why a cub?
#101

My Feedback: (23)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fayetteville,
GA
ORIGINAL: []TEX[]
The H9 ARFs are pretty close!
ORIGINAL: abufletcher
In fact, what's the scalest Cub kit out there?
In fact, what's the scalest Cub kit out there?
#102
ORIGINAL: GaGeeBees
In terms of kits, you could start a whole thread on that topic alone.
In terms of kits, you could start a whole thread on that topic alone.
#103
Member
My Feedback: (11)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Smartsville,
CA
How many "museum scale" DR1s do you actually see in person? Yet how many Cubs both kit built and ARF do you see any given weekend at the club field? I think this "professed" love of Cubs is quite genuine. Besides, a full scale Cub is so simple you don't need a museum scale kit to make a realistic one.
#104
Maybe, but where's the Cub kit with guaranteed 100% accurate scale outlines (fuselage, wings, tail, rudder, undercarriage geometry) and maybe also a scale airfoil? You'd think there'd be at least one kit that could make these claims. Instead, what we get is companies talking about "scale-like" wire undercarriage, "scale" vacuum-formed dummy engines, working side door, and decals. That's not what makes a model "scale!"
#105

#106
Senior Member
Ha! I challenge you to build one scale with all the nuts and bolts, interior and all! That airplane is so basic that a miscalculation in one location and all bets are off for everything else! The fin- fuse- stab junction fillet is difficult to execute. So is the cabin area. It is a fun airplane to build and fly. I could Lomcevac(sp?) with it. It was fun to roll down the runway with one wheel, lift and then roll the other. It is a great airplane to practice 'slips' for the times you need to fly into and out of a boxed canyon (hey- I can pretend, right?). You had to use the rudder. I remember a Nats or some meet that had an absolutely perfect Cub and some less than perfect 'warbirds' outscored it. That's one reason I don't care for those 'beautycontests'- too much subjectivity involved. Ultimately- beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Have fun!
#107

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Glenview,
IL
#108
#109

I think you are discounting how good the Sig 1/6 , 1/4 and BUSA kits are for being scale. What is wrong with them can be easy to fix for some one who wants to. It would be much harder to start with the 1/5 sig, GP or Goldberg, as good of airplanes as they are.
#110
ORIGINAL: TFF
I think you are discounting how good the Sig 1/6 , 1/4 and BUSA kits are for being scale. What is wrong with them can be easy to fix for some one who wants to. It would be much harder to start with the 1/5 sig, GP or Goldberg, as good of airplanes as they are.
I think you are discounting how good the Sig 1/6 , 1/4 and BUSA kits are for being scale. What is wrong with them can be easy to fix for some one who wants to. It would be much harder to start with the 1/5 sig, GP or Goldberg, as good of airplanes as they are.
After looking at a build thread for the 1/6 scale Cub on RC Groups, you're right that that one looks like the kit for me!
#111
I have built and flown (3) Cub models over the years. All have been Sig kits, so I can't comment on the other kits that are available. I built the 1/6 scale full span version and the clipped wing version, and the 1/4 scale clipped wing. All are really nice flyers, but what I liked the best about these kits are the way they look!!! I think Sig has done a GREAT job with these kits!!! I'm even considering getting another 1/6 kit!
#112

The 1/5 Sig is dumb down snap together plane; the 1/6 and 1/4 are put the sticks in the same place as the tubes go on the real ones. I know you would want even more detail, but they are the place to start. Most dont care what is under the covering and the 1/5 a little bigger than the 1/6 which is "small" for today.
#113
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: vertical grimmace
A Cub would certainly be good practice if you aspire to fly WW1 aircraft. I have never really been a fan myself and never owned one, but I have flown them. I am more sick of P-51 mustangs and P-47 Thunderbolts than I am Cubs honestly! With the Warbird craze now, these are very prevelant just because they are easy to fly mostly I believe.
A Cub would certainly be good practice if you aspire to fly WW1 aircraft. I have never really been a fan myself and never owned one, but I have flown them. I am more sick of P-51 mustangs and P-47 Thunderbolts than I am Cubs honestly! With the Warbird craze now, these are very prevelant just because they are easy to fly mostly I believe.
#115
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fergus Falls,
MN
I just started flying this year and have always been fascinated with the Cubs, so I just purchased a Hangar 9 J-3 Cub PNP (already assembled) from a local hobby shop. However, a couple of the plastic windows are loose. What is the best glue to re-attach the windows? Canopy glue or epoxy?
Thanks,
Brian
Thanks,
Brian
#117

