Community
Search
Notices
RC Pattern Flying Discuss all topics pertaining to RC Pattern Flying in this forum.

SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2010 | 10:55 PM
  #476  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Well, the cost savings for the first one are not much of a consideration when the time spent and the mental energy are figured into the calculation. The real benefit will come on the second one, where there is a lot more understanding of the variables.

This tube cost $9 and I made a few boo-boos when cutting the first bands, but there is plenty of material left over for soft mount #2!!

I think I attached it before, but the PDF is an actual scan of the drill guide for the aircraft ply (1/8" 5-ply) that I used for my mount, and the stand-off bolt locations came out accurately when using it for figuring out the stand-off locations. If you want to use it, print with page scaling OFF of course!
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Ay73955.pdf (11.2 KB, 24 views)
File Type: pdf
Xu62639.pdf (124.9 KB, 22 views)
Old 02-05-2010 | 09:22 AM
  #477  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tavares, FL
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Bob,

Thanks again for posting your info. It will help a bunch.

I was considering putting thin wing servos on the elevator halves. But since the stabs aren't going to be removeable, I might just go with 2 small digital servos mounted in the sides of the fuse's tail under the stabs. Do you or Matt see anything wrong with this. Most specifically do you think the balance can work with out the batteries and rudder servo on the firewall. Who would have that this would even be an issue with a gas engine on the focus. Regardless, light weight is good.

Thanks a bunch.
Old 02-05-2010 | 10:28 AM
  #478  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

FlyEng,

I think you will still be able to achieve CG with the elevator servos in the tail as long as you use the "midi" size digitals. I don't have the ignition module and Rx batteries as far forward as possible. I don't like that hard-to-reach space between the firewall and the first former, but could have placed stuff there if necessary.

Definitely want to use pull-pull rudder, however.
Old 02-05-2010 | 12:01 PM
  #479  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: FlyEng

Bob,

Thanks again for posting your info. It will help a bunch.

I was considering putting thin wing servos on the elevator halves. But since the stabs aren't going to be removeable, I might just go with 2 small digital servos mounted in the sides of the fuse's tail under the stabs. Do you or Matt see anything wrong with this. Most specifically do you think the balance can work with out the batteries and rudder servo on the firewall. Who would have that this would even be an issue with a gas engine on the focus. Regardless, light weight is good.

Thanks a bunch.
That would work fine, as Bob states, with a pair of small digitals. That's exactly how I have my new plane set-up. It originally was intended to use the much heavier ZDZ40 cc engine up front, that's the main reason I originally set-it up that way. But I was still looking at adding 4 ozs or so to the tail to balance things. Heavier all the way around

With the ligthness of the SAP engine up front, it will work out just about perfect with no additional tail weight needed. Overall weight savings with the SAP versus the ZDZ is about 14 to 16 ozs, or a 10 lb airplane rather than 11 pounds.

But even at 11 pounds, the SAP has enough beans to take the plane through any maneuver in the book or outside the book. In other words, power is non-issue

MattK
Old 02-05-2010 | 12:57 PM
  #480  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tavares, FL
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

MTK,

I can't wait. The power the Syssa puts out is awesome as you've determined and reported. I really like where you challenged someone to buy it and test it after they said there was no way to get the results you got. That's awesome. I think we met once many years ago down here in District 3. Probably at Ocala but maybe at one of the other meets. I was doing sportsman at the time and was asking lots of questions. I haven't competed for quite awhile but will again soon.

I just need the engine and accessories. I'm sure Todd still has his hands full getting caught up so I'm okay with it. It's only been since Christmas on the engine order. He spoke at length to my wife when she placed the order. It's hard to get her talking to anyone in the hobby let alone an RC manufacturer. Sounds like his likability and product will take him a long way.
Old 02-05-2010 | 01:35 PM
  #481  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: FlyEng

MTK,

I can't wait. The power the Syssa puts out is awesome as you've determined and reported. I really like where you challenged someone to buy it and test it after they said there was no way to get the results you got. That's awesome. I think we met once many years ago down here in District 3. Probably at Ocala but maybe at one of the other meets. I was doing sportsman at the time and was asking lots of questions. I haven't competed for quite awhile but will again soon.

I just need the engine and accessories. I'm sure Todd still has his hands full getting caught up so I'm okay with it. It's only been since Christmas on the engine order. He spoke at length to my wife when she placed the order. It's hard to get her talking to anyone in the hobby let alone an RC manufacturer. Sounds like his likability and product will take him a long way.
Actually, I think he has just about caught up on his back orders. Maybe even has Ed Alt's engine ready. That engine was a complete special with reduced exhaust timing to try and take advantage of torque at lower rpm. It's an experiment worth trying and is specific to pattern wants (not needs, just wants).

