Community
Search
Notices
RC Monster Trucks Discuss rc monster trucks in this forum

Why not gas instead of nitro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:11 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Benito, TX
Default Why not gas instead of nitro?

Just thinking
Why don't they make the engines gasoline instead of nitro? Nitro is expensive and wastes real fast. Gas is not expensive and lasts longer.
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:15 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Smithtown, NY,
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

They do....the only one i know of is the Traxxas Monster Buggy. Its HUGE. 1/6 scale. its around $1000.00 though. But the prices of gas now is crazy,$2.00 a gallon!
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
lax195's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: PA
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

but also, gasoline is not as combustable as methanol/nitromethane. you get a lot more power and performance from glow fuel. and also glow fuel is a mixture of oil and other stuff which makes it so expensive.
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:21 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Benito, TX
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

Yes I heard of that engine too but that is the only one. Most of the engines in the market are nitro.
Even with that price you still can't compare $30 to $2 per gallon.
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:28 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Benito, TX
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

Are they really that much weaker than nitro to put them out of the market?
Old 03-20-2004 | 06:55 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: n/a, VA
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

how bout octane... its only like 5-10 a gallon but i guese itd be hard to get ahold of unless you live near a nascar track like me!
Old 03-20-2004 | 07:07 PM
  #7  
Sweetshoes90210's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: longmeadow, MA
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

If you were to use octane fuel, any engine manufactuing company would halft to chage their who engine layout, not to mention the engine would need to be much bigger because you need a bigger glowplug in order to ignight the fuel. Even though octane runs much cleaner than Nitro, nitro puts out atleast 3x as much power.

(It smells better too. )
Old 03-20-2004 | 08:01 PM
  #8  
BFT
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX,
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

This company [link=http://www.molzermoweryracing.com/off_road.html]Molzer Mowery Racing[/link] manufactures GAS R/C vehicles.

The following are some examples of their off-road vehicles.


The Biggest And Baddest truck is comming very very soon. Call one of Our Dealers now to reserve yours.

The chassis of the 1:6 scale models Marder, Beetle Off-Road and On-Road are identical, they only differ in bodies, tires and chassis accomodation. The models are built on a 4mm u-bended chassis. All borings underneath the chassis are countersunk, therefore the screw heads can't bear out. Double wishbones at front and rear axle as well as 4 bulk oil-pressure shock absorbers guarantee perfect ground adherence. All rotating parts are supported by ball-bearings. Rear gear wheels, differential gears and all driving elements are case-hardened. The ABS-undertray (Beetle) and side guards (Marder) protect the models from dirt.
Old 03-20-2004 | 08:41 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Florence, SC,
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

my friend made up some "home-made" gas for his savage. It was made of a pinch of nitro, gasoline, wd-40 all mixed up. He said it ran pretty good, had low RPMS not as much power. It still would spin the tires but not much speed. And it looked like a masquito fogger cause it smoked so much
Old 03-20-2004 | 09:01 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Benito, TX
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

Thas truck is cool but it is $1200[X(]
That is what 1/6 scale costs. Its just too much. For now atleast.
Old 03-20-2004 | 09:23 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nashville, TN,
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

I hope this isnt against forum rules or anything here....its an old advertisement from the March 2000 edition of RCCA:
[link=http://www.mustangmods.com/data/2197/rcca.jpg]pic[/link]
Would be cool if they still made something like that, or better yet, just sold the engines.
Old 03-20-2004 | 11:28 PM
  #12  
mecky33's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Federal Way, WA
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

joe, Nitro is much more powerful than gas. I just bought a 25CC gas string trimmer and that thing only puts out .8 HP. my 2.6CC engine in my Cen truck puts out 1.2 HP. So for a tenth the size and 1.5 times the HP, nitro is pretty powerful stuff.
Old 03-21-2004 | 04:53 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: london, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

Weight for weight, nitro engines are way more powerfull, and as power is way more important than economy in scale engines, thats what will dominate the market.



ORIGINAL: joe78586

Just thinking
Why don't they make the engines gasoline instead of nitro? Nitro is expensive and wastes real fast. Gas is not expensive and lasts longer.

you wanna try living over here mate! our petrol averages over £4.00 a gallon now.
Old 03-21-2004 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
DCLXVI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

ORIGINAL: BFT

This company [link=http://www.molzermoweryracing.com/off_road.html]Molzer Mowery Racing[/link] manufactures GAS R/C vehicles.
I'm sorry to say this but that company doesn't make the trucks and cars...those are manufactured by FG in Germany...

There are lots of 1/5 & 1/6 trucks and cars on the market that runs on gas, FG is the most popular maker, HARM is another one...there are more, most of them are European...
Old 03-21-2004 | 01:49 PM
  #15  
Banned
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: manitowoc, WI
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

$ 1200 is the retail price for the FG truck. Street price is $850 + sh and no radio gear. I think that is reasonable compared to a hopped upped T-max or savage. I build my own gas cars. Both trucks have a 3 hp stock motor and foreword/reverse transmission.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv63799.jpg
Views:	226
Size:	43.1 KB
ID:	113738   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ca80394.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	57.4 KB
ID:	113739  
Old 03-21-2004 | 11:20 PM
  #16  
Tigger N. Bennie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Track
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

You failed to mention the FG Monster is 2WD, but will soon have a 4WD option as well as a RTR option. If it ships with the latest Zenoah engine, I would have though it has more than 3 hp unless you are writing about the engines in your trucks pictured. Then again, I don't know much about the Zenoah G230RC1 or G230RC02 engines.

Edit: Since so many people also don't use the search button, below is a link to the thread I started about the FG Monster. There are also a few comments from one of the US Importers on the same thread.

RC Cars >> Monster Trucks >> FG 1/6 Scale R/C Off Road Monster Truck
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/FG_1...1565262/tm.htm
Old 03-21-2004 | 11:24 PM
  #17  
Tigger N. Bennie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Track
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

ORIGINAL: BFT
Molzer Mowery Racing manufactures GAS R/C vehicles.
MolzerMoweryRacing is one of two current "U.S. Importers" of FG--MMR is not a manufacturer.
Old 03-22-2004 | 01:34 AM
  #18  
fhm101's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pinson, AL
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

The main reason (I think) that nitro based fuel is used for models is it's much safer to handle than gasoline. Could you imagine the carnage if every T Maxx/Savage, etc. owner had a 5 gallon can of gas in the same place they now store their model fuel?
Old 03-22-2004 | 01:50 AM
  #19  
vizaracer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Knoxville, TN
Default RE: Why not gas instead of nitro?

ive got a motor scooter with a Mitsubishi engine andn it has like like 5 hp. its a 40cc engine though. ive seen some engines for the motor scooters that are 43cc and have like 7 hp. and those engines are zenoah. ive seen rpm for them up to 15,000 rpm.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.