Go Back  RCU Forums > Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more > Batteries & Chargers
Receiver& ignition on same batter >

Receiver& ignition on same batter

Community
Search
Notices
Batteries & Chargers Nicads, Nickel Metal Hydride, Lithium, LiPoly, Chargers, Cyclers, etc...

Receiver& ignition on same batter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2013 | 01:00 PM
  #26  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 280
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BarracudaHockey
I'm just curious, I swear i'm not trying to stir a pot, but how many ignitions have you had or personally seen short out and take out a battery?

No problem, I see your point.

Personally I haven't seen or read of any ignition system shorting out, but it's not really something that you're going to hear about on a regular basis. If it were to happen, the person would probably lose the plane, if it was piggy-backed on the receiver battery and would go down as "radio failure" or a "bad battery."

Another thing that could happen that I didn't mention, is a high current draw situation draining the flight pack. For instance, if the spark plug was worn or incorrectly gapped (i.e. excessive gap), that would cause the amp draw to increase quite a bit, and could drain the pack at a faster rate than expected.

This is all strictly opinion on my part, but again, why take the chance when batteries are so inexpensive?

Last edited by bchapman; 11-18-2013 at 02:01 PM.
Old 11-18-2013 | 01:31 PM
  #27  
hookedonrc's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

I have never used electronic ignition, but my thumbs probably have more shorts in them....
Old 11-18-2013 | 03:50 PM
  #28  
pilotpete2's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lyndonville, VT
Default

An IBEC, such as the Tech-aero will limit the current that a shorted out ignition module can draw. While a shorted ignition module is rare, I would not directly hook an ignition module to the receiver bus or "Y" it to the same battery as the receiver without the current limiting and noise filtering that the IBEC provides.
If an ignition module does short out, you'll know it within 1 second, since that's about the time it'll take your engines sudden case of the quiets to reach your position on the flight line, you're not going to be flying around too long with that shorted out ignition.
Pete
Old 11-18-2013 | 04:47 PM
  #29  
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Siler City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by BarracudaHockey
Hundreds of flights, no shorted ignitions.

If the battery in your transmitter shorts out do you have another transmitter handy?


+1

You go BarracudaHockey l'm with you...........
Old 11-18-2013 | 06:05 PM
  #30  
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: walla walla, WA
Default

Originally Posted by BarracudaHockey
Hundreds of flights, no shorted ignitions.

If the battery in your transmitter shorts out do you have another transmitter handy?
thousands of flights- have had ignition develop an internal short and fry the receiver because the ignition and engine switches were located next to each other. Postmortem revealed that when you propped the motor over there was a spark going between the ignition on off switch to the receiver on off switch. One fried receiver was the result as well as a bent plane. One foot of separation between anything ignition and receiver is recommended for a reason... Kind of like checking the chamber is empty when handling a firearm. If you do everything else right it probably wont cause a problem but if you don't and inadvertently pull the trigger. It could be very bad....
Old 11-18-2013 | 06:43 PM
  #31  
My Feedback: (42)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by bchapman
I wouldn't use the same battery for the ignition and receiver. If the ignition shorted out and drained the battery you wouldn't have control on the aircraft. I'm a fan of redundancy. Why take the chance?
Re. the concern about a shorted CDI, have a look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTgfkCZ5Dl8
Old 11-18-2013 | 06:58 PM
  #32  
My Feedback: (42)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 2walla
thousands of flights- have had ignition develop an internal short and fry the receiver because the ignition and engine switches were located next to each other. Postmortem revealed that when you propped the motor over there was a spark going between the ignition on off switch to the receiver on off switch. One fried receiver was the result as well as a bent plane. One foot of separation between anything ignition and receiver is recommended for a reason... Kind of like checking the chamber is empty when handling a firearm. If you do everything else right it probably wont cause a problem but if you don't and inadvertently pull the trigger. It could be very bad....
And re. this concern, have a look at this as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw743dZEhsI

TVS suppressors can be made available.
Old 11-18-2013 | 07:32 PM
  #33  
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: walla walla, WA
Default

Not testing anything here as you aren't letting the circuit build the voltage necessary to spark with your connection set up. Hook the jumper you are using to form the airgap to the ground lead from your ibec vice the shield wire and see if that causes a problem. Bet something cooks. A stray spark is going to jump to ground not the positive lead coming in. Is there any suppression on the ground side? High voltage can do strange things...
Old 11-19-2013 | 05:25 AM
  #34  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Destin, FL
Default

Guys-

I am interested in a single battery in a 30cc Yak I am putting together with a DLE 30 (new HV ignition).

