next plane
#26

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
The Super Sportster is a pretty straight-forward plane to fly. It's a little faster and it's a little more touchy/responsive than your normal trainer....but as long as you really own your trainer you'll be fine.
#27
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Meridian,
ID
IMHO the tiger 2 is really good for second plane. But i preferred the 4*40. Awesome flyer and is fun to build. Dont worry about a challenging kit build, you have the bug and hopefully will build many more kits.
I have the bug and am currently building a GP ultimate bi-plane. I also have about 35 kits stashed away to build at a later date.
Dan
I have the bug and am currently building a GP ultimate bi-plane. I also have about 35 kits stashed away to build at a later date.

Dan
#28
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: No City,
I wish Balsa USA still offered the Thunderbug 40 in a kit because my Thunderbug was the best/most fun "2nd" plane of all time.
Converted to a tail dragger it's a great design. Flies great, easy landings. Balsa USA currently sells the plans only.
I googled "Thunderbug 40" and came up with a guy selling a kit on a club listing. http://www.rccd.org/Fly%20Market.htm One of you should jump on that. I'd buy it but have too many projects currently.
I think some Stiks land too fast for a 2nd plane following a trainer, at least mine did.
Converted to a tail dragger it's a great design. Flies great, easy landings. Balsa USA currently sells the plans only.
I googled "Thunderbug 40" and came up with a guy selling a kit on a club listing. http://www.rccd.org/Fly%20Market.htm One of you should jump on that. I'd buy it but have too many projects currently.
I think some Stiks land too fast for a 2nd plane following a trainer, at least mine did.
#29
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Great planes rapture
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXFHG4&P=0
i built one as my second nitro plane, first kit
i had a spad stick as my introduction to nitro (i flew gws planes, slowstick/estarter, before i started with the spad stick)
for me i could have gone to a faster/more aerobatic plane
but im glad i didnt.
this plane is a floater, can knife egde, stall spin ect
its really smooth in the air, a great sunday flyer.
it can handle wind (i flew in 20 mph one day) but be careful, mine flipped off my starting stand and broke a wingtip and part of the rudder. easy 1 hour fix.
this is one of those planes that can be a simple float around plane, and when you want to, it can do some aerobatics.
highly recommend
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXFHG4&P=0
i built one as my second nitro plane, first kit
i had a spad stick as my introduction to nitro (i flew gws planes, slowstick/estarter, before i started with the spad stick)
for me i could have gone to a faster/more aerobatic plane
but im glad i didnt.
this plane is a floater, can knife egde, stall spin ect
its really smooth in the air, a great sunday flyer.
it can handle wind (i flew in 20 mph one day) but be careful, mine flipped off my starting stand and broke a wingtip and part of the rudder. easy 1 hour fix.
this is one of those planes that can be a simple float around plane, and when you want to, it can do some aerobatics.
highly recommend
#30

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pittsfield,
MA
Before you make up your mind check out the manual
http://manuals.hobbico.com/gpm/gpma0205-manual.pdf
http://manuals.hobbico.com/gpm/gpma0205-manual.pdf
#31

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pittsfield,
MA
Save the $25 and get the 40 size Sportster http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXJ575&P=7
#33
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fresno,
CA
As for your second plane, I assume you can build? I'll go along with the guys and vote for either the 4* 40 or 60 or the tiger 2 40 or 60 I really think you would like either one. and there not hard to build.Just take your time.I have a 4*60 with a 75OS in mine, perfect power choice i think, and both planes are fairly easy to land as well as flying them.Good luck with whatever plane you choose.
#34

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: davidbegg
I am putting together the Goldberg Skylark as my second plane. Hope I chose right!!
Cheers
David
I am putting together the Goldberg Skylark as my second plane. Hope I chose right!!
Cheers
David
By the way, mine had an OS 52 Surpass four stroke. I don't recommend that at all. The process of getting that engine in that small engine compartment was a real pain. The design is more suited to a two stroke engine than a four stroke. In this case, the throttle is on the opposite side as it was on a two stroke. That caused some interesting problems. I ended up shaving some of the wood from the inside of the cheek to get clearance for the throttle linkage. And, getting the linkage to where it was rather than where it was designed to be was a challenge, especially for a fairly new RC'er.
Best of luck with it. You will enjoy the way it flys.
CGr.



