BME 58 Extreme
#76

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
I had a chance to fly my 58 (stock BIG muffler) with a Vess 23a, I only flew a few minutes because my plane kept disappearing. The conditions were less than ideal, 40* and fog. I could pull out my old E6B and tell how far off standard conditions that is, but it might not have had that great of an impact on my numbers. Although, when I landed my plane was washed for me, it was dripping wet.
In stock configuration you should hit about 7300 +/- on the vess 23a, and have about 28-29lbs of static thrust. I was too lazy to re-adjust my needles, did not want to lay on the wet grass.
I seem to have to use tad more throttle to fly at similar speeds to the menz-s 23x8 (I was hoping for that) and pull out of hover seemed a little better on the hole shot, but did not steadily increase speed vertically as much as the menz. Then again, I could not go vertical very far before I lost the plane.
I can't wait to try a tuned pipe and hit 7900 on that vess or menz, both very good props for the 58, That would truely be better than foamie power
In stock configuration you should hit about 7300 +/- on the vess 23a, and have about 28-29lbs of static thrust. I was too lazy to re-adjust my needles, did not want to lay on the wet grass.
I seem to have to use tad more throttle to fly at similar speeds to the menz-s 23x8 (I was hoping for that) and pull out of hover seemed a little better on the hole shot, but did not steadily increase speed vertically as much as the menz. Then again, I could not go vertical very far before I lost the plane.
I can't wait to try a tuned pipe and hit 7900 on that vess or menz, both very good props for the 58, That would truely be better than foamie power
#81
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: lucedale,
MS
ORIGINAL: IFlyEm35
JTec makes mufflers for the 44 and 50. Is the 50 the same?
JTec makes mufflers for the 44 and 50. Is the 50 the same?
John
#85
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St Helens,
OR
Guys....i am not 100% ;positive , but i don't think the old pitts from the 44cc and 50cc sport engines are going to work with the new 58 Extreme. The exhaust port alone is over 1-1/2 time the size of a DA-50 exhaust port. Tom really removed a lot of metal out of the exhaust port to let this little sucker breath. I know he has some pitts ( i think the bolt on side dump) for the 58's. It would be cool if Jtec came out with a rear dump and side dump for this 58cc motor.....that way you could buy a pair for the 116 extreme. I use canisters myself though , and that's what i'll end up using on my BME 58......just like the sound a lot better ya know?
#86

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
I finally have some video of the engine running in the air, not much of a video though.
Don't laugh, my videoagrapher didn't do the best job of videoing, neither of us could figure out the camera
Nothing special in the flying, just try to show how the engine runs in the air. It is tough to tell how well it jumps out of hover, but next time my son will not zoom in that much so you can have a better perspective of the pull out. There is no editing, just straight video, I have flown this engine from day one in this manor.
This might take a few minutes, fighting with you tube, never done this kinda stuff before and the down load is taking for ever, might not be until tomorrow.
Success, give it a few minutes to process, then it will work, I hope. Now I just need to learn to edit a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rr-7qtJvT0
Don't laugh, my videoagrapher didn't do the best job of videoing, neither of us could figure out the camera
Nothing special in the flying, just try to show how the engine runs in the air. It is tough to tell how well it jumps out of hover, but next time my son will not zoom in that much so you can have a better perspective of the pull out. There is no editing, just straight video, I have flown this engine from day one in this manor.This might take a few minutes, fighting with you tube, never done this kinda stuff before and the down load is taking for ever, might not be until tomorrow.
Success, give it a few minutes to process, then it will work, I hope. Now I just need to learn to edit a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rr-7qtJvT0
#89

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
One of our fields is on a private strip at the edge of town (wasn't that way 10 years ago), so full scales come and go occasionally. They actually only use about 1/4 of the run way and never come close to us unless they want to give us a show
With the completely blue sky and my son's zooming in, you really couldn't tell much about the acceleration or hole shot. I never really pushed it hard, just wanted to show the throttle-ability and engine performance on the lower end. No one has posted a vid of this engine flying, so I figured it was time. My yak weighs 18lbs.
In my next video, I will edit it down to a reasonable size and toss the plane around a bit more.

With the completely blue sky and my son's zooming in, you really couldn't tell much about the acceleration or hole shot. I never really pushed it hard, just wanted to show the throttle-ability and engine performance on the lower end. No one has posted a vid of this engine flying, so I figured it was time. My yak weighs 18lbs.
In my next video, I will edit it down to a reasonable size and toss the plane around a bit more.
#91
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St Helens,
OR
yeah thanks RTK for posting that vid. I'm hoping to get my maiden in on my little H9/carden yak here within the next 2 weeks. If i added everything up right , it should come in a little under 17lbs. I think like 16lbs 10oz. If my motor can get tuned as well as yours , i should have a lot of fun with this little combo.
And RTK....since i'm getting ready to fire it up for the first time....what oil do you think i should do the break in with? Either the ashless oil or possibly penzoil air cooled oil? I'll run it at about 32:1 to 36:1 for the first 3-4 gallons , and then was going to switch up to the honda H1R stuff or possibly just stay with penzoil.
Not even sure how that longer header pipe of mine is going to work yet....but i'll cross that bridge after the first few flights. I have a shorter header that i could use , but i'll have to hack through the bottom of the firewall a little.
And RTK....since i'm getting ready to fire it up for the first time....what oil do you think i should do the break in with? Either the ashless oil or possibly penzoil air cooled oil? I'll run it at about 32:1 to 36:1 for the first 3-4 gallons , and then was going to switch up to the honda H1R stuff or possibly just stay with penzoil.
Not even sure how that longer header pipe of mine is going to work yet....but i'll cross that bridge after the first few flights. I have a shorter header that i could use , but i'll have to hack through the bottom of the firewall a little.
#92

