Airfoil for F3A
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
I want to build new wing on my F3A and I don´t know which airfoil use to precision aerobatics and good spin-rolls. And can you recommend me root and tip dimensions? I plan Wing Span 1980mm.
Pls, sorry my English. I´m from Czech Republic.
Pls, sorry my English. I´m from Czech Republic.
#2
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: -.--.-..---..---.-.-.-....-.., FINLAND
Hi MadBox,
There been some interest on airfoils recently, I cannot find proper thread just now.
Try this search [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/searchpro.asp?phrase=airfoil&fuzzyMatch=on&author= &forumid=101&topicreply=combined&message=both&time frame=%3E&timefilter=0&language=single&top=500&cri teria=AND&minRank=0&sortMethod=d&submitbutton=+OK+]link[/link]
There been some interest on airfoils recently, I cannot find proper thread just now.
Try this search [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/searchpro.asp?phrase=airfoil&fuzzyMatch=on&author= &forumid=101&topicreply=combined&message=both&time frame=%3E&timefilter=0&language=single&top=500&cri teria=AND&minRank=0&sortMethod=d&submitbutton=+OK+]link[/link]
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
Thanks, I had NACA 63A012, it was great airfoil, but with this airfoil I cannot do good spin roll. Somebody told me that with this airfoil it is hard to do spin roll. So I am looking for soma another airfoil. Do you think that NACA0012 will be better?
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodstock, GA
ORIGINAL: MadBox
Thanks, I had NACA 63A012, it was great airfoil, but with this airfoil I cannot do good spin roll. Somebody told me that with this airfoil it is hard to do spin roll. So I am looking for soma another airfoil. Do you think that NACA0012 will be better?
Thanks, I had NACA 63A012, it was great airfoil, but with this airfoil I cannot do good spin roll. Somebody told me that with this airfoil it is hard to do spin roll. So I am looking for soma another airfoil. Do you think that NACA0012 will be better?
-Mike
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Woodstock, GA
The tip and taper is where you get to play 
Some people like a really thick tip, some like a really thin tip. Both have different characteristics; the best I can say is try one and go fly it, see how you like it. if it's not what you want, change it. You can spend a lifetime playing with airfoils. And still find yourself drawing the same conclusion: it doesn't matter all that much.
-Mike

Some people like a really thick tip, some like a really thin tip. Both have different characteristics; the best I can say is try one and go fly it, see how you like it. if it's not what you want, change it. You can spend a lifetime playing with airfoils. And still find yourself drawing the same conclusion: it doesn't matter all that much.
-Mike
#7

Do you mean snap roll when you say spin roll? (or another way is to call it a flick roll---same thing as a snap roll)
If you do, then plan form and wing loading are more important than the section, but, for what it's worth 64012 at the root and down to 64009 at the tip works well in my hands at least.
If you do, then plan form and wing loading are more important than the section, but, for what it's worth 64012 at the root and down to 64009 at the tip works well in my hands at least.
#8
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
ORIGINAL: MHester
The tip and taper is where you get to play
Some people like a really thick tip, some like a really thin tip. Both have different characteristics; the best I can say is try one and go fly it, see how you like it. if it's not what you want, change it. You can spend a lifetime playing with airfoils. And still find yourself drawing the same conclusion: it doesn't matter all that much.
-Mike
The tip and taper is where you get to play

Some people like a really thick tip, some like a really thin tip. Both have different characteristics; the best I can say is try one and go fly it, see how you like it. if it's not what you want, change it. You can spend a lifetime playing with airfoils. And still find yourself drawing the same conclusion: it doesn't matter all that much.
-Mike
I want to bulid new wing on my F3A Atlantis, because old wing are so heavy and it is hard to make nice snap roll with them.

This is my model.
#9
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
ORIGINAL: f3a05
Do you mean snap roll when you say spin roll? (or another way is to call it a flick roll---same thing as a snap roll)
If you do, then plan form and wing loading are more important than the section, but, for what it's worth 64012 at the root and down to 64009 at the tip works well in my hands at least.
Do you mean snap roll when you say spin roll? (or another way is to call it a flick roll---same thing as a snap roll)
If you do, then plan form and wing loading are more important than the section, but, for what it's worth 64012 at the root and down to 64009 at the tip works well in my hands at least.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: USA
"planform" is normally the outline of the plane if viewed from above-----as most aircraft plans are presented this way it becomes the "planform" view.
"Section" is another way of referring to the airfoil chosen. If you took a completed wing and cut vertically through it and then viewed the cut from its side you have a "section". It means the same as the airfoil outline.
Hope this helps.
"Section" is another way of referring to the airfoil chosen. If you took a completed wing and cut vertically through it and then viewed the cut from its side you have a "section". It means the same as the airfoil outline.
Hope this helps.
#12
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
ORIGINAL: onewasp
"planform" is normally the outline of the plane if viewed from above-----as most aircraft plans are presented this way it becomes the "planform" view.
"Section" is another way of referring to the airfoil chosen. If you took a completed wing and cut vertically through it and then viewed the cut from its side you have a "section". It means the same as the airfoil outline.
Hope this helps.
"planform" is normally the outline of the plane if viewed from above-----as most aircraft plans are presented this way it becomes the "planform" view.
"Section" is another way of referring to the airfoil chosen. If you took a completed wing and cut vertically through it and then viewed the cut from its side you have a "section". It means the same as the airfoil outline.
Hope this helps.
#13

