Pilot RC 73" Sbach
#151
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
I'm stil pretty timid with his thing so I haven't gone full throttle with it. Mid-throttle is pretty much where I stay. It balloons out of banked turns and balloons with the slightest addition of throttle at landing speed. If I release elevator on a nose down approach it will nose up and balloon pretty quickly as well.
#153
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
My original thought was that it was tail heavy so I moved weight forward. It is definitely nose heavy now compared to thw recommended CG. I'm really thinking it is a thrust issue....especially since I am the only one whose cowl doesn't line up with the spinner. My spinner appears to be "lower" than anyone elses. This suggests it might have too much down thrust.
#154
ORIGINAL: DonLEmmel
Great shot of your Sbach. I've got the same color scheme and it is simply a beautiful looking plane! The alignment of your spinner and your cowl makes me curious if mine somehow got down thrust in it. Mine tends to balloon on landings. I'm told this could be from too much down thrust.
Great shot of your Sbach. I've got the same color scheme and it is simply a beautiful looking plane! The alignment of your spinner and your cowl makes me curious if mine somehow got down thrust in it. Mine tends to balloon on landings. I'm told this could be from too much down thrust.
#156
Don,
I am running the dle too, and have 6oz of lead in the nose. Our planes sure are acting differently. Maybe yours does have extra downthrust that counteracts being more tailheavy than mine. Yours sounds like it is behaving pitch sensitive though. My guess is yours is not nose heavy. Just my 2cents. Jon
I am running the dle too, and have 6oz of lead in the nose. Our planes sure are acting differently. Maybe yours does have extra downthrust that counteracts being more tailheavy than mine. Yours sounds like it is behaving pitch sensitive though. My guess is yours is not nose heavy. Just my 2cents. Jon
#158
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
ORIGINAL: maukaonyx
Don,
I am running the dle too, and have 6oz of lead in the nose. Our planes sure are acting differently. Maybe yours does have extra downthrust that counteracts being more tailheavy than mine. Yours sounds like it is behaving pitch sensitive though. My guess is yours is not nose heavy. Just my 2cents. Jon
Don,
I am running the dle too, and have 6oz of lead in the nose. Our planes sure are acting differently. Maybe yours does have extra downthrust that counteracts being more tailheavy than mine. Yours sounds like it is behaving pitch sensitive though. My guess is yours is not nose heavy. Just my 2cents. Jon
#160
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
I added some up thrust and it no longer balloons on the landings. Actually, I think I can cut back just a little on the up thrust I added and it will be perfect. The initial few minutes of flight was interesting while I retrimmed because of the thrust angle change.
#162
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chardon,
OH
Can someone give me the distance from the firewall to where the backplate for the prop spinner is on the PILOT RC Sbach 342 73" wingspan aircraft. Want to order an engine but don't have the plane yet.
Thanks in advance
Greg
Thanks in advance
Greg
#163
<span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 9pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">DLE 30 v2 is the recommended engine and has a measurement of </span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: "Helvetica","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">6.37 in. [162 mm].
</span>
</span>
#166
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
Just finished rebuilding mine after a dead stick landing that ripped out the landing gear. Pilot RC provided laser cut parts to rebuild basically the front two-thirds of the plane. All I had to pay was shipping from China ($38). The laser cut parts were free. Plane looks almost as good as new. I'm converting to electric as part of the rebuild. Installing an E-Flite Power 160 to replace the DLE-30. The Power 160 will have tons more power than the DLE.
#167
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
I mounted the E-Flite Power 160 tonight. The spinner and the cowl lined up perfectly. The DLE-30, which this plane was designed for, didn't line up correctly. The Sbach never flew right with the DLE-30. It always had issues with ballooning on landings. I suspect that something was out of alignment on that frame. Since everything lines up properly on this rebuild I'm optimistic that the ballooning problem will go away.
#169
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
ORIGINAL: Sbach342Guy
I mounted the E-Flite Power 160 tonight. The spinner and the cowl lined up perfectly. The DLE-30, which this plane was designed for, didn't line up correctly. The Sbach never flew right with the DLE-30. It always had issues with ballooning on landings. I suspect that something was out of alignment on that frame. Since everything lines up properly on this rebuild I'm optimistic that the ballooning problem will go away.
I mounted the E-Flite Power 160 tonight. The spinner and the cowl lined up perfectly. The DLE-30, which this plane was designed for, didn't line up correctly. The Sbach never flew right with the DLE-30. It always had issues with ballooning on landings. I suspect that something was out of alignment on that frame. Since everything lines up properly on this rebuild I'm optimistic that the ballooning problem will go away.
I'm seriously thinking of trying e-power; this airplane would be a nice candidate, I think.
.
