Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 U Can Do 3D >

U Can Do 3D

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

U Can Do 3D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2004 | 07:10 AM
  #1851  
rajul's Avatar
Moderator
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Missouri City, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

Anybody using CF rods instead of 4-40 steel rods ? What diameter of CF rod is suitable ?
Old 01-12-2004 | 07:56 AM
  #1852  
Desertrat's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Boerne, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

I am. I used the 1/8 rods, titanium ends on mine because I had some left over from a 35% project. If I had it to do over, I would use the Hangar 9 Titanium rods - about the same price or even cheaper, way easier to set up, likely stronger, and just as light.
Old 01-12-2004 | 08:02 AM
  #1853  
rajul's Avatar
Moderator
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Missouri City, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

ORIGINAL: Desertrat

I am. I used the 1/8 rods, titanium ends on mine because I had some left over from a 35% project. If I had it to do over, I would use the Hangar 9 Titanium rods - about the same price or even cheaper, way easier to set up, likely stronger, and just as light.
For a 35%, 1/8" is mighty small, perhaps 5/32" or 3/16" ?

Can the titanium rods be joined to obtain "in-between" lengths ? Just concerned that it will be more difficult to get the exact lengths as they are supplied in fixed lengths. Also, I notice that there is a hex in the middle of the rod. What is that for ?

One concern with CF rods I have is that in the event I want to re-use the titanium ends, it will be kinda tough to remove JB weld ?
Old 01-12-2004 | 11:42 AM
  #1854  
Desertrat's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Boerne, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

1. 1/8 is plenty strong for short lengths (less than 6 inches), the CF is <very> strong.

2. Titanium rods cant really be joined, but they do come in several lenghts. Just measure the distance and buy the appropriate length rod.

3. The "hex" in the middle of the H9 rods is thier beauty - they are reverse threaded on one side so you can adjust the length by turning them one direction or the other without removing the clevis from the surface. It makes setup a snap.

4. Its not a big deal to remove the ends from the CF, they arent very strong laterally and you can break off the CF rod from the length and clean off the glue fairly easily. Actually I was surprised how easy it was to chip off the CF and remove JB weld with a wire brush on a dremel.
Old 01-20-2004 | 07:55 PM
  #1855  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

I'm having problems with my engine leaning out in a hover. I was told an "oscilating pump" made by perry would help, if not solve the problem. My tank is in the original position, so it's not like the fuel has a long way to go. Does anyone have any suggestions/experience with perry pumps?
Old 01-20-2004 | 08:04 PM
  #1856  
rajul's Avatar
Moderator
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Missouri City, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

Try setting your high end richer by 300-400 rpm, and tune your engine at half tank or slightly below.
Old 01-20-2004 | 08:38 PM
  #1857  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

Ah, I forgot to mention that I tried that, and while it helped, it still looses power. Is it the variation in air/fuel volume in the tank that would cause it to tune differently at different fuel levels? It does seem to get progressively worse as the fuel runs out. In fact, it actually stalled/went dead stick, this afternoon. I assumed that the fuel starts to foam pretty badly at lower levels. This, in conjunction with the low RPMs I typically have it floating around on between hovering attempts.


Aside from that, I'm having a blast with this thing.
Old 01-20-2004 | 08:47 PM
  #1858  
rajul's Avatar
Moderator
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Missouri City, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

What type of engine and muffler setup do you have ?
Old 01-20-2004 | 08:51 PM
  #1859  
Flyfalcons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bonney Lake, WA
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

The amount of fuel pressure you can get may decrease as the tank level goes down. A perry pump would definitely solve the problem and you'll end up with a bulletproof reliable engine.
Old 01-20-2004 | 09:13 PM
  #1860  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

O.S. 91 4-stroke, stock muffler. It now has a 15 x 4 APC, and it's running on 25% pro pattern cool power. I went down in diameter from a 16 x 4 to get faster spool up, and a little more rpms. It tached out at 9,300 with the 16 x 4 on 15% cool power 4-stroke formula. I used a buddy of mine's digi tach, so I can't wait to see what it's doing now. It is making a bit more thust, but not much.

