R and D
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
ORIGINAL: Ih82crash
So what is the latest? What new planes can we look forward to?
So what is the latest? What new planes can we look forward to?
I have the 35% Edge 540 ready to go, but the market for that one seems a little limited. Am I wrong? I had 4 of the originals and still have 1, that seems to indicate that a 35% Edge is not what the world wants.
I have been considering a 50cc Giles, but again the market seems narrow. We are always fighting the sheep mentality which says if someone important says something is good then everyone has to have it. I like a little variety, not just flying a Yak.
I am also considering changing the 35% Extra 300 to a 260, and I'm curious about opinions of that move.
TF
#3
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Broken Arrow,
OK
I don't know, I'm kinda partial to the "Not what everyone else has" mentality. Thats why I bought the WH Sukhoi, round cowl plane but NOT a Yak[8D]. Of course I still have people say "That's a cool looking Yak"......"It's NOT a YAK!!!!"
Ever thought of doing another biplane? Pitts Python maybe?
Whatever you do I'm sure it will be cool and just one more plane I will want!
Ever thought of doing another biplane? Pitts Python maybe?
Whatever you do I'm sure it will be cool and just one more plane I will want!
#4
I also like something a bit different...
How about picking the best overall flying fuse, making several wing sets for it, Extra wings, Edge, Giles and folks could order up which version they wanted for their flying styles??
I think the Extra moving to a 260 would be nice, as well as a larger Ultimate that would work with the DA-85.
How about picking the best overall flying fuse, making several wing sets for it, Extra wings, Edge, Giles and folks could order up which version they wanted for their flying styles??
I think the Extra moving to a 260 would be nice, as well as a larger Ultimate that would work with the DA-85.
#5
I vote for a 50cc Giles. I would really like to have the 40% version but don't really have the room for another big plane and my 35% Sukhoi is so perfect that I don't want to quite flying it. Besides, I have a spare DA50 that would love to be in a Giles.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
ORIGINAL: Greg Cothern
I also like something a bit different...
How about picking the best overall flying fuse, making several wing sets for it, Extra wings, Edge, Giles and folks could order up which version they wanted for their flying styles??
I also like something a bit different...
How about picking the best overall flying fuse, making several wing sets for it, Extra wings, Edge, Giles and folks could order up which version they wanted for their flying styles??
A bigger biplane would sell more slowly than the 50cc.
TF
#8
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
ORIGINAL: rxfish
A 35 percent Extra 260 in a scale scheme would be nice, as long as it flies as good as the 35 percent 300! My best flying plane to date! What happened to the MX2?
A 35 percent Extra 260 in a scale scheme would be nice, as long as it flies as good as the 35 percent 300! My best flying plane to date! What happened to the MX2?
When you say "scale scheme", give me an example. I had the 33% Patty Wagstaff 260's before and nobody wanted them. The other schemes sold well, but the Patty's did not move at all.
So what other scale scheme did you have in mind?
TF
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Elko,
NV
I think the 35% edge would be good. I think whatever you decide on you should design it with a single aileron servo. I know that makes some people leary, but I fly my sukhoi with only one 5955 per aileron and have absolutely no problems, because the aileron is stiff enough to handle it. I think if people knew how well the mid wing cap flies they would sell out today!
#21
Senior Member
My Feedback: (40)
ORIGINAL: Pat Roy
I think the 35% Edge is due for a customer color scheme design contest.
I think the 35% Edge is due for a customer color scheme design contest.
The 50cc scheme the edge scheme was nice but so many people bought it over the years it got kind of old... kind of like hearing a good song too many times. The rest just didn't do it for me on any model.
In the 41% I really love the flame scheme.. the others again don't appeal to me at all.
Please take this as trying to be helpful with some honest input.. I realize you can't please everyone I am just sharing my opinion here.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
ORIGINAL: Ih82crash
Sorry I am a little confused. So You have a 35% edge available now? any pictures or specs I'm definately interested
Sorry I am a little confused. So You have a 35% edge available now? any pictures or specs I'm definately interested
We have designed a 35% Edge, it's been flying for a long time. 102.5" wing span, 96" length, same design specs as most of our other planes. It's very light at 23-24 pounds with DA-85, uses a single servo on each aileron.
I had 4 of them built in the last container I received to put out for customer testing and for promotional purposes. 3 were sold, I have one left. The covering scheme is not complete, it is done like our 84" Edge 540T except the tops of the wings are all white and the h-stabs are red, blue, and white.
At some point this will become a production plane with a new color scheme, so this last plane won't be an orphan.
You can see videos of it in another thread here, Charua has one and has flown the heck out of it. Same for Kevin Elder who did a review;
http://www.downonthedeckdiscussion.c...76ca408684c926
I'll put up a couple videos soon.
TF






