Brison 3.2 Wanted
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (5)
The "Buy Sell" section of RCU is not working. Hopefully the Moderator will let me post this here. I need a Brison 3.2 with the mechanical advance and small propeller hub. The sensor should be on the side of the hub. A new one is preferred but a used excellent one is also a good candidate. The engine should look like the attached image. PM me with what you have. Thanks. Dan.
#5
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
I still have one of the Brison blue case mechanical 3.2's in very good shape but I'd need a real good reason to let it go.
I still have one of the Brison blue case mechanical 3.2's in very good shape but I'd need a real good reason to let it go.
#9

My Feedback: (24)
OK Dan, curiosity has me asking this one. With all the "hot" 50 and now 60cc engines out why are you wanting this vintage engine with mechanical linkage et all?
I happen to own two of the 2.6 sized that run very well and had Gary polish the case and bead blast the head, freshen the rings, etc before he closed the doors.
I happen to own two of the 2.6 sized that run very well and had Gary polish the case and bead blast the head, freshen the rings, etc before he closed the doors.
#10
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (5)
TOM, tell me what it's worth and if I agree I will buy it from you if you want to sell it.
bigben,
1. I have several planes set up for the Brison. I need that backplate mount and side induction. Any other configuration would require a major rebuild.
2. I'm from the old school and I like the mechanical advance over the electronic because of its fast response.
3. I don't need the power of the newer engines. My planes are already over powered. I would rather have the reliabilty of the Brisons.
4. The standoffs introduce a very long cantilever from the firewall. I've seen those engines vibrating a significant amount as the piston bangs away perpendiculalar to the standoffs. You can't beat keeping the pistons close to the firwall for a secure and vibration free system.
5. I'm not a big fan of those rear input diaphragms. It's another moving part I have to worry about if the engine does not start or run poorly. I would rather have the carburetor get its input pulse directly.
That's enough. I'll have to change over one of these days. I can live with the OS 55 layout. Like everything else with OS it's expensive. A spare ignition module is $250. A carburetor is $150. Maybe one of these days. Not right now.
Dan.
bigben,
1. I have several planes set up for the Brison. I need that backplate mount and side induction. Any other configuration would require a major rebuild.
2. I'm from the old school and I like the mechanical advance over the electronic because of its fast response.
3. I don't need the power of the newer engines. My planes are already over powered. I would rather have the reliabilty of the Brisons.
4. The standoffs introduce a very long cantilever from the firewall. I've seen those engines vibrating a significant amount as the piston bangs away perpendiculalar to the standoffs. You can't beat keeping the pistons close to the firwall for a secure and vibration free system.
5. I'm not a big fan of those rear input diaphragms. It's another moving part I have to worry about if the engine does not start or run poorly. I would rather have the carburetor get its input pulse directly.
That's enough. I'll have to change over one of these days. I can live with the OS 55 layout. Like everything else with OS it's expensive. A spare ignition module is $250. A carburetor is $150. Maybe one of these days. Not right now.
Dan.
#11

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Riverton,
WY
There's a lot to be said for the bullet proof nature of an anvil. So many of the HP 50-60cc engines are somewhat fragile. They require rebuilds every couple of hundred hours. The typical Brison will run for much longer with minimal attention. The "weak point" on the Brison is the rod bearing 500-600 hr and the wear on the delrin ring 500-800hr. Both are simple to replace.
#13

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: bigben
OK Dan, curiosity has me asking this one. With all the ''hot'' 50 and now 60cc engines out why are you wanting this vintage engine with mechanical linkage et all?
I happen to own two of the 2.6 sized that run very well and had Gary polish the case and bead blast the head, freshen the rings, etc before he closed the doors.
OK Dan, curiosity has me asking this one. With all the ''hot'' 50 and now 60cc engines out why are you wanting this vintage engine with mechanical linkage et all?
I happen to own two of the 2.6 sized that run very well and had Gary polish the case and bead blast the head, freshen the rings, etc before he closed the doors.
#16

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: DAN REISS
Thank you Mr. Moderator, The Fox 3.2s are no longer in production. The now sell DLEs. Dan.
Thank you Mr. Moderator, The Fox 3.2s are no longer in production. The now sell DLEs. Dan.
http://www.chiefaircraft.com/rcmsec/...s/FPE/FPE.html
Replacement for their 3.2.
#17
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (5)
Yes Truckracer, the FPEs are a suitable replacement for the Brisons. I have considered them. I don't know why the 3.2s are not being made any more. Maybe Mahle(Makita?) stopped making the pistons and cylinders. That would be a major redesign for FPE to get everything rebalanced. I'll keep them in mind. For now, a good used or even new Brison would be the easiest for me to deal with. Good inputs, all you guys. Dan.
#18

