Super Skybolt ARF
#376
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Columbia,
TN
Yep... I saw your review and video..... great job on that
Looks like the OS has excellent verticle... I am sure it has gotten more power since then... takes a few gallons on the OS before it starts pulling hard
Thanks MinnFlyer
SDS
Looks like the OS has excellent verticle... I am sure it has gotten more power since then... takes a few gallons on the OS before it starts pulling hard
Thanks MinnFlyer
SDS
#379
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Columbia,
TN
Hi MinnFlyer....
I really think that is the hot set up for this bird. Are you running your tank on cg? What size tank and how much runtime?
Thanks,
SDS
I really think that is the hot set up for this bird. Are you running your tank on cg? What size tank and how much runtime?
Thanks,
SDS
#381
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Elk River, MN
Minn: I fairly confident you could build a removable smoke "tray" that would hold the pump tank and battery right where the stock receiver and battery location is. This would be the smoke system on the CG with minimal change whether you have it in or not...
Just my .02.
Just my .02.
#386
Senior Member
Here are some pics of mine now that it's complete and ready to maiden.
What's the concensus on the CofG? With the battery in the standard location my CofG is a finger's width behind the suggested mark. It takes 4oz of lead just behind the firewall to ballance.
I could move the battery forward so i don't have to use the lead, but i'm reluctant to do so if the recommended setting is conservative and i'm only going to have to move it back.
I'm thinking i'll stick the 4Oz of lead in the nose and remove 1/2Oz at a time until i'm satisfied. Then i'll experiment with battery locations to find one which gives me the same CofG without needing lead.
Update: It flies great with the battery in the stock location and no additional lead in the nose. My motor/muffler weighs in at 25.4oz (720gm).
What's the concensus on the CofG? With the battery in the standard location my CofG is a finger's width behind the suggested mark. It takes 4oz of lead just behind the firewall to ballance.
I could move the battery forward so i don't have to use the lead, but i'm reluctant to do so if the recommended setting is conservative and i'm only going to have to move it back.
I'm thinking i'll stick the 4Oz of lead in the nose and remove 1/2Oz at a time until i'm satisfied. Then i'll experiment with battery locations to find one which gives me the same CofG without needing lead.
Update: It flies great with the battery in the stock location and no additional lead in the nose. My motor/muffler weighs in at 25.4oz (720gm).
#387
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Melbourne Victoria, AUSTRALIA
Custom, you could use a 1 oz weight in the spinner, or a heavy nut, and that would go close to puttin the CofG in the right place for alot less added weight.
I picked up a Skybolt kit from an estate a couple of months back; finished the build up with just covering to go. I've weighed everything that will go into it including covering, and figure it will be 7.5 lbs ready to fly, before fuelling it up.
I have an OS .91 Surpass II for it. Hopefully be flying in a couple of months.
I picked up a Skybolt kit from an estate a couple of months back; finished the build up with just covering to go. I've weighed everything that will go into it including covering, and figure it will be 7.5 lbs ready to fly, before fuelling it up.
I have an OS .91 Surpass II for it. Hopefully be flying in a couple of months.
#389
Senior Member
What motor are you using now and how much does it weigh with pipe?
My motor weighs in at 720gm (25.4Oz) with the Turbo-Jett Muffler. I believe that is slightly heavier than the suggested 91 Surpass.
I've read some posts that say the suggested CofG is very conservative, and i've read just as many posts saying they moved the battery up to the front to achieve the suggested CofG and were happy with the way it flew.
My motor weighs in at 720gm (25.4Oz) with the Turbo-Jett Muffler. I believe that is slightly heavier than the suggested 91 Surpass.
I've read some posts that say the suggested CofG is very conservative, and i've read just as many posts saying they moved the battery up to the front to achieve the suggested CofG and were happy with the way it flew.
#390
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Meadville,
PA
CustomPC, I wouldn't say the CG is 'very' consertive, I'd say it is 'extremely' conservative. I have an OS .91 Surpass on mine and the have two 1100 Mah batteries located under the very rear of the fuel tank. I think I started out with 12 oz. of weight of lead on the firewall and ended up taking it all off.
#391
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Columbia,
TN
Sure would be nice to know where everybody is ending up on the cg
135mm is my best guess from reading the thread.
Hope everybody had a nice Thanksgiving
SDS
135mm is my best guess from reading the thread.
Hope everybody had a nice Thanksgiving
SDS
#393
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Meadville,
PA
ORIGINAL: sdstick06
Sure would be nice to know where everybody is ending up on the cg
135mm is my best guess from reading the thread.
Hope everybody had a nice Thanksgiving
SDS
Sure would be nice to know where everybody is ending up on the cg
135mm is my best guess from reading the thread.