Make no mistake though, the engine performs great for pattern needs as is. Propping it to around 8K will let the engine work well. True, I am running it at around 7500 with larger props but the engine is intended to run higher rpm than that. Let me wring mine out at 7500 for a frame of reference.

The last remaining item it needs for pattern is the adapter for a nose ring. This item has been designed and will be a simple add-on item on an existing engine.

MattK
Old 02-06-2010 | 09:17 AM
  #482  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Matt,

Is the 7500 rpm number with your CF-lam Xoar 18-5/8 x 13?

I don't think mine needs a nose ring, but if it adds to the quietness and efficiency I will give it a shot. Although this plane is the quietest gasser I've seen, there are still a few bumping and knocking things I have to track down, and the 18x10PN prop is pretty noisy when the tips start ripping over 8k rpm.

There is also something I noted the other day, the engine permormance dropped significantly when doing an outside loop. I don't believe it was a fuel delivery issue (i.e. fuel clunk not following fuel), but rather the change in air pressure on the little static plate (or whatever it is you call it... the plate on the carb with the small hole in it). I know this is sometimes solved by soldering a nipple on that plate and running a piece of fuel tube back into the fuse. But first I will make absolutely sure it isn't a problem with the clunk. It was cold, and Tygon does stiffen up quite a bit.
Old 02-06-2010 | 11:20 AM
  #483  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

ORIGINAL: cmoulder

Matt,

Is the 7500 rpm number with your CF-lam Xoar 18-5/8 x 13?

I don't think mine needs a nose ring, but if it adds to the quietness and efficiency I will give it a shot. Although this plane is the quietest gasser I've seen, there are still a few bumping and knocking things I have to track down, and the 18x10PN prop is pretty noisy when the tips start ripping over 8k rpm.

There is also something I noted the other day, the engine permormance dropped significantly when doing an outside loop. I don't believe it was a fuel delivery issue (i.e. fuel clunk not following fuel), but rather the change in air pressure on the little static plate (or whatever it is you call it... the plate on the carb with the small hole in it). I know this is sometimes solved by soldering a nipple on that plate and running a piece of fuel tube back into the fuse. But first I will make absolutely sure it isn't a problem with the clunk. It was cold, and Tygon does stiffen up quite a bit.
Bob,

Not that prop....that prop turns around 7200 give or take. I will probably chop it down to around 17 3/4 to get the prop in a happier zone. The 17x13 turn around 7500 which is about as low as I want to run. The 18x12 will be the prop I use in comps most likely and I expect it to turn around 7500 give or take. We have to see how the engine does in the summer.

I had noticed some dropped off in output at certain times too, when the engine only had a few runs on it, maybe a dozen or so. That has seemed to go away after some running. I think it's a matter of lack of break in but not certain. I do know that now that engine has a gallon through it, it doesn't sag at those same locations in flight as it once did. I suspect this will get even better after a few more gallons.

We are still steep on the learning curve with this engine

Matt
Old 02-06-2010 | 11:22 AM
  #484  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bedford, NH
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

What oil and ratio are you using?
Old 02-06-2010 | 11:28 AM
  #485  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: ghoffman

What oil and ratio are you using?
The first runs at Todd's place were at 85:1. The next several runs I used Ed's fuel which I think was around 100:1. The last gallon is one I mixed at 60:1. I will be using Todd's mix from now on which is 85:1

Matt
Old 02-06-2010 | 11:45 AM
  #486  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

We are still steep on the learning curve with this engine
It's amazing how many things remain to be sorted out once a model is "finished"

I am addressing the reg issue today. One of the regs did indeed need a 6" extension between the Rx and the reg, so I am charging up the batteries fresh and then will see what the current draw is when both regs have that same extension and therefore the same resistance. If that doesn't work out, I will change out the reg that wasn't delivering current and see what happens then.

Old 02-07-2010 | 10:50 PM
  #487  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Quick update on the regs... apparently there was a little glitch in one of the 4 that I have. It works fine solo, but for some reason is not sharing power in a balanced reg set-up. Even so, that particular regulator was still working fine when the other was completely turned off, so there never was any danger of the Rx losing power. If anything, a good illustration of the dual redundancy idea in action.

Installed the 2 new regs today and both are tracking voltage drops in the Lipos to an extremely tight tolerance, always +/- 0.01V.
Old 02-08-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #488  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

ORIGINAL: MTK

This shot is of the wood prop laminated in carbon. The technique is quite simple really. You simply place the assembly in a vacuum sealer and draw the vacuum
Matt, any chance you might do a mini-tutorial on your Xoar e-prop modification, with CF cloth sources, adhesives/resins and technique involved?

