50cc Sukhette Build Thread, now in progress!!
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
In the next few days all the important components for the new 50cc Sukhoi will be arriving at my door so I thought folks might want to see a build and flight performance thread to go along with this new kit. In talking with Tom we agreed that this plane will be done pretty much "box stock" using the in house 3mm 53cc engine and house muffler, the optional hardware kit, (5) Hitec 5955 servos and (1) 8611 servo since I came up short one 5955, SWB servo arms, probably 1-1/4" in length, One Fromeco 5,600mAh flight battery and regulator, one Fromeco 2,300 mAh ignition battery and regulator, and only one possible change in hardware by using a RCBlimpro titanium unit since I already have one. Everything used will be noted, along with any tips or difficulties that are discovered as it moves along.
I don't have a programmer so all you Hitec diehards please forgive me for using a Matchbox to link up the elevator servos.
The engine and servos should be arriving today with the plane next Monday if UPS gets their delivery days to match the shipping notification dates. I'll be out looking to see where I left my camera in anticipation of the new arrival and will be posting pictures and notes as the build proceeds. Then the fun part, The flight side! I love 3D and don't have time for IMAC so the flight report will focus on the 3D side of the envelope. Bear with me and permit a little time to get used to the plane before it gets down and dirty.
So stand by, it's comin' soon...
I don't have a programmer so all you Hitec diehards please forgive me for using a Matchbox to link up the elevator servos.
The engine and servos should be arriving today with the plane next Monday if UPS gets their delivery days to match the shipping notification dates. I'll be out looking to see where I left my camera in anticipation of the new arrival and will be posting pictures and notes as the build proceeds. Then the fun part, The flight side! I love 3D and don't have time for IMAC so the flight report will focus on the 3D side of the envelope. Bear with me and permit a little time to get used to the plane before it gets down and dirty.
So stand by, it's comin' soon...
#3
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
He hasn't even started yet and I already have to tell him how to do things!
I flew the first one with 5645s in the wing and 6985s for the elevators. That's right, Karbonite gears. Because that's what I had. Your 5955s are way overkill but should be fun.
I also used a 2400mah Li-Ion battery pack on Rx and 730mah Nimh for ignition. Apparently Pat plans to fly this thing for an endurance record.
Matchbox? Why not just use two channels on elevators?
Or does JR not support that feature? (wink wink nudge nudge).
TF
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
It does but I don't have the time to spend reading the manual and working through all the trim an offset functions that will come to bear. JR likes to provide about 40% of what you need in the manuals and let you struggle and fumble through from there. Since I use the Matchboxes a lot it only takes about ten minutes to have both servos dialed in and ready to go.
I have the battery packs noted and like not having to charge everyday with a 50cc plane. Also flying 3D places a heavier amp load on batteries not normally encountered in IMAC. The day I see 45 degree deflections used in an IMAC contest for the majority of the maneuvers I'm going home. Using the sizes I noted I can fly for 2 or 3 days and no recharge. The weight penalty is 3.3 ounces over using a smaller flight battery. For me the use of nimh or nicad batteries is not an option. If there was a substantial weight savings with the same capacity I would go with lithium manganese for both and use the same Fromeco regulators.
As for the servos, I'm one that likes to "over size" so I can move equipment up, not just down. If I buy and fly a servo that's more than I need for a small plane it will be there when I go to a larger plane. For a few bucks per servo up front I save from having to buy twice and come out quite a few dollars ahead in the end. The fact that I've even considered Hitec servos is quite a step for me, so I'm not going with minimun equipment lists. I learned a long, long time ago that purchasing what a plane "requires" sets me up for having to buy the same number of products in a beefier size all over again for the next plane. That's worked with engines, radios, servos, and just about everything else I've used. That justs costs waaay too much in the long run.
BTW, when I went over to the flying field used by Jeffro#### in Oregon we flew from 10 am to 7:00pm and I quit counting the number of times I flew after the sixth flight. That's a lot of battery time without recharging. So now everyone has my reasoning for the equipment used. It can be done a couple ounces lighter and a few dollars cheaper, but this method is just my way.
I have the battery packs noted and like not having to charge everyday with a 50cc plane. Also flying 3D places a heavier amp load on batteries not normally encountered in IMAC. The day I see 45 degree deflections used in an IMAC contest for the majority of the maneuvers I'm going home. Using the sizes I noted I can fly for 2 or 3 days and no recharge. The weight penalty is 3.3 ounces over using a smaller flight battery. For me the use of nimh or nicad batteries is not an option. If there was a substantial weight savings with the same capacity I would go with lithium manganese for both and use the same Fromeco regulators.
As for the servos, I'm one that likes to "over size" so I can move equipment up, not just down. If I buy and fly a servo that's more than I need for a small plane it will be there when I go to a larger plane. For a few bucks per servo up front I save from having to buy twice and come out quite a few dollars ahead in the end. The fact that I've even considered Hitec servos is quite a step for me, so I'm not going with minimun equipment lists. I learned a long, long time ago that purchasing what a plane "requires" sets me up for having to buy the same number of products in a beefier size all over again for the next plane. That's worked with engines, radios, servos, and just about everything else I've used. That justs costs waaay too much in the long run.
BTW, when I went over to the flying field used by Jeffro#### in Oregon we flew from 10 am to 7:00pm and I quit counting the number of times I flew after the sixth flight. That's a lot of battery time without recharging. So now everyone has my reasoning for the equipment used. It can be done a couple ounces lighter and a few dollars cheaper, but this method is just my way.
