How to get an Abrams...
#1
Thread Starter

Feeling very Rip van Winkle here. Many years ago, I had plans for building a 1:16 Abrams when there weren't ANY. I even ran a Yahoo Groups site on modeling this vapor Abrams. I finally bailed on the idea and the site, handed the site over to someone else to manage, now it's gone...
Anyway, now I have the itch again, and lo/behold, there are many choices in 1:16... yay. But where to start? I'm sifting through the forum, seeing lots of info, but I'm not sure what the best choices are.
Looks like:
> Tamiya full option... nice, but I'm not quite ready to part with a grand;
> Heng Long "plastic", very upgradable;
> Heng Long "metal", but maybe the plastic HL + available aftermarket is better?
> Hooben... seems to look pretty good, not sure I get all the options, who they are, what the kit actually is... confused.
> Trumpeter static kit... maybe can be used as a top hat on a HL?
So what am I missing? And what's a good choice here for a full function 1:16 R/C Abrams, but not necessarily for battling?
Pat M
Anyway, now I have the itch again, and lo/behold, there are many choices in 1:16... yay. But where to start? I'm sifting through the forum, seeing lots of info, but I'm not sure what the best choices are.
Looks like:
> Tamiya full option... nice, but I'm not quite ready to part with a grand;
> Heng Long "plastic", very upgradable;
> Heng Long "metal", but maybe the plastic HL + available aftermarket is better?
> Hooben... seems to look pretty good, not sure I get all the options, who they are, what the kit actually is... confused.
> Trumpeter static kit... maybe can be used as a top hat on a HL?
So what am I missing? And what's a good choice here for a full function 1:16 R/C Abrams, but not necessarily for battling?
Pat M
Last edited by patmat; 08-24-2018 at 11:12 AM.
#2

Pat,
Read this, John did , what I think, is a good comparison.
Go to post #44 for the specs.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-t...c-setup-2.html
Enjoy,
Shad
Read this, John did , what I think, is a good comparison.
Go to post #44 for the specs.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-t...c-setup-2.html
Enjoy,
Shad
#3
Thread Starter

Ah, thanks! Seems the general opinion is higher quality & durability with Tamiya, but HL will get you there too (with more DIY work).
I still want to learn about Hooben...
Edit: Looks like there is nothing to see regarding a Hooben M1A2... at least not since a couple years ago?
I still want to learn about Hooben...
Edit: Looks like there is nothing to see regarding a Hooben M1A2... at least not since a couple years ago?
Last edited by patmat; 08-24-2018 at 12:11 PM.
#4