I weighed both the APC 18x10PN and 17x13 and they are pretty hefty at 4.2 oz!![X(]
Old 02-08-2010 | 05:58 PM
  #489  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: cmoulder


ORIGINAL: MTK

This shot is of the wood prop laminated in carbon. The technique is quite simple really. You simply place the assembly in a vacuum sealer and draw the vacuum
Matt, any chance you might do a mini-tutorial on your Xoar e-prop modification, with CF cloth sources, adhesives and technique involved?

I weighed both the APC 18x10PN and 17x13 and they are pretty hefty at 4.2 oz!![X(]
Bob,

I am preparing an article for publication in one of the RC magazines, preferably MA, but anyone of them that will pay, will do. Soon as I get commitment from a magazine that they are interested, I will send you the article.

There is significant weight savings that can be had. The 18x12 I just completed weighs in at 50 grams, about 80 grams less than the APCs. It is very stiff and strong as you'd expect.

There are a couple very important benefits, one of which is lower nose weight. But even more important is the significantly lower RMOI the smaller mass generates. The larger mass of the apc causes unwanted forces to the airplane which vary continuously throughout rpm changes. Lower rotating mass reduces these forces substantially and even guys with less flying experience (relatively speaking, probably not rank beginners) can tell the difference. Spool up and down become easier, crisper. True, flywheel effect at idle suffers but it matters very little in an ignition set-up.

That's why I have been most excited by this development. And the Xoar props make the transition to hybrid, true composite props easier because there is little carving involved by the user. These props were not available even as late as spring last year, to the best of my knowledge. I received my first ones around October last year.

Matt

Old 02-08-2010 | 06:02 PM
  #490  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Meriden, CT
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Also, it is easier on engines during high g aerobatics...
Those are very sweet props!
Go Matt!
Old 02-08-2010 | 06:37 PM
  #491  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

The first of these I did was a ZDZ 20x10 woodie that was stock wood for the ZDZ40 cc. I shaved and shaved the wood thickness down to about half the original. Shaved off something like 55 grams off a prop that weighed around 120 grams stock. I became quite skeptical because the blades became very flimsy at 50% the original thickness. Once I added the carbon tube sock, my skepticism abated. Extremely stiff and mighty strong outcome at at slightly over half the thickness on the blades. This hybrid prop weighs in at 80 grams

I think the SAP180 will turn this prop but I haven't tried it. When I do, I will report the results here.

Of course one may carve his own wood as I have. I also have a 21x12 I carved from a known blank like a 22x12.....but that's a lot of work, checking and re-checking to make sure the angle per blade station is constant and area distribution is constant. It becomes even more work intensive if you want to increase the angle during the carving process at any station. I bought the aero perfect inclinometer partially for this purpose. One can never be too fussy about the angles' accuracy. A prop works best when it is statically and dynamically balanced.

Doing a prop from a known Xoar electric makes life far easier since the heavy lifting is mostly done. Not that these are perfect (mine were perfect to within a couple mils only at some stations but not in all stations; a couple stations were off by 15 mils)....it is simply easier to sand off 20 mils rather than shave 1/8 inch or more.

BTW the carbon tube sock adds around 15 mils to the thickness when you vacuum bag the assembly. It would be much thicker if not bagged. I would not do one this way without vacuum bagging

Bob, when i start breaking it down there is quite a bit going on in this endeavor. Perhaps even more than building your own soft mount. But it's a good skill to learn just like building your own mounts

matt
Old 02-08-2010 | 06:37 PM
  #492  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

By my rough conversion (1 oz = 28 gr), 4.2 oz is about 120 grams, so the weight-savings is quite significant!

I will be looking forward to making one of these.
Old 02-09-2010 | 10:49 AM
  #493  
DaveL322's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Medford, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Slightly off topic -

Has anyone used the Syssa CF spinners? I'm interested in knowing the backplate thickness and weight of the backplate + cone for the 2.5 and 3" spinners?

Thanks,

Dave
Old 02-09-2010 | 10:56 AM
  #494  
MTK
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: DaveL322

Slightly off topic -

Has anyone used the Syssa CF spinners? I'm interested in knowing the backplate thickness and weight of the backplate + cone for the 2.5 and 3'' spinners?

Thanks,

Dave
I have a 3 1/2". I'll take measurements and send you an email
Old 02-09-2010 | 11:06 AM
  #495  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Meriden, CT
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

3" spinner cone and backplate weigh 1.4 oz or 40 grams
Old 02-09-2010 | 06:41 PM
  #496  
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tavares, FL
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: MTK


ORIGINAL: cmoulder


ORIGINAL: MTK

This shot is of the wood prop laminated in carbon. The technique is quite simple really. You simply place the assembly in a vacuum sealer and draw the vacuum
Matt, any chance you might do a mini-tutorial on your Xoar e-prop modification, with CF cloth sources, adhesives and technique involved?

