New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
#1626
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbia City,
IN
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Hey Ron!
No I didn't go with Kelvins exhaust. At our new field, we are trying to keep the peace a little, so the neighbors don't tire of us too early! The Saito has a nice throaty growl in the air, and really sound nice and mean. Not to loud, but definitely authoritative.
Good luck with your continued flights. I sent off a note to HH about the gear, so we'll see what kind of response I get. In the meantime, Frankie will sit idle until a local Big Bird event later this month. Plenty to fly in the meantime!
No I didn't go with Kelvins exhaust. At our new field, we are trying to keep the peace a little, so the neighbors don't tire of us too early! The Saito has a nice throaty growl in the air, and really sound nice and mean. Not to loud, but definitely authoritative.
Good luck with your continued flights. I sent off a note to HH about the gear, so we'll see what kind of response I get. In the meantime, Frankie will sit idle until a local Big Bird event later this month. Plenty to fly in the meantime!
#1627
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ocilla, GA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: reincarnate
The engine issue has resolved itself with the replacement of the pack, and a slight richening of the HS needle. However a new and repetitive problem has surfaced yet again. Flew two flights this morning, one with chin cowl removed, and one with it back on, just to ensure temp wasn't a big problem. On landing the second time, after a smooth touchdown and taxi back, I brought it back in to check and refuel. As is my habit with the retracts, I lifted the nose and cycled them once, to insure they had not bent on landing. All good there, but when I dropped them back down I noticed that one side had slightly more toe in than normal. Upon inspection, I found that the weld that attaches the scissor to the strut had cracked, and a hard wiggle on the wheel finished the job. The weld simply separated from the strut. There was no adhesion of steel to steel. This is the second set of gear that I've had this problem on, and in the same place. A call to HH service found that evidently I am the only person that has ever bought this airplane that this has happened to. They have offered to inspect the gear and send me new set, but I think I'll fix it myself. I'm sure of my welding abilities. Heck, a JB weld probably would have more strength than this had.
Check your gear, and include this in your pre and thru flight checks. Mine wasn't a hard landing at all, in fact it was as smooth as any I ever done.
The engine issue has resolved itself with the replacement of the pack, and a slight richening of the HS needle. However a new and repetitive problem has surfaced yet again. Flew two flights this morning, one with chin cowl removed, and one with it back on, just to ensure temp wasn't a big problem. On landing the second time, after a smooth touchdown and taxi back, I brought it back in to check and refuel. As is my habit with the retracts, I lifted the nose and cycled them once, to insure they had not bent on landing. All good there, but when I dropped them back down I noticed that one side had slightly more toe in than normal. Upon inspection, I found that the weld that attaches the scissor to the strut had cracked, and a hard wiggle on the wheel finished the job. The weld simply separated from the strut. There was no adhesion of steel to steel. This is the second set of gear that I've had this problem on, and in the same place. A call to HH service found that evidently I am the only person that has ever bought this airplane that this has happened to. They have offered to inspect the gear and send me new set, but I think I'll fix it myself. I'm sure of my welding abilities. Heck, a JB weld probably would have more strength than this had.
Check your gear, and include this in your pre and thru flight checks. Mine wasn't a hard landing at all, in fact it was as smooth as any I ever done.
#1628
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Captianron.....I've not herard of over-revving either except in the case of having a motor too lean. Those "old-timers" probably are not used to the keleo exhaust note. You seeing a smoke trail at all? Using an 18x8, I doubt your over-revving. The motor is rated to 10,000 rpm's(and thats conservative from Horizon). Rips 220 is turing it at 8600 on the ground using an 18x8, so about 9200 in the air.
I've run an 18x12 on my 220 and its not near as broken in as Rip's is and Im getting about 7500, but I richened it down to about 7200. I've got some other props Im planning on testing as well..including an 18x10 MAS, 16x14 APC, 17x10 APC, and some 16x12's(APC and Menzjlik). I'd like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isnt turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
BTW..Im also running 15% and Rip is running 20
I've run an 18x12 on my 220 and its not near as broken in as Rip's is and Im getting about 7500, but I richened it down to about 7200. I've got some other props Im planning on testing as well..including an 18x10 MAS, 16x14 APC, 17x10 APC, and some 16x12's(APC and Menzjlik). I'd like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isnt turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
BTW..Im also running 15% and Rip is running 20
#1629
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frisco,
TX
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Cap'nRon,
The only way to know for sure is with a tach. I'm still sticking with the 16x12 APC at about 30 flights now. Just bought three more gallons of 20/20 fuel because of the pending shortage. We usually get two or three warbirds up at the same time, make high downwind legs, then dive down to the deck for those high speed passes 10 feet off the runway, then repeat. We usually don't get off full throttle unless we want to "form up" for a pass. I've gone through a bunch of props looking for the right combo. I have no plans of trying others now.
