Top Flite Staggerwing
#128
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston ,
TX
ORIGINAL: Tall Texan
Still planning on the Saito 170 Radial or maybe a Zenoah 23. It looks like the radial will fit but will be pretty tight
Still planning on the Saito 170 Radial or maybe a Zenoah 23. It looks like the radial will fit but will be pretty tight
#129
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Algonquin,
IL
I am looking at putting my Saito 180 in mine. I think that I will have to cut some of the cowl for the rocker arm covers. I might put it in inverted to avoid seeing the cutouts. I will do more measuring to be sure.
Hey Jimt, yours looks just like mine! I am thinking about some black and gold trim to the wings to "finish off" the look.
Anybody else have thoghts about adding something to the wings?
Jim K
Hey Jimt, yours looks just like mine! I am thinking about some black and gold trim to the wings to "finish off" the look.
Anybody else have thoghts about adding something to the wings?
Jim K
#130
Mine arrived intact with no help from UPS, looks like they drug it behind the 727 and the truck. Major dings/tear in box, thankfully it just missed the wings.
#131
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Etiwanda,
CA
I'll always try to do 2nd day air. More expensive but cuts down on damage for me! I find replacement parts always have something wrong with them. Glad to hear you squeaked by.
The RCS 180se will fit fine in mine. Although I found the marks on the firewall to be around a 1/2" low. The original marks made the cowl "droop" down excessively. No other problems as yet.
One minor thing... The covering on the wings are scratched from the factory heat iron on all cap strips. It would have helped to use a sock.
This is one pretty awesome plane.
The RCS 180se will fit fine in mine. Although I found the marks on the firewall to be around a 1/2" low. The original marks made the cowl "droop" down excessively. No other problems as yet.
One minor thing... The covering on the wings are scratched from the factory heat iron on all cap strips. It would have helped to use a sock.
This is one pretty awesome plane.
#132
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Granger, IN
The only thing I will add is a NC number to the wings. I will need to search some pictures for what number to use. the N2100 may need to go.
#133
I believe my Staggerwing should be here tomorrow or Monday.
I'll be using an OS 160 four cycle twin (they want me to "keep it in the family")
They also said that the OS 325 5 cylinder would be "just too much" for this plane.
The Robart retract system will also be on the way.
I'll be using an OS 160 four cycle twin (they want me to "keep it in the family")
They also said that the OS 325 5 cylinder would be "just too much" for this plane.
The Robart retract system will also be on the way.
#134
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston ,
TX
ORIGINAL: I'll be using an OS 160 four cycle twin (they want me to "keep it in the family")
They also said that the OS 325 5 cylinder would be "just too much" for this plane.
They also said that the OS 325 5 cylinder would be "just too much" for this plane.
#135
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
ORIGINAL: pettit
I'll be using an OS 160 four cycle twin (they want me to "keep it in the family")
I'll be using an OS 160 four cycle twin (they want me to "keep it in the family")
Uh Oh. Don't tell me RC Report is becoming like the other magazines.....[
]
#136
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Etiwanda,
CA
It seems that I did need to raise the engine 1/2". The pics show the cowl and dummy engine aligned to the side graphics and prop shaft. I also needed to shift the engine ,facing the firewall, to the right 1/4".
#137
We like to comply with requests from the manufacturer, especially when they show a particular engine in the manual and I just happen to have one.
Plus, the 325 Radial is really too much (power and $$$) for this plane.
Plus, the 325 Radial is really too much (power and $$$) for this plane.
#144
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Algonquin,
IL
FGPierce,
Yiour pictures seem to show that you mounted the 180se inverted. Is that correct?
According to the RCS website, the 180se is 5" from the prop centerline to the top of the plug. My Saito 180 is 4.4" so it should work inverted, also. Did you try to mount the 180se at 90 degrees? Do you know how much room there is for a 90 degree monted engine?
Soory to bother you with these questions, but you seem to be moving right along. I have only taken mine out of the box and looked at it so far. My job, seems to get in the way of my fun.
Jim K.
Yiour pictures seem to show that you mounted the 180se inverted. Is that correct?
According to the RCS website, the 180se is 5" from the prop centerline to the top of the plug. My Saito 180 is 4.4" so it should work inverted, also. Did you try to mount the 180se at 90 degrees? Do you know how much room there is for a 90 degree monted engine?
Soory to bother you with these questions, but you seem to be moving right along. I have only taken mine out of the box and looked at it so far. My job, seems to get in the way of my fun.
Jim K.
#145
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Etiwanda,
CA
jimmkeeh
Your right! The engine is inverted. I'm sure all the cowls are the same shape as mine and with that being said you'll notice that the cowl isn't round. The bottom drops down a bit giving a little more room for the inverted position. I don't think you'll find the same room horizontally. However your engine is shorter than mine so you may be able to sneak it in. Now there's the consideration of cooling. The cowl is too tight against the fuselage for that. You'll need to make a hole. I wanted mine on the bottom. After all a lot time spent in admiration of this beauty will be on the ground. The unsightly hole won't be as noticeable to the ants.
Your right! The engine is inverted. I'm sure all the cowls are the same shape as mine and with that being said you'll notice that the cowl isn't round. The bottom drops down a bit giving a little more room for the inverted position. I don't think you'll find the same room horizontally. However your engine is shorter than mine so you may be able to sneak it in. Now there's the consideration of cooling. The cowl is too tight against the fuselage for that. You'll need to make a hole. I wanted mine on the bottom. After all a lot time spent in admiration of this beauty will be on the ground. The unsightly hole won't be as noticeable to the ants.
#149
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Algonquin,
IL
fgpierce,
Yeah, I saw the shape of the cowl was better for inverted. This is good for gas, but I amy have to lower the tank for inverted glow. Siphoning can be a real problem!
In either case. I plan on the exhaust going out the bottom, so I will have openings there for the muffler and cooling.
Jim K.
Yeah, I saw the shape of the cowl was better for inverted. This is good for gas, but I amy have to lower the tank for inverted glow. Siphoning can be a real problem!
In either case. I plan on the exhaust going out the bottom, so I will have openings there for the muffler and cooling.
Jim K.
#150

My Feedback: (123)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hattiesburg,
MS
Mine will be here next week. I noticed on the Top-Flite website video that on landing they had full flaps on the lower wing. I am trying to figure that programming out. How to mix all 4 ailerons for flying and only the lower ailerons for flaps? This is one exciting project for sure. I am waiting to decide what engine. I want a gasser for sure.