Good to hear about the Perry. Last I checked they were in the neiborhood of $30. Very not bad...
Old 01-20-2004 | 10:27 PM
  #1861  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

Try running an APC 15 x 6 prop on your .91, I liked it best on that engine in the UCD. If your not running a pump of any kind your going to have issues with fuel delivery in the UCD because the tank is mounted so high in the nose in relation to the carb which is very low on a 4 stroke. You are probably setting it overly lean to compensate for the high tank siphoning fuel at low throttle while the plane is horizontal. Once the nose goes up then you are way lean and the motor gets hot and loses power.

A pump will help with this problem but I think a regulated fuel system is a better approach. I put a Cline on my plane and it solved ALL of my fuel delivery issues, also allowed me to place the tank back over the CG which makes a HUGE difference in the way the plane flies.
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:27 AM
  #1862  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

Thank you, and I may go with a 15 x 5, because I had been running a 14 x 7 when it was on the pattern ship. It was pretty fast, wich is something I don't want to happen with those huge control surfaces. Could you tell me more about the Cline system? What powers the pump, and how much weight did it add?

I've been reading about moving the tank over the C.G. I even downloaded the pics so I could do it later. I still need to add some down and right thrust. It is of course, an on-going project, wich is half the fun. Thanks for the help
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:32 AM
  #1863  
rajul's Avatar
Moderator
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Missouri City, TX
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

The Cline or Iron Bay regulator will work great. Here is the info you need:

http://www.billsroom.com/pcfs/

http://www.ironbaymodelcompany.com/

Good luck !
Old 01-21-2004 | 04:00 AM
  #1864  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Advice on engine choice

Thank you.
Old 01-21-2004 | 04:39 AM
  #1865  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: SwindonWiltshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Default Fuel tank on CG

Hello!

For those who've put the fuel tank on the CG could you post a picture of how you fixed the tank in? I went thrugh this who thread yesterday (3 hours!) and could only find a coupla pics. I'm just finishing off my UCD and using a YS91FZ. I've cut out the ribs in the centre section and the tank fits in nicely but I'm not sure the best way of securing it. Maybe silicon sealant?

Andy
Old 01-21-2004 | 04:41 AM
  #1866  
MikeEast's Avatar
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Nederland, TX
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

Velcro, Fuel Tubing or Zip Ties should work really well. I assume you installed a pump?
Old 01-21-2004 | 01:54 PM
  #1867  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

After reading about the Cline/Iron Bay regulator options, I'm still curious as to wich would help more. Wouldn't the Perry work best, as it pumps fuel to the engine? Or is it the regulator, wich means to me that I would re-adjust the mixture, and in theory, it would have the right pressure all the time? But what about when I throtle down a bit, will the lack of pressure leave the regulator starved for fuel?
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:10 PM
  #1868  
Gbee's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: West Suffield, CT,
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

I ran a 7-year old Cline (not used for 5 years) in my UCD60 with Saito 100 all season and worked excellent till October. Very frustating when these darn things don't work! I removed it, readjusted the needles slightly, and I'm living with the static fuel-flooding problem. I dissassembled the Cline and found no apparent problem or debris, other than the diagphram is maybe stiff. Anyhow, my experience with the Perry pressure pumps was the engine(s) always loaded up a mid throttle settings. I had to keep the engine on the lean side at full throttle to correct the loading at midrange - not good. I did not try the Perry on the Saito 100. The Cline or Iron Bay regulator makes the engine run flawlessly (after proper low & hign needle adjustments) at all throttle settings ... until the thing fails.
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:15 PM
  #1869  
coomarlin's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morgantown, WV
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

ORIGINAL: bmgbeetle

After reading about the Cline/Iron Bay regulator options, I'm still curious as to wich would help more. Wouldn't the Perry work best, as it pumps fuel to the engine? Or is it the regulator, wich means to me that I would re-adjust the mixture, and in theory, it would have the right pressure all the time? But what about when I throtle down a bit, will the lack of pressure leave the regulator starved for fuel?
Throttling down with a regulator installed does not lead to an instantanious decrease in pressure. The pressure will decline over a period of time, but in my experience I've never seen it happen to the point that the engine stops. I heard someone mention a few years ago that he thought it would take at least 2-3 minutes of idle before the pressure decreased enough to make an engine die. I have a Cline regulator and i've seen my plane sit there idling on the tarmack for several minutes without skipping a beat. And I have the tank placed near CG.

