World Spitfire engine choice?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kingsport,
TN
I just got my 1/7 scale Spitfire from World today. This plane looks excellent, and was packaged with great care. I just can't say enough about it. Now I'm deliberating what engine to put in it. I read a review on this plane a while back in Model Airplane News, I believe it was. A 70 4c is recommended for it, and they used an OS 70 in the article, but had to add 6 oz of weight to the nose. So I say why not make use of that extra weight and go bigger. I've been considering an OS 91, anybody have any thoughts or suggestions?
#2
Junior Member
My Feedback: (32)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orange Beach,
AL
I have the P-39 which is almost the same except for flaps. I have a saito 100 on mine and it flies great. Don't go any smaller than the 91. Also mine balanced fine. Good luck
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kingsport,
TN
Thanks guys, the Saito 100 was my first choice, but I thought it was aweful light. Now that I know it will work out just fine, I will stick to the original plan. Now I just have to figure out if I want to start this one, or my Fokker DVII next, which will also be getting a Saito. By the way, I got a chance to look over the Spit real good last night, and I noticed the surfaces didn't seem to travel all that far.
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
One minor problem here with the Saito 100 in this size plane which I am expericencing and that is the torque and alot of it. I have countless sizes of two strokes from 46-3500 . We have here a honking engine on a very light (but re-enforced) frame. I have the idle so low its about to quit and the plane is still rolling forward. Make sure you get the CG right on.
#10
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: perth, AUSTRALIA
we are building a marutaka 60 scale spit , and want to know why there is a 3 degree offset in the engine mountings , asper the plan, is it for prop torque comphensation or what ?
perth australia
perth australia
#12
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: perth, AUSTRALIA
thanks richard, would you suggest to use the origional hardwood mounts or convert to the manufactured engine mounts , in which case do you shim to allow for this , also if we want to install flaps on this model,can we multi task the alerons to this task or would you install seperate flaps , the radio has a heap of available channels jrx10
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Crete,
IL
Original: Me-109K4
By the way, I got a chance to look over the Spit real good last night, and I noticed the surfaces didn't seem to travel all that far.
By the way, I got a chance to look over the Spit real good last night, and I noticed the surfaces didn't seem to travel all that far.
Original: BoGo
I have the idle so low its about to quit and the plane is still rolling forward.
I have the idle so low its about to quit and the plane is still rolling forward.
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
If you use separate aileron servos, you can set up "flaperons". You really should not be shimming the engine mount angles since it is already built in. Just mount the engine flush against the firewall.
ORIGINAL: dicksallie
thanks richard, would you suggest to use the origional hardwood mounts or convert to the manufactured engine mounts , in which case do you shim to allow for this , also if we want to install flaps on this model,can we multi task the alerons to this task or would you install seperate flaps , the radio has a heap of available channels jrx10
thanks richard, would you suggest to use the origional hardwood mounts or convert to the manufactured engine mounts , in which case do you shim to allow for this , also if we want to install flaps on this model,can we multi task the alerons to this task or would you install seperate flaps , the radio has a heap of available channels jrx10
#16

My Feedback: (72)
I had a Super Tiger 90 in mine, inverted with stock OS style muffler and it hauled butt...
These plane takes a bunch of nose weight so use horse power instead of lead.
My friend fly's one with a 61 two stroke and more than satisfactory.
The landing gear works great for an ARF and you need to use a good retract servo, the only thing that I and everyone else hates about the plane is that damn ugly canopy.
P.S. This plane is a vertual copy of the Top Flite Gold Edition Spitfire.
These plane takes a bunch of nose weight so use horse power instead of lead.
My friend fly's one with a 61 two stroke and more than satisfactory.
The landing gear works great for an ARF and you need to use a good retract servo, the only thing that I and everyone else hates about the plane is that damn ugly canopy.
P.S. This plane is a vertual copy of the Top Flite Gold Edition Spitfire.