Also, I just received my scale exhaust from Tony Howard. Frankie is naked now (exhaust-less), so this is going to be SWEET. The parts and quality seem first class. I'll post some pics as I get it built and detailed.
Nick
The only way to know for sure is with a tach. I'm still sticking with the 16x12 APC at about 30 flights now. Just bought three more gallons of 20/20 fuel because of the pending shortage. We usually get two or three warbirds up at the same time, make high downwind legs, then dive down to the deck for those high speed passes 10 feet off the runway, then repeat. We usually don't get off full throttle unless we want to "form up" for a pass. I've gone through a bunch of props looking for the right combo. I have no plans of trying others now.
Also, I just received my scale exhaust from Tony Howard. Frankie is naked now (exhaust-less), so this is going to be SWEET. The parts and quality seem first class. I'll post some pics as I get it built and detailed.
Nick
#1630
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Quote:-like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isn't turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
Hi
running that prop at those revs should give you a good speed considering it unloads as the speed goes up .I would be surprised If going from what mine did that you would get it to go much faster .
How many vertical rolls does it do with that prop on ? mine did at least two with the 18*12 ,so with the extra torque of the 4 stroke I would expect you would be able to do more .
Regards .G
Hi
running that prop at those revs should give you a good speed considering it unloads as the speed goes up .I would be surprised If going from what mine did that you would get it to go much faster .
How many vertical rolls does it do with that prop on ? mine did at least two with the 18*12 ,so with the extra torque of the 4 stroke I would expect you would be able to do more .
Regards .G
#1631
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Collins,
CO
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: kahloq
Captianron.....I've not herard of over-revving either except in the case of having a motor too lean. Those "old-timers" probably are not used to the keleo exhaust note. You seeing a smoke trail at all? Using an 18x8, I doubt your over-revving. The motor is rated to 10,000 rpm's(and thats conservative from Horizon). Rips 220 is turing it at 8600 on the ground using an 18x8, so about 9200 in the air.
I've run an 18x12 on my 220 and its not near as broken in as Rip's is and Im getting about 7500, but I richened it down to about 7200. I've got some other props Im planning on testing as well..including an 18x10 MAS, 16x14 APC, 17x10 APC, and some 16x12's(APC and Menzjlik). I'd like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isnt turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
BTW..Im also running 15% and Rip is running 20
Captianron.....I've not herard of over-revving either except in the case of having a motor too lean. Those "old-timers" probably are not used to the keleo exhaust note. You seeing a smoke trail at all? Using an 18x8, I doubt your over-revving. The motor is rated to 10,000 rpm's(and thats conservative from Horizon). Rips 220 is turing it at 8600 on the ground using an 18x8, so about 9200 in the air.
I've run an 18x12 on my 220 and its not near as broken in as Rip's is and Im getting about 7500, but I richened it down to about 7200. I've got some other props Im planning on testing as well..including an 18x10 MAS, 16x14 APC, 17x10 APC, and some 16x12's(APC and Menzjlik). I'd like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isnt turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
BTW..Im also running 15% and Rip is running 20
Frankly (I love using that word in this thread!), the old-timers have probably NEVER heard a 4-stroke as large as the Saito 220 with an exhaust note as "interesting" as the Keleo single-pipe Pitts. It's truly a unique sound! And, I've also not had anyone at either of our club's airfields suggest the Saito is over-revving, and I doubt it is. No way my 220 is going from 8600 static to over 10,000 when it unloads in the air! I think your 9200 is a good estimate.
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
It is no big deal in the high-powered rocketry hobby field to have an on-board device (~$60) that measures local altitude when armed on the launch pad (and just prior to launch), senses/records altitude 10 times per second on the ascent, and, when the ambient atmospheric pressure detected begins to increase (ie, rocket has arced past it's apogee and has begun to descend), it sets off an electronic event that will eject a drogue chute just past apogee, say, 15K feet AGL, then wait during it's rather rapid descent (minimizes downwind drift) until the rocket is 1200' above it's initial launch altitude, and then set off a second electronic event that blows out the main recovery parachute for a soft landing. Oh, and did I mention it will beep out (or download over USB) the maximum altitude obtained during the flight? Pardon the pun, but this stuff is no longer "rocket science!"
