Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Define a drone >

Define a drone

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Define a drone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2015 | 10:04 AM
  #151  
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Browns Mills, NJ
Default

In simple terms.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) - Any vehicle that does not have a human physically in it, but it is being controlling remotely period!

Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) - Any vehicle that does not have a human in it , but it is being controlling remotely by Line of Sight (LOS) or it is being controlled by video transmission. It may also be partially or fully autonomous by way of a computer or flight controller.

Drone - An unmanned aircraft or ship that can navigate autonomously, without human control or beyond line of sight. (Loosely used definition) Any unmanned aircraft or ship that is guided remotely.

Note: The FAA uses UAS because it defines both UAV and a Drone.
Old 12-29-2015 | 10:09 AM
  #152  
AndyAndrews's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,147
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Originally Posted by 108buzz
In simple terms.Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) - Any vehicle that does not have a human physically in it, but it is being controlling remotely period!Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) - Any vehicle that does not have a human in it , but it is being controlling remotely by Line of Sight (LOS) or it is being controlled by video transmission. It may also be partially or fully autonomous by way of a computer or flight controller.Drone - An unmanned aircraft or ship that can navigate autonomously, without human control or beyond line of sight. (Loosely used definition) Any unmanned aircraft or ship that is guided remotely.Note: The FAA uses UAS because it defines both UAV and a Drone.
lol, I just love it when people use the term "period" as if to say things never change. When it comes to the FAA, the word period apply's every time they open their mouths.
Old 12-29-2015 | 10:10 AM
  #153  
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Browns Mills, NJ
Default

Period! BLAHHHH

Last edited by 108buzz; 12-29-2015 at 10:12 AM.
Old 12-29-2015 | 10:59 AM
  #154  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Killeen, TX
Default

It maybe that FAA is getting their terminology from Websters Dictionary..."Drone" an unmanned aircraft or ship guided by remote control.
Remote control could be just about anything electronic !!
Old 12-29-2015 | 11:11 AM
  #155  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyAndrews
This is the problem Drone buzes Obama motorcade...http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...hawaii-n487176
Too soon to tell but perhaps that was clockboy's drone, you know the one he invented himself. In that case all will be forgiven, and then some.
Old 12-29-2015 | 11:13 AM
  #156  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 108buzz
In simple terms.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) - Any vehicle that does not have a human physically in it, but it is being controlling remotely period!

Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) - Any vehicle that does not have a human in it , but it is being controlling remotely by Line of Sight (LOS) or it is being controlled by video transmission. It may also be partially or fully autonomous by way of a computer or flight controller.

Drone - An unmanned aircraft or ship that can navigate autonomously, without human control or beyond line of sight. (Loosely used definition) Any unmanned aircraft or ship that is guided remotely.

Note: The FAA uses UAS because it defines both UAV and a Drone.
So would r/c cars, motorcycles, blimps and subs also be considered drones?
Old 12-29-2015 | 11:17 AM
  #157  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyAndrews
lol, I just love it when people use the term "period" as if to say things never change. When it comes to the FAA, the word period apply's every time they open their mouths.
"....if, ands, or buts.....Period"!
Old 12-29-2015 | 12:30 PM
  #158  
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Hartford, CT
Default

Originally Posted by SushiHunter
Well if you're out for exciting adrenelin rush r/c why aren't you doing turbines then? Hell, even my Habu 32 8s stumax will give you more of a rush then a r/c hovering octopus.

One thing I've noticed about watching many various custom mr's is the larger they are, the more lethargic they perform. I also know personally about 8 local heli pilots who don't like mr's at all. They get on both the electric and nitro 700 t-rex helis and they are doing big air and crazy stuff. You can't say that mr's is a more of a adrenelin rush then that cause those guys are shaking while they are doing heli maneuvers a few feet off the ground. I've never seen anyone shaking while flying a g.d. mr.

Here's a heli video for you. Check it out and please post up a video of a mr "drone" that's even half exciting as this heli.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Kv67V63ZEo
I love it...that's awesome!
Old 12-29-2015 | 12:31 PM
  #159  
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Hartford, CT
Default

Originally Posted by SushiHunter
So would r/c cars, motorcycles, blimps and subs also be considered drones?
Pick the one that goes up into the national airspace, and you have your answer.
Old 12-29-2015 | 01:22 PM
  #160  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porcia83
Pick the one that goes up into the national airspace, and you have your answer.
Bet the day will come when "drone" will cover everything air, surface, subsurface that is controlled by radio without an pilot, operator, driver, etc. in it.