Looking at your nice pictures of your Atlantis, and reading that your present wings are heavy, I would guess that the weight of the wing is the problem.
Is the problem that it is difficult to make the snap stop at the right place?
If so, a wing panel that is lighter, especially out towards the tip, will make the snap roll much easier to start and stop, and is more important than the airfoil used.
Is the problem that it is difficult to make the snap stop at the right place?
If so, a wing panel that is lighter, especially out towards the tip, will make the snap roll much easier to start and stop, and is more important than the airfoil used.
#14
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
ORIGINAL: f3a05
Looking at your nice pictures of your Atlantis, and reading that your present wings are heavy, I would guess that the weight of the wing is the problem.
Is the problem that it is difficult to make the snap stop at the right place?
If so, a wing panel that is lighter, especially out towards the tip, will make the snap roll much easier to start and stop, and is more important than the airfoil used.
Looking at your nice pictures of your Atlantis, and reading that your present wings are heavy, I would guess that the weight of the wing is the problem.
Is the problem that it is difficult to make the snap stop at the right place?
If so, a wing panel that is lighter, especially out towards the tip, will make the snap roll much easier to start and stop, and is more important than the airfoil used.
Right wing: 550 grams
Left wing : 545 grams
So I think that it is too much and I would to have 350-400 grams. So I will try to make a smaller wing.
Can you recommend me wing loadnig ? I'm not sure how big should be the wings.
#15