#5

My Feedback: (15)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: APO,
AE, GERMANY
Geesh dude I seriously cant keep up with you. Perhaps when my company grows larger I will hire a professional plane builder and field assistant.
Cant wait to see the build thread! Im sure its yet another winner. Too many choices!
Cant wait to see the build thread! Im sure its yet another winner. Too many choices!
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (57)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Port Edwards,
WI
Silver, Mine should be here in a few days too. I have Tom's 3MM 53cc sitting on the bench already. I'll be using 5645s for the ailerons and elevators. I have a JR 8611A for the rudder. It'll use one NIMH 1500 for ignition and one 2800 Li-Ion for the flightpack. Hopefully, it'll balance good with no spinner and no pants. I'll be interjecting my thoughts and summaries on the plane throughout this thread.
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Glad to have you. Especially since you will be using much of what Tom suggested.
Engine and Hardware
Engine
The box with the 3mm-53 engine and the optional hardware kit arrived today. I must say, the engine casting looks better than most of the 3w castings I have seen, and that has been a lot of engines! I have four 3w engines here at the house right now and not one of them looks as good as the 3mm. The machine work on the hub is very clean. The hub bolt pattern is the same as a DA-100 so if you have one of the DA drill guides laying around it will be a good tool. Don't despair if you do not. If you have access to a drill press and take your time you can use the prop washer itself. Just make sure your work is secure and don't rush the holes. Once you have the first hole drilled drop a short bolt through the prop washer and prop to keep everything aligned and drill away!
This particular carb came fully equipped with usable throttle and choke levers. What a welcome change. I've become so fed up with engine suppliers sending out aircraft engines with a throttle tab designed for a weed eater and not usable on a plane so I'm extremely relieved to see an engine I don't have to modify. Thanks Tom, hope that's being done with all of them. Heck, even the fuel inlet is pointing the right way for a change. Most of the new engines I usually see have the inlet pointed to the side or down for some reason. In some cases even forward! All the carb levers rotate in the right directions, forward and aft. There's no awkward or difficult linkage arrangements that will be needed to make everything work right. Definately plug and play for the most part.
Intreresting positioning of the carb. In an upright position, the carb is located low on the left side of the case with the needles angled down and slightly aft. I do not ever suggest that a carb be tuned with a spinning propeller and I don't so so now, but with a cowl removed the carb needles are accessable from behind the engine and on the "top" in an inverted engine installation. Hmmmm, pretty nice!.
Too bad the muffler is always inside the cowl. This one is well polished and would look good outside the cowl. Oh well. Note the baffle inside the muffler. This is a step up from most mufflers which are usually nothing more than a means to divert the exhaust out and away form the engine, and have no form of baffle at all. The baffle will help considerably in reducing exhaust noise, and may well reduce it to a level where noise sensitive fields may not require a cannister. That saves money!!
Tom has provided a 4 page set of engine instructions that anyone should be able to understand and follow. Probably the best set of "working" directions I have ever seen. Step by step how to tune the engine, what to listen for and what to do. He also included a 1 pint bottle of Pennzoil Air Cooled Two Stroke oil so you can't go wrong if you simply read and follow the instructions. Save everyone and yourself a lot of time, work, and frustration and read the instructions before starting the engne the first time. Please.
The instructions contain information that will help the user in correctly securing the propeller. Pay attention to this section closely since propeller hubs from various manufacturers are not the same in thickness and may require the use of a longer or shorter prop bolt in some cases.
Of course the engine comes with the ignition and CM-6 spark plug. All you'll need to complete the engine installation is a switch and battery for the ignition.
Looking at the cylinder head and inside the exhaust port reveals some nice features. The piston uses a twin ring design which greatly assists in shedding heat. The inside exhaust port is "ovaled", which helps the ring positioning inside the cylinder, holding the rings better in the piston and reducing ring wear where they pass over the exhaust port. The cylinder head itself has a lot of fin area. More than adaquate to keep this baby cool in most installations and requiring only a little help from the user in tightly cowled applications.
As noted in the instructions the ignition timing is pretty much fixed. There is a small amount of adjustment available in the hall sensor, but only about 5 or 6 degrees total overall. The nice thing about that is it means that engine pretty much has to be correctly timed when it gets to the user. There's not enough room to get it wrong.
Hardware
Since I know the question will come up at least twice before this build thread is concluded I'm going to list the full contents of the optional hardware pack. As follows:
(1) Dubro 24 ounce fuel tank
(1) Dubro Gas Conversion Stopper, use this one not the one that comes with the tank. The one with the tank is for glow fuel and will melt with gas.
3 feet Dubro 1/8"i.d. tygon fuel tubing. !/8 will easily feed a 150cc engine so there's no need for anything larger.
(2) Dubro 2"x3/16" Steel Axle Shafts.
(4) Dubro 3/16" wheel collars
Approximately 10 feet of pull/pull rudder cable and associated hardware.
(4) Wild Hare ball link assemblies for 4-40 rod with 8-32 screws for elevator and aileron horns. No "A" nuts. You don't need them.
(7) Servo extension "keepers". They've come to be known as "squiggles" and work well.
(2) 1/16" hairpin cotters. A very nice safety when used in the anti rotation wing dowels.
(4) Sullivan clevises. The good kind.
(1) Fuel line "Tee".
(1) Fuel dot. Glue or silicone in type that works very well.