My Feedback: (6)
I love Cubs but hate Cub Yellow so when I covered my 1/5 th scale SIG I covered it in bright yellow. I have a Goldberg Cub that is getting the sunburst pattern covering in two colors of green (my son's favorite color). I have a SIG Clipped Wing kit from the mid 70s (.19 to .35 size) that will probably get a transparent covering when it gets built. I don't think I'm ready to fly that plane its a challange!
#118

I'm looking for the Carl Goldberg Cub wing kit. It's the kit that spans, 76.5".
Anyone have one? I'll pay.
I could also use any completed, covered or not covered, Carl Goldberg Cub wing of that size.
Can anyone help?
Best place to Post this request?
Thanks,
Charles
Anyone have one? I'll pay.
I could also use any completed, covered or not covered, Carl Goldberg Cub wing of that size.
Can anyone help?

Best place to Post this request?
Thanks,
Charles
#119

My Feedback: (126)
ORIGINAL: Avaiojet
I'm looking for the Carl Goldberg Cub wing kit. It's the kit that spans, 76.5''.
Anyone have one? I'll pay.
I could also use any completed, covered or not covered, Carl Goldberg Cub wing of that size.
Can anyone help?
Best place to Post this request?
Thanks,
Charles
I'm looking for the Carl Goldberg Cub wing kit. It's the kit that spans, 76.5''.
Anyone have one? I'll pay.
I could also use any completed, covered or not covered, Carl Goldberg Cub wing of that size.
Can anyone help?

Best place to Post this request?
Thanks,
Charles
Great Planes bought carl Goldberg.
You may be able to get a wing kit from Tower Hobby.
http://www.carlgoldbergproducts.com/...pma0963.html#1
#120

Thanks for your reply.
I'll try Tower but I doubt it.
I actually called CG today. They said the wing kit has been discontinued for some time. They actully suggested I buy the Cub kit.
I would if I knew someone who wanted the fuse, tail feathers and other parts?
Charles
I'll try Tower but I doubt it.
I actually called CG today. They said the wing kit has been discontinued for some time. They actully suggested I buy the Cub kit.
I would if I knew someone who wanted the fuse, tail feathers and other parts?
Charles
#121

My Feedback: (126)
ORIGINAL: Avaiojet
Thanks for your reply.
I'll try Tower but I doubt it.
I actually called CG today. They said the wing kit has been discontinued for some time. They actully suggested I buy the Cub kit.
I would if I knew someone who wanted the fuse, tail feathers and other parts?
Charles
Thanks for your reply.
I'll try Tower but I doubt it.
I actually called CG today. They said the wing kit has been discontinued for some time. They actully suggested I buy the Cub kit.
I would if I knew someone who wanted the fuse, tail feathers and other parts?
Charles
If CG doesn't have it, Tower won't.
I tried to get a window set for mine. They were going to charge me shipping from CG to them and then shipping from Tower to me.
I was lucky and found the windshield at fiberglass specialties.
You're probably better off getting the kit from eBay or RCU.
Bob
#122
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: naperville, IL
I agree that Flying a cub in scale flight can not be matched - all the sticks are gently used and adjusting for the flight and consistancy of speed - I love my cub - nothing better on a calm summer day - and I have those extras and aerobats
#123
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: harrodsburg, KY
I built a Carl Goldberg Models Cub and flew it with an 80 Saito 4 stroke. Very aerobatic for such a big wing. After a season, I built the floats and flew it off of the water for a while..what a blast! That was a long time ago. Now I am building a Sig 1/4 scale Cub. I like Cubs for Cub's sake. Nothing loks or flies quite like a Cub!</p>
#124
I love the Cub. I learned to fly with the Gold Edition Goldberg on a buddy box. Over the years I've built both wing version of GB Cubs. The last one I had was a 60 GP Cub. GB flew better I thought. Now after finding an old package of photos and log books of my dads. I'm building a 1/4 scale B USA like the one in the photo. My dads that he flew when he lived in Curvensvills PA.
#125

My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Holly Lake Ranch,
TX
You could say I,m a cub lover. I've restored many J3's and been envolved with the "LEGEND" factory since we started in '04. I've been out of RC for some time but now I'm building a SIG Kit. It will have a for stroke for power and be finished to look like Joe Debranski's who won Grand champion classic at Oshkosh in "08. I had a hand in that restoration.
Nothing says flying like the CUB. Yea, it's yellow and it's boring, but it draws a crowd every where we go.
Nothing says flying like the CUB. Yea, it's yellow and it's boring, but it draws a crowd every where we go.


