather heavy at 210gr.
I'm interested in trying a gas engine but then I would use the MVVS 2.15 but weighting 1500gr that means moving the wings forward and probably molding the top and lower half of the fuselage and also the canopy to save weight.
Specially for you flyintexan a picture of some covering bits and the brand new glass plate I cut my film on, my old one was to small for the Typhoon, also some templates for this plane.
Well I use two boards, then I can have all the mess on one board and keep the other one tidy.
I'm actually using the glow version of the MVVS 1.50 but with the Walbro carb.
This engine is about 800gr and the pipe is rather heavy at 210gr.
I'm interested in trying a gas engine but then I would use the MVVS 2.15 but weighting 1500gr that means moving the wings forward and probably molding the top and lower half of the fuselage and also the canopy to save weight.
Specially for you flyintexan a picture of some covering bits and the brand new glass plate I cut my film on, my old one was to small for the Typhoon, also some templates for this plane.
#483
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Reykjavik, ICELAND
Boogie I did, very interesting and informative but must be done in a very light airframe. It is good to have an option if the fuel cost will be to much.
#486
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: TauntonSomerset, UNITED KINGDOM
ORIGINAL: s05.cmoore
So i guess it comes down to which system has the lightest weight, best reliability, is the most durable, and the most aerodynamic. I dont know for certain about which is the best weight, reliability or durability...but retracted wheels are most aerodynamic.
chris
So i guess it comes down to which system has the lightest weight, best reliability, is the most durable, and the most aerodynamic. I dont know for certain about which is the best weight, reliability or durability...but retracted wheels are most aerodynamic.
chris
#490
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Reykjavik, ICELAND
Spending time at the field really has slowed down my building so I took a break to finish my very simple sport Typhoon. With the servos in the stab and the battery up front, the C of G was spot on. There is so much room in this plane and that makes the radio installation very easy.
Servos for ailerons and elevators DS9401, for the rudder DS8321 and a standard ball bearing servo on the throttle.
Servos for ailerons and elevators DS9401, for the rudder DS8321 and a standard ball bearing servo on the throttle.
#492
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Reykjavik, ICELAND
Flying
The Typhoon is the best plane I have ever had. Certainly flies way beyond my abilities and is also a real joy. Very very stable and accurate. The last model I took to the field was my old Magic so the difference in speed will take me a little time to get used to. The Typhoon just looks so slow in the air compared to my fast .60 size planes.
With the high fuselage it will be a challenge for me in cross wind so I'm looking forward to get to knowing this plane better and many interesting flying sessions.
The Typhoon is the best plane I have ever had. Certainly flies way beyond my abilities and is also a real joy. Very very stable and accurate. The last model I took to the field was my old Magic so the difference in speed will take me a little time to get used to. The Typhoon just looks so slow in the air compared to my fast .60 size planes.
With the high fuselage it will be a challenge for me in cross wind so I'm looking forward to get to knowing this plane better and many interesting flying sessions.
#493
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Reykjavik, ICELAND
My next project will be Mike Hester's Tempest. The Typhoon being the plane I have enjoyed the most building, so I'm very enthusiastic to start building the Tempest. I think Mike has made an awesome plane and the aggressive look of the new wings looks fantastic [8D]
#497
Junior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Nictaux,
NS, CANADA
Sigurdur,
Your Typhoon looks great!. I would love to see it fly. Are you planning to be out at Þytur anytime this weekend? I would like very much to drop by.
Cheers,
Andre
Your Typhoon looks great!. I would love to see it fly. Are you planning to be out at Þytur anytime this weekend? I would like very much to drop by.
Cheers,
Andre
#499

My Feedback: (7)
Norm: There is no constuction manual specifically for the T2K that I know of. There is (was) a book, "Building a Pattern Plane," that outlined construction of an earlier version of the T2K that is very helpful. The problem is that it is out of print and hard to find. Few (including me) want to part with their copies. Keep checking on RCU and E-bay.
There is a LOT of good information on constructing the T2K here:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_41.../tm.htm#418054
This thread or the one above are good places to ask questions about this plane. It is a great flying plane. I love mine!
There is a LOT of good information on constructing the T2K here:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_41.../tm.htm#418054
This thread or the one above are good places to ask questions about this plane. It is a great flying plane. I love mine!