As for the Pump vs regulator debate it's been going on for years. There are varying opinions, and I've admittedly never used a Perry pump. But from everything I've seen a read a regulator does a better job at delivering a consistant amount of fuel to the carb. They are not finicky to adjust like most pumps. They allow what is demanded by the engine and thats all. There is no adjustments on a regulator like there is a pump. But thats just my opnion. I'm sure there a lot of pther people that will prefer pumps.
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:17 PM
  #1870  
coomarlin's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Morgantown, WV
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

ORIGINAL: Gbee

I ran a 7-year old Cline (not used for 5 years) in my UCD60 with Saito 100 all season and worked excellent till October. Very frustating when these darn things don't work!
What were the symptoms of a failed cline? How did the engine act?
Old 01-21-2004 | 02:52 PM
  #1871  
Gbee's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: West Suffield, CT,
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

The engine ran perfectly until one day on the first start it wouldn't start. Head pressure in the tank was good - I used the Fourmost check valve in the UCD. It seemed like I ran my electric starter forever and continued to check the tank pressure whenever I stopped crankin'. When I did get it started, after much fiddiling (removed cowl, fuel filter, replaced glow plug) it wouldn't accelerate past mid throttle. It was always too lean. I guess the Cline wasn't allowing enough fuel through it. I removed the Cline, readjusted needles and flew many uneventful 3D flights. I haven't replaced the Cline yet and probably won't. I wonder, can you buy the diaphragm? I fly the UCD46 with an inverted Surpass .70 (my winter flyer on skis) and deal with the flooding issue. Engine/plane combo works great for me....although the Saito 100 would really be awesome in the little UCD.
Old 01-21-2004 | 03:20 PM
  #1872  
SLINGSHOT-RCU's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Timmonsville, SC
Default RE: engine choice

ORIGINAL: Striker

Bentgear,

You guys are right, but what about ground clearance with the 16X4? I can make a new landing if needed anyways.

Thanks for the input guys.

Im runing a apc 16x6 on my ys91ac works out great....
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ec89834.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	32.5 KB
ID:	92921   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ec89708.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	45.9 KB
ID:	92922  
Old 01-21-2004 | 05:00 PM
  #1873  
RobertC's Avatar
My Feedback: (157)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kirkland, WA
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

Hi Andy,

Here is a picture of the tank in my UCD which also is using a YS 91FZ. I just used a support against the back of the tank (to prevent it from moving backward) and one over the front (to hold it in place). I think that these pieces of wood were included with the plane (to hold the tank in the "stock" location?). Anyway, this seems to work just fine.

By the way, you will *love* the plane with that engine!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ge96121.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	39.1 KB
ID:	92944  
Old 01-21-2004 | 06:22 PM
  #1874  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Omaha, NE
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

Cline sells new diaphragms for about $6 a piece. He will even tell you that these need to be replaced periodically to ensure proper operation of the unit, something like every couple of years if I remember correctly.
Old 01-21-2004 | 06:29 PM
  #1875  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: SwindonWiltshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Fuel tank on CG

Robert,

Thankyou! Just what i was after! I've taken heed of what was said earlier in the thread and wrapped the tank in the tape that came with my zagi (the reinforcing stuff) and used silicon sealant around the neck too. I agree with what you've done - front and back supports are the best way to go but mu throttle servo will go in front of the tank. I'm *so* looking forward to flying this - just need some decent weather. Much abliged sir!

Andy


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.