GP Super Stearman
#1501
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fogelsville,
PA
ORIGINAL: jbdismukes
Best void for batteries is behind the firewall, where the fuel tank goes. Only access is through the lower wing saddle. Besides, I have to second the opinion of Xairflyer (above).
Best void for batteries is behind the firewall, where the fuel tank goes. Only access is through the lower wing saddle. Besides, I have to second the opinion of Xairflyer (above).
Everyone is entitled to their opinion just like everyone is entitled to choose the power system (gas, nitro, electric) that flies their model. As long as people are buying airframes, regardless of the power system, the hobby will live on. If that stops, we're all screwed. Curiuous, does it make you nervous that electric is slowly taking over the hobby as it has the RC car hobby? As battery technology gets better (lighter, more powerful, and less expensive), electric will gradually follow the same path with RC airplanes so get used to us "all electric" giant scale plane people!![X(]
#1502

My Feedback: (2)
If you go over to the PT17 Stearman thread which is the same plane minus two ailerons you will find a conversion there. I forget the guys name but he did a real nice job. He also relaced the stock dummy engine with one made by Williams Bros., and made custom scale landing gear as the stock gear is far from scale.
#1503
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fogelsville,
PA
ORIGINAL: Super08
If you go over to the PT17 Stearman thread which is the same plane minus two ailerons you will find a conversion there. I forget the guys name but he did a real nice job. He also relaced the stock dummy engine with one made by Williams Bros., and made custom scale landing gear as the stock gear is far from scale.
If you go over to the PT17 Stearman thread which is the same plane minus two ailerons you will find a conversion there. I forget the guys name but he did a real nice job. He also relaced the stock dummy engine with one made by Williams Bros., and made custom scale landing gear as the stock gear is far from scale.
#1504

My Feedback: (2)
I went and looked, his name is ElecRick. Go to post 131 for his first post.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_29..._6/key_/tm.htm
BTW he made a hatch for the batteries shown in post 140....I'm outta here.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_29..._6/key_/tm.htm
BTW he made a hatch for the batteries shown in post 140....I'm outta here.
#1505

My Feedback: (1)
I have lots of electric models, but all lightweights, for bigger models you need big motors, big esc and big batteries and the cost of which would buy you easily a petrol engine which cost nothing to run, I cant see the point other than no fuel to carry.
You just have to have noise, smells and smoke for scale models.
It would not be practical to remove the wings everytime you have to change batteries, you either have to install the batteries in a fire safe charge bag and charge them on board or make a removable hatch at the front cockpit which would be the only practical place on this model
You just have to have noise, smells and smoke for scale models.
It would not be practical to remove the wings everytime you have to change batteries, you either have to install the batteries in a fire safe charge bag and charge them on board or make a removable hatch at the front cockpit which would be the only practical place on this model
#1506
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fogelsville,
PA
ORIGINAL: Xairflyer
I have lots of electric models, but all lightweights, for bigger models you need big motors, big esc and big batteries and the cost of which would buy you easily a petrol engine which cost nothing to run, I cant see the point other than no fuel to carry.
You just have to have noise, smells and smoke for scale models.
It would not be practical to remove the wings everytime you have to change batteries, you either have to install the batteries in a fire safe charge bag and charge them on board or make a removable hatch at the front cockpit which would be the only practical place on this model
I have lots of electric models, but all lightweights, for bigger models you need big motors, big esc and big batteries and the cost of which would buy you easily a petrol engine which cost nothing to run, I cant see the point other than no fuel to carry.
You just have to have noise, smells and smoke for scale models.
It would not be practical to remove the wings everytime you have to change batteries, you either have to install the batteries in a fire safe charge bag and charge them on board or make a removable hatch at the front cockpit which would be the only practical place on this model
If no easy access to lipos, then no electric conversion in my book. No charging on board for me either! All of my lipos are charged in a lipo safe bag and stored in a retired ammo case or my fireproof safe. I take no chances. I even check cell balance every few weeks and I have about 2o lipos.
#1507

