I have already bought this plane but I am not sure which engine should I buy. Since my flying field is about 7500 feet above sea level I am thinking about a Saito 100. If I install this engine, should I consider any modifications positioning the engine mount? How about a YS 63 or a OS .91 Surpass with pump? I am planning on using a Perry oscillating pump with the Saito 100 so I wont have to worry about the fuel tank position. Any ideas or experiences?
Thanks

cafusin, you really dont need to move the tank, and if you go to page 75 i have some info on mounting the 100. i havent time now but ill dig up more info later and get back to ya just keep the questions comming and youll get more answers from everyone here!!

ps. the mount in the pic on page 75 is a ucd60 size mount (great planes 60-120 size)you really dont want to mount it on the stock(small)mount.

more

SCTCRASH
My UCD 46 has the same problem with needing 10 clicks up for level flight. which requires down stick on inverted flight. There was a post somewhere back there about trimming plane out to neutral flight upright & inverted. Not sure where. Mine balances at 5 1/2" also. She flies great even with up adjustment. Up thrust should work I would think. Plane is so forgiving on low rates. You gotta love this plane.

Doug

Hey Gary... Just an update on the Skysharkrc.... I never could get in contact
with the guy at eagle, just his help that is running his hobby shop, he said he
heard about them but nothing more... But a few at the field said that S.S. has
been in Havasu for a while, selling their planes, but no real hobby shop for
parts etc...But that could have changed?.. But no reports on their planes and or
service... They did say a club member won a drawing of one of their planes at
a fun fly(not the 540) which looked good.... But he has never put it together....

Great 5hrs. this morning at the field... No UCD, But the 4*/Saito ran great...
Now using the 16X4W.... Guess I'll need bigger wheels... I only had about 1/4"
ground clearence with the tail in the up level position... Made a bunch of T.A.G.'s
and landings... And the prop is as it started... I was going to uninstall the
saito... But I readjusted the valves and had the new prop... So I had to try it..
Gary.. were you using this prop??? And the Profile is flying like it's old self?????
It was taking a bit more to hold it in a invert flat.... But the last two times out...
It pretty much went into it anytime I wanted it to... The last two mornings where
AZ. cool :-).... So I guess it was just the thin air??.....

cafusin....7500= Saito 100.... IMO.... I would go with the bigger mount also....
I think the stock tk position will work... Or just trim the F.W. hole and tank saddle
a bit... You can lower the tank 1/4 or a bit more before needed to trim the motor
mount, I used the stock marks for the engine mounts... That's what I did to mine..
If you do go with the Saito 100... At least make sure you have the 10oz tank...
which will fit in the location.. Seems like a few had the 8oz tks. and the later
models came with the 10oz???... My used UCD had the 8... and now a 10oz is in
there.... The saito will run a few seconds longer

On a little sad note... Members at the field were talking about how our "free" flying
site maybe close to being over in the unknown future and/or runway shorter....
Talks about shops and homes are getting louder[:@]..... You know what that means

gjeffers
new ucd?
anyway looks good

38

oh no Ronl, not the cancer of society moving in on you[]

been checking around about skyshark and have had a little luck with good word about them and just saw a post about them in the giant scale thread and Q'd the guy just now and he lives in Vegas so im just waiting
for his thoughts.
yes i have run the 16x4w on my papa Do way back and really didnt like it, just to slow and had to push the engine all the time seemed like and slow spool up also, i just like apc 15x6 on my 100

has been really nice here too 65 this morning, got rained out for work so i guess ill have to fly the 60 size all day tomorrow (did today too)

well we got a new contract signed and seems we will be hauling salt to las vegas every day starting in dec so ill have access to real hobby shops now,(will have to drop my trailer to go shopping) but just in fuel ill save a bundle.(just ordered 6 new model 79 petes with all the chrome)[8D]

thanks 38 but not yet, im flying my 60 size for now, but will replace it soon
i pulled it off the wall and it flys again(and tomorrow too!!!)

I too was not sure of the spool up with the 16X4W... But man it throws alot
of air... which I did notice on hovers of the 4*... Tho, the spool up was slower
the added air made up for it so I'm still checking it out, I also picked up a
15X6, but did not try it yet....