I think on-board telemetry is a golden opportunity in this hobby...
Rip
#1632
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: GSK
original: Kahloq
like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isn't turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
Hi
running that prop at those revs should give you a good speed considering it unloads as the speed goes up .I would be surprised If going from what mine did that you would get it to go much faster .
How many vertical rolls does it do with that prop on ? mine did at least two with the 18*12 ,so with the extra torque of the 4 stroke I would expect you would be able to do more .
Regards .G
like to see the rpm's back in the 8300+ range and right now, my motor isn't turning the 18x12 fast enough for my comfort, but I dont want a lower pitch then 10, would prefer 12 or better.
Hi
running that prop at those revs should give you a good speed considering it unloads as the speed goes up .I would be surprised If going from what mine did that you would get it to go much faster .
How many vertical rolls does it do with that prop on ? mine did at least two with the 18*12 ,so with the extra torque of the 4 stroke I would expect you would be able to do more .
Regards .G
#1633
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Collins,
CO
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: frisconick
Cap'nRon,
The only way to know for sure is with a tach. I'm still sticking with the 16x12 APC at about 30 flights now. Just bought three more gallons of 20/20 fuel because of the pending shortage. We usually get two or three warbirds up at the same time, make high downwind legs, then dive down to the deck for those high speed passes 10 feet off the runway, then repeat. We usually don't get off full throttle unless we want to "form up" for a pass. I've gone through a bunch of props looking for the right combo. I have no plans of trying others now.
Also, I just received my scale exhaust from Tony Howard. Frankie is naked now (exhaust-less), so this is going to be SWEET. The parts and quality seem first class. I'll post some pics as I get it built and detailed.
Nick
Cap'nRon,
The only way to know for sure is with a tach. I'm still sticking with the 16x12 APC at about 30 flights now. Just bought three more gallons of 20/20 fuel because of the pending shortage. We usually get two or three warbirds up at the same time, make high downwind legs, then dive down to the deck for those high speed passes 10 feet off the runway, then repeat. We usually don't get off full throttle unless we want to "form up" for a pass. I've gone through a bunch of props looking for the right combo. I have no plans of trying others now.
Also, I just received my scale exhaust from Tony Howard. Frankie is naked now (exhaust-less), so this is going to be SWEET. The parts and quality seem first class. I'll post some pics as I get it built and detailed.
Nick
I'm switching to my already-owned 18x10 MAS this weekend, but, based upon your recommendation, I'm going to order a 16x12 at my first opportunity.
LOL! You're less paranoid than I am! I just bought SIX gallons of 20/20 fuel, fearing the worst with regard to the nitro shortage.
May I be proven wrong!
Rip
#1634
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Rip...maybe dont order a 16x12 yet. I have several of them on hand so we can try them at the field. Once you determine whether or not you like it, then spend your money.
I have:
3 x 16x12's APC
1 x 16x12 Menjzlik carbon-fiber
2 x 16x14's APC
2 x 17x10's APC
1 x 18x6 Zinger wood
1 x 18x10 MAS nylon/glass
1 x 18x12 menjzlik carbon-fiber(already flown......no problems taxing either...didnt want to race down the runway just trying to taxi)
I have:
3 x 16x12's APC
1 x 16x12 Menjzlik carbon-fiber
2 x 16x14's APC
2 x 17x10's APC
1 x 18x6 Zinger wood
1 x 18x10 MAS nylon/glass
1 x 18x12 menjzlik carbon-fiber(already flown......no problems taxing either...didnt want to race down the runway just trying to taxi)
#1635
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Quote :-
The numbers should indicate good speed, but it didnt seem to be running that fast once airborne. I doubt it unloaded much....maybe due to the extreme light weight of the prop itself. I wasnt comfortable enough with how it was flying and how the engine was sounding to try any vertical rolls. Now my friends electric with the 18x12 apc could do 4 or more rolls vertically and still keep climbing
Don,t you just hate that , I love the verticals , but you have It all over him with the sound, wait until you see that long stream of smoke coming out of it when the Controller fries itself
(hope that it does,nt ) but I have had that happen with a couple of electric aircraft I was test flying for a mate , Looks great but the result was not good , managed to get them back onto the ground O:K but he had to put the fire out Inside very quickly .
