Community
Search
Notices
Extreme Speed Prop Planes Discuss the need for speed with fast prop planes (Screamin Demon, Diamond Dust, Shrikes or any REAL sound breakin'''' plane)

something new

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2008 | 12:17 PM
  #1  
bob27s's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cleveland, OH
Default something new

I thought some of you folks might like to see something new developed for the QM40 aircraft......

Has other applications too.

Bob
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv64024.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	44.3 KB
ID:	909519  
Old 03-21-2008 | 12:46 PM
  #2  
MJD's Avatar
MJD
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Default RE: something new


ORIGINAL: bob27s

I thought some of you folks might like to see something new developed for the QM40 aircraft......

Has other applications too.

Bob
Well THAT's a heck of a good idea! That's a concept that looks way cool for Q500's, sport, whatever. I like it. Would you use a third fill line, or loop the fuel line forward and back to the needle valve inlet for fueling access, or have I missed something obvious?

MJD
Old 03-21-2008 | 01:06 PM
  #3  
combatpigg's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,448
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
From: arlington, WA
Default RE: something new

Very nice! You guys are right on top of everything [8D]
Old 03-21-2008 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
bob27s's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cleveland, OH
Default RE: something new

ummmmmmmmmm

Maybe this prototype picture will help explain. You can see why Dub changed to the new design.

Quite a few use a filter or joiner in-line between the fuel tank and shutoff. That way we can leave the pinch-off closed, fuel, and it wont leak afterward.

Others wanted access to the port - disconnect fueling.

So they have a choice here.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Jh16750.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	57.3 KB
ID:	909560  
Old 03-21-2008 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
ChrisAttebery's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gilroy, CA
Default RE: something new

Very slick. What's the weight penalty vs a standard mount with remote needle? It looks like the backplate could be thinned at least in the bottom portion.


Chris
Old 03-21-2008 | 03:28 PM
  #6  
MJD's Avatar
MJD
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Default RE: something new


ORIGINAL: bob27s

ummmmmmmmmm

Maybe this prototype picture will help explain. You can see why Dub changed to the new design.

Quite a few use a filter or joiner in-line between the fuel tank and shutoff. That way we can leave the pinch-off closed, fuel, and it wont leak afterward.

Others wanted access to the port - disconnect fueling.

So they have a choice here.
Capiche , I forgot about the need for shutoffs on QM's. I knew real estate was scarce though. Thanks Bob.
Old 03-21-2008 | 03:48 PM
  #7  
bob27s's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cleveland, OH
Default RE: something new


ORIGINAL: ChrisAttebery

Very slick. What's the weight penalty vs a standard mount with remote needle? It looks like the backplate could be thinned at least in the bottom portion.


Chris
No penalty really considering its use ..... that is the standard QM40 engine mount. The SJ-46 mount is the same, just different mounting holes.

Probably saves .25 oz in the long run by eliminating the remote body and mounting screws
Old 03-21-2008 | 03:56 PM
  #8  
ChrisAttebery's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gilroy, CA
Default RE: something new

Must be the perspective on the first shot. It looks like the backplate is ~1/8" thicker than the second picture.
Old 03-21-2008 | 07:06 PM
  #9  
YUKONFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: WHITEHORSE, YT, CANADA
Default RE: something new

Nice intergration of parts, one less remote body and screws
Old 03-21-2008 | 09:06 PM
  #10  
Kmot's Avatar
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,963
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Northridge, CA
Default RE: something new

That is one very nice motor mount. I see lots of 'sport' applications.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.