Hi Seamus, seems like we have a lot of models in common!
Electrics will NEVER take over from a decent glow or gas powered large scale biplane, I agree with you, great in my shocky but thats where it ends for me.
Everyone to their opinion but my radial saito sounds right and at least it has a sound!
Electrics will NEVER take over from a decent glow or gas powered large scale biplane, I agree with you, great in my shocky but thats where it ends for me.
Everyone to their opinion but my radial saito sounds right and at least it has a sound!
#1508
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oakdale, CA,
ORIGINAL: maverickma
Does the wing have to come off to access this area?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion just like everyone is entitled to choose the power system (gas, nitro, electric) that flies their model. As long as people are buying airframes, regardless of the power system, the hobby will live on. If that stops, we're all screwed. Curiuous, does it make you nervous that electric is slowly taking over the hobby as it has the RC car hobby? As battery technology gets better (lighter, more powerful, and less expensive), electric will gradually follow the same path with RC airplanes so get used to us ''all electric'' giant scale plane people!![X(]
ORIGINAL: jbdismukes
Best void for batteries is behind the firewall, where the fuel tank goes. Only access is through the lower wing saddle. Besides, I have to second the opinion of Xairflyer (above).
Best void for batteries is behind the firewall, where the fuel tank goes. Only access is through the lower wing saddle. Besides, I have to second the opinion of Xairflyer (above).
Everyone is entitled to their opinion just like everyone is entitled to choose the power system (gas, nitro, electric) that flies their model. As long as people are buying airframes, regardless of the power system, the hobby will live on. If that stops, we're all screwed. Curiuous, does it make you nervous that electric is slowly taking over the hobby as it has the RC car hobby? As battery technology gets better (lighter, more powerful, and less expensive), electric will gradually follow the same path with RC airplanes so get used to us ''all electric'' giant scale plane people!![X(]
#1509

My Feedback: (1)
ORIGINAL: madmodelman
Hi Seamus, seems like we have a lot of models in common!
Electrics will NEVER take over from a decent glow or gas powered large scale biplane, I agree with you, great in my shocky but thats where it ends for me.
Everyone to their opinion but my radial saito sounds right and at least it has a sound!
Hi Seamus, seems like we have a lot of models in common!
Electrics will NEVER take over from a decent glow or gas powered large scale biplane, I agree with you, great in my shocky but thats where it ends for me.
Everyone to their opinion but my radial saito sounds right and at least it has a sound!

I have the proper stearman though (PT-17)
which is what you should have to show off that saito radial better.
#1510
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fogelsville,
PA
ORIGINAL: Xairflyer
Yes Gary looks that way, I have a super chippy and used to own a JL Hawk as well 
I have the proper stearman though (PT-17)
which is what you should have to show off that saito radial better.
ORIGINAL: madmodelman
Hi Seamus, seems like we have a lot of models in common!
Electrics will NEVER take over from a decent glow or gas powered large scale biplane, I agree with you, great in my shocky but thats where it ends for me.
Everyone to their opinion but my radial saito sounds right and at least it has a sound!
Hi Seamus, seems like we have a lot of models in common!
Electrics will NEVER take over from a decent glow or gas powered large scale biplane, I agree with you, great in my shocky but thats where it ends for me.
Everyone to their opinion but my radial saito sounds right and at least it has a sound!

I have the proper stearman though (PT-17)
which is what you should have to show off that saito radial better.
#1511

Agreed Seamus but not enough cylinders to look right! The story is I got the Saito and installed it in a WM Giant scale Zero but she sadly went in on the second flight so I was looking for something to install the engine into and a GP kit came up for sale at ÂŁ200 and the engine slides in an absolute treat. My Super Chippy has an SC160 flat twin installed, that's a nice engine also.
Alas I am now hooked on the smell of burning kerosene (or is it the sound of burning?)
For anyone installing a Saito 170 it is essential to use an on board glow system and keleo ringed exhaust system by the way. A bit expensive but the sound and reliability is superb, plus no glow fuel on the airframe! Gary.
Alas I am now hooked on the smell of burning kerosene (or is it the sound of burning?)
For anyone installing a Saito 170 it is essential to use an on board glow system and keleo ringed exhaust system by the way. A bit expensive but the sound and reliability is superb, plus no glow fuel on the airframe! Gary.
#1516
Someone had recommended a TruTurn AT-6 Spinner, and I can't find the right thread, does anyone know which one fits a G-26? Would that be the 2 1/4" 120 size ?
My SS should arrive tomorrow. I have some time to assemble it before the weather gets better here.
Thanks
My SS should arrive tomorrow. I have some time to assemble it before the weather gets better here.
Thanks
#1517
Can anyone post a picture of how and where they mounted the G-26 electronic ignition unit? I can't see how to put it inside the fuselage, and I can't figure out how to clamp it down to the firewall yet.
Thanks
I did get the choke to set up nicely., the little knob is accessible in the gap from the cowl.
Thanks
I did get the choke to set up nicely., the little knob is accessible in the gap from the cowl.
#1518
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Santiago, CHILE
You can mount the ignition on top of the engine. Look at post NÂş 1491, there are some pics. Is not a g26 but I think you can do the same.
Good work on the choke.
Good work on the choke.
#1519
The manual that came with the engine states that the ignition unit can reach 90c, do you think the strap ties will hold up to that? Maybe I could use a long hose clamp? That was where I was attempting to mount the engine, seems to want to fit there pretty well..
#1520