Any thoughts on battery size? I will be using LIFEs.

I was planning on using two by 2300 but that may be overkill.

Larry
Old 11-19-2013 | 05:54 AM
  #35  
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,288
Received 444 Likes on 363 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

1 2300 or 2500 is fine
Old 11-19-2013 | 07:19 AM
  #36  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 280
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NJRCFLYER2
Re. the concern about a shorted CDI, have a look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTgfkCZ5Dl8
Great information and excellent video! I guess if you use an IBEC you can go with a single receiver and ignition module battery.

I don't see that much of an advantage other than if you are really tight in the weight department. A good IBEC looks like it's about $40. You could probably get a decent battery and switch for about that much, so price isn't that big of a difference either.

I still like the simplicity of the two battery approach through. All you have there is a battery and a switch instead of a complex electronic device. But, either method seems safe enough for me. I guess it's just a personal preference.

Last edited by bchapman; 11-19-2013 at 07:23 AM.
Old 11-19-2013 | 12:30 PM
  #37  
pilotpete2's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lyndonville, VT
Default

The traditional two battery and switch setup has one safety drawback (OK, glow engines too) If power to the receiver is lost due to a bad connection in the battery or switch harness. No matter what the fail safe setting the receiver provides, the engine will continue at whatever power setting in affect at the time the power to the receiver was lost.
In an IBEC setup, if power to the receiver is lost for any reason, the engine quits immediately instead of continuing at whatever the throttle setting was at the moment the power was lost.
Pete
Old 11-19-2013 | 12:41 PM
  #38  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 280
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpete2
The traditional two battery and switch setup has one safety drawback (OK, glow engines too) If power to the receiver is lost due to a bad connection in the battery or switch harness. No matter what the fail safe setting the receiver provides, the engine will continue at whatever power setting in affect at the time the power to the receiver was lost.
In an IBEC setup, if power to the receiver is lost for any reason, the engine quits immediately instead of continuing at whatever the throttle setting was at the moment the power was lost.
Pete
Good point I hadn't thought of that. That's what i love about these forums, people always come up with ideas you may not have thought of!

I guess the best method would be to use an IBEC setup with dual receiver batteries and switches?

I use two receiver batteries and two switches now on receiver and one for ignition alone.

I know there will be somebody that will say "what if the receiver fails do you have another?" or something of that nature, but I'm just trying to brainstorm the best approach without going overboard.

Last edited by bchapman; 11-19-2013 at 12:46 PM.
Old 11-19-2013 | 12:46 PM
  #39  
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,288
Received 444 Likes on 363 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

The RC Excel optical kill does the same thing, loose signal and it kills the engine.

I always want dead stick on signal loss, some argue the point of low idle in fail safe but I'd rather be on the safe side.

@Bchapman - redundancy is great, it just depends on how far you want to take it
Old 11-19-2013 | 01:22 PM
  #40  
hookedonrc's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

So far, from what I have read, I have not changed my plans to put in an optical kill switch/IBE in my Pulse 125 using 1 battery. If I have to wait for a short or some other failure, believe me, the plane might last longer. I have been known to test the life expectancy of my planes.
Old 11-19-2013 | 01:48 PM
  #41  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Destin, FL
Default

Andy-

My question above was on using a single 2300 LIFE with a 30 cc yak.

Just for info--I have regular voltage high torque digital servos all around.

I suspect that the ignition probably uses around 200 or so mah per flight.

What do you think I could expect for a reasonable flight time and number of flights before recharging this single battery?

