Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Scale Aircraft
 GP Ultimate .40 >

GP Ultimate .40

Community
Search
Notices
RC Scale Aircraft Discuss rc scale aircraft here (for giant scale see category above)

GP Ultimate .40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2004 | 06:19 PM
  #1  
dale691's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 591
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cairns, AUSTRALIA
Default GP Ultimate .40

I am interested in the GP ultimate, i havn'e built a kit since my trainer quite a few years ago, just wondering if anybody had an insight into the build and how the plane flies, this will also be my first Bi-plane aswell

Thanks
Old 12-27-2004 | 06:34 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Center of the Flyover States,
Default RE: GP Ultimate .40

As far as bipes go it should be a fairly straightforward build. The fuselage is jig locked and the cabanes are already built for you. They are not wire rods either which is nice to avoid. The fuselage is built like a brick firestation with dense balsa so if you can remove some wood here and there that is all for the better.
Old 12-27-2004 | 07:43 PM
  #3  
dale691's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 591
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cairns, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: GP Ultimate .40

Thanks for that will a thunder tiger 0.46 have enough power for it?
Old 12-28-2004 | 10:37 AM
  #4  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Center of the Flyover States,
Default RE: GP Ultimate .40

This model weighs in at about 90 - 106 ounces, but could be more with a larger engine, two servos in the wings etc. The TT.46 with a 10x6 probably puts out 85-90 ounces of thrust depending upon your elevation above sealevel. I'm too lazy to go to the map to see how close Adelaide is to the coast[&:] With an 11x5 prop and 15% nitro you might be able to get a little more umph out of the TT. So, it would fly it and you would be able to do your basic aerobatics.

Most say .60-.75 two strokes and .70-.91 four strokers are better with strong vertical performance.......much more satisfying. You need about a 1 to 1.3 weight to thrust ratio for "good" aerobatic capability. A 1:1 ratio +/- is only fair, but definately flyable.
Old 12-28-2004 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
dale691's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 591
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cairns, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: GP Ultimate .40

Thankyou for that i investigate it a bit more it's looking good so far for what i want
Old 12-28-2004 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Farmington Hills, MI
Default RE: GP Ultimate .40

Ultimate builds great and flys even better. I used an GMS.61 and it has plenty of power. Be careful with the wing incidences and the engine thrust line and the plane will fly very true. With the GMS engine, I didn't need any extra weight to balance out perfectly. I only use 10% nitro so unlimited verticals are not exactly unlimited, but very close. Plane gets lots of compliments at the fields I fly at.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.