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Question, I have been considering swapping out my OS 1.20 for my Saito 1.50. Those of you that are running the Saito, how does it work? My flying buddy has a CCRC 26 on his SS, and my 1.20 can't begin to keep up. I'd appreciate any feed back the group can offer. Oh by the way, is anyone running a Pitts muffler on their 1.50, and does it fit or did you have to chop up the airplane?
Thanks again
Thanks again
#1521
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Santiago, CHILE
I don´t know for sure what temp can reach the zenoha cdi unit, but 90ºc seems high to me, maybe in a extreme condition, running the engine at full throttle all the time.
Don´t worry about the strap ties holding on, they will.
BUT, if you want a better solution, use a width (I think that´s the word) velcro to hold the unit, with a latex foam. The velcro will asborb more engine vibrations than the strap ties. You can attach the velcro with a piece of plywood, screwed to the firewall, on each side. I use this method on all my planes.
Hope you can understand the draw.
Don´t worry about the strap ties holding on, they will.
BUT, if you want a better solution, use a width (I think that´s the word) velcro to hold the unit, with a latex foam. The velcro will asborb more engine vibrations than the strap ties. You can attach the velcro with a piece of plywood, screwed to the firewall, on each side. I use this method on all my planes.
Hope you can understand the draw.
#1522
I got the EI mounted using strap ties, before I saw your drawing. Your drawing is fine, I had some Velcro, I should have used it.
Here, I got all the switches in the front cockpit. I went with dual batteries and switches on this one.
Here, I got all the switches in the front cockpit. I went with dual batteries and switches on this one.
#1523

My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Covina,
CA
Jim,
I'm using the 180 Saito and it has a lot of power. There are times when I go off course when I'm taking off so I just give it full throttle and it jumps right off the runway. I never had a 120 or 150 in it so I can't really give you a comparison.
On the other hand the Stearman isn't really supposed to be a speed demon. I think the 120 would give you more of scale flight.
So if you really want some speed and your thinking about the 150 you might as well use the 180 and really give it some punch. The 180 fits in with no problem.
I used the stock muffler and it works fine. I have it exhausting out the bottom with an extension. The only problem I had with the muffler is it has a tendency to loosen. I made a bracket to keep it from rotating loose and I also use a little high tempiture Loctite on the treads. Make sure you don’t get any Loctite in the engine.
Good Luck and Happy Landings
Shubova
[8D]
I'm using the 180 Saito and it has a lot of power. There are times when I go off course when I'm taking off so I just give it full throttle and it jumps right off the runway. I never had a 120 or 150 in it so I can't really give you a comparison.
On the other hand the Stearman isn't really supposed to be a speed demon. I think the 120 would give you more of scale flight.
So if you really want some speed and your thinking about the 150 you might as well use the 180 and really give it some punch. The 180 fits in with no problem.
I used the stock muffler and it works fine. I have it exhausting out the bottom with an extension. The only problem I had with the muffler is it has a tendency to loosen. I made a bracket to keep it from rotating loose and I also use a little high tempiture Loctite on the treads. Make sure you don’t get any Loctite in the engine.
Good Luck and Happy Landings
Shubova
[8D]
#1524

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Shubova, thanks for the information, yes the OS 120 flys very scale, my friend and I want to try to do some formation flying, and I need something with more power, I have the Saito 1.50 that I was going to use in a biplane I am building, but that one won't be ready for a while, that is why I was thinking of the 1.50, all I need to do is pick up a pitts muffler. Do you have any photos of your installation posted on the thread? Thanks again !
#1525
Senior Member
My Feedback: (55)
I have my new SS in the box, no damage during shipping, and ready to begin building in a few months. I am still going through the mental prebuild and making decisions about engines and other parts. I plan to install a DLE 30 for propulsion and use one servo for each aileron ( 4 servo setup) - at the moment the servos woudl be HS-5485 digital servos, the Hitec version of a sport digital servo. Using four aileron servos does not seem to be the popular choice and I was wondering if I might get some feed back with some thoughts about that decision. The new radios make this very easy to do with the ability to trim each servo indepently or to make collective (in the aggregate not the collective pitch on a helicopter) trim changes to adjust for inflight variances. This thread has sure provided me with a bundle of helpful information as well as excitement about this plane. So please, if you have some thoughts about my decision to use four aileron servos, good or bad, please fire away. Thanks
Howard
Howard