(2) 4-40x1" nylon screws.
(2) 1 foot lengths of 3/16" fiberglass tubing for control rods.
(2) 4-40x 12" threaded rods with nylon clevises. I haven't figurerd out what these are for yet. Probably choke and throttle.
(1) 4/40x12" all thread rod for the inside of the fiberglass tubes. Includes instructions for making the pushrods. Too easy.
Miscelleneous nuts, bolts, screws, and washers.
(2) 3-1/2" Dubro treaded wheels.
(2) Wild Hare rudder horns and (1) 8-32 screw. Very similar to the Dubro long tab type.
Typically the tail wheel assembly and hinges come in the box with the plane. As a rule there will also be an additional package of factory supplied hardware. Some of it you'll use, and some you won't. The factory supplied metric axles are pretty soft and the metric wheel collars often don't fit. I guarantee that you won't find a wrench or socket that fits them of any type other than Crescent. That's why Wild Hare provides the option of a stronger Dubro set in the optional harware pack. An aluminum wing tube will be standard.
I ordered a carbon wing tube to go with the plane since my flying style always bends aluminum ones. Also obtained was a 22-10 Bunny prop. I had been thinking that the 10 pitch might be a bit much but looking at this pretty piece of wood is making me think it may be a good choice. We'll see about that later. Nice to see the Bunny has now made it to the prop blades. Kinda rounds things out if you will.
I'll be using a 3-1/2" Esprit Models fiberglass spinner on this one. They come in one color, white, and I don't know if I'll get around to painting it or not. They weigh nothing. The only real weight is the aluminum backplate and a good portion of that has been removed to lighten the spinner even more. Easy to fit and cut, and the inside of the backplate center is raised and ribbed to better hold the prop for those using only a center prop bolt. Since the spinner is secured to the backplate at the side with four 3mm button head allen screws you don't need a prop adapter or long spinner screw. With the 3mm engine, you would not need a spinner adapter in any case. The end of the prop shaft is drilled and tapped to accept a spinner bolt. I'm not sure of the screw size yet but it appears to be the same as the prop retention screws.
That's it for now, the plane should arrive next week. Hopefully all the above will clear any questions about the engine and hardware kit. It's a good value with quality parts and will save a lot of time going to a hobby shop. At today's gas prices that's saying a lot. I'll be back with more when the plane arrives.
Engine and Hardware
Engine
The box with the 3mm-53 engine and the optional hardware kit arrived today. I must say, the engine casting looks better than most of the 3w castings I have seen, and that has been a lot of engines! I have four 3w engines here at the house right now and not one of them looks as good as the 3mm. The machine work on the hub is very clean. The hub bolt pattern is the same as a DA-100 so if you have one of the DA drill guides laying around it will be a good tool. Don't despair if you do not. If you have access to a drill press and take your time you can use the prop washer itself. Just make sure your work is secure and don't rush the holes. Once you have the first hole drilled drop a short bolt through the prop washer and prop to keep everything aligned and drill away!
This particular carb came fully equipped with usable throttle and choke levers. What a welcome change. I've become so fed up with engine suppliers sending out aircraft engines with a throttle tab designed for a weed eater and not usable on a plane so I'm extremely relieved to see an engine I don't have to modify. Thanks Tom, hope that's being done with all of them. Heck, even the fuel inlet is pointing the right way for a change. Most of the new engines I usually see have the inlet pointed to the side or down for some reason. In some cases even forward! All the carb levers rotate in the right directions, forward and aft. There's no awkward or difficult linkage arrangements that will be needed to make everything work right. Definately plug and play for the most part.
Intreresting positioning of the carb. In an upright position, the carb is located low on the left side of the case with the needles angled down and slightly aft. I do not ever suggest that a carb be tuned with a spinning propeller and I don't so so now, but with a cowl removed the carb needles are accessable from behind the engine and on the "top" in an inverted engine installation. Hmmmm, pretty nice!.
Too bad the muffler is always inside the cowl. This one is well polished and would look good outside the cowl. Oh well. Note the baffle inside the muffler. This is a step up from most mufflers which are usually nothing more than a means to divert the exhaust out and away form the engine, and have no form of baffle at all. The baffle will help considerably in reducing exhaust noise, and may well reduce it to a level where noise sensitive fields may not require a cannister. That saves money!!
Tom has provided a 4 page set of engine instructions that anyone should be able to understand and follow. Probably the best set of "working" directions I have ever seen. Step by step how to tune the engine, what to listen for and what to do. He also included a 1 pint bottle of Pennzoil Air Cooled Two Stroke oil so you can't go wrong if you simply read and follow the instructions. Save everyone and yourself a lot of time, work, and frustration and read the instructions before starting the engne the first time. Please.
The instructions contain information that will help the user in correctly securing the propeller. Pay attention to this section closely since propeller hubs from various manufacturers are not the same in thickness and may require the use of a longer or shorter prop bolt in some cases.
Of course the engine comes with the ignition and CM-6 spark plug. All you'll need to complete the engine installation is a switch and battery for the ignition.
Looking at the cylinder head and inside the exhaust port reveals some nice features. The piston uses a twin ring design which greatly assists in shedding heat. The inside exhaust port is "ovaled", which helps the ring positioning inside the cylinder, holding the rings better in the piston and reducing ring wear where they pass over the exhaust port. The cylinder head itself has a lot of fin area. More than adaquate to keep this baby cool in most installations and requiring only a little help from the user in tightly cowled applications.