I have seen several batteries go up in smoke
The numbers should indicate good speed, but it didnt seem to be running that fast once airborne. I doubt it unloaded much....maybe due to the extreme light weight of the prop itself. I wasnt comfortable enough with how it was flying and how the engine was sounding to try any vertical rolls. Now my friends electric with the 18x12 apc could do 4 or more rolls vertically and still keep climbing
Don,t you just hate that , I love the verticals , but you have It all over him with the sound, wait until you see that long stream of smoke coming out of it when the Controller fries itself
(hope that it does,nt ) but I have had that happen with a couple of electric aircraft I was test flying for a mate , Looks great but the result was not good , managed to get them back onto the ground O:K but he had to put the fire out Inside very quickly .
I have seen several batteries go up in smoke
#1636
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Collins,
CO
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: kahloq
Rip...maybe dont order a 16x12 yet. I have several of them on hand so we can try them at the field. Once you determine whether or not you like it, then spend your money.
I have:
3 x 16x12's APC
1 x 16x12 Menjzlik carbon-fiber
2 x 16x14's APC
2 x 17x10's APC
1 x 18x6 Zinger wood
1 x 18x10 MAS nylon/glass
1 x 18x12 menjzlik carbon-fiber(already flown......no problems taxing either...didnt want to race down the runway just trying to taxi)
Rip...maybe dont order a 16x12 yet. I have several of them on hand so we can try them at the field. Once you determine whether or not you like it, then spend your money.
I have:
3 x 16x12's APC
1 x 16x12 Menjzlik carbon-fiber
2 x 16x14's APC
2 x 17x10's APC
1 x 18x6 Zinger wood
1 x 18x10 MAS nylon/glass
1 x 18x12 menjzlik carbon-fiber(already flown......no problems taxing either...didnt want to race down the runway just trying to taxi)
If we get good flying weather on Saturday PM or Sunday AM, let's try out one or two.
I'll swap out to my MAS 18x10 before the weekend, try it, then I'd like to try one of your 16x12 APC's.
It's too late, and I'm too lazy to re-read your earlier posts on this; have you tried the 16x14 or 17x10 APC's?
Rip
#1637
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
I have not tested the 16x14 or the 17x10 yet, althouhg I do have a 16x14 mounted on the plane now. Im gonna test run the motor tomorrow here at the house with that prop on it see what I get.
BTW....here's a couple flyby dirty passes from the last flight a week ago.
BTW....here's a couple flyby dirty passes from the last flight a week ago.
#1638
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbia City,
IN
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Rip n Bank Date 7/7/2008 11:26:58 PM
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
#1639
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frisco,
TX
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Anxious to here the results of the 16x14. It's the only one I haven't tried yet. Don't forget to reset the high speed mix with each prop change. Let us know how it goes.
Thanks,
Nick
Thanks,
Nick
#1640
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Collins,
CO
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: reincarnate
Try [link=http://www.wingedshadow.com/products.html]here[/link] Rip. I've always wanted to try a couple of these gizmos, but a different "need" always seems to show up. Let me know if you get one. I'd like to know how they work.
Rip n Bank Date 7/7/2008 11:26:58 PM
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
They don't appear to make an on-board RPM recorder, but I pinged them with an email inquiring about any plans for such a product.
Cheers!
Rip
#1641
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Burlington, NJ
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: Rip n Bank
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
OK, now, who makes an on-board device that can record at least a couple of minutes of RPM data from an optical pickup attached to cowl of Frankie, then, once back on the ground, allows you to download the data to a PC over a USB link?
http://www.eagletreesystems.com/MicroPower/micro.htm
It's made for eflite, but you can get sensors for rpm, alt, airspeed, throttle setting, gps, etc and you should be able to use it on fuel planes without any trouble.
#1643
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbia City,
IN
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: kiosk
hey guys, putting together Frankie (second one) dont recall where this part belongs, dont seem to find in manual...what is it?
hey guys, putting together Frankie (second one) dont recall where this part belongs, dont seem to find in manual...what is it?
#1644
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
THANKS FOR THE INPUT GUYS!
Ordered an 18x8 black Zoar to try at our Warbirds in August. I not as adventerous as some of you. I just want to make sure I'm not over revving her and taking a chance on seeing the piston floating down while I'm nogotiation a dead stick.
NICE PIX RANDY, SHE LOOKS GREAT IN THE AIR ON THOSE FLY BY'S. Too bad RIP N BANK hasn't got a good camera man. Still never seen his in the air. HAS IT REALLY BEEN AIRBORNE? ROTFL!!!!!! I know I'll get to see it fly right beside mine at Warbirds over Pueblo. ROCK AND ROLL BABY!!!!
DANG! I LOVE THIS HOBBY............................................. .........................CAPTAIN RON.