Hope everybody had a nice Thanksgiving
SDS
#394
ORIGINAL: CustomPC
Here are some pics of mine now that it's complete and ready to maiden.
What's the concensus on the CofG? With the battery in the standard location my CofG is a finger's width behind the suggested mark. It takes 4oz of lead just behind the firewall to ballance.
I could move the battery forward so i don't have to use the lead, but i'm reluctant to do so if the recommended setting is conservative and i'm only going to have to move it back.
I'm thinking i'll stick the 4Oz of lead in the nose and remove 1/2Oz at a time until i'm satisfied. Then i'll experiment with battery locations to find one which gives me the same CofG without needing lead.
Here are some pics of mine now that it's complete and ready to maiden.
What's the concensus on the CofG? With the battery in the standard location my CofG is a finger's width behind the suggested mark. It takes 4oz of lead just behind the firewall to ballance.
I could move the battery forward so i don't have to use the lead, but i'm reluctant to do so if the recommended setting is conservative and i'm only going to have to move it back.
I'm thinking i'll stick the 4Oz of lead in the nose and remove 1/2Oz at a time until i'm satisfied. Then i'll experiment with battery locations to find one which gives me the same CofG without needing lead.
CustonPC you are the best!
I am waiting for a vid mate!
Kostas
#395
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Columbia,
TN
ORIGINAL: pkevinb
I just put mine together and measured the CG. I have mine at 5 3/4" back on the bottom of the upper wing. I think the manual calls for 4 5/8".
ORIGINAL: sdstick06
Sure would be nice to know where everybody is ending up on the cg
135mm is my best guess from reading the thread.
Hope everybody had a nice Thanksgiving
SDS
Sure would be nice to know where everybody is ending up on the cg
135mm is my best guess from reading the thread.
Hope everybody had a nice Thanksgiving
SDS
Is that measured from the leading edge back at the center of the wing.... or from the leading edge back ligning up with the side of the fuse? Did I say that right??
SDS
#397
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Elk River, MN
I'm surprised to hear about moving the CG back... While the stock one is conservative, this is not a 3D airplane and does not benefit much from a rearward CG. The snaps only get sloppier and the knife edge starts to couple. At the stock location, I could dang near get a flat spin to climb with a saito 1.25, Minn saw mine fly with a stock CG, I don't see a need to go any further back with it.
Now that being said, we all have different preferences, and I am a student of the game. Could you guys explain to me the benefits you are looking for when moving the CG back on this type of plane?!?!
Now that being said, we all have different preferences, and I am a student of the game. Could you guys explain to me the benefits you are looking for when moving the CG back on this type of plane?!?!
#398
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Meadville,
PA
My Skybolt was extremely nose heavy, landed hot, and required a lot of down elevator to fly inverted. I don't fly any 3D with it, and don't try. I mainly fly scale aerobatics with it. I can't fly knife edge well, but it seems to want to pull to the belly. I can't get it into a very flat upright spin even using cross controls. It does very nice tail-slides though. I simply had to move the CG back to get it to fly properly.
The Skybolt is my favorite plane to fly though. It is just smooth in everything it does and is just a pleasure to fly and watch in the air. I have a .40 size Ultimate and the Skybolt flies like a trainer compared to it. I like the Skybolt so much that I am going to get another to have just in case something ever happens to the one I have.
The Skybolt is my favorite plane to fly though. It is just smooth in everything it does and is just a pleasure to fly and watch in the air. I have a .40 size Ultimate and the Skybolt flies like a trainer compared to it. I like the Skybolt so much that I am going to get another to have just in case something ever happens to the one I have.
#399
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Columbia,
TN
The old but tried and true test for proper cg.....
go 3/4 throttle... roll to inverted... establish 45 degree upline... take your hands of the sticks (neutralize the controls) see what she does
If she maintains the 45 degree upline.... cg is right on
Nose drops... she is nose heavy
Tail drops... she is tail heavy
That's all there is to it... hope that helps
SDS
go 3/4 throttle... roll to inverted... establish 45 degree upline... take your hands of the sticks (neutralize the controls) see what she does
If she maintains the 45 degree upline.... cg is right on
Nose drops... she is nose heavy
Tail drops... she is tail heavy
That's all there is to it... hope that helps
SDS
#400
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Melbourne Victoria, AUSTRALIA
trixer, well I've weighed EVERYTHING that is going to go into the finshed aircraft, allowed .2 oz per sq ft for covering per specs; engine prop, spinner, spats, all went on the scales, and I came up with just under 7.5, so I'm figuring it won't go over that.
That's it hanging i my basement until I get back onto it which I hope will be soon.