#170
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
I used to have a DLE-30 mounted on this plane so I used the included standoffs. The standoffs are 2.36" long. The nylon spacers are each 1/2" and can be found at most hardware stores. I still needed to add about 1/16" to the standoffs to get clearance for the spinner backplate. I used the X-mount that came with the E-Flite Power 160 to make a template for drilling mounting holes in the firewall.
#171
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Excellent, thanks.
Are stand-offs included in the kit, or with the motor? I haven't fully unpacked my kit yet; only took the fuselage and cowl out to check for engine fit, and it ain't looking good for anything but a small gasser or electric. The main problem, as noted in a post some pages back, is the darn firewall is not big enough for a proper motor mount on the larger two or four strokes. Plus, an inverted mount is the only way to go to preserve the cowl lines, and while I have operated inverted glow engines successfully, I'd simply rather not go through the hassle (on-board glow power, hold the airplane sideways or upside down while fueling/priming, etc.).
Then again, from what few quick checks I have done, the cost to get a sufficiently powerful electric set-up, with decent endurance, is... intimidating. Maybe I'm missing something, or looking at the wrong stuff, but Jeez, Louise. Much more research remains. Since I have several other IC projects waiting, I can take my time on this. But this is too nice an airplane not to at least try.
I have nothing against gasoline power, but it simply won't work for me. I have had a couple of 50cc gassers, and loved them. But when I got rid of my truck and bought a "cross-over" vehicle, I no longer have a place to carry the gas can outside of the passenger compartment. The stupid towing package- and the moonroof- are the ONLY options I did not get on my ride; otherwise, I'd get one of those basket things. No roof rack, either, so...
I dunno, glow fuel is only going to get more expensive, so I might like this e-power thing once I get comfortable with it. Hey... I'm just now getting a 2.4gHz radio, FWIW...
.
Are stand-offs included in the kit, or with the motor? I haven't fully unpacked my kit yet; only took the fuselage and cowl out to check for engine fit, and it ain't looking good for anything but a small gasser or electric. The main problem, as noted in a post some pages back, is the darn firewall is not big enough for a proper motor mount on the larger two or four strokes. Plus, an inverted mount is the only way to go to preserve the cowl lines, and while I have operated inverted glow engines successfully, I'd simply rather not go through the hassle (on-board glow power, hold the airplane sideways or upside down while fueling/priming, etc.).
Then again, from what few quick checks I have done, the cost to get a sufficiently powerful electric set-up, with decent endurance, is... intimidating. Maybe I'm missing something, or looking at the wrong stuff, but Jeez, Louise. Much more research remains. Since I have several other IC projects waiting, I can take my time on this. But this is too nice an airplane not to at least try.
I have nothing against gasoline power, but it simply won't work for me. I have had a couple of 50cc gassers, and loved them. But when I got rid of my truck and bought a "cross-over" vehicle, I no longer have a place to carry the gas can outside of the passenger compartment. The stupid towing package- and the moonroof- are the ONLY options I did not get on my ride; otherwise, I'd get one of those basket things. No roof rack, either, so...
I dunno, glow fuel is only going to get more expensive, so I might like this e-power thing once I get comfortable with it. Hey... I'm just now getting a 2.4gHz radio, FWIW...

.
#172
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: STEWARTSTOWN, PA
The stand offs I used came with the DLE-30. There are several sites that carry standoffs in assorted lengths. Switching to electric was not cheap. The E-Flite Power 160 was $138 (with coupon code), Batteries from HK were $166 (delivered), ESC for HK was $125 (delivered), and the Prop was $20. Only bought one set of batteries since they were so expensive. I should have much better power with the Power 160 vs the DLE-30. It will be a couple more weeks before I can re-maiden it since I'm still waiting on the ESC and batteries.
Motor, ESC, Battery, Drill bit, Y-Connector for batteries
Electric Cost : $455
Motor, Muffler, Ignition Cutoff, Throttle Servo, Carb Standoffs, Ignition Battery, Ignition Switch, Motor Standoffs, Refueler, Spark Plug, Drill guid for prop, Canister Mounts
Gas Cost: $540
Motor, ESC, Battery, Drill bit, Y-Connector for batteries
Electric Cost : $455
Motor, Muffler, Ignition Cutoff, Throttle Servo, Carb Standoffs, Ignition Battery, Ignition Switch, Motor Standoffs, Refueler, Spark Plug, Drill guid for prop, Canister Mounts
Gas Cost: $540
#173
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
I'm going to need everything, even a charger. I'm still using an Alpha 4; the only "new" battery technology I have is in my new 2.4 transmitter; and it came with its own charger. I'm still using NImH on- board batteries; never got into the lithium/polymer/whatevers.
.
.