Ordered an 18x8 black Zoar to try at our Warbirds in August. I not as adventerous as some of you. I just want to make sure I'm not over revving her and taking a chance on seeing the piston floating down while I'm nogotiation a dead stick.
NICE PIX RANDY, SHE LOOKS GREAT IN THE AIR ON THOSE FLY BY'S. Too bad RIP N BANK hasn't got a good camera man. Still never seen his in the air. HAS IT REALLY BEEN AIRBORNE? ROTFL!!!!!! I know I'll get to see it fly right beside mine at Warbirds over Pueblo. ROCK AND ROLL BABY!!!!
DANG! I LOVE THIS HOBBY............................................. .........................CAPTAIN RON.
#1645
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: captainron
THANKS FOR THE INPUT GUYS!
Ordered an 18x8 black Zoar to try at our Warbirds in August. I not as adventerous as some of you. I just want to make sure I'm not over revving her and taking a chance on seeing the piston floating down while I'm nogotiation a dead stick.
NICE PIX RANDY, SHE LOOKS GREAT IN THE AIR ON THOSE FLY BY'S. Too bad RIP N BANK hasn't got a good camera man. Still never seen his in the air. HAS IT REALLY BEEN AIRBORNE? ROTFL!!!!!! I know I'll get to see it fly right beside mine at Warbirds over Pueblo. ROCK AND ROLL BABY!!!!
DANG! I LOVE THIS HOBBY............................................. .........................CAPTAIN RON.
THANKS FOR THE INPUT GUYS!
Ordered an 18x8 black Zoar to try at our Warbirds in August. I not as adventerous as some of you. I just want to make sure I'm not over revving her and taking a chance on seeing the piston floating down while I'm nogotiation a dead stick.
NICE PIX RANDY, SHE LOOKS GREAT IN THE AIR ON THOSE FLY BY'S. Too bad RIP N BANK hasn't got a good camera man. Still never seen his in the air. HAS IT REALLY BEEN AIRBORNE? ROTFL!!!!!! I know I'll get to see it fly right beside mine at Warbirds over Pueblo. ROCK AND ROLL BABY!!!!
DANG! I LOVE THIS HOBBY............................................. .........................CAPTAIN RON.
#1646
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Ok...so...I test flew the plane with a 16x14 APC on it. Its not performing as Id hoped. I got no better then 7200 rpm's out of it. Thats the same basic rpm level I got with the 18x12. And honestly, the plane didnt seem to fly very well on the 16x14. To my eyes, it seemed to kinda wallow around. It never got into the peak rpm range so speed just never seemed to be there at all. I was so uncomfortable with how it was flying that I landed after only the 2nd pass. Im sure it would have flow ok for the full tank, but it just seemed like it was struggling to maintain decent flying speed. I think once in the air, the high pitch might be overloading the motor(obviously not over-revving sicne its only getting 7200 on the ground, just too much pitch for the motor).
I will try a 16x12 later today hopefully. I will also bring along the 17x10 and try that if need be as well as bring along an 18x6 Zinger that was on the motor in a different plane.
And yes, I have been taching it after each prop change and adjusting the high speed needle.
I will try a 16x12 later today hopefully. I will also bring along the 17x10 and try that if need be as well as bring along an 18x6 Zinger that was on the motor in a different plane.
And yes, I have been taching it after each prop change and adjusting the high speed needle.
#1648
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Collins,
CO
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: reincarnate
It's the "scale" radio antennae. Leave it off, or break it off the first time you load it in the trailer!
ORIGINAL: kiosk
hey guys, putting together Frankie (second one) dont recall where this part belongs, dont seem to find in manual...what is it?
hey guys, putting together Frankie (second one) dont recall where this part belongs, dont seem to find in manual...what is it?
Yeah, when I was building Frankie, I picked up that "antenna" out of the box, flexed it, and said "Oh, yeah, right." and tossed it in the trash bin!
Ironically, I eventually resolved my range test issues with Frankie by incorporating a functional Dean's mast antenna in the same place as the scale antenna location.
Rip
#1649
My Feedback: (21)
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
kahloq, so do you normally do landings with half flaps then, i noticed on your set of pics, which was on landing i believe. If it gives me better performance and stability on landing i will try to make this a habit, had one tip stall on landing and dont need it to happen again heh.
Thanks.
Loiue
Thanks.
Loiue
#1650
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Collins,
CO
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
ORIGINAL: kahloq
Captainron, here's Rips P-51 flying. I think I posted these on page 58 or something
Captainron, here's Rips P-51 flying. I think I posted these on page 58 or something
See there!
Neener, neener...
Rip