As noted in the instructions the ignition timing is pretty much fixed. There is a small amount of adjustment available in the hall sensor, but only about 5 or 6 degrees total overall. The nice thing about that is it means that engine pretty much has to be correctly timed when it gets to the user. There's not enough room to get it wrong.
Hardware
Since I know the question will come up at least twice before this build thread is concluded I'm going to list the full contents of the optional hardware pack. As follows:
(1) Dubro 24 ounce fuel tank
(1) Dubro Gas Conversion Stopper, use this one not the one that comes with the tank. The one with the tank is for glow fuel and will melt with gas.
3 feet Dubro 1/8"i.d. tygon fuel tubing. !/8 will easily feed a 150cc engine so there's no need for anything larger.
(2) Dubro 2"x3/16" Steel Axle Shafts.
(4) Dubro 3/16" wheel collars
Approximately 10 feet of pull/pull rudder cable and associated hardware.
(4) Wild Hare ball link assemblies for 4-40 rod with 8-32 screws for elevator and aileron horns. No "A" nuts. You don't need them.
(7) Servo extension "keepers". They've come to be known as "squiggles" and work well.
(2) 1/16" hairpin cotters. A very nice safety when used in the anti rotation wing dowels.
(4) Sullivan clevises. The good kind.
(1) Fuel line "Tee".
(1) Fuel dot. Glue or silicone in type that works very well.
(2) 4-40x1" nylon screws.
(2) 1 foot lengths of 3/16" fiberglass tubing for control rods.
(2) 4-40x 12" threaded rods with nylon clevises. I haven't figurerd out what these are for yet. Probably choke and throttle.
(1) 4/40x12" all thread rod for the inside of the fiberglass tubes. Includes instructions for making the pushrods. Too easy.
Miscelleneous nuts, bolts, screws, and washers.
(2) 3-1/2" Dubro treaded wheels.
(2) Wild Hare rudder horns and (1) 8-32 screw. Very similar to the Dubro long tab type.
Typically the tail wheel assembly and hinges come in the box with the plane. As a rule there will also be an additional package of factory supplied hardware. Some of it you'll use, and some you won't. The factory supplied metric axles are pretty soft and the metric wheel collars often don't fit. I guarantee that you won't find a wrench or socket that fits them of any type other than Crescent. That's why Wild Hare provides the option of a stronger Dubro set in the optional harware pack. An aluminum wing tube will be standard.
I ordered a carbon wing tube to go with the plane since my flying style always bends aluminum ones. Also obtained was a 22-10 Bunny prop. I had been thinking that the 10 pitch might be a bit much but looking at this pretty piece of wood is making me think it may be a good choice. We'll see about that later. Nice to see the Bunny has now made it to the prop blades. Kinda rounds things out if you will.
I'll be using a 3-1/2" Esprit Models fiberglass spinner on this one. They come in one color, white, and I don't know if I'll get around to painting it or not. They weigh nothing. The only real weight is the aluminum backplate and a good portion of that has been removed to lighten the spinner even more. Easy to fit and cut, and the inside of the backplate center is raised and ribbed to better hold the prop for those using only a center prop bolt. Since the spinner is secured to the backplate at the side with four 3mm button head allen screws you don't need a prop adapter or long spinner screw. With the 3mm engine, you would not need a spinner adapter in any case. The end of the prop shaft is drilled and tapped to accept a spinner bolt. I'm not sure of the screw size yet but it appears to be the same as the prop retention screws.
That's it for now, the plane should arrive next week. Hopefully all the above will clear any questions about the engine and hardware kit. It's a good value with quality parts and will save a lot of time going to a hobby shop. At today's gas prices that's saying a lot. I'll be back with more when the plane arrives.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Awesome, looking forward to reading about the build. There has been quite abit of talk about the 50cc sukhoi here in Oz so I'm sure Howie will get them in.
In reguards to the match boxes, I think it is a quick, easy and very reliable way to run elevator servos. I have run them in both my 50cc planes and it works a treat, and the matchboxes are alot cheaper than the hitec programmer.
In reguards to the match boxes, I think it is a quick, easy and very reliable way to run elevator servos. I have run them in both my 50cc planes and it works a treat, and the matchboxes are alot cheaper than the hitec programmer.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
This particular carb came fully equipped with usable throttle and choke levers. What a welcome change. I've become so fed up with engine suppliers sending out aircraft engines with a throttle tab designed for a weed eater and not usable on a plane so I'm extremely relieved to see an engine I don't have to modify. Thanks Tom, hope that's being done with all of them. Heck, even the fuel inlet is pointing the right way for a change. Most of the new engines I usually see have the inlet pointed to the side or down for some reason. In some cases even forward!
That's one of my contributions. Nothing drives me nuts quite as quickly as an engine that cannot be used without modification.
Of course the engine comes with the ignition and CM-6 spark plug. All you'll need to complete the engine installation is a switch and battery for the ignition. You'll have to add a plug to the ignition switc lead that matches that on the switch you intend to use.
If you use all standard switches and battery packs no soldering is required.
Also Pat did not mention that the ignition comes with some nice plastic "wrap" that can and should be wound around the plug wire and other wires to prevent abrasion which can be done easily by rubbing on the fiberglass cowl.
(4) Sullivan clevises. The good kind.
Since the spinner is secured to the backplate at the side with four 3mm button head allen screws you don't need a prop adapter or long spinner screw.