My Feedback: (19)
I would guess FPE changed to the Husk. cylinders because they were cheaper .... just a guess though. I fly a FPE 4.2 on occasion.
FYI, I recently went through the same search you are going through .... only I was looking for a Brison 2.4. Found one that was actually new and had just sat around for years unused. Excellent price too. Keep looking, they're out there to be found.
FYI, I recently went through the same search you are going through .... only I was looking for a Brison 2.4. Found one that was actually new and had just sat around for years unused. Excellent price too. Keep looking, they're out there to be found.
#19

My Feedback: (69)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pahrump,
NV
Hello,
I am glad to see this post as I am old school myself to a degree and happen to have a Brison 3.2 and a 6.4. The 6.4 has some time but well taken care of and inspected with a clean bill of health. The 3.2 was purchased just a bit before the doors closed. In my years of r/c this was "THE" engine and would probably be in the running if Gary was still open. It has the Synchro Spark and the engine has at most all of an hour and probably closer to 30 minutes. At this time I have no plane for it but not at all interested in selling but just curious what it would honestly bring. The case is also polished. It could easily be changed to mechanical advance but a different ignition box would be needed and could probably be exchanged/traded here on RCU.
Thank you,
John
I am glad to see this post as I am old school myself to a degree and happen to have a Brison 3.2 and a 6.4. The 6.4 has some time but well taken care of and inspected with a clean bill of health. The 3.2 was purchased just a bit before the doors closed. In my years of r/c this was "THE" engine and would probably be in the running if Gary was still open. It has the Synchro Spark and the engine has at most all of an hour and probably closer to 30 minutes. At this time I have no plane for it but not at all interested in selling but just curious what it would honestly bring. The case is also polished. It could easily be changed to mechanical advance but a different ignition box would be needed and could probably be exchanged/traded here on RCU.
Thank you,
John
#20

My Feedback: (16)
ORIGINAL: DAN REISS
Thank you Mr. Moderator, The Fox 3.2s are no longer in production. The now sell DLEs. Dan.
Thank you Mr. Moderator, The Fox 3.2s are no longer in production. The now sell DLEs. Dan.
Fox needs to change their web site if they don't sell the Fox engines anymore?
You can buy DLE's most anywhere.
I see that as a poor move for for Fox.
The only way to stay competitive with the same product as everyone else is with price or service and they don't have the edge on either one with that line.
Whoever made that decision never had Marketing 101 in school?
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
The Mahle top ends are still in production and easily obtained. Not cheaply, but easily. The problem is likely with the cranks. If the previous supply ran out then new would have to be made and it takes awhile for the Chinese to make a halfway decent crank.
Dan,
Thanks for the offer of purchase but I don't want to sell one of the best engines I have ever made. It would not go low on the sales amount even if I did, which would scare away most people.
Dan,
Thanks for the offer of purchase but I don't want to sell one of the best engines I have ever made. It would not go low on the sales amount even if I did, which would scare away most people.
#23

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
The Mahle top ends are still in production and easily obtained. Not cheaply, but easily. The problem is likely with the cranks. If the previous supply ran out then new would have to be made and it takes awhile for the Chinese to make a halfway decent crank.
Dan,
Thanks for the offer of purchase but I don't want to sell one of the best engines I have ever made. It would not go low on the sales amount even if I did, which would scare away most people.
The Mahle top ends are still in production and easily obtained. Not cheaply, but easily. The problem is likely with the cranks. If the previous supply ran out then new would have to be made and it takes awhile for the Chinese to make a halfway decent crank.
Dan,
Thanks for the offer of purchase but I don't want to sell one of the best engines I have ever made. It would not go low on the sales amount even if I did, which would scare away most people.
#24
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Any Brison component that is not part of the old Allison inventory is now made in China and later assembled in Canada. At least that was the plan told to me by Kangke people after they took over Brison. Not at all certain but I would guess the China business model would insist any new parts be made "at home" to better satisfy profitability.
#25

My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: Tired Old Man
Any Brison component that is not part of the old Allison inventory is now made in China and later assembled in Canada. At least that was the plan told to me by Kangke people after they took over Brison. Not at all certain but I would guess the China business model would insist any new parts be made ''at home'' to better satisfy profitability.
Any Brison component that is not part of the old Allison inventory is now made in China and later assembled in Canada. At least that was the plan told to me by Kangke people after they took over Brison. Not at all certain but I would guess the China business model would insist any new parts be made ''at home'' to better satisfy profitability.
I have no clue what is in a current Brison engine for a crank.