Last edited by SushiHunter; 12-29-2015 at 01:24 PM.
Old 12-29-2015 | 01:28 PM
  #161  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porcia83
I love it...that's awesome!
That's what they look like to me anyways. There was a guy who used a custom one to lift up a full sized dirt bike. It looked like a great big black hovering octopus.
Old 12-29-2015 | 02:42 PM
  #162  
cbaker65's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 422
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , CA
Default

You all just have to go back to paper airplanes!...

Oh...an keep your monster trucks from getting air born!....LOL
Old 12-29-2015 | 03:43 PM
  #163  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Paradox, NY
Default

[QUOTE=SushiHunter;12151459]Well if you're out for exciting adrenelin rush r/c why aren't you doing turbines then? Hell, even my Habu 32 8s stumax will give you more of a rush then a r/c hovering octopus.

It's all relative, Turbine jet flying out in a big box.....edf jet flying in a much smaller box ( harder to see it).....Micro beast in a still much smaller box all about the same excitement!!!. I learned how to fly heli 30 years ago without a gyro, that was exciting. Racing the boats would be closer to having 8 turbine jets pylon racing in a parking garage, and during the laps 6 would go down and be in the way while you finish the race!.
Old 12-29-2015 | 04:38 PM
  #164  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Paradox, NY
Default

This is interesting, sorry off topic. Over 500mph in a 300' circle and no motor to boot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFPJ6DUAY10
Old 12-29-2015 | 04:59 PM
  #165  
My Feedback: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Erie, PA
Default

Drones are the things you see plastered on the first 2 pages of AMA magazine this month. The magazine is titled " Model Aviation ". If the AMA can't tell the difference, how do we expect the FCC to consider them any different than model airplanes ???
Old 12-29-2015 | 05:34 PM
  #166  
HoundDog's Avatar
My Feedback: (49)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Default

Why does it matter? GOD the FAA doesn't use the term. at least in the reference to R/C TOYS... they use UAS Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
Now ask the News Media or any one Not affiliated with R/C flying,

DRONE. An evil device that was created to Kill commercial airliners full of Innocent people or nasty things that spy on people in their bedrooms.
Old 12-29-2015 | 07:12 PM
  #167  
Rob2160's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Default

[QUOTE=Tiporarefun;12151820]
Originally Posted by SushiHunter
Well if you're out for exciting adrenelin rush r/c why aren't you doing turbines then? Hell, even my Habu 32 8s stumax will give you more of a rush then a r/c hovering octopus.

It's all relative, Turbine jet flying out in a big box.....edf jet flying in a much smaller box ( harder to see it).....Micro beast in a still much smaller box all about the same excitement!!!. I learned how to fly heli 30 years ago without a gyro, that was exciting. Racing the boats would be closer to having 8 turbine jets pylon racing in a parking garage, and during the laps 6 would go down and be in the way while you finish the race!.
Agreed, its a circular discussion though because what I find exciting might be boring to others and vice versa.

I flew pylon racers in he early 80's so raw speed stopped producing adrenaline over 30 years ago. The Habu is a nice plane, smooth and easy to fly but in my opinion nothing exciting or challenging there.

I had taken a break from RC fixed wing as I had lost the passion after 30 years so flying aerobatics in helicopters and multicopters is a refreshing change.

I also agree the large flying octopus camera ships are boring purely from a piloting perspective, but as a tool for aerial photography they are hard to beat.

Show me a fixed wing turbine that can do this.... It is by far the most challenging RC flying I have tried.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjOqNljw7ck

Last edited by Rob2160; 12-29-2015 at 08:21 PM.
Old 12-29-2015 | 09:15 PM
  #168  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Rob2160;12151997]
Originally Posted by Tiporarefun

Agreed, its a circular discussion though because what I find exciting might be boring to others and vice versa.

I flew pylon racers in he early 80's so raw speed stopped producing adrenaline over 30 years ago. The Habu is a nice plane, smooth and easy to fly but in my opinion nothing exciting or challenging there.

I had taken a break from RC fixed wing as I had lost the passion after 30 years so flying aerobatics in helicopters and multicopters is a refreshing change.

I also agree the large flying octopus camera ships are boring purely from a piloting perspective, but as a tool for aerial photography they are hard to beat.