A short follow up. I mounted the 3mm 53 on mine yesterday, The installation is very easy, requires 1" standoffs which I made from oak dowels in about 5 minutes, and 4 x 2.5" screws. This puts the prop about 1/4" ahead of the cowl face. The muffler fits nicely inside the cowl with no butchering, and without a spark plug in the engine the cowl will fit over the engine without any cutting. So it looks like the only cutting will be a small hole to clear the spark plug/cap (may not be needed) and perhaps a V cut at the rear to allow more cooling air to vent.
This is the easiest engine mounting operation I have ever done with a gas engine.
TF
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Tom,
You're right, my bad. I did not open the bag with the ignition yesterday and only saw an open wire end. The ignition switch wire DOES have the Futaba connector, and the open end I saw was the male wire end that was included for the owner to use on their switch if needed. That's nice. NOBODY does that! BTW, JR plugs directly into a Futaba plug without modification. The new style Airtronics will too, but the old style Airtronics will not without changing wire locations in the plug. Basically, using the Futaba female lead on the ignition covered just about all the bases for most switches in use today.
Looking inside the ignition cap and you'll note that the cap has the silicone insert. That's a lot better than the rubber insert that will break down over time. This eliminates the need for a later cap rework. Another very nice touch. The module has a note that you can use either 4.8 or 6v batteries, so that allows some flexibility in battery choices. You have two sizes of spiral wrap included with the engine. One is large for the plug wire and the other is smaller for the electrical leads. Use them since they do a good job of protecting things from abrasion. This is noted in the engine instructions and for those tha have not used a gas engine before I can't stress enough how quickly a cowl can cut a plug wire if they're not separated.
I didn't think anyone would be interested in engine pics. I guess I was wrong. I'll get some done and uploaded a little later today. That Bunny prop deserves a couple of frames by itself[8D] Here's a pic with some of the new Wild Hare ball links and rudder hardware.
You're right, my bad. I did not open the bag with the ignition yesterday and only saw an open wire end. The ignition switch wire DOES have the Futaba connector, and the open end I saw was the male wire end that was included for the owner to use on their switch if needed. That's nice. NOBODY does that! BTW, JR plugs directly into a Futaba plug without modification. The new style Airtronics will too, but the old style Airtronics will not without changing wire locations in the plug. Basically, using the Futaba female lead on the ignition covered just about all the bases for most switches in use today.
Looking inside the ignition cap and you'll note that the cap has the silicone insert. That's a lot better than the rubber insert that will break down over time. This eliminates the need for a later cap rework. Another very nice touch. The module has a note that you can use either 4.8 or 6v batteries, so that allows some flexibility in battery choices. You have two sizes of spiral wrap included with the engine. One is large for the plug wire and the other is smaller for the electrical leads. Use them since they do a good job of protecting things from abrasion. This is noted in the engine instructions and for those tha have not used a gas engine before I can't stress enough how quickly a cowl can cut a plug wire if they're not separated.
I didn't think anyone would be interested in engine pics. I guess I was wrong. I'll get some done and uploaded a little later today. That Bunny prop deserves a couple of frames by itself[8D] Here's a pic with some of the new Wild Hare ball links and rudder hardware.
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Evans,
CO
ORIGINAL: RustyTumbles
Awesome, looking forward to reading about the build. There has been quite abit of talk about the 50cc sukhoi here in Oz so I'm sure Howie will get them in.
In reguards to the match boxes, I think it is a quick, easy and very reliable way to run elevator servos. I have run them in both my 50cc planes and it works a treat, and the matchboxes are alot cheaper than the hitec programmer.
Awesome, looking forward to reading about the build. There has been quite abit of talk about the 50cc sukhoi here in Oz so I'm sure Howie will get them in.
In reguards to the match boxes, I think it is a quick, easy and very reliable way to run elevator servos. I have run them in both my 50cc planes and it works a treat, and the matchboxes are alot cheaper than the hitec programmer.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
That sir depends on how many matchboxes you need to buy.
I just use 2 channels on my receiver, one for each servo. Most radios have an automatic mix feature, if yours does not then a manual mix will do it. On my DX-7 (which I really like BTW) I set up a mix, used #5 or 6 which has the trim affecting both servos.
But for those who like match boxes, I have 4 of them for sale for $40 each, new in box.
TF
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Boys, boys!
There are as many different ways to set up a plane as there are people that own them. Each has their own preferences in equipment and electrical arrangements. I'm not going to begin to try and cover all of them, but what I will do is set the plane up the way I normally would to suit the way I prefer to fly. There has never, I repeat never, been anyone that did not like the way my planes and installations performed. Some may have thought the control sensitivity was too touchy or too soft, but all have liked the way they flew. From kit builts and bashes to ARCs and ARFS there has not been a complaint.
I am not going to use a choke servo since I believe it introduces an additional level of risk that outweighs it's increase in safety. I don't have a programmer and I am not going to run out and buy one for 5 servos. For me the use of Hitec products again is a giant step and one that I'm taking with extreme caution. Matchboxes have worked for me as long as I have used them, which is since they first came on the market. As for transmitter mixing and programming, I don't have time to keep up with every change in transmitter software that comes every other day. Between changes in programming at work, various transmitters where a manufacturer cannot seem to carry the same logic from model to model, servo programmers which have been well illustrated to be critical in the way they are used, and home computer updates and ungrades a person can spend their entire remaining life doing nothing but learning changes in software. I have other things to do more important.
If anyone has the impression that I'm developing a burr under the saddle they're probably right.