My Feedback: (1)
None of the 1/16 Abrams kits on the market are perfect IMO. I own both the HL and the Trumpeter Abrams. I'm building the HL as an M1A2. The Trumpeter is being built as an M1A1 since that's the version I have. I want to mate it to a DKLM metal lower hull, but I haven't ordered it yet so I can't comment about the fitment. They are also making an M1A2 version, but the errors (hull defects, hull errors, sprocket errors, basket errors) on the Trumpeter A1 are carried over to the new A2 release. Preliminary dry fitting of the Trumpeter upper seems to fit pretty well on the HL lower, but some re-engineering of some of the parts will be needed to get it to fit right since the rear plates are cut differently from the Trumpeter and the HL.
Hooben: Looks nice, but I don't know of anyone that owns one. It is vaporware as far as I can tell. Detail is nice from what I can see.
HL: Needs a lot of work to be a hobby grade tank no matter which version you buy (new radio, new controller board, and new sound card needed if sound isn't on the controller). Sound set isn't for an Abrams. Details are soft (as in missing or incorrect). Somewhere in between the Tamiya and the Trumpeter as far as build difficulty. Low resale value.
Trumpeter: HUGE mistakes in molding that are not easily fixed. The detail it has that doesn't need to be fixed is good. Don't recommend buying the A1 or the A2 kit unless you are a glutton for punishment. Difficult to build as a hobby grade tank. Low resale value.
Tamiya: Hobby grade out of the box since it's a Tamiya, but I don't own one and have never touched on in person. Has had some teething issues with the electronics. Details are also soft (as in missing or incorrect). Easiest to build as a hobby grade tank. Highest resale value.
Hooben: Looks nice, but I don't know of anyone that owns one. It is vaporware as far as I can tell. Detail is nice from what I can see.
HL: Needs a lot of work to be a hobby grade tank no matter which version you buy (new radio, new controller board, and new sound card needed if sound isn't on the controller). Sound set isn't for an Abrams. Details are soft (as in missing or incorrect). Somewhere in between the Tamiya and the Trumpeter as far as build difficulty. Low resale value.
Trumpeter: HUGE mistakes in molding that are not easily fixed. The detail it has that doesn't need to be fixed is good. Don't recommend buying the A1 or the A2 kit unless you are a glutton for punishment. Difficult to build as a hobby grade tank. Low resale value.
Tamiya: Hobby grade out of the box since it's a Tamiya, but I don't own one and have never touched on in person. Has had some teething issues with the electronics. Details are also soft (as in missing or incorrect). Easiest to build as a hobby grade tank. Highest resale value.
#5
Feeling very Rip van Winkle here. Many years ago, I had plans for building a 1:16 Abrams when there weren't ANY. I even ran a Yahoo Groups site on modeling this vapor Abrams. I finally bailed on the idea and the site, handed the site over to someone else to manage, now it's gone...
Anyway, now I have the itch again, and lo/behold, there are many choices in 1:16... yay. But where to start? I'm sifting through the forum, seeing lots of info, but I'm not sure what the best choices are.
Looks like:
> Tamiya full option... nice, but I'm not quite ready to part with a grand;
> Heng Long "plastic", very upgradable;
> Heng Long "metal", but maybe the plastic HL + available aftermarket is better?
> Hooben... seems to look pretty good, not sure I get all the options, who they are, what the kit actually is... confused.
> Trumpeter static kit... maybe can be used as a top hat on a HL?
So what am I missing? And what's a good choice here for a full function 1:16 R/C Abrams, but not necessarily for battling?
Pat M
Anyway, now I have the itch again, and lo/behold, there are many choices in 1:16... yay. But where to start? I'm sifting through the forum, seeing lots of info, but I'm not sure what the best choices are.
Looks like:
> Tamiya full option... nice, but I'm not quite ready to part with a grand;
> Heng Long "plastic", very upgradable;
> Heng Long "metal", but maybe the plastic HL + available aftermarket is better?
> Hooben... seems to look pretty good, not sure I get all the options, who they are, what the kit actually is... confused.
> Trumpeter static kit... maybe can be used as a top hat on a HL?
So what am I missing? And what's a good choice here for a full function 1:16 R/C Abrams, but not necessarily for battling?
Pat M
Here are a some photos of a few of my upgraded HL Abrams having fun. You will notice that there are next to no photos posted in this forum of Tamyia Abrams being driven like this.
If you are in California there is going to be a tank trials course being put on by the San Diego Tank Club on Sept 1st. I am not a member, but will be attending and running these two Abrams on the trials course. So lets see some Tamiya Abrams owner come out and show what their Abrams can do.





Yes getting air time.

Hard power turns in soft sand.



Jumping a ditch. The landing was hard and nothing was broken
#7

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pontyclun.Mid - Glamorgan, UNITED KINGDOM
Wow -you certainly drive your tanks hard !!
How do you find the lower hulls stand up around the suspension mounts ?
Or are you running a different lower hull?
Tamiya also sell a static Abrams but I think a full RC upgrade does not make this option viable ...
How do you find the lower hulls stand up around the suspension mounts ?
Or are you running a different lower hull?
Tamiya also sell a static Abrams but I think a full RC upgrade does not make this option viable ...
#8
If you just want an out of the box highly detailed static model then the Tamiya Abrams is worth the money. It can be refitted to RC should you wish too much easier than other static models.
#9

#10
Thread Starter

#11
Thread Starter

BTW, I'm still mulling over another option... doing something with my (possibly salvageable) 21st Century Abrams...
.
There's a whole 1:9 Abrams in this bin. All the broken parts allow it to compress better.
.

There's a whole 1:9 Abrams in this bin. All the broken parts allow it to compress better.
#12

My Feedback: (1)
How about a brand new, in the box HL Abrams for sixty bucks? There's a current issue with elevation but I have enough parts to replace anything it needs. I bought it, tested it (that's how I know there's an elevation issue), made sure it runs properly and everything else works fine and stashed it away. It was one of two, and the other I went all out on. Braced the hull, ball-bearing gearboxes, metal everything, from tracks with rubber pads to metal suspension arms and bearings in all the roadwheels and idlers, custom paint, and on and on and on. For me that project was mainly about trying new stuff, like seeing if I could get the armored glass right (give myself a B+ on that one), and making my own decals for the markings on the front (1/37 Tank Battalion, 1st A.D.) because those are the guys that were across the highway when I was at Katterbach with the 501st CAB (Combat Aviation Battalion). You can see the thread here
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-t...bat-ready.html
and if you scroll to the bottom of the first (and only) post there's a link for video on the Angelus Mortis.
Let me know if you're interested in the Abrams.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-t...bat-ready.html
and if you scroll to the bottom of the first (and only) post there's a link for video on the Angelus Mortis.