Show me a fixed wing turbine that can do this.... It is by far the most challenging RC flying I have tried.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjOqNljw7ck
Nope not interested the least bit in seeing the terrain from the perspective of something like a flying tennis ball. Plus if that's being flown outside of LOS isn't that now against new FAA policy?
Old 12-29-2015 | 11:22 PM
  #169  
Rob2160's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Default

Originally Posted by SushiHunter

Nope not interested the least bit in seeing the terrain from the perspective of something like a flying tennis ball. Plus if that's being flown outside of LOS isn't that now against new FAA policy?
Exactly my point. You have no interest in flying a multi like this and I have no interest flying an RC jet around the sky. No challenge in that from my perspective but if you enjoy it that is cool with me.

There is enough variety in this hobby to keep everyone happy.

You may be right about FPV and the FAA but they have no jurisdiction in Australia and I can fly FPV legally beyond visual line of sight.

Last edited by Rob2160; 12-30-2015 at 02:43 AM.
Old 12-30-2015 | 06:58 AM
  #170  
HoundDog's Avatar
My Feedback: (49)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Default

Originally Posted by SushiHunter

Nope not interested the least bit in seeing the terrain from the perspective of something like a flying tennis ball. Plus if that's being flown outside of LOS isn't that now against new FAA policy?

Originally Posted by Rob2160
Exactly my point. You have no interest in flying a multi like this and I have no interest flying an RC jet around the sky. No challenge in that from my perspective but if you enjoy it that is cool with me.

There is enough variety in this hobby to keep everyone happy.

You may be right about FPV and the FAA but they have no jurisdiction in Australia and I can fly FPV legally beyond visual line of sight.
Hey Rob
Like I always say if U can't find something one likes in this hobby go buy a Sail Boat a Lawn chair and a 6 pac. Now when U sober up U can use your FPV to find the Sail Boat or maybe another 6 pac and to He]] with the dumb boat.


Besides U assies ain't got a goofy FAA down under either. Hey can ya fly one of them there mix master (quads) under the influence. Just Kidd'n guy. Hows your summer going. Parts of the USA ain't havin a good winter. Tornados, flooding and Blizzards Kill'en People and all.

p.s. running in and out of the ruins looks like a blast.
Old 12-30-2015 | 08:16 AM
  #171  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob2160
Exactly my point. You have no interest in flying a multi like this and I have no interest flying an RC jet around the sky. No challenge in that from my perspective but if you enjoy it that is cool with me.

There is enough variety in this hobby to keep everyone happy.

You may be right about FPV and the FAA but they have no jurisdiction in Australia and I can fly FPV legally beyond visual line of sight.
Some day if/when my hand/eye coordination isn't like it used to be when I was younger I'll get into flying a multirotor "drone". I'll need that safety net of just taking my fingers off the controls so it stops moving and just hovers dead in it's tracks until I regain coordination and continue on. Damn jets and planes! Can't just stop them moving forward when loosing control.
Old 12-30-2015 | 11:49 AM
  #172  
stevekott's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: yorba linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rob2160

You may be right about FPV and the FAA but they have no jurisdiction in Australia and I can fly FPV legally beyond visual line of sight.
Ahhh ... Remember when the U.S.A. was the land of the free!


By the way .. No more talk of illegal RC Flyers.

From now on they are referred to as Undocumented Drone Pilots
Old 12-30-2015 | 01:08 PM
  #173  
SushiHunter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevekott
Ahhh ... Remember when the U.S.A. was the land of the free!

By the way .. No more talk of illegal RC Flyers.

From now on they are referred to as Undocumented Drone Pilots
Yes, I do remember. Matter of fact, I remember a number of years ago saying that if the Government could figure out a way to make everyone pay for the air they breath, they'd do so. Everyone laughed then but years later Bamacare came out.

Last edited by SushiHunter; 12-30-2015 at 01:15 PM.
Old 12-30-2015 | 03:35 PM
  #174  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
From: willow springs , IL
Default

I wonder if the quad copter pilot asked for permission from the county before he zipped through and videoed the ruins of the old Maui high school?
Old 12-30-2015 | 03:56 PM
  #175  
stevekott's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: yorba linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by jofunk
I wonder if the quad copter pilot asked for permission from the county before he zipped through and videoed the ruins of the old Maui high school?
Anyone in government will ALWAYS say no if you ask permission. They take an oath. Its part of the CYA doctrine.

You will get much more accomplished in life if you later ask for forgiveness rather than upfront asking for permission.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.