Yeah.. They are sure building a lot here... We thought with all this heat.....
It may still be a while... They can only play with dirt now..., piping work is
1-2+yrs away.... But with the playing of dirt... It may shorten the runway by
40'........ Maybe that's why I got the 100... The 4* can get up in a few feet,
with the 100 on the UCD I could problely hand launch it And you could
always do an "upright" flat spin landing

look at the ouch thread Ron, i think some of the people there think im nuts[&:]
and i have actually thought of a hand launch too!!!! (but wont)[X(]

Hey guys, I got to fly a 60 today..... [8D] [X(] One of the guys at the field has a UCD 60 (and about 20 other planes). He brought his 60 along today and really doesn't like to fly it so he had me fly it. He said "if you crash it, don't worry about it, we'll just go out and pick up the pieces." So I took it up to fly around some.......... Nice flying but it only has an OS 91 so it seemed really under powered compared to the 82 in my 46. Fun to fly the bigger model though. [8D]

yea, i have my 100 in my 60 size now Rob and it just isnt the same[]
but is is a peach to fly

Yeah, the one I flew with the 91 seemed kind of underpowered especially trying to do a hover. Beautiful plane though. Man! That is a daisy.......[X(][8D] Would like to buy it from him but I'm still out of work. (on strike)

Hey Ron, Sorry to hear about the developing going on...... [>:] There's some neighborhood somewhere around here that is complaining about a gun range that was there long before the neighborhood. [>:]

gjeffers...I read that "ouch" thread. They were making fun of you. They just don't know you. Starting a plane in the back of your truck...I don't see anything wrong with that.
With the 60 you've gone from Super Power to power. The 100 is just barely enough in the 60, at least at my elevation. Use 30%, it helps a lot. But I flew mine like that for a long time, but the 110 is more fun.

CeeGee...About that gun range...just point it at the neighbors. Should solve the problem.

Radieron...Upright flat spin landing...Sounds fun!!!! Sounds like you need bigger wheels or taller landing gear. I use Dubro 3" Super Lite tires. The only weigh about 1 1/2 ozs for both and it gets the engine a little higher. Also, I think gjeffers is using UCD60 landing gear on the 46. It's about an inch taller also. I think with the 100 on the 46, it won't matter how long your runway is.

gjeffers....It looks like you have a lot of room in your flying area...Wouldn't it be a riot for several of us to meet at your field and give you some flying buddies!!! Maybe this winter. You know...when it's not several hundred degrees out. That would be cool. I could bring 3 or 4 UCDs...maybe that would be enough for an afternoon or two.

thanks
Barry

Try to pull full back on the elevators right when your leaving the ground, as soon as it lifts off hold it in the full up elevator position, then shut your eyes and listen for a wonderful sound.

Life is a Death Spin

Hey guys,

Would the U can do 3d .46 be a good second plane? I am looking for something unique for my next plane. My first was the Hangar 9 Alpha, but know I get bored with it since it only does mild areobatics. It seems like everyone and there ucle gets a Sig 4* or tiger for there second plane.

Hey Savage, Welcome to an awesome thread where you can find out everything you want to know about the UCD's and some things you don't. Depending on your skill I would say the UCD's make great second planes but I think that with a 46 it will do only mild aerobatics and you may get bored with it quickly. While an 82 Saito or 91 isn't required to fly it it will sure make it tons more fun to fly and aerobisize it, much more than a 46. In the long run you'll probably be happier with at least an 82 4 stroke. [8D]

Barry, That's a good idea. (about the gun range) I didn't think of that...........[:-]

S-a-v-a-g-e... Only you will know.... But I feel the UCD "can" be a good second
plane depending on that persons skill level.. With low rates it does fly real easy...
Floats and lands great... Better than a trainer IMO.. Turn on the hi rates and let
loose.. Those big control surfaces will throw the plane around... But it will "not"
take the abuse the "normal second" plane would take... "excessive "Big" stick
movements or continued hard landings"( even after strenghtened the L.G. block..)
Now the UCD will handle 3D moves... And IMO is one of the eaisest planes to fly
But if you add to it.. a lot of over correcting, Hi speeds etc. that normally goes with
a second plane... Something may come apart IMO.. Just my thoughts....
She will make you look better than you think you are:-) But.. get to brash to soon
and she will slap you back down one way or the other.. But you have to love the "Do's"

Ok, I have heard that the landing is most vulnerable part this plane. Does anyone make some stronger ones? I was thinking carbon fiber? Or is there a known converstion were I take the landing gear of a different plane and bolt 'em up?

that would be great Barry, all you guys would be welcome to come down(and up for Ron) but yea there is plenty of room for us all and no rules[X(]we do have great weather comming

Savage, welcome, thats exactly what i did, i had a alpha and went to a ucd 60 then a 46, but i think the 46 would be a great 2nd plane, my son did it that waydo it!!!!!

S-a-v-a-g-e.... It's not the L.G. it's self.... But the area the L.G. is connected too..
As with most 3D type planes... Their build "light"... Though strong enough for....
say a thrid.. fourth plane... It "may" not be strong enough for a second plane..
taking the above description.... She does fly, land easy..... But abuse is not one
of her virtues.....

Savage, Yeah, what Ron has said is exactly right. They're made light for 3D type performance and also don't want to be flown fast. And yes they are easy to fly.......[8D]

Hey Ron, Where's the picture of your profile??? [:-]