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
I've been running Pennzoil air cooled 32:1 from day one and will continue unless I try some Stihl ultra that I bought. Run what ever good oil you have on hand.
Too short of a pipe set up and large props don't work well with this engine, but you will never know until you run it.
Jeff, it is not running perfect right now, it has run better and will, when I get my header length right. My son wanted to go flying so I figured I might as well shoot some video.
What pipe are you running and what is the measurement from the beginning of the pipe to the middle of the rear reflector cone??
Too short of a pipe set up and large props don't work well with this engine, but you will never know until you run it.
Jeff, it is not running perfect right now, it has run better and will, when I get my header length right. My son wanted to go flying so I figured I might as well shoot some video.
What pipe are you running and what is the measurement from the beginning of the pipe to the middle of the rear reflector cone??
#93
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St Helens,
OR
Hey RTK....
the header i had Karl up in canada make for me , was a tough one! I had to have some special bends in it to clear the firewall. I could have had it built a little shorter , but i just sent karl some phots and measurements of my set up , and this is what i got. karl is a craftsman to say the least...he built it exactly to spec.
With that being said....the pipe , from exhaust stack to the end of the pipe is about 13.5" and the canister is 8" long. The canister is about the same size of what a normal sized 50cc canister would be ( close to a MTW 75 i believe.)
here is a couple pics so you can check it out.
BTW....IF i have to , i can run another header i got from another guy on FG , that Karl built. It is about 12.5" long , but i can cut dang near 5-6" off the thing , since it only bends once , and then it's a strait shot to the canister. Only problem is , i'd have to cut into my firewall.
I wanted to run this longer pipe to at least see what it's going to act like. Any ideas on what it may do with that long of a header and canister set up?
the header i had Karl up in canada make for me , was a tough one! I had to have some special bends in it to clear the firewall. I could have had it built a little shorter , but i just sent karl some phots and measurements of my set up , and this is what i got. karl is a craftsman to say the least...he built it exactly to spec.
With that being said....the pipe , from exhaust stack to the end of the pipe is about 13.5" and the canister is 8" long. The canister is about the same size of what a normal sized 50cc canister would be ( close to a MTW 75 i believe.)
here is a couple pics so you can check it out.
BTW....IF i have to , i can run another header i got from another guy on FG , that Karl built. It is about 12.5" long , but i can cut dang near 5-6" off the thing , since it only bends once , and then it's a strait shot to the canister. Only problem is , i'd have to cut into my firewall.
I wanted to run this longer pipe to at least see what it's going to act like. Any ideas on what it may do with that long of a header and canister set up?
#94

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Left Coast ,
CA
You might be just fine the way you are, Karl sure makes nice headers.
I have never run a can on this engine, if it is a tuned type can and you are too short you will see a definite decrease in power and a rise in temps. If it is too long you just don't see the power, but she runs cool.
You should hit around the 7's for the average 23x8 prop (nx, menz) and 7300 for a vess23a. That is what I got with a stock muffler if memory serves. BUT,,,, at your weight, you will be ballistic with any set up
I have never run a can on this engine, if it is a tuned type can and you are too short you will see a definite decrease in power and a rise in temps. If it is too long you just don't see the power, but she runs cool.
You should hit around the 7's for the average 23x8 prop (nx, menz) and 7300 for a vess23a. That is what I got with a stock muffler if memory serves. BUT,,,, at your weight, you will be ballistic with any set up
#95
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St Helens,
OR
ORIGINAL: RTK
You might be just fine the way you are, Karl sure makes nice headers.
I have never run a can on this engine, if it is a tuned type can and you are too short you will see a definite decrease in power and a rise in temps. If it is too long you just don't see the power, but she runs cool.
You should hit around the 7's for the average 23x8 prop (nx, menz) and 7300 for a vess23a. That is what I got with a stock muffler if memory serves. BUT,,,, at your weight, you will be ballistic with any set up
You might be just fine the way you are, Karl sure makes nice headers.
I have never run a can on this engine, if it is a tuned type can and you are too short you will see a definite decrease in power and a rise in temps. If it is too long you just don't see the power, but she runs cool.
You should hit around the 7's for the average 23x8 prop (nx, menz) and 7300 for a vess23a. That is what I got with a stock muffler if memory serves. BUT,,,, at your weight, you will be ballistic with any set up
YES!!...that's what i wanted to hear! I guess i'll just have to get it fired up , and tuned , and see how she does. I know one thing , karls header won't be having any problem letting it breath ....the pipe is dang near glass smooth on the inside with an exact port match....hope she runs well.
#98

My Feedback: (13)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: berlin hts,
OH
just had to jump in hear to get this thread back on track.i just ran the fourth tank through a BME 58 with stock muffler and a vess 23-a.needles have been tweak for good transiton and top rpm's, i got 7440 all good and warm with Belray at 50:1.is this the norm for this engine,if so i am very impress.
#100
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Antelope,
CA
All right spring is in the air and I'm sure there have been many flights on your 58s. Is the performance holding up? Are there any heat issues related to the lighter weight? How is the reliability any deadsticks? I could come up with about 17 more questions but I only need one more,,, Should I buy one?
Robert
Robert