Let me know if you're interested in the Abrams.
#16
Thread Starter

BTW, here's an Abrams color scheme that may or may not grow on you...desert tan under, solid green above, and camo netting to give it the NATO look:
https://www.dvidshub.net/video/51884...rams-tank-crew
Explained here as a temporary thing:
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-t...ouflage-2017-4
https://www.dvidshub.net/video/51884...rams-tank-crew
Explained here as a temporary thing:
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-t...ouflage-2017-4
#17
Seeing as not many guys here have both tanks, I'll add my two cents.I have both the Heng Long Abrams with the Clark TK board, pretty much fully-upgraded with PDSGB, metal suspension arms, metal roadwheels, tracks, the works, and the Tamiya Abrams, pretty much stock out of the box.
The tank I take out for battling remains the Tamiya Abrams.
The tank I take out for battling remains the Tamiya Abrams.
#18
I have a henglong abrams with ibu2, recoil, barrel flash, upgraded trannys and 12bolt supply for fast turret and high speed. Lots of work to upgrade, easy under 500 bucks.
Still, the couple tamiya abrams i have seen blow it away and are way nicer.
there is a flaw in the tamiya abrams one of our guys found a nylon gear in each trany that has a D slot for lokcing on a shaft and while drivingh in fast mode the gear spins on the shaft. Dklm makes metal replacmenta for them.
overall, my impression as with most henglongs is the henglong is a toy, the tamiya is machinery. It takes quite a bit of work to upgrade a henglong and they come out quite nice when done well. Still nothing beats just building a kit.
Still, the couple tamiya abrams i have seen blow it away and are way nicer.
there is a flaw in the tamiya abrams one of our guys found a nylon gear in each trany that has a D slot for lokcing on a shaft and while drivingh in fast mode the gear spins on the shaft. Dklm makes metal replacmenta for them.
overall, my impression as with most henglongs is the henglong is a toy, the tamiya is machinery. It takes quite a bit of work to upgrade a henglong and they come out quite nice when done well. Still nothing beats just building a kit.
#19

We have over a dozen M1 in our club from all brands. That ranges from basic HL to fully upgraded ones with TUSK package and weathering.
I would say the Tamiya is the best built out of box, while the best you can do is to go with HL, but use the full-metal hull from DKLM with all metal options. Get TK60 or WH16 board with external ESC, do 3S if you want serious speed.
I would say the Tamiya is the best built out of box, while the best you can do is to go with HL, but use the full-metal hull from DKLM with all metal options. Get TK60 or WH16 board with external ESC, do 3S if you want serious speed.
#20
It costs a fair bit to upgrade a HL to attain reasonable IR battling standards. Disclaimer - I have picked shops that are known to me and the community, not the absolute cheapest. No bias to pick the most expensive source was intended.
Basic kit (since you're throwing out most everything) - $200 from IMEX
Lower hull upgrades:
DKLM full lower hull - $560,
OR:
RCtank.de track tensioner $50, upgraded gearboxes (PDSGB $165 or IMEX $70), metal tracks $80 (DKLM), metal roadwheels and suspension arms (Aliexpress) $100
So say, between $300-560 on lower hull upgrades
Electronics:
Clark TK22/60 board and miscellaneous items - $120-400
Recoil:
Clark/DKLM - $35-65
Of course, if you aren't battling, you're free to take the à la carte option. But assuming battling is the requirement, the costs quickly start to mount as the minimum money needed to get it rolling would be around $655. And that's not considering shipping costs from multiple suppliers.
To be sure, the Tamiya remains more expensive at $900 before shipping from Danville. For the ~$250 difference in cost, I guess people are expecting big things. For me, the big things are:
I did an experiment once - bought a HL Challenger 2 and did nothing else aside from install a Clark TK22 system to make it IR battle ready. That meant plastic gearboxes, plastic tracks, the whole lot. It was unbelievable how such a large tank could be so light and moved so nimbly! That only lasted one afternoon of IR battling though, because towards the end of the day, one of the tracks had stretched, and both poor plastic gearboxes' clutches were giving way.
Basic kit (since you're throwing out most everything) - $200 from IMEX
Lower hull upgrades:
DKLM full lower hull - $560,
OR:
RCtank.de track tensioner $50, upgraded gearboxes (PDSGB $165 or IMEX $70), metal tracks $80 (DKLM), metal roadwheels and suspension arms (Aliexpress) $100
So say, between $300-560 on lower hull upgrades
Electronics:
Clark TK22/60 board and miscellaneous items - $120-400
Recoil:
Clark/DKLM - $35-65
Of course, if you aren't battling, you're free to take the à la carte option. But assuming battling is the requirement, the costs quickly start to mount as the minimum money needed to get it rolling would be around $655. And that's not considering shipping costs from multiple suppliers.
To be sure, the Tamiya remains more expensive at $900 before shipping from Danville. For the ~$250 difference in cost, I guess people are expecting big things. For me, the big things are:
- A better, more polished turbine soundtrack (although Clark assures me that later versions of his boards no longer have the horrid stepped engine sounds)
- Y-axis gun stabilizer and turret heading hold (Clark offers this, but you have to buy the (much) more expensive board)
- Fibre optic lighting system
- Designed for extended use, hence maintenance access is taken into consideration (e.g. concealed switches)
- Photo-etched detail grilles
I did an experiment once - bought a HL Challenger 2 and did nothing else aside from install a Clark TK22 system to make it IR battle ready. That meant plastic gearboxes, plastic tracks, the whole lot. It was unbelievable how such a large tank could be so light and moved so nimbly! That only lasted one afternoon of IR battling though, because towards the end of the day, one of the tracks had stretched, and both poor plastic gearboxes' clutches were giving way.
#21
Thread Starter