Thanks-

Larry
Old 11-19-2013 | 02:00 PM
  #42  
pilotpete2's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lyndonville, VT
Default

"I have been known to test the life expectancy of my planes. "
Yeah, they do all seem to come with an expiration date

I just lost my "beater" (8 seasons) 4 Star 60 to failed CA hinges. About 25' off the deck in a shallow dive, the elevator hinges let go. Spectacular full power lawn dart!
My bad for not checking the hinges more frequently
Well now I have a good excuse to get the new 4 Star 64 ARF! Some nice changes to the original design.
Pete
Old 11-19-2013 | 02:07 PM
  #43  
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 28,288
Received 444 Likes on 363 Posts
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by phakur
Andy-

My question above was on using a single 2300 LIFE with a 30 cc yak.

Just for info--I have regular voltage high torque digital servos all around.

I suspect that the ignition probably uses around 200 or so mah per flight

What do you think I could expect for a reasonable flight time and number of flights before recharging this single battery?

Thanks-

Larry
On that setup on a 50cc with a 2300 I was charging every 3 flights (10 to 12 minutes), it would report the battery at 50% capacity when I plugged it in. A few times I would do 4 flights and it would be in the 40 percent range.

Probably could have done more but as fast as they charge, why bother right?
Old 11-19-2013 | 02:36 PM
  #44  
hookedonrc's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpete2
"I just lost my "beater" (8 seasons) 4 Star 60 to failed CA hinges. About 25' off the deck in a shallow dive, the elevator hinges let go. Spectacular full power lawn dart!
My bad for not checking the hinges more frequently
I know what you mean about those CA hinges. On my second flight of my Ultra Stick Lite with a G26 for power, the entire left aileron ripped completely off. How I got it back on the ground with no more damage is the great unknown of my time in this hobby.
Old 11-19-2013 | 03:06 PM
  #45  
acerc's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,131
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: The Sunshine state, when it's not raining!
Default

I am running a single, LiFe 3000mah, in my Pitts with a Tech-Aero ign cut off. So far I can fly two days, 3 flights each, before recharging. About 1-1/2 hour air time, and not a single glitch to boot.
It is powered by a 55cc twin.
I am so happy with the set-up I am switching my Ultimate over to one battery. It needs replacements.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	16.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	66.3 KB
ID:	1940665  
Old 11-19-2013 | 03:22 PM
  #46  
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by bchapman
Great information and excellent video! I guess if you use an IBEC you can go with a single receiver and ignition module battery.

I don't see that much of an advantage other than if you are really tight in the weight department. A good IBEC looks like it's about $40. You could probably get a decent battery and switch for about that much, so price isn't that big of a difference either.

I still like the simplicity of the two battery approach through. All you have there is a battery and a switch instead of a complex electronic device. But, either method seems safe enough for me. I guess it's just a personal preference.
Or space, .60 size airplanes on the new generation of small gas engines can get tight.
Old 11-19-2013 | 06:20 PM
  #47  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Palatine, IL
Default

Rats nest topic. The big manufactures DA, OS, and DLE say 8-12 inch spacing between ignition and radio equipment. Is it possible to transmit RF interference through a battery? Dose the battery chemistry play a factor? Rats nest.
Old 11-19-2013 | 06:24 PM
  #48  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default

Originally Posted by waynem
Thanks Pilotpete, Where can I find a Ibec and how much does it cost? Wayne M.
this one is good as well http://syssaaircraft.net/shop/syssa-...n-kill-switch/
Old 11-19-2013 | 10:31 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Newaygo, MI
Default

Same one !!!! they just sell them !!!!
Old 11-20-2013 | 09:49 AM
  #50  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Myers Florida OH
Default

Originally Posted by phakur
Guys-

I am interested in a single battery in a 30cc Yak I am putting together with a DLE 30 (new HV ignition).

I have three 30cc planes and all have the IBEC Unit and a single 2300 mah A123 pack. If I fly 6 flights I generally have to put back in 800 to 1000 mah . The actual usage is less since the charger is less than 100% efficient.

Any thoughts on battery size? I will be using LIFEs.

I was planning on using two by 2300 but that may be overkill.

Larry
I have three 30cc planes and all have a single A123 6.6 volt of 2300 mah and an Ibec Unit. After 6 flights I generally have to put 800 to 1000 mah back in the battery. Since the charger is less than 100% efficient the actual usage in less. My rule of thumb is to use no more than half the battery's capacity before charging. One 2300 is fine in a 30cc plane.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.