BME Edge?
#276

My Feedback: (25)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Greenville, PA
The covering is not as good in the hot sun as Monocote, mainly the black. Its not bad though, I would compare it to Ultracote to work with. In fact the colors match Ultracote best. It takes Ironing and heat gun well with out worry of burning. The only thing I did was replace the black on the wing and now all is fine. So far it seem like it will hold up well. I've seen ARF's with covering that is not near this quality.
#278
Well, I have it finished. I am not real happy with the balance, but everything else came out nice. The balance is 5 1/2" back from the LE at the fuse. To you guys that are flying this, is that safe? I like a fairly tail heavy plane, but I don't want something that is going to be dangerous. I can replace that stock tail wheel setup, but that is not going to move the cg much. I checked the cg without the tail wheel on there and it only advanced it a little. I don't want to add lead cause it is already 17.2 lbs, but I don't want a terrible handling airplane either. I know some of these manufactures cg are real conservative, and I hope thats the case on this one. Should be able to try it out when the weather clears a little.
#279
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lake Metigoshe,
MB, CANADA
Hi Bryant your cg at 5 1/2 will be fine. I flew mine at 5 3/4 today and it was good, hover alot better then when i had it at 5 1/4. I see you weight with the Brison is close to mine 17.5lb, maybe i not crazy after all
Are you running 2 receiver batterys and what muffler?
Are you running 2 receiver batterys and what muffler?
#282
I will be sure to give a flight report for you guys. We need more reports on this plane so others can decide for or against it. Thanks for the info Y N C. That eases my mind on the cg issue. Thanks for compliments also. I think this covering scheme is more exciting than the stock one.
#283
Senior Member
My Feedback: (99)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: frisco,
TX
ORIGINAL: Bryant330L
I don't want to add lead cause it is already 17.2 lbs, but I don't want a terrible handling airplane either.
I don't want to add lead cause it is already 17.2 lbs, but I don't want a terrible handling airplane either.
#284
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alta Loma, CA
ORIGINAL: bodymann
I thought these planes were suppose to come in @ 15 lbs..............What happened
I thought these planes were suppose to come in @ 15 lbs..............What happened
#286
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lake Metigoshe,
MB, CANADA
BME claim the plane is no more than 15.5 or 16lbs, but the plane comes out of the box with little hardware that came with it is 10lb 5oz, by the time you add engine , radio equiments, and the rest of the hardwares its going to be 17 +lbs. It's still a great flying plane, just a little dispointed of the weight. Maybe their scale only goes to 15.5lbs.
#287
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alta Loma, CA
ORIGINAL: Y N C
BME claim the plane is no more than 15.5 or 16lbs, but the plane comes out of the box with little hardware that came with it is 10lb 5oz, by the time you add engine , radio equiments, and the rest of the hardwares its going to be 17 +lbs. It's still a great flying plane, just a little dispointed of the weight. Maybe their scale only goes to 15.5lbs.
BME claim the plane is no more than 15.5 or 16lbs, but the plane comes out of the box with little hardware that came with it is 10lb 5oz, by the time you add engine , radio equiments, and the rest of the hardwares its going to be 17 +lbs. It's still a great flying plane, just a little dispointed of the weight. Maybe their scale only goes to 15.5lbs.
#289
Senior Member
My Feedback: (33)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oxford, MS
You all need to remeber that a BME 50cc only wieghts in at 3.0lbs that leaves 2 lbs for the rest of the stuff. I think it can come in at 15.5lbs with the right engine and equipment.
What engine are you guys using that came in at 17lbs ??? And what batteries ??
Chad
What engine are you guys using that came in at 17lbs ??? And what batteries ??
Chad
#290
I have a Brison 3.2 for power, 1200 NiMH for rx and the same for ign. Motor weight is not really too much of an issue on mine because I am still tail heavy. If my motor was lighter I would still have to add weight. I don't put too much stock in manufacturers weight because they are hardly ever right. There is no way to get this plane anywhere close to the 14lbs that they have listed on the bottom end of their scale. I know mine could be lighter but it would take redoing the plane to get the weight up front.
#291
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alta Loma, CA
3-lbs is probably for a bare engine. Its more like 4-lbs ready to fly (pitts muffler, ignition and battery included). I just don't see any coming in under 16-lbs, with something closer to 17-lbs the norm. Again, these planes will be awesome at 17-lbs so its not a big deal. I just take exception to false claims.
#292
Senior Member
My Feedback: (33)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oxford, MS
I'am not defending them , i agree that manfactures cannot tell the whole truth!! I just am fixin to order one of these and trying to get all the info i can and the best plane !!!
I was wondering if someone would mind measuring one wing half for me on there BME edge, I need the legnth and the width of the root and the tip. I'am just wanting to know the real wing area of this plane .
One place that i have found is that manafactures cannot tell the truth about wing area!! They usually include the fuse there and some even just add the tail in for good measure. When the only thing that actually flies is the wing itself ..... It is what holds the plane in the air the rest of the plane just controls the wing. Any way if some one would measure that i would appreciate it.
Chad
I was wondering if someone would mind measuring one wing half for me on there BME edge, I need the legnth and the width of the root and the tip. I'am just wanting to know the real wing area of this plane .
One place that i have found is that manafactures cannot tell the truth about wing area!! They usually include the fuse there and some even just add the tail in for good measure. When the only thing that actually flies is the wing itself ..... It is what holds the plane in the air the rest of the plane just controls the wing. Any way if some one would measure that i would appreciate it.
Chad
#296
Senior Member
My Feedback: (33)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oxford, MS
Well i figured the wing area for the BME. It has 1148.52 square inches of wing area. That is not too bad. Now that is real wing area no cheating and just the wing.
17lbs , 1148.52 wing area, yikes wing loading kinda high !!!! Has anyone done some high alpha stuff with this plane yet ?
Chad
17lbs , 1148.52 wing area, yikes wing loading kinda high !!!! Has anyone done some high alpha stuff with this plane yet ?
Chad
#298
Senior Member
My Feedback: (33)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oxford, MS
I do believe that my math is correct , are you going by what is advertised or did you measure the wing ? I have found that advertised wing area includes the fuse. As we all know the fuse does not fly the wing does! the rest of the plain just holds the wing and controls it. If i'am wrong please correct me !
Chad
Chad
#299
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lake Metigoshe,
MB, CANADA
Bryant330l flew the Edge today with cg at 6inch from leading edge, that's balance at the middle of the wing tube and it still very stable, hover and TR alot better too. The only thing I notice it has little more coupling during knift edge, other than that its the nices plane I had flowen so far.
#300
Well, I got to fly mine today also. My cg is still at 5 1/2 and it is good there. The plane is very stable in a harrier. It is a really nice flyer for a plane this size. It flys a little like my 34% Extra but just not quite as stable in some 3d stuff. Harrier rolls are nice and pretty much everything else it too. My Brison gave it unlimited vertical, but it does not "rocket" out of a hover. My only real concern with this plane is the lack of rudder authority. It didn't seem like it had very much. Maybe I don't have enough servo on it. I am running a Hitec 700 on 6v, which has 161 oz of torque. I would think that would be plenty. For you guys on the fence about buying this one... I give it a thumbs up. Particleman here on rcu flew it for a little while too, maybe he will give his opinion on how it flys.



testing