Thanks, there's plenty to chew on here.
For me, there's another complication... I have a small machine shop and can do electronics too. Oh, and CAD and I do a lot with industrial grade 3D Printing, including metal parts.While I won't be tooling up a set of metal tracks, I could do my own gearboxes and a number of other things. Likely cost me more than buying, but I'm one of those who likes the building maybe more than the running!
We'll see how deep I get here...
p.s., in case you think 3D Printing is just that junky home printing stuff, take a look at this engine I did... even the brass is 3DP...
For me, there's another complication... I have a small machine shop and can do electronics too. Oh, and CAD and I do a lot with industrial grade 3D Printing, including metal parts.While I won't be tooling up a set of metal tracks, I could do my own gearboxes and a number of other things. Likely cost me more than buying, but I'm one of those who likes the building maybe more than the running!
We'll see how deep I get here...
p.s., in case you think 3D Printing is just that junky home printing stuff, take a look at this engine I did... even the brass is 3DP...
Last edited by patmat; 08-25-2018 at 05:36 PM.
#22

Pat,
Pure talent! Very impressive! In ah!
With talents like that, you could really help out the tanking community.
I dont see you having any issues making any brand tank work for what you want it to do.
If something breaks, you can just make a better part yourself!
Enjoy,
Shad
Pure talent! Very impressive! In ah!
With talents like that, you could really help out the tanking community.
I dont see you having any issues making any brand tank work for what you want it to do.
If something breaks, you can just make a better part yourself!
Enjoy,
Shad
#23
Pat, im kind of into boats as well, my father was, PTs, 1:96 warships, etc etc, i have his Sterling 42ft chriscraft corvette. Never knew what it was till i saw your online magazine.
My boat operation nowadays is LCMs for my shemrnas. I have a scratch built LCM6 i bought and a dklm lcm3 kit i havent built yet.
word is torro is making a RTR lcm3 in 1:16 now.
My boat operation nowadays is LCMs for my shemrnas. I have a scratch built LCM6 i bought and a dklm lcm3 kit i havent built yet.
word is torro is making a RTR lcm3 in 1:16 now.
Last edited by RichJohnson; 08-26-2018 at 03:13 PM.
#24
Thread Starter

KY Models: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...3#post39908495
KY makes all the RTR ships for the likes of Graupner and Hobbico (now Horizon).
But may be same as Sangjiang Models? https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...dels-1-16-LCM3
KY makes all the RTR ships for the likes of Graupner and Hobbico (now Horizon).
But may be same as Sangjiang Models? https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...dels-1-16-LCM3