The current generation of "2 metre" f3a models snap better than earlier ones, and they have smaller wings
than your Atlantis.
Have a look at the designs for Oxalys, Beryl, Integral(New Stephane Carrier model @ Zn Line), Genesis---They'll all have wing spans near 74 inches (1.88 metres) and wing area about 950 square inches(sorry, don't know metric for that!)
But---have you tried different control settings just for snaps? My Abbra (Made in the Czech Republic!) is OK for single snaps on my normal flight settings, but needs much more aileron. a little more elevator, and less rudder for anything more than one.
than your Atlantis.
Have a look at the designs for Oxalys, Beryl, Integral(New Stephane Carrier model @ Zn Line), Genesis---They'll all have wing spans near 74 inches (1.88 metres) and wing area about 950 square inches(sorry, don't know metric for that!)
But---have you tried different control settings just for snaps? My Abbra (Made in the Czech Republic!) is OK for single snaps on my normal flight settings, but needs much more aileron. a little more elevator, and less rudder for anything more than one.
#16
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
ORIGINAL: f3a05
The current generation of "2 metre" f3a models snap better than earlier ones, and they have smaller wings
than your Atlantis.
Have a look at the designs for Oxalys, Beryl, Integral(New Stephane Carrier model @ Zn Line), Genesis---They'll all have wing spans near 74 inches (1.88 metres) and wing area about 950 square inches(sorry, don't know metric for that!)
But---have you tried different control settings just for snaps? My Abbra (Made in the Czech Republic!) is OK for single snaps on my normal flight settings, but needs much more aileron. a little more elevator, and less rudder for anything more than one.
The current generation of "2 metre" f3a models snap better than earlier ones, and they have smaller wings
than your Atlantis.
Have a look at the designs for Oxalys, Beryl, Integral(New Stephane Carrier model @ Zn Line), Genesis---They'll all have wing spans near 74 inches (1.88 metres) and wing area about 950 square inches(sorry, don't know metric for that!)
But---have you tried different control settings just for snaps? My Abbra (Made in the Czech Republic!) is OK for single snaps on my normal flight settings, but needs much more aileron. a little more elevator, and less rudder for anything more than one.
But I have used OS160FX and the weight of my model is 4900grams (172.8 ounces) and I´m afraid of wing loading, because a lot of models(oxalys, Beryl,...) are more lighter (4300grams=151.6 ounces) What do you think, should i do quite larger wings?
I have tried everything and finally I must have a lot of ailerons and rudder and i little of elevator, but it still isn't right. My friend have Rhapsody(too from JM composite) and it do snap rolls much better than my Atlantis.
I know Abbra very well. And the models from JM Composite are the most used in czech pattern flying.
#17
Hello Madbox
Weight of each wing of my Partner (balsa foam with Oracover ) is 460 g totaly équiped. Carbon tube is 50 g.
I also had a Cocaine and Rhapsody (JM composite/ Modelltechnik-lorenz). Weight of each wing painted in mold) is about 450 g totaly equiped and carbon tube is 70 g.
Now wingspan is about 1,85m. End of wing is smaller than before about 200 to 210 mm.
A good airfoil is Eppler 168
http://epervier.sudluberon.free.fr/spp/21profil.htm
regards
Weight of each wing of my Partner (balsa foam with Oracover ) is 460 g totaly équiped. Carbon tube is 50 g.
I also had a Cocaine and Rhapsody (JM composite/ Modelltechnik-lorenz). Weight of each wing painted in mold) is about 450 g totaly equiped and carbon tube is 70 g.
Now wingspan is about 1,85m. End of wing is smaller than before about 200 to 210 mm.
A good airfoil is Eppler 168
http://epervier.sudluberon.free.fr/spp/21profil.htm
regards
#18
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
ORIGINAL: papaone
Hello Madbox
Weight of each wing of my Partner (balsa foam with Oracover ) is 460 g totaly équiped. Carbon tube is 50 g.
I also had a Cocaine and Rhapsody (JM composite/ Modelltechnik-lorenz). Weight of each wing painted in mold) is about 450 g totaly equiped and carbon tube is 70 g.
Now wingspan is about 1,85m. End of wing is smaller than before about 200 to 210 mm.
A good airfoil is Eppler 168
http://epervier.sudluberon.free.fr/spp/21profil.htm
regards
Hello Madbox
Weight of each wing of my Partner (balsa foam with Oracover ) is 460 g totaly équiped. Carbon tube is 50 g.
I also had a Cocaine and Rhapsody (JM composite/ Modelltechnik-lorenz). Weight of each wing painted in mold) is about 450 g totaly equiped and carbon tube is 70 g.
Now wingspan is about 1,85m. End of wing is smaller than before about 200 to 210 mm.
A good airfoil is Eppler 168
http://epervier.sudluberon.free.fr/spp/21profil.htm
regards
#19
Hello
I think you'll have no problem with weight about 5000 g and new small wings.
Now same pattern like Oxalys are set up with "electric motor and batteries " as they are set up with Yamada about 4600 g. They are near 4900 / 5000 g with same wings about 63 dm2 and there are no problem with wing load.
Claude
I think you'll have no problem with weight about 5000 g and new small wings.
Now same pattern like Oxalys are set up with "electric motor and batteries " as they are set up with Yamada about 4600 g. They are near 4900 / 5000 g with same wings about 63 dm2 and there are no problem with wing load.
Claude
#21
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: , FRANCE
ORIGINAL: MadBox
Thank you. It looks like great page, but I can't speak French. Know anybody similar page in English?
Thank you. It looks like great page, but I can't speak French. Know anybody similar page in English?
Manu
#23
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dvur Kralove, CZECH REPUBLIC
Yes there is a wing tube an my Atlantis. But I made new much smaller and lighter wings already. Now my Atlantis flies great.
#25
airfoils -a waste of time
make it as thin as you can and as light as you can and use at least a 2-1 taper ratio
The shape will be dictated by thickness and high point needed to prevent twist and flex.
The strongest lightest one you can get will be 1 lb foam with 1/16" thick 6 lb balsa welded on with a press to get an absolute 100% bond . epoxy OR ProBond either one done right works.
a cf wing tube and sleeve with top n bottom spars connecting top to tube to bottom - then extended out a few inches completes th job -do not stop th e tube and spar at same spot.
The completed covered assembled 1200sq in assy inc servos is under two lbs.
dun it over n over
snaps are a product of the model setup - you can snap a 20% airfoil if you setup for a quick pitch.
make it as thin as you can and as light as you can and use at least a 2-1 taper ratio
The shape will be dictated by thickness and high point needed to prevent twist and flex.
The strongest lightest one you can get will be 1 lb foam with 1/16" thick 6 lb balsa welded on with a press to get an absolute 100% bond . epoxy OR ProBond either one done right works.
a cf wing tube and sleeve with top n bottom spars connecting top to tube to bottom - then extended out a few inches completes th job -do not stop th e tube and spar at same spot.
The completed covered assembled 1200sq in assy inc servos is under two lbs.
dun it over n over
snaps are a product of the model setup - you can snap a 20% airfoil if you setup for a quick pitch.