I weighed both the APC 18x10PN and 17x13 and they are pretty hefty at 4.2 oz!![X(]
Bob,

I am preparing an article for publication in one of the RC magazines, preferably MA, but anyone of them that will pay, will do. Soon as I get commitment from a magazine that they are interested, I will send you the article.

There is significant weight savings that can be had. The 18x12 I just completed weighs in at 50 grams, about 80 grams less than the APCs. It is very stiff and strong as you'd expect.

There are a couple very important benefits, one of which is lower nose weight. But even more important is the significantly lower RMOI the smaller mass generates. The larger mass of the apc causes unwanted forces to the airplane which vary continuously throughout rpm changes. Lower rotating mass reduces these forces substantially and even guys with less flying experience (relatively speaking, probably not rank beginners) can tell the difference. Spool up and down become easier, crisper. True, flywheel effect at idle suffers but it matters very little in an ignition set-up.

That's why I have been most excited by this development. And the Xoar props make the transition to hybrid, true composite props easier because there is little carving involved by the user. These props were not available even as late as spring last year, to the best of my knowledge. I received my first ones around October last year.

Matt

Matt,

The reduction in spinning mass outfront does make for a surprising change in handling as you say. Remeber Dynamics that course in school right after Statics. If folks don't believe the effects they can try it themselves. Try holding the plane securley while its running at a fair RPM and sharply repoint the nose into a different position. You'll feel the forces trying to deflect the movement of the nose from the straight path you're wanting it to go. An exageration of this is the spinning bicycle wheel or the rotor on helicopters. When the wheel or blades are rotating, it is quite hard to rotate the frame or center out of plane with the rotating disk without getting unwanted results. Most people get this i'm sure. Trade the rpm of the spinning prop for the mass of the tire and wheel and there you go. Makes one wonder why the front end our planes don't rip off more often than they do. This is especially true when considering guys do repeated walls and other high G maneuvers.

I'm glad this came up because I've been wondering for quite sometime as to why pattern flyers don't use lighter weight props. I figured that our planes with long tail moments meant most would end up tail heavy. Consequently, i guess there was no reason to develop light weight props for pattern use. If you had trouble with weight you went for a light weight spinner. I like the idea of light weight props...... Makes a bigger Syssa engine even more practical.
Old 02-10-2010 | 08:25 AM
  #497  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ossining, NY
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

You'll feel the forces trying to deflect the movement of the nose from the straight path you're wanting it to go. An exageration of this is the spinning bicycle wheel or the rotor on helicopters. When the wheel or blades are rotating, it is quite hard to rotate the frame or center out of plane with the rotating disk without getting unwanted results.
Absolutely correct! I assemble my own bike wheels - both mountain and road - and when you spin a lightweight road bike wheel it is MUCH easeir to change the plane of rotation than when doing the same thing with a heavier mountain bike wheel.

At the kind of rpm's we're talking about with gas engines, having a prop that weighs less than half as much as these 120-gram APC's has got to be a good thing.
Old 02-10-2010 | 12:44 PM
  #498  
DaveL322's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Medford, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)


ORIGINAL: cmoulder
having a prop that weighs less than half as much as these 120-gram APC's has got to be a good thing.
What are your priorities for a prop??
Thrust
Pitchspeed
Quiet
Efficient (low input power needed for relatively high thrust)
Consistency
Cost

APC absolutely revolutionized model airplane propellers in the late 1980s because they were able to make props that with very few exceptions outperformed anything else available at the time, and did this for a very reasonable cost and with 100% consistency. 20 years later, some of the other options out there are finally able to compete with APC in some applications. The downside to APCs is that in the larger sizes, the mass is relatively high - but - it is very rare (and likely very costly, either in terms of time or money) to find a lighter prop that will outperform the APC. If you have power to spare, and prioritize reduced gyroscopics (and the associated loads on the engine/motor and trim of the airplane), then it makes sense to experiment/test lighter props. I'd also note that many of the lightweight CF props available to day that work well are blatantly molded from APCs.

Regards,

Dave
Old 02-10-2010 | 12:46 PM
  #499  
DaveL322's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Medford, NJ
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Todd / Matt,

Thanks for some of the requested info. I'm looking for weight and backplate thickness of the 2.5 and 3" spinners to see if they will work on some existing planes where I want to fine tune CG (save some weight on the nose), and the prop shafts are a bit short.

Regards,

Dave




ORIGINAL: tsyssa

3'' spinner cone and backplate weigh 1.4 oz or 40 grams
Old 02-10-2010 | 01:02 PM
  #500  
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St.Clairsville, OH
Default RE: SAP 180 (Syssa Performance)

Dave,
Is the gyroscopic effect of little importance?APC has some props they list as pattern and narrow. Some of them are lighter. Might they be viable options? I was looking at the 17.5x12.

Being a little green, I'm sure its a no no for a good reason that eludes me but why can't we use electric props on IC engines?
Thanks in advance,
Rick


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.