There are as many different ways to set up a plane as there are people that own them. Each has their own preferences in equipment and electrical arrangements. I'm not going to begin to try and cover all of them, but what I will do is set the plane up the way I normally would to suit the way I prefer to fly. There has never, I repeat never, been anyone that did not like the way my planes and installations performed. Some may have thought the control sensitivity was too touchy or too soft, but all have liked the way they flew. From kit builts and bashes to ARCs and ARFS there has not been a complaint.
I am not going to use a choke servo since I believe it introduces an additional level of risk that outweighs it's increase in safety. I don't have a programmer and I am not going to run out and buy one for 5 servos. For me the use of Hitec products again is a giant step and one that I'm taking with extreme caution. Matchboxes have worked for me as long as I have used them, which is since they first came on the market. As for transmitter mixing and programming, I don't have time to keep up with every change in transmitter software that comes every other day. Between changes in programming at work, various transmitters where a manufacturer cannot seem to carry the same logic from model to model, servo programmers which have been well illustrated to be critical in the way they are used, and home computer updates and ungrades a person can spend their entire remaining life doing nothing but learning changes in software. I have other things to do more important.
If anyone has the impression that I'm developing a burr under the saddle they're probably right.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
Pat:
I was not directing my comments at you. I'm speaking to the audience who may not understand that a Matchbox is not needed. I want to keep the cost of planes down so more people can afford them, that's all. I was just trying to make sure that people do not assume that they need a $50 matchbox.
Every time we add some component to the mix there are people out there, new to big gas planes, who get more freaked out and confused about what is "needed" vs. what is "neato!".
So many people follow your write-ups that I felt it was important to explain that not everyone needs to know how to set up a plane with a matchbox.
Also I agree the servo programmer IMHO is mostly useless. I had one for a year, never used it. It's cumbersome and unnecessary 99% of the time. Somehow JR and Futaba manage to get by without them.
Oh, another note to the audience. Since most of these aerobatic planes are similar in their setup, once I get one plane set up in my transmitter with all the zowies that I want, I just copy that model when I start a new setup, then rename and adjust it as necessary. Of course I alwys end up with a bunch of odd behaving mixes left over from the previous setup, but it does save time.
TF
I was not directing my comments at you. I'm speaking to the audience who may not understand that a Matchbox is not needed. I want to keep the cost of planes down so more people can afford them, that's all. I was just trying to make sure that people do not assume that they need a $50 matchbox.
Every time we add some component to the mix there are people out there, new to big gas planes, who get more freaked out and confused about what is "needed" vs. what is "neato!".
So many people follow your write-ups that I felt it was important to explain that not everyone needs to know how to set up a plane with a matchbox.
Also I agree the servo programmer IMHO is mostly useless. I had one for a year, never used it. It's cumbersome and unnecessary 99% of the time. Somehow JR and Futaba manage to get by without them.
Oh, another note to the audience. Since most of these aerobatic planes are similar in their setup, once I get one plane set up in my transmitter with all the zowies that I want, I just copy that model when I start a new setup, then rename and adjust it as necessary. Of course I alwys end up with a bunch of odd behaving mixes left over from the previous setup, but it does save time.
TF
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
I'll try to make appropriate notes about various personal equipment choices versus requirements as I go along. There are A LOT of different ways to do things, and often one will not be any better than another. Preferences and comfort levels have as much to do with an installation as anything else.
If you have a transmitter that permits slaving one elevator servo with another channel, permitting the use of dual servos to drive a given surface, it eliminates extra or redundant equipment. If you do not have a transmitter that permits this, such as a 6XA or XAs for example, there are a few other ways to accomplish the same thing. One is the use of Hitec servos and their programmer. That's about the only way you could accurately and effectively use a Wye harness to drive a servo pair.
The next way would be to use a Matchbox, Smartfly equalizer, or the product made by Futaba whose name I can't remember that does about the same as the other two.
Another method, which I do not recommend, is to use a simple Wye harness and reverse the way one elevator servo is mounted in the fuselage. This is a terrible way to do this, and rarely matches the other elevator servo.
Servo choices are something that has a lot of leeway. Wild Hare is very good at determining what their planes require in servo torque. As long as the owner meets those requirements the planes always fly well. The level of performance is something that's always up to the buyer regardless of the manufacturer. One can go much higher in performance levels, but that will always be at a higher price. As previously noted, I like to size my servos based upon the plane to be flown today, against what plane I might want to install the gear in a little later. I do the same for batteries since they can quickly add up the dollars when buying more batteries. Might that plane be smaller, having less of a speed or torque requirement, or perhaps larger? For me it's usually larger so I size accordingly.
If you have a transmitter that permits slaving one elevator servo with another channel, permitting the use of dual servos to drive a given surface, it eliminates extra or redundant equipment. If you do not have a transmitter that permits this, such as a 6XA or XAs for example, there are a few other ways to accomplish the same thing. One is the use of Hitec servos and their programmer. That's about the only way you could accurately and effectively use a Wye harness to drive a servo pair.
The next way would be to use a Matchbox, Smartfly equalizer, or the product made by Futaba whose name I can't remember that does about the same as the other two.
Another method, which I do not recommend, is to use a simple Wye harness and reverse the way one elevator servo is mounted in the fuselage. This is a terrible way to do this, and rarely matches the other elevator servo.
Servo choices are something that has a lot of leeway. Wild Hare is very good at determining what their planes require in servo torque. As long as the owner meets those requirements the planes always fly well. The level of performance is something that's always up to the buyer regardless of the manufacturer. One can go much higher in performance levels, but that will always be at a higher price. As previously noted, I like to size my servos based upon the plane to be flown today, against what plane I might want to install the gear in a little later. I do the same for batteries since they can quickly add up the dollars when buying more batteries. Might that plane be smaller, having less of a speed or torque requirement, or perhaps larger? For me it's usually larger so I size accordingly.
#17
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
For all those with planes in the first group of six.
I'd like to invite people that have one of the first six Sukhettes to post your assembly andflight experiences with the plane as this thread moves along. Doing so will provide that many more perspectives and methods for doing things that all will benefit from. Please take a moment to note centers of gravity used, control deflection for all rates, and any mixes and percentages that you end up with. Inclusion of your choice in radio equipment should provide a tremendous amount of information for people with various tastes in radio manufacturers to use in their set ups later.
Thanks in advance for the help. I know it's a little extra work, but it's worth it.
Pat.
I'd like to invite people that have one of the first six Sukhettes to post your assembly andflight experiences with the plane as this thread moves along. Doing so will provide that many more perspectives and methods for doing things that all will benefit from. Please take a moment to note centers of gravity used, control deflection for all rates, and any mixes and percentages that you end up with. Inclusion of your choice in radio equipment should provide a tremendous amount of information for people with various tastes in radio manufacturers to use in their set ups later.
Thanks in advance for the help. I know it's a little extra work, but it's worth it.
Pat.
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Darth-UPS-Vader dropped of a couple of boxes today that were beat to death. After making Vader wait while the boxes were opened I was surprised to find an undamaged plane inside.
Man, this baby is RED!! For anyone into graphics this is the one to start with! Lots of artist easle here. As the pics get posted you'll note that it's very similar in construction to it's big brother. Two piece gear legs, a very nice cannister pipe ring/opening in the cowl. A new item with the fiberglass tunnel cover/recess. A nicely tinted canopy, and all the various nuts and bolts that normally arrive from the factory in the kit. Yes, the tailwheel is there
The light was getting a little less than optimal for pics but I hurried and shot as many as I could. A few were with a flash to give a better view of the inside. I'm gonna post a bunch of pics, starting with the box condition and then go out and get to work. Tom came up with some easy to use dimensions for an engine mounting template using the 3mm-53 so that should cut down some of the thinking part of the assembly
Overall she's looking pretty good right out of the box. Very few wrinkles in the covering and the parts fit is great with nice looking glue joints. This should be an easy assembly and flying should be a treat!
Man, this baby is RED!! For anyone into graphics this is the one to start with! Lots of artist easle here. As the pics get posted you'll note that it's very similar in construction to it's big brother. Two piece gear legs, a very nice cannister pipe ring/opening in the cowl. A new item with the fiberglass tunnel cover/recess. A nicely tinted canopy, and all the various nuts and bolts that normally arrive from the factory in the kit. Yes, the tailwheel is there

The light was getting a little less than optimal for pics but I hurried and shot as many as I could. A few were with a flash to give a better view of the inside. I'm gonna post a bunch of pics, starting with the box condition and then go out and get to work. Tom came up with some easy to use dimensions for an engine mounting template using the 3mm-53 so that should cut down some of the thinking part of the assembly

Overall she's looking pretty good right out of the box. Very few wrinkles in the covering and the parts fit is great with nice looking glue joints. This should be an easy assembly and flying should be a treat!
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ofallon,
MO
Glad the plane arrived alive....I hvae done some service work in the local ups sort facility and my conclusion is UPS = United Plane Smashers.
#20
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Been in a UPS hub or two some years back when riding front seat with a major air freight carrier. Made my hair stand on end when I saw the way they "handle" packages. Meaning as few hands as they could lay on a package an still get from one point to another.
On closer examination mine did not make it as unscathed as I had thought. Found a place on the right side aft fuselage where something had managed to poke through the box into the side sheeting. It's in a non critical area and small enough where a 1/2" "dot" of covering will hide it with no notice.
Cowl Attachment, of note:
Finally sitting down with the plane for a good look-see and I noticed there has been a change in the way the cowl attaches between the 35% and 28% birds. The construction between the two is so similar it's scary! That's a good thing, BTW. The 50cc plane has a couple of wood "hooks" at the bottom of the cowl to set the cowl down into. This is addition to the upper cowl attach screws. This is very nice and should prevent a cowl from dropping down into the prop if the upper screws were to fall out. With this feature the cowl CANNOT drop lower than when it installed prior to flight. It just can't! You have to line the cowl up a little more accurately when you slide it in place but it's not at all difficult. If I can do it anyone can do it, and it only took me twice to figure it out
Reduces the fastener count in the cowl attachment as well.
In the pics you can see where the cowl fits into the fuselage hooks. This one was a little snug and left the cowl sitting just a touch high in relation to the top of the fuselage. The correction is very simple. I used a small, 1/4" wide rasp to adjust the fuselage hook depth a little bit. Took about 2 minutes. BTW, snug is good. That's one of the things that keeps the caowl from dropping down should the screws ever loosen up. You want snug.
**********************
At the moment I'm still making up my mind on the cannister cut out and fiberglass insert. For those that will be using cannisters it's a very nice feature but I'm one of those that still only needs a muffler at the places I fly. More on this later as I ponder it more thoroughly.
On closer examination mine did not make it as unscathed as I had thought. Found a place on the right side aft fuselage where something had managed to poke through the box into the side sheeting. It's in a non critical area and small enough where a 1/2" "dot" of covering will hide it with no notice.
Cowl Attachment, of note:
Finally sitting down with the plane for a good look-see and I noticed there has been a change in the way the cowl attaches between the 35% and 28% birds. The construction between the two is so similar it's scary! That's a good thing, BTW. The 50cc plane has a couple of wood "hooks" at the bottom of the cowl to set the cowl down into. This is addition to the upper cowl attach screws. This is very nice and should prevent a cowl from dropping down into the prop if the upper screws were to fall out. With this feature the cowl CANNOT drop lower than when it installed prior to flight. It just can't! You have to line the cowl up a little more accurately when you slide it in place but it's not at all difficult. If I can do it anyone can do it, and it only took me twice to figure it out
Reduces the fastener count in the cowl attachment as well. In the pics you can see where the cowl fits into the fuselage hooks. This one was a little snug and left the cowl sitting just a touch high in relation to the top of the fuselage. The correction is very simple. I used a small, 1/4" wide rasp to adjust the fuselage hook depth a little bit. Took about 2 minutes. BTW, snug is good. That's one of the things that keeps the caowl from dropping down should the screws ever loosen up. You want snug.
**********************
At the moment I'm still making up my mind on the cannister cut out and fiberglass insert. For those that will be using cannisters it's a very nice feature but I'm one of those that still only needs a muffler at the places I fly. More on this later as I ponder it more thoroughly.
#22
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
I'm thinking a surfer in a tube might just do it...
Seriously, this "Sukhette" is really a shrunk down version of the 35% plane in almost everything. The wings plug into a recessed pocket the same way. The gear attaches pretty much the same way. Interior framing is the same. Decking is the same. The rudder shape and volume is proportional. All the moments are similar or the same so it should IMAC well for a "small" plane. The ailerons are HUGE!! It will be a 3D butt kicker for sure.
Did I say this thing is REALLY red?
Seriously, this "Sukhette" is really a shrunk down version of the 35% plane in almost everything. The wings plug into a recessed pocket the same way. The gear attaches pretty much the same way. Interior framing is the same. Decking is the same. The rudder shape and volume is proportional. All the moments are similar or the same so it should IMAC well for a "small" plane. The ailerons are HUGE!! It will be a 3D butt kicker for sure.
Did I say this thing is REALLY red?

#24
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Glad you brought that up since I was trying to think of a way to segue it into another post.
The answer is absolutely not, and brings me back to the fiberglass cannister tunnel. An explanation is in order. Tom does not like to send me planes with instructions, or, and this is more likely, they have not been developed yet as was the case with the 35% Sukhoi. When I started looking at this 50cc version and noted the tunnel, the next thing I did was to look at the landing gear mounts. Since they appeared essentially the same as the 35% version I was thinking that you would access the gear through the pipe tunnel. Not this time buddy. The 'glass tunnel blocks all that off.
So now I'm thinking "how the hell are you supposed to install the gear if you can't get through the tunnel?" The light finally came on when I took the gear legs out of the bags and noticed that not only are they quite a bit thicker than those on the larger version, they are TAPPED to accept the retention screws! Oh man, this is gonna be easy!!!! Drop the screws into the gear from inside the fuselage, where you have tons of room and Locktite them in. Those that may have wanted to bend their gear into an arc can forget it. These legs are stout!
Another note. I have not been able to locate a third servo cut out in the back of the fuselage in order to tail mount a rudder servo. You have one opening on each side for the elevator servos so a pull-pull installation is mandatory. Probably better that way so people like me will stop pushing and pulling the rudder from only one side
The answer is absolutely not, and brings me back to the fiberglass cannister tunnel. An explanation is in order. Tom does not like to send me planes with instructions, or, and this is more likely, they have not been developed yet as was the case with the 35% Sukhoi. When I started looking at this 50cc version and noted the tunnel, the next thing I did was to look at the landing gear mounts. Since they appeared essentially the same as the 35% version I was thinking that you would access the gear through the pipe tunnel. Not this time buddy. The 'glass tunnel blocks all that off.
So now I'm thinking "how the hell are you supposed to install the gear if you can't get through the tunnel?" The light finally came on when I took the gear legs out of the bags and noticed that not only are they quite a bit thicker than those on the larger version, they are TAPPED to accept the retention screws! Oh man, this is gonna be easy!!!! Drop the screws into the gear from inside the fuselage, where you have tons of room and Locktite them in. Those that may have wanted to bend their gear into an arc can forget it. These legs are stout!
Another note. I have not been able to locate a third servo cut out in the back of the fuselage in order to tail mount a rudder servo. You have one opening on each side for the elevator servos so a pull-pull installation is mandatory. Probably better that way so people like me will stop pushing and pulling the rudder from only one side
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Evans,
CO
ORIGINAL: Silversurfer
Another note. I have not been able to locate a third servo cut out in the back of the fuselage in order to tail mount a rudder servo. You have one opening on each side for the elevator servos so a pull-pull installation is mandatory. Probably better that way so people like me will stop pushing and pulling the rudder from only one side
Another note. I have not been able to locate a third servo cut out in the back of the fuselage in order to tail mount a rudder servo. You have one opening on each side for the elevator servos so a pull-pull installation is mandatory. Probably better that way so people like me will stop pushing and pulling the rudder from only one side


Thanks